Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Zapier Logo

Top 10 Zapier Alternatives

Vendor: Zapier
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Zapier Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Zapier based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Azure Data Factory, and SSIS. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Zapier surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integrations with over 3,000 apps, automating workflows with ease, and providing a user-friendly interface that empowers businesses and individuals to enhance productivity without requiring extensive technical expertise.

Zapier Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Zapier, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Zapier Logo
Zapier Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)
4.0 out of 5
Informatica IDMC excels at data governance with advanced features, while Zapier simplifies automation without deep data management. In comparison, Zapier offers convenient integration for small businesses, whereas IDMC addresses complex enterprise needs despite higher costs and interface improvement areas.
Download Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Zapier Report
Informatica IDMC involves higher setup costs, reflecting its robust capabilities and enterprise focus, whereas Zapier offers a lower initial setup cost, making it more accessible for small to medium-sized businesses with straightforward integration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica IDMC involves higher setup costs, reflecting its robust capabilities and enterprise focus, whereas Zapier offers a lower initial setup cost, making it more accessible for small to medium-sized businesses with straightforward integration needs.
Zapier Logo
Azure Data Factory
4.0 out of 5
Zapier Logo
Azure Data Factory
4.0 out of 5
Zapier offers seamless app integration and customizable automation without coding. In comparison, Azure Data Factory supports complex ETL flows, ideal for Microsoft environments. Zapier's deployment is straightforward, while Azure provides flexible cloud options, with each having distinct pricing models tailored to different needs.
Download Azure Data Factory vs. Zapier Report
Zapier's setup cost is described as straightforward and affordable, whereas Azure Data Factory's setup cost can be higher and more complex, reflecting its enterprise-level features.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier's setup cost is described as straightforward and affordable, whereas Azure Data Factory's setup cost can be higher and more complex, reflecting its enterprise-level features.
Zapier Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
Zapier Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services suits organizations with existing Microsoft infrastructure, allowing custom code use and parallel processing for economical ETL solutions. In comparison, Zapier offers flexible automation for non-technical users with effortless cloud-based deployment, though advanced features add costs.
Download SSIS vs. Zapier Report
SSIS requires an initial setup cost, while Zapier offers a more budget-friendly alternative with lower setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
SSIS requires an initial setup cost, while Zapier offers a more budget-friendly alternative with lower setup expenses.
Zapier Logo
Zapier Logo
Informatica PowerCenter
4.0 out of 5
Informatica PowerCenter excels in handling large data volumes with robust security, ideal for enterprises with complex ETL needs. In comparison, Zapier offers user-friendly automation of workflows, saving time and allowing easy connectivity between apps without requiring custom code, suitable for diverse integrations.
Download Informatica PowerCenter vs. Zapier Report
Informatica PowerCenter requires a significant initial investment for setup, while Zapier offers a more cost-effective setup process, highlighting a key contrast in pricing between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica PowerCenter requires a significant initial investment for setup, while Zapier offers a more cost-effective setup process, highlighting a key contrast in pricing between the two solutions.
Zapier Logo
webMethods.io
4.0 out of 5
Zapier Logo
webMethods.io
4.0 out of 5
Zapier connects multiple applications for seamless automation, ideal for startups without coding tasks. In comparison, webMethods.io offers enterprise-level business process integration with EDI support, suited for companies needing robust scalability. Zapier's pricing may escalate, while webMethods.io aligns with larger enterprise budgets.
Download Zapier vs. webMethods.io Report
Zapier offers a straightforward setup with no upfront cost, while webMethods.io requires a more complex setup process that may involve initial fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier offers a straightforward setup with no upfront cost, while webMethods.io requires a more complex setup process that may involve initial fees.
Zapier Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
Zapier Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
Zapier excels in automating workflows through seamless app integrations, aiding businesses in simplifying processes. In comparison, Palantir Foundry offers robust data management and visualization capabilities, ideal for complex engineering tasks. Both cater to different needs, ensuring diverse solutions for tech buyers.
Download Palantir Foundry vs. Zapier Report
Zapier incurs no setup costs, while Palantir Foundry involves substantial initial investments, highlighting a significant difference in upfront expenses between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier incurs no setup costs, while Palantir Foundry involves substantial initial investments, highlighting a significant difference in upfront expenses between the two solutions.
