Rivery vs Zapier comparison

Read 41 Zapier reviews

863 Views
547 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Rivery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Zapier and Rivery compete in data automation and integration, with Zapier having an edge in pricing and support, while Rivery stands out for its robust features.

Features: Zapier offers automation capabilities connecting a wide range of apps, making it valuable for simple workflows without coding knowledge. It facilitates task automation across various platforms and provides intuitive interfaces suitable for quick setups. Rivery focuses on advanced data transformation and orchestration, delivering powerful ETL capabilities. It supports complex data tasks and integrates various data sources seamlessly, enabling detailed data management and transformation efforts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zapier offers a straightforward deployment model for quick setup with minimal technical support, optimal for users who prioritize rapid implementation. Its customer service is typically more responsive, catering well to users needing timely assistance. Rivery requires a more involved setup process, ideal for enterprises needing customized solutions. Its robust support aids in detailed configurations, assisting enterprises in optimizing deployments to meet specific needs.

Pricing and ROI: Zapier typically provides lower entry costs, presenting an economical option for businesses initiating automation with minimal investment, aligning with smaller operations seeking cost-effective solutions. Rivery's pricing involves higher initial costs due to its extensive feature set, aiming for higher ROI for businesses pursuing comprehensive data management, yielding long-term value through enhanced data capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Rivery vs. Zapier Report (Updated: December 2024).

Download the complete report

Rivery vs. Zapier

December 2024

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Rivery

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (36th), Migration Tools (4th), Cloud Migration (16th)

Zapier

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Rivery is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zapier is 2.0%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

reviewer2335923

Senior Operations Analyst at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides users with an initial setup phase, which is fairly simple to manage

I don't know what could be improved in terms of what my company was used to previously or after moving over to Rivery. I have not had much experience with platforms other than Rivery. For me, Rivalry was a way to step up from what we used. To be honest, I am not really sure what improvements could be made in Rivery. Pricing is a little steep for smaller organizations, I would say. The product's pricing model could be a little bit better. I am not aware if there are additional packages for smaller organizations, but if there are no packages available, then maybe that would be a good way to introduce something new in the tool.

Read full review

FrankHo

Analyst at MSXI

Though the tool offers a visually appealing UI, it needs to improve its documentation

With Zapier, improvements are required in the areas of concerns like bugs, ease of use, and documentation. The product has many bugs, so users have to wait for a period ranging from five minutes to an hour to see where the Zap went. In Zapier, Zaps aren't very understandable owing to the way they work. As a user, you would think that in Zapier, a Zap works in a particular way once you set it up, but it won't happen. At times, some Zaps can interfere with each other, because of which there might be infinite loops that may occur, owing to which multiple Zaps continue to run or break down in general, after which nothing would run in your environment. You would not be notified about the breakdown of Zaps. The bugs in the product may be considered to understand or get an explanation of how Zaps works between software systems, so for something between Gmail and HubSpot, Zapier would explain through better documentation what would work and what wouldn't work. Maybe if Zapier had better functionality with Python or any other coding language in general, it would make the product a lot better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Connects to many APIs in the market and new ones are being added all the time."

"The solution's most valuable features are that it is quick to connect and simple to use."

"What's most valuable in Zapier is its simplicity, seamlessness, and smooth plug-in, so you won't need to build code for every action. I'm not a developer, but I can use Zapier."

"Zapier luckily has a wide range of integrations, I would say."

"Zapier is a really good tool for connecting multiple different platforms and data sources. For example, with Quickbase, I can easily integrate data from other sources like AWS or task-tracking platforms such as ClickUp or Asana."

"Zapier's interface, for me, is the solution's greatest value proposition. It is designed and developed for people who don't have a clue about what they're trying to do. It has a very user-friendly interface."

"Zapier is user friendly and makes it easy to integrate different tools. It has a drag and drop functionality which makes it easy to connect environments."

"There are a few valuable features, like the stability that it comes with and also the number of features that it offers. I've used other services like Pabbly, but they don't offer similar numbers of applications that Zapier has or allows to integrate with – it's maximum."

"Zapier’s most valuable feature is its ability to interconnect applications or devices."

