Red Hat Single Sign On vs Thales SafeNet Trusted Access comparison

Red Hat Single Sign On and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access compete in Identity and Access Management solutions. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is often preferred for its comprehensive features that justify higher costs.

Features: Red Hat Single Sign On is praised for its easy integration, strong authentication methods, and open-source flexibility. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access stands out for its extensive security policies, multi-factor authentication options, and robust compliance features. Users highlight differences with Thales showing more advanced security features.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Red Hat Single Sign On requires better documentation and UI enhancements. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access users call for smoother user experience and faster support response times. Red Hat's documentation and support are primary concerns, while Thales focuses on user experience and support speed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Single Sign On is noted for straightforward initial setup but limited deployment models and average customer service. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access offers flexible deployment options and strong customer service, although initial setups can be complex. Thales notably excels with deployment flexibility and service quality.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Single Sign On is seen as cost-effective with a lower setup cost and satisfactory ROI. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access, despite higher costs, is valued for delivering high ROI due to its premium features. Users find Thales worth the investment for superior ROI and features.