Zapier Logo
AWS Glue
3.9 out of 5
Zapier Logo
AWS Glue
3.9 out of 5
Zapier excels in seamless automation with extensive app integrations for non-coders. In comparison, AWS Glue provides powerful ETL capabilities and efficient large data processing within the AWS ecosystem. Tech buyers might choose Zapier for workflow automation or AWS Glue for robust data operations.
Download AWS Glue vs. Zapier Report
Zapier requires minimal setup costs and is known for quick deployment, whereas AWS Glue involves higher setup costs due to its complexity and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier requires minimal setup costs and is known for quick deployment, whereas AWS Glue involves higher setup costs due to its complexity and scalability.
Zapier Logo
Zapier Logo
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Data Integrator excels in tackling complex data environments with robust ETL capabilities suited for enterprise-level integration. In comparison, Zapier offers straightforward no-code automation with broad integrations, ideal for businesses seeking flexible, affordable solutions without extensive technical skills.
Download Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs. Zapier Report
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) entails significant setup costs compared to the minimal setup required for Zapier, highlighting a contrast in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) entails significant setup costs compared to the minimal setup required for Zapier, highlighting a contrast in initial investment.
Zapier Logo
Qlik Talend Cloud
4.1 out of 5
Zapier Logo
Qlik Talend Cloud
4.1 out of 5
Qlik Talend Cloud offers advanced data integration with customization for complex algorithms, appealing to tech buyers seeking flexibility. In comparison, Zapier provides an accessible automation platform with extensive pre-built connections, ideal for users wanting straightforward integration without deep technical skills.
Download Qlik Talend Cloud vs. Zapier Report
Qlik Talend Cloud has a moderate setup cost, while Zapier's setup cost is minimal. Qlik Talend Cloud offers a more comprehensive setup with a focus on integration, unlike Zapier, which emphasizes simplicity.
View comparison
Pricing
Qlik Talend Cloud has a moderate setup cost, while Zapier's setup cost is minimal. Qlik Talend Cloud offers a more comprehensive setup with a focus on integration, unlike Zapier, which emphasizes simplicity.
Zapier Logo
Fivetran
4.1 out of 5
Zapier Logo
Fivetran
4.1 out of 5
Zapier facilitates non-technical user automation with its large library of integrations, ideal for quickly connecting diverse systems. In comparison, Fivetran suits complex data needs with robust pipeline automation, appealing to businesses needing comprehensive data syncing solutions.
Download Fivetran vs. Zapier Report
Zapier offers a low setup cost, which appeals to those seeking affordability, while Fivetran presents higher initial investment, reflecting its focus on robust data integration capabilities and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier offers a low setup cost, which appeals to those seeking affordability, while Fivetran presents higher initial investment, reflecting its focus on robust data integration capabilities and scalability.
Zapier Logo
Boomi iPaaS
4.0 out of 5
Zapier Logo
Boomi iPaaS
4.0 out of 5
Boomi iPaaS offers extensive integration features ideal for mid-sized companies seeking low-code development. In comparison, Zapier provides ease in setting up automations for small businesses. Boomi focuses on flexibility and cost-effective connection licensing, while Zapier appeals with simple workflows and affordability.
Download Boomi iPaaS vs. Zapier Report
Boomi iPaaS incurs higher setup costs, making it a robust choice for complex integrations; Zapier offers a more accessible entry point with lower setup expenses, appealing for simpler automation tasks.
View comparison
Pricing
Boomi iPaaS incurs higher setup costs, making it a robust choice for complex integrations; Zapier offers a more accessible entry point with lower setup expenses, appealing for simpler automation tasks.
Zapier Logo
Zapier Logo
Matillion Data Productivity Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Zapier excels in automation, connecting applications with a vast library of integrations like Facebook Lead Forms, ideal for businesses requiring versatile process automation. In comparison, Matillion Data Productivity Cloud focuses on robust ETL processes, beneficial for organizations prioritizing seamless AWS integration and data transformation.
Download Matillion Data Productivity Cloud vs. Zapier Report
Zapier's setup cost is notably lower than Matillion Data Productivity Cloud, highlighting significant differences in pricing and initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier's setup cost is notably lower than Matillion Data Productivity Cloud, highlighting significant differences in pricing and initial investment requirements.
