Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security comparison

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

22nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trend Vision One Endpoint S...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

131

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (5th), Endpoint Compliance (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is 2.2%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Shiraz Ali

Networking Solutions Specialist at GBM

Provides a unified and multi-layer security solution

I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities. Having a single, more user-friendly management console, like a one-window approach, would streamline the user experience and make it easier for administrators to handle security tasks more efficiently. Sangfor Endpoint Secure currently only allows one manager to control clients, and it lacks a backup system. It would be better if it supported a secondary manager for backup in case the primary one fails, ensuring uninterrupted service.

Read full review

John Trembly

Technical Specialist at Iona Catholic Secondary School

Provides a single dashboard, integrates well, and has predictive machine learning

Microsoft's new Azure Code Signing is causing a lot of issues for us with One Endpoint Security. We currently have two systems in operation, on-prem and SaaS, and many of the agents won't upgrade beyond version B11564 because these newer versions require Azure Code Signing compliance on the endpoint. If we are not up to date with our Windows updates, we don't have this compliance. Irrespective of the Windows version we are running, we have to apply patches to the machines, if the OS is not damaged, to make them compliant. After that, we can upgrade to the latest version of the respective agent. This process also applies to both Deep Security and Workload Security. I have two production servers: one for Windows and another for Mac. These servers are available in both on-premise and SaaS versions. Additionally, I have a test server that is located on-premises. The significant distinction with the SaaS version is the absence of a test server where I can install a new version. This means I can't allow the agents on it to upgrade and then perform testing. In contrast, with the production SaaS version of One Endpoint Security, I have numerous agents transitioning and coming online. It's essential that these agents upgrade to a newer version. Among these agents, there are five or six different versions, not counting the really old ones that have yet to upgrade due to ACS non-compliance. I can't leave the testing phase for an extended period because I still have outdated agents that need to be updated. These agents can't be left hanging while I wait to test the newest version that has just been released. New versions seem to come out every couple of months in the SaaS environment. In the past, when I solely used the on-premises version, I would review security bulletins for the SaaS version to identify any issues. I'm apprehensive about potential future situations involving this, primarily because the majority of our agents now operate on the cloud version. If a problem is discovered, rolling back on those agents would be challenging. It would require careful operation to revert them to a different version. The on-premises version of One Endpoint Security has an update function that allows us to manually update a bunch of servers. For example, if I just turned on a policy, I can force the agents to quickly download the policy and start following the update procedure or update settings. However, this function is not available in the SaaS version. This is because the system cannot communicate with the agent through the firewall. The SaaS version has an automatic update function and an update source entry in the update agents sub-menu, but it does not have a way to force agents to update. This is a problem because we cannot automatically update the agents. We have to manually log in to the machines and give them an update command. Currently, we have no choice but to wait until the agents find the updates themselves.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the product for network protection from any malicious threat."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates."

"It has a quick response time, threat intelligence, cybersecurity features, quick report generation, behavior analysis, dynamic detection, and quarantine features."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"The user-friendliness of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is particularly impressive. Even with basic technical knowledge, users can easily navigate the system, make changes, and implement updates."

"The real-time monitoring feature of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is truly real-time, with no delay compared to other solutions."

"The most valuable feature I have found in the system is its comprehensive end-to-end protection."

"I like the tool's honeypot feature. Some features include having a honeypot to detect attacks in a certain area. Additionally, there is RDP protection, which means that when we remote into our server or any endpoint, we must enter a password as a second layer of security. It can also integrate with next-generation firewalls."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure pros

"The main features that are useful are application control, vulnerability protection, and XDR Vision One which we have recently started using. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."

"The most valuable features are behavior analytics, machine learning, and virtual patching."

"I use Trend Vision One Endpoint Security for work control, application control, firewall, whitelist and blocklist filtration, analysis, monitoring, deep security for the servers, major monitoring, and IPS modules."

"Its real-time features are valuable. It is in real-time, and it works fine."

"It's easier to integrate Apex One than Kaspersky. It also performs well, and the customer feedback has been positive."

"I think this is the best solution in the category of endpoint protection, it's really excellent. It's better than McAfee."

"It's very good and efficient."

"I have opened three tickets with the technical support and they were responsive and asked me to send them my logs."

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities."

"There are a few areas for improvement. We have encountered licensing issues on occasion, and sometimes updates don't apply properly."

"When an issue occurs, the response time for first-level support and the time taken for meetings could be improved."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure should include healing capabilities."

"It would be much more convenient if the migration tool could be installed directly on the customer's VMs, enabling a smoother migration process to the new infrastructure, with potential restrictions addressed accordingly."

"The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered."

"It is complicated to establish a tunnel due to technical issues in the VPN system."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure performs poorly."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure cons

"Trend Micro Apex One can improve its vulnerability assessment and monitoring tools."

"I would like to see better reporting."

"It would be great it can support endpoint encryption."

"It is weak in terms of intelligence. By implementing Trend Micro Apex One, I wanted to see real-life scenarios. I deployed it on 50 clients to check if I could do lateral moments and zero-day exploits. I wanted to check how the zero-day protection works with Trend Micro. It fails with most of them because it is signature-based. They are not looking at the MITRE ATT&CK framework, so with zero-day attacks, it mostly fails."

"Apex One could use some updates to its UI, threat modeling, and insights. I would like to see better integration with helpdesk platforms and more AI-driven features."

"The pricing is very high."

