SmartBear TestComplete vs TestProject [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

SmartBear and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Additionally, 87% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

SmartBear TestComplete

Read 76 SmartBear TestComplete reviews

9,825 Views
6,779 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

TestProject [EOL]

Read 6 TestProject [EOL] reviews

71% willing to recommend

SmartBear TestComplete

TestProject [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SmartBear TestComplete and TestProject [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,240 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SmartBear TestComplete

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (6th), Regression Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (5th)

TestProject [EOL]

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Prakhar Goel

Sr Test Lead at Emerson

Used for integration automation, user-based automation, and web automation

The solution's most valuable features are the drag-and-drop feature, keyword-driven approach, and reusability of the scripts. The solution has introduced a new feature that helps us identify objects we cannot normally identify. It gives you a fair idea of objects, resolving the object recognition issue. The solution can be used to perform different tests on different machines.

Read full review

Ashu Singh

Senior quality analyst at Lalli

An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget

The solution's reporting system should be clearer and easier to understand for a layperson. I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it. For a layperson, the solution should be easy to use. Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product. The product's current price should be lowered to attract potential customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is stable for what we are currently using it for, and it is sufficient for us."

"The initial setup is pretty easy and it's quick to deploy."

"Valuable for us is the ability to identify objects by using Find methods."

"It's cross platform automation capabilities specially ranging across web, UNIX (via putty), and other systems."

"It helped to automate all the possible functional test cases which I previously used to do by manual testing."

"The solution helps improve the stability of our product. It also decreases the work of our manual quality assurance engineers."

"We were able to run tests on daily promotions of software so all software was tested every night, making any bugs instantly visible the next morning."

"Even with my limited programming knowledge, I was able to create automation tests using the Keyword Test feature."

More SmartBear TestComplete pros

"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."

"The automation and AI are very good."

"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."

"One of the valuable features the solution offers is the chance to be able to perform automatic tests by recording, and to create them without having coding knowledge."

"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The product has a very good record-and-play functionality."

"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."

Cons

"Memory consumption Speed of interaction with controls Sets of prepared libraries like asserts Templates of tests from scratch"

"There is no support for mobile testing automation."

"The initial setup of SmartBear TestComplete was complex."

"What is currently missing from this solution is better support for mobile testing."

"There is no qualified support for different web UI frameworks and no V8 support as well."

"The level of technical support leaves a lot to be desired."

"Often crashes with large projects. File check-in takes too much time in TFS."

"Technical support can be improved by being more efficient in responding to questions."

More SmartBear TestComplete cons

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."

"A company would not be able to scale with just this solution."

"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."

"I have had some difficulty trying to configure it on several browsers."

"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."

"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."

"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."

More TestProject [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team."

"Our ROI is about $10,000 a year."

"It is approximately $6,000 a year."

"We have a TestComplete 12 license."

"The price of SmartBear TestComplete could be less. The main challenge is when it comes to node-locked. They should use a subscription model, such as a monthly-based subscription or, a quarterly-based subscription. Their floating license is very expensive, and this high price should be reduced or provide, at a minimum, a subscription model."

"The licensing costs are in the range of $1,000 to $3,000."

"The product is becoming more and more expensive."

"The option we chose was around $2,000 USD."

More SmartBear TestComplete pricing and cost advice

"Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."

"The solution is free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,240 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	32

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartBear TestComplete?

I am not involved in pricing or licensing; our management team handles these aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete?

While using SmartBear TestComplete, we are fine with the current capabilities, however, it would be beneficial to improve some performance aspects, especially the image comparison feature. Occasion...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SmartBear TestComplete?

We are using SmartBear TestComplete ( /products/smartbear-testcomplete-reviews ) for automation over applications.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 8% of the time

Eggplant Test vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 6% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 2% of the time

More SmartBear TestComplete Competitors

Testim vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

Katalon Studio vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

BrowserStack vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

More TestProject [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete

September 2026

Download SmartBear TestComplete product report

Buyer's Guide

TestProject [EOL]

September 2026

Download TestProject [EOL] product report

Overview

SmartBear TestComplete offers automation testing across desktop, web, and mobile platforms with robust object identification and cross-browser compatibility. It features seamless integration with CI tools and supports diverse tech stacks, enhancing efficiency through modular testing and data-driven capabilities.

SmartBear TestComplete is known for its Object Browser and Object Spy, providing deep inspection and interaction within applications. It supports third-party tool integration, particularly CI platforms, enhancing testing consistency through name mapping and modular testing. Despite its high pricing and need for enhancement in COM and ActiveX support and mobile testing, it offers record-and-playback features, self-healing capabilities, and cross-browser compatibility, making it a choice for regression and automation. Users leverage it for testing in environments including Windows, with exploration into a Flutter-based mobile context. Improvements are desired in object mapping, headless testing, and programming language support, while challenges exist in UI usability and virtual machine licensing.

What are the key features of SmartBear TestComplete?

Object Browser and Object Spy: Provides deep inspection and interaction capabilities within applications.
Integration Support: Seamlessly works with third-party tools and CI platforms.
Record-and-Playback: Simplifies test creation and execution.
Data-Driven Testing: Enhances testing processes by using varied data inputs.
Self-Healing: Offers resilience in automated tests upon changes.
Cross-Browser Compatibility: Supports testing across different browsers effectively.

What benefits do users highlight in reviews?

Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes and reduces manual effort.
Consistency: Promotes uniform testing practices through modular approaches.
Diverse Tech Stack Support: Accommodates a wide range of programming languages.
CI/CD Pipeline Compatibility: Enhances integration and testing in CI/CD workflows.

SmartBear TestComplete is implemented in industries requiring comprehensive testing solutions, including those performing regression and functionality testing across platforms. Its integration and behavior automation support CI/CD pipelines, while desktop, web, and mobile applications are tested for UI automation and backend database functionality, showing its adaptability to industry-specific needs.

SmartBear

TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.

IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,240 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.