Zapier Logo
SnapLogic
3.9 out of 5
Zapier Logo
SnapLogic
3.9 out of 5
SnapLogic excels in handling complex enterprise integrations with advanced features. In comparison, Zapier offers simplicity and ease of use for smaller businesses, highlighting its intuitive setup. SnapLogic suits enterprises with robust needs, while Zapier efficiently connects apps for straightforward automation tasks.
Download SnapLogic vs. Zapier Report
SnapLogic's setup cost is higher than Zapier's, making Zapier a more budget-friendly choice for initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
SnapLogic's setup cost is higher than Zapier's, making Zapier a more budget-friendly choice for initial setup expenses.
Zapier Logo
Alteryx Designer
3.9 out of 5
Zapier Logo
Alteryx Designer
3.9 out of 5
Zapier connects over 7,000 applications for automating workflows, ideal for non-technical users. In comparison, Alteryx Designer excels in data preparation and analytics with robust tools. Zapier offers flexible pricing, while Alteryx's cost can be substantial but provides powerful data insights.
Download Alteryx Designer vs. Zapier Report
Zapier offers a low setup cost appealing to budget-conscious users, while Alteryx Designer has a higher setup cost reflecting its advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier offers a low setup cost appealing to budget-conscious users, while Alteryx Designer has a higher setup cost reflecting its advanced capabilities.
Zapier Logo
FME
4.3 out of 5
Zapier Logo
FME
4.3 out of 5
FME offers complex data transformations and format support, suiting technical users needing advanced manipulation. In comparison, Zapier is ideal for non-technical users seeking quick automation with easy deployment and a vast app integration library, providing a cost-effective, user-friendly solution for fast ROI.
Download FME vs. Zapier Report
FME incurs a higher setup cost compared to Zapier's more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
FME incurs a higher setup cost compared to Zapier's more budget-friendly option.
Zapier Logo
MuleSoft Composer
3.9 out of 5
Zapier Logo
MuleSoft Composer
3.9 out of 5
Zapier, known for affordability and simplicity, is ideal for small businesses seeking easy automation. In comparison, MuleSoft Composer supports complex workflows for larger organizations. Zapier's ease appeals to novices, while MuleSoft's intricate features justify its higher cost for advanced integration needs.
Download MuleSoft Composer vs. Zapier Report
Zapier has a straightforward setup with no initial costs, while MuleSoft Composer involves a more complex setup process that may include additional fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier has a straightforward setup with no initial costs, while MuleSoft Composer involves a more complex setup process that may include additional fees.
Zapier Logo
Zapier Logo
SAP Replication Server
4.0 out of 5
SAP Replication Server excels in high-performance data replication, crucial for businesses with complex data environments. In comparison, Zapier's strength lies in automating workflows across apps, appealing to companies prioritizing productivity. Each addresses distinct business integration needs effectively.
Download SAP Replication Server vs. Zapier Report
SAP Replication Server involves a more complex setup cost compared to Zapier, which typically offers a lower initial cost and ease of setup, highlighting a significant difference in user investment and deployment time.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP Replication Server involves a more complex setup cost compared to Zapier, which typically offers a lower initial cost and ease of setup, highlighting a significant difference in user investment and deployment time.
Zapier Logo
Zapier Logo
ETL Solutions Transformation Manager
4.5 out of 5
ETL Solutions Transformation Manager provides advanced data transformation for handling complex data environments. In comparison, Zapier excels in simplicity and extensive app integrations. Transformation Manager appeals to those needing sophisticated control, while Zapier suits businesses seeking rapid deployment and broad connectivity.
Download ETL Solutions Transformation Manager vs. Zapier Report
ETL Solutions Transformation Manager involves a higher setup cost compared to Zapier, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ETL Solutions Transformation Manager involves a higher setup cost compared to Zapier, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
Zapier Logo
Skyvia
4.5 out of 5
Zapier Logo
Skyvia
4.5 out of 5
Zapier excels in spreadsheet integrations and task automation, ideal for straightforward automation needs with easy deployment. In comparison, Skyvia's comprehensive cloud data integration capabilities and advanced data handling make it better suited for complex tasks, despite requiring more setup time for intricate integrations.
Zapier requires no setup cost, while Skyvia offers flexible setup pricing, highlighting a distinct cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier requires no setup cost, while Skyvia offers flexible setup pricing, highlighting a distinct cost difference.
