Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

RSA Adaptive Authentication vs Symantec Advanced Authentication comparison

RSA and Broadcom are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. RSA is ranked #28, while Broadcom is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.0. RSA holds a 0.8% mindshare in AS, compared to Broadcom’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of RSA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
RSA Adaptive Authentication
Read 6 RSA Adaptive Authentication reviews
  • 289 Views
  • 244 Comparison Views
71% willing to recommend
Symantec Advanced Authentic...
Read 9 Symantec Advanced Authentication reviews
  • 308 Views
  • 213 Comparison Views
77% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Symantec Advanced Authentication and RSA Adaptive Authentication are prominent solutions in the authentication technology category. RSA Adaptive Authentication has an edge due to its feature robustness, while Symantec Advanced Authentication is favored for pricing and customer support.

What features are offered by Symantec Advanced Authentication in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

Symantec Advanced Authentication offers ease of use, strong security features, and efficient pricing. RSA Adaptive Authentication provides advanced fraud detection capabilities, extensive integration options, and a broad range of adaptable features for diverse scenarios.

What areas of improvement can be found in Symantec Advanced Authentication in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

Symantec Advanced Authentication needs an improved setup process, more customization options, and better user interface enhancements. RSA Adaptive Authentication requires better documentation, performance improvements, and streamlined user training materials.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Symantec Advanced Authentication in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

Symantec Advanced Authentication is known for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer service. RSA Adaptive Authentication, despite its complexity, is supported by a helpful customer service team during the implementation process.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Symantec Advanced Authentication in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

Symantec Advanced Authentication is noted for competitive pricing and a quick ROI. RSA Adaptive Authentication, while higher in cost, offers a comprehensive feature set that justifies the investment through long-term benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed RSA Adaptive Authentication vs. Symantec Advanced Authentication Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
RSA Adaptive Authentication vs. Symantec Advanced Authentication
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

RSA Adaptive Authentication
Ranking in Authentication Systems
28th
Average Rating
6.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Symantec Advanced Authentic...
Ranking in Authentication Systems
19th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of RSA Adaptive Authentication is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Advanced Authentication is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Authentication Systems
 

Featured Reviews

AR
It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs
RSA Adaptive Authentication is one of the most used tools for stopping fraud in the world. The tool is very good variable to take into account when deciding what product to choose. I think RSA is best options in this field since the tool is a really good piece of engineering.
Read full review
Umair (Abu Mohaymin) Akhlaque - PeerSpot reviewer
Ensures robust security features and ease of deployment, although it may lack some of the more modern authentication options
There has been a need for aggressive development to modernize the product and align it with contemporary security requirements. While the rebranding has been a step forward, further enhancements are essential to meet the evolving demands of the market. It lacks features such as ActiveSync Exchange security, and it doesn't offer alternatives like password-less authentication via biometrics or patches. While Symantec mainly relies on traditional token-based or password-based methods, newer authentication methods are missing from its repertoire. Support services often lack promptness and depth of knowledge, leaving customers waiting for weeks to resolve issues. In the realm of multifactor authentication, swift resolution of problems is critical, as any slowdown or interruption can significantly impact operations. Urgent improvement is necessary to ensure that support responses are faster and more effective, aligning with the demands of MFA implementation.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features."
"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."
"Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA."
"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."
"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement."
"It tells us exactly what we want in terms of authentication to various applications and provides protection for users who access them."
"Rules on Risk Authentication are very good."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is that it's a strong authentication solution that's able to integrate with applications."
"One of the most valuable aspects is its remarkable stability."
 

Cons

"I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages..."
"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."
"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."
"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."
"Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further."
"It has taken years to implement."
"Urgent improvement is necessary to ensure that support responses are faster and more effective, aligning with the demands of MFA implementation."
"We have seen quite a few issues with bugginess. It is indeed pretty buggy and we have had to install some fixes."
"This solution could be improved with risk-based authentication. I think that this product has everything that most customers are looking for, but modern technology has people looking for security tools with risk-based authentication, which they have a separate tool for. If they could integrate this, it would improve Symantec Advanced Authentication. They have to look at what's newly trending and how things are moving forward, and then adapt and adopt those features. Symantec's technical support should also be improved, in terms of response time."
"Advanced Authentication talks about the Device ID. But how the device ID is captured, I want to know more about that."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."
"Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."
"Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."
"The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."
"The price is reasonable."
"There are eventually going to be implementation costs. Sometimes you're required to have custom code developments there, so that has to be part of the implementation price."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
49%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Retailer
4%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Symantec Advanced Authentication?
One of the most valuable aspects is its remarkable stability.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Advanced Authentication?
The price is reasonable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Symantec Advanced Authentication?
There has been a need for aggressive development to modernize the product and align it with contemporary security requirements. While the rebranding has been a step forward, further enhancements ar...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

RSA Authentication Manager vs RSA Adaptive Authentication Logo
RSA Authentication Manager vs RSA Adaptive Authentication
Compared 40% of the time
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Adaptive Authentication Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Adaptive Authentication
Compared 32% of the time
ThreatMetrix vs RSA Adaptive Authentication Logo
ThreatMetrix vs RSA Adaptive Authentication
Compared 28% of the time
More RSA Adaptive Authentication Competitors
Thales Authenticators vs Symantec Advanced Authentication Logo
Thales Authenticators vs Symantec Advanced Authentication
Compared 100% of the time
More Symantec Advanced Authentication Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
November 2024
RSA Adaptive Authentication reportDownload RSA Adaptive Authentication product report
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Advanced Authentication
October 2024
Symantec Advanced Authentication reportDownload Symantec Advanced Authentication product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
CA Advanced Authentication, CA Strong Authentication, CA Risk Authentication, Arcot WebFort, Arcot RiskFort
 

Learn More

RSA
Broadcom
 

Overview

RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.

CA Advanced Authentication provides a secure, user-convenient and cost-effective way to protect online and mobile applications. The solution consists of two components:  CA Risk Authentication allows the enterprise to silently and transparently collect data and assess risk based on device identification, location and user behavior, among other factors, and CA Strong Authentication provides a wide variety of software-based, two-factor authentication credentials and technology to make passwords more secure.  Together they enable an intelligent, layered security approach to protect user identities and organizational data.

Take the assessment


 

Sample Customers

ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
Global bank, Large Filipino Bank and SK Infosec
Buyer's Guide
RSA Adaptive Authentication vs. Symantec Advanced Authentication
October 2024
Free Report: RSA Adaptive Authentication vs. Symantec Advanced Authentication
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA Adaptive Authentication vs. Symantec Advanced Authentication and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our RSA Adaptive Authentication vs. Symantec Advanced Authentication report.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.