"I think that this product needs to improve the data loss prevention port."

"The main thing they need to improve is their reporting functionality and the forensics for their on-premise consult. They do not have very good reporting features or forensic functionality in the on-premise version. They need to improve that."

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"Price-wise, Sangfor Endpoint Secure can be considered a competitively priced product in the market as it offers quite low prices compared to other solutions."

"We were using Hyper-V. So, we switched to Sangfor because of the pricing."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure's pricing is cheap. I rate it seven out of ten."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure is not a cheap solution."

"The solution is cheap. It is cheaper than other products by 15-20 percent."

"Its "pay as you grow" model offers cost-effectiveness compared to major cloud providers."

"It's an annual subscription."

"The licensing fee and support are bundled together."

"Trend Micro Apex One's pricing is good."

"From a commercial aspect, it is a bit higher compared to other market products."

"The pricing for Apex One is midrange, and worth the costs."

"When compared to Symantec, Kaspersky, and others the price is higher, they are more expensive."

"I think that this product is expensive."

"There is a license for this solution and it can be paid for monthly or annually."

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

52%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates.

What needs improvement with Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered. It would be better if it were a simplified version with fewer buttons and a more consolidated layout.

What is your primary use case for Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is easy to handle with its user-friendly interface. The four engines it utilizes for endpoint detection provide fewer false positives compared to other solutions. It is used...

What's the difference between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One?

Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and containers - all with a unified and comprehensive SaaS solution and without compromising ...

What do you like most about Trend Micro Apex One?

It is updated automatically without much intervention from our side. We can also get some reports easily.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro Apex One?

The pricing is very high, despite the solution’s capabilities.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Comparisons

Compared 20% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 12% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 8% of the time

ESET Inspect vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 6% of the time

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure Competitors

Trend Micro Deep Security vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 21% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 19% of the time

Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Download Sangfor Endpoint Secure product report

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Download Trend Vision One Endpoint Security product report

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report

Also Known As

No data available

Trend Micro Apex One, OfficeScan, Trend Micro OfficeScan

Overview

Organizations use Sangfor Endpoint Secure for endpoint protection and security management, managing devices, servers, and networks against malicious threats. It also assists in blocking websites, managing infrastructure, applications, antivirus needs, and aids in migrating to cloud environments.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers end-to-end protection, incorporating file protection, AI detection, behavior analysis, access control, and ISP load balancing. It facilitates VM migration with minimal downtime and includes a dual-end user interface for creating firewall rules, uploading images, and configuring VM settings. Enhancements such as Hyper-V capabilities, policy certificates, honeypot features, and next-generation firewall integrations are available. However, Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve on console management, reporting functionalities, public cloud migration support, navigation, VPN system issues, licensing, update management, transitioning processes, and incorporating healing capabilities.

What are its most important features?

Comprehensive end-to-end protection including file protection
AI detection and behavior analysis
Access control and ISP load balancing
Ease of VM migration with minimal downtime
Streamlined dual-end user interface for firewall rules and VM settings
Hyper-V capabilities and policy certificates
Honeypot feature for attack detection and RDP protection
Integration with next-generation firewalls

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced device, server, and network security from malicious threats
Simplified migration from on-premises to cloud environments
User-friendly navigation and management capabilities
Advanced detection and behavior analysis reducing potential threats
Streamlined enforcement of robust security policies

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is implemented across various industries to ensure comprehensive security management and protection. IT departments leverage its VM migration capabilities for seamless transitions to cloud environments. Healthcare organizations use it to secure sensitive patient data, while educational institutions utilize it for safeguarding academic records and personal information. Financial services employ it to protect critical transactional data and adhere to stringent compliance requirements.

Sangfor

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security delivers comprehensive antivirus, data protection, and device management. It offers robust threat detection and is deployable on-premises or via the cloud, making it versatile for endpoint security across organizations.

Emphasizing reliable endpoint security, Trend Vision One guards workstations and servers with extended detection and response features. Its machine learning-driven threat detection offers protection from malware and viruses, including zero-day threats. With seamless updates and automation, it minimizes administrative burdens, making deployment efficient. Criticisms include high resource use during scans and integration complexities, with calls for improved data loss prevention and better encryption. Users see the need for enhanced Linux support and quicker security updates.

What features define Trend Vision One Endpoint Security?

Real-time threat detection: Provides immediate alerts on potential risks.
Virtual patching: Protects against known vulnerabilities without software updates.
Centralized management console: Facilitates efficient device management.
Machine learning: Enhances detection with advanced analytics.
Zero-day threat protection: Guards against unforeseen attacks.
Ransomware detection: Identifies and prevents ransomware incursions.
Automated updates: Ensures systems are protected with the latest safeguards.

Which benefits are crucial in reviews?

Reducing administrative overhead: Automation decreases time spent on routine tasks.
Efficient threat response: Facilitates quick identification and mitigation of risks.
Seamless system updates: Keeps protection up to date without disruptions.
Improving operational efficiency: Integrates smoothly with existing security solutions.

In the finance sector, Trend Vision One is implemented for robust data protection and regulatory compliance. Healthcare providers rely on it for protecting sensitive patient information from cyber threats. Retailers use it for safeguarding payment systems and customer data against breaches, ensuring uninterrupted business operations.

Trend Micro

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, A&W Food Services of Canada, Babou, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization (BO), DCI Donor Services, Evalueserve, Gulftainer, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, MEDHOST

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security