"The ability to connect web applications to trigger actions in another app after having enriched, formatted, delayed, grouped, and filtered is really valuable for many businesses."

More Zapier pros

Cons

"Lineage and an impact analysis or logic dependency are lacking."

"Pricing is a little steep for smaller organizations, I would say. The product's pricing model could be a little bit better."

"The pricing could be a little cheaper."

"The solution does not work properly when we apply filters and we get errors."

"It is not worth the money if you have a little bit of a technical mind...Zapier is not able to set up different modules. When automation doesn't work, it's not that easy to find why it didn't work."

"The user interface for Zapier could be improved. It also takes some time to sync the data between different environments."

"After mapping them out, and they'd worked for a while, I've had Zapier fail."

"Zapier could be a little faster, but that might not be possible. I would encourage Zapier to make more API endpoints for each application"

"With Zapier, improvements are required in the areas of concerns like bugs, ease of use, and documentation."

"I think that this solution should have more apps connected to it."

More Zapier cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's price as six out of ten if I consider the lowest price to be one and the highest price to be ten."

"It's very straightforward licensing. There's only one cost you have to pay, and if you want a relevant pricing plan, I think you have two or three different models or packages which include the number of notifications or Zaps, as they call it, that you can program."

"There is a free plan that is, of course, limited. However, it allows you to understand and check true scenarios for a while."

"The price of Zapier is approximately $75 monthly."

"Per task, there is a monthly plan involving 15 euros...Also, in different forms, they just give you the ability to use different features. They charge 18.58 euros for the first standard plan, which includes 750 tasks. So, it is about 25 cents per task."

"The least expensive plan is $24 a month, and you can go all the way to $800 a month if you're a huge company using many tasks."

"Think your Zaps through to make sure you don't use more Zaps than you need."

"Zapier is a paid service. Its license renews monthly, and Zapier will downgrade your subscription to the free version when your credit card doesn't have funds. That significantly impacts your service because everything halts completely. Zapier doesn't have any hidden costs."

"Zapier's price is good."

More Zapier pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

University

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rivery?

The tool's price can be a little steep for a small organization. I rate the tool's price as six out of ten if I consider the lowest price to be one and the highest price to be ten.

What needs improvement with Rivery?

What is your primary use case for Rivery?

My company has started to use the Rivery extract data from Hive. It is like a project management sort of program, and we started to use Rivery to get the data from there over into Mavenlink, so we ...

What do you like most about Zapier?

The product's most valuable feature is automation.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zapier?

The pricing is suitable. It's not cheap, but not expensive.

What needs improvement with Zapier?

The pricing could be a little cheaper.

Alteryx Designer vs Rivery

Comparisons

dbt vs Rivery

Compared 41% of the time

Compared 32% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Rivery

Compared 27% of the time

More Rivery Competitors

Coefficient vs Zapier

Compared 28% of the time

AWS Glue vs Zapier

Compared 21% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs Zapier

Compared 18% of the time

MuleSoft Composer vs Zapier

Compared 14% of the time

Fivetran vs Zapier

Compared 11% of the time

More Zapier Competitors

Product Reports

Download Rivery product report

Data Integration

December 2024

Download Zapier product report

November 2024

Learn More

Rivery

Overview

Rivery is a serverless, SaaS DataOps platform that empowers companies of all sizes around the world to consolidate, orchestrate, and manage internal and external data sources with ease and efficiency.

By offering comprehensive data solutions and partnering with complementary technology providers, including Google, Snowflake, Tableau, and Looker, Rivery enables data-driven companies to build the perfect ecosystems for all their data processes.

Zapier is a tool for primarily non-technical users to connect together web apps.

An integration between two apps is called a Zap. A Zap is made up of a Trigger and one or more Actions or Searches.

Whenever the trigger happens in one app, Zapier will automatically perform the actions or searches in another app in order.

Zaps are very lightweight and easy to set up. Zaps do not import or export old data (they only operate on new items created after the Zap is enabled). Zaps are also not kept in sync ("two way syncing") after the Zap is triggered.

Zaps are deceivingly simple if you're used to dealing with complex and difficult integrations. Their simplicity is what enables anyone to create them.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

BuzzFeed, Groupon, Spotify, Columbia University, FOX