Zapier Logo
CData Drivers
1 out of 5
Zapier Logo
CData Drivers
1 out of 5
Zapier excels in automating tasks with extensive integrations and user-friendly tools. In comparison, CData Drivers focuses on secure data access through its robust data adapters, appealing to tech buyers seeking advanced integration capabilities. Zapier's straightforward deployment contrasts with CData Drivers's technical setup for data professionals.
Zapier offers a simple setup without upfront costs, while CData Drivers require an initial investment for integration.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier offers a simple setup without upfront costs, while CData Drivers require an initial investment for integration.
Zapier Logo
Tray.io
1 out of 5
Zapier Logo
Tray.io
1 out of 5
Tray.io appeals to enterprises with complex integration needs and robust support. In comparison, Zapier's extensive pre-built integrations and user-friendly workflows attract small businesses seeking simple automation. Tray.io's higher setup cost suits large organizations, while Zapier's affordability benefits smaller enterprises.
Tray.io often has higher setup costs, offering comprehensive initial configurations, while Zapier provides a more accessible entry point with lower setup prices, catering to users seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Tray.io often has higher setup costs, offering comprehensive initial configurations, while Zapier provides a more accessible entry point with lower setup prices, catering to users seeking cost-effective solutions.
Zapier Logo
Stitch
3.5 out of 5
Zapier Logo
Stitch
3.5 out of 5
Zapier is preferred for its ease of use and accessible customer service, appealing for simple automation needs. In comparison, Stitch offers advanced ETL features and detailed customer support, making it ideal for complex data tasks and justifying its higher cost for comprehensive data management.
Download Stitch vs. Zapier Report
Zapier offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Stitch may present a higher setup expense but provides enhanced scalability options.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Stitch may present a higher setup expense but provides enhanced scalability options.
Zapier Logo
Coefficient
1 out of 5
Zapier Logo
Coefficient
1 out of 5
Zapier leads in ease of integration and a vast app ecosystem, ideal for automating tasks across tools. In comparison, Coefficient excels in data-driven tasks and deep business application integration, appealing to those prioritizing detailed data handling and analytics accuracy within their workflows.
Zapier offers competitive pricing in terms of setup cost, whereas Coefficient provides a more straightforward cost structure, highlighting a distinct difference in initial investment for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier offers competitive pricing in terms of setup cost, whereas Coefficient provides a more straightforward cost structure, highlighting a distinct difference in initial investment for users.
Zapier Logo
AWS AppSync
4.0 out of 5
Zapier Logo
AWS AppSync
4.0 out of 5
Zapier enhances workflow automation with its easy integrations, appealing to tech buyers seeking simplicity. In comparison, AWS AppSync attracts those needing scalable app development through its GraphQL API capabilities and strong AWS support. Zapier offers quick ROI, while AppSync suits those valuing robust feature sets.
Download AWS AppSync vs. Zapier Report
Zapier has minimal setup costs, making it an appealing choice for small businesses, whereas AWS AppSync generally requires higher initial investments due to its advanced capabilities and integration features.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier has minimal setup costs, making it an appealing choice for small businesses, whereas AWS AppSync generally requires higher initial investments due to its advanced capabilities and integration features.
Zapier Logo
Coupler.io
1 out of 5
Zapier Logo
Coupler.io
1 out of 5
Zapier offers extensive app connections and automation features, appealing to users seeking versatility. In comparison, Coupler.io excels in data import automation, ideal for data-driven applications. Zapier's user-friendly setup contrasts with Coupler.io's technical focus, catering to specific data management needs.
Zapier requires no upfront setup fees, while Coupler.io charges an initial setup cost, highlighting a cost-effective entry point with Zapier for users comparing the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier requires no upfront setup fees, while Coupler.io charges an initial setup cost, highlighting a cost-effective entry point with Zapier for users comparing the two solutions.
Zapier Logo
Quickwork
1 out of 5
Zapier Logo
Quickwork
1 out of 5
Zapier excels in extensive app integrations and easy setup, appealing to small businesses with its budget-friendly plans and responsive customer service. In comparison, Quickwork's advanced features and real-time processing suit enterprises needing complex automation, with higher pricing justified by its sophisticated functionality.
Zapier requires a setup cost, while Quickwork offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier requires a setup cost, while Quickwork offers a more cost-effective setup option.

Related categories

Cloud Data Integration
Data Integration
Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies