Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trend Micro Deep Security vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Trend Micro Deep Security
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
89
Ranking in other categories
Virtualization Security (1st), Cloud and Data Center Security (8th)
Trend Vision One Endpoint S...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
131
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (5th), Endpoint Compliance (3rd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Trend Micro Deep Security is designed for Virtualization Security and holds a mindshare of 40.4%, down 44.6% compared to last year.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, on the other hand, focuses on Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP), holds 1.8% mindshare, down 2.7% since last year.
Virtualization Security
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Harel Cohen - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers excellent endpoint protection and great stability
Technically speaking, the customer support is okay, but the responsiveness needs to be improved. I'm referring to the universal support, as the Israeli staff are excellent and always willing to help. However, opening a case and entering into a back-and-forth with emails takes too much time. It should be working more quickly and smoothly.
John Trembly - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides a single dashboard, integrates well, and has predictive machine learning
Microsoft's new Azure Code Signing is causing a lot of issues for us with One Endpoint Security. We currently have two systems in operation, on-prem and SaaS, and many of the agents won't upgrade beyond version B11564 because these newer versions require Azure Code Signing compliance on the endpoint. If we are not up to date with our Windows updates, we don't have this compliance. Irrespective of the Windows version we are running, we have to apply patches to the machines, if the OS is not damaged, to make them compliant. After that, we can upgrade to the latest version of the respective agent. This process also applies to both Deep Security and Workload Security. I have two production servers: one for Windows and another for Mac. These servers are available in both on-premise and SaaS versions. Additionally, I have a test server that is located on-premises. The significant distinction with the SaaS version is the absence of a test server where I can install a new version. This means I can't allow the agents on it to upgrade and then perform testing. In contrast, with the production SaaS version of One Endpoint Security, I have numerous agents transitioning and coming online. It's essential that these agents upgrade to a newer version. Among these agents, there are five or six different versions, not counting the really old ones that have yet to upgrade due to ACS non-compliance. I can't leave the testing phase for an extended period because I still have outdated agents that need to be updated. These agents can't be left hanging while I wait to test the newest version that has just been released. New versions seem to come out every couple of months in the SaaS environment. In the past, when I solely used the on-premises version, I would review security bulletins for the SaaS version to identify any issues. I'm apprehensive about potential future situations involving this, primarily because the majority of our agents now operate on the cloud version. If a problem is discovered, rolling back on those agents would be challenging. It would require careful operation to revert them to a different version. The on-premises version of One Endpoint Security has an update function that allows us to manually update a bunch of servers. For example, if I just turned on a policy, I can force the agents to quickly download the policy and start following the update procedure or update settings. However, this function is not available in the SaaS version. This is because the system cannot communicate with the agent through the firewall. The SaaS version has an automatic update function and an update source entry in the update agents sub-menu, but it does not have a way to force agents to update. This is a problem because we cannot automatically update the agents. We have to manually log in to the machines and give them an update command. Currently, we have no choice but to wait until the agents find the updates themselves.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The platform's IP detection feature is particularly effective in identifying connections to our servers."
"The vulnerability scanning reduces false positives by quite a bit."
"It has a perfect SaaS which integrates with AWS, offering flexibility to deploy quickly and easily in the cloud."
"Signatures are frequently updated."
"Deep Security is a good product for managing a few servers."
"We like the Smart protection and the Virtual patching."
"The solution's features, including real-time monitoring, IPS activity, and firewall alerts, are found to be the most effective in our company"
"It is a stable solution...The solution's initial setup was straightforward."
"We've found the technical support to be very helpful overall."
"One of the better features, in my opinion, is that it also makes use of a web reputation. For example, if someone accidentally clicks on a link in an email that leads to a malicious website, they will block it."
"One of the advantages for me is that it is very easy to use."
"We really like the ability to have different policies to keep servers and endpoints unique to their own policy."
"The most valuable features are reporting and where we have the ability to report back and provide information when an item is quarantined or not quarantined."
"The most valuable feature of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is the virtual patching it provides."
"This solution protects us from virus attacks before they affect the organization."
"The initial setup is very easy."
 

Cons

"Trend Micro's technical support sometimes takes too long to respond, although they respond quickly at other times."
"Sometimes, the product is not very stable, but it is something that depends on the infrastructure in which the tool is used."
"Post-implementation is time-consuming. You have to do monitoring, and that takes time. After you set up everything, it's not a full-fledged implementation. You have to keep on monitoring and configuring."
"The problem with this solution is that if you go on large sites you have to have an external database, which would increase the cost."
"In the solution, servers often go offline for various reasons, requiring us to manually check the cause or issue, such as connectivity issues, and to find out why the agent went offline."
"I would like them to add EDR features, moving away from traditional signature-based anti-malware."
"Trend Micro is not government certified or federal complaint. If they could become compliant/certified, this would make it easier for us to use it for our government projects."
"We have had some issues when it drains some of the resources of the server."
"The performance could always be improved."
"​It needs a consolidated manager as there are too many parts to currently manage it.​"
"There were challenges in uninstalling the Trend Micro solution from certain endpoints."
"There were challenges in uninstalling the Trend Micro solution from certain endpoints."
"The scans in Trend Micro Apex One take a very long time and it takes up my system resources. I do not receive alerts. These areas could improve."
"The solution could use extra dashboards and offer more analytics."
"The solution could be more proactive by using AI to assess the production landscape and compete with other products."
"I would like to have DLP features implemented into Vision One Security."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Purchasing this solution through the AWS Marketplace was secure and quick. AWS has good prices for a good product."
"Purchasing on the AWS Marketplace is like shopping on Amazon Prime."
"If you need an additional 10 or 20 licenses, you will need to pay additional fees."
"It is a very expensive solution. It would be nice if they lower its price. Its license is based on the machines."
"The cost runs around forty dollars per server a month."
"We have saved a 50% ROI for the on-premise product. It gave us significant improvement overall in productivity, costs, and efficiency."
"I rate the price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is a high price. It is a very costly tool...There are no additional payments to be made other than the normal price of the tool."
"The training needs improvement. It is expensive (classroom training), and it is often hard to find answers by yourself using the documentation."
"We have the smallest package of Trend Micro Apex One. The full package is expensive, and it was more expensive than we thought."
"The price for Trend Micro is reasonable."
"We are using an annual license for this solution."
"The price of the solution is fine."
"Its price is competitive."
"The pricing was previously considered affordable, however, currently, it is on the rise due to a new licensing segregation policy."
"The SaaS version is competitively priced and amazingly easy to set up."
"It's well priced at a yearly rate. The price itself depends on whether the solution is full suite, half suite, or some other engine. It's different according to the consumer's requests."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtualization Security solutions are best for your needs.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
41%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Educational Organization
52%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Is Crowdstrike Falcon better than Trend Micro Deep Security?
I like that Crowdstrike allows me to easily correlate data between my firewalls. What’s most useful for my needs is the intelligence modules feature. I also find that Crowdstrike Falcon’s dashboard...
What's the difference between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One?
Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and containers - all with a unified and comprehensive SaaS solution and without compromising ...
What do you like most about Trend Micro Apex One?
It is updated automatically without much intervention from our side. We can also get some reports easily.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro Apex One?
The pricing is very high, despite the solution’s capabilities.
What needs improvement with Trend Micro Apex One?
The pricing is very high. Despite the magnificent capabilities, the cost is still a concern. Additionally, we need more training resources for my team and I, such as developing labs and sessions to...
 

Also Known As

Deep Security
Trend Micro Apex One, OfficeScan, Trend Micro OfficeScan
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rush University Medical Center, Guess? Inc., Mazda Motor Logistics Europe, MEDHOST, KSC Commercial Internet Co., Ricoh Company Ltd., Square Enix, SoftBank Telecom, Telecom Italia, United Way of Greater Atlanta, A&W Food Services of Canada
Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, A&W Food Services of Canada, Babou, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization (BO), DCI Donor Services, Evalueserve, Gulftainer, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, MEDHOST
Find out what your peers are saying about Trend Micro, Sophos, Bitdefender and others in Virtualization Security. Updated: March 2025.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.