SmartBear TestComplete vs TestProject [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

SmartBear and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Additionally, 87% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

SmartBear TestComplete

Read 76 SmartBear TestComplete reviews

9,265 Views
6,486 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

TestProject [EOL]

Read 6 TestProject [EOL] reviews

71% willing to recommend

SmartBear TestComplete

TestProject [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SmartBear TestComplete and TestProject [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,889 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SmartBear TestComplete

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (7th), Regression Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (6th)

TestProject [EOL]

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Prakhar Goel

Sr Test Lead at Emerson

Used for integration automation, user-based automation, and web automation

The solution's most valuable features are the drag-and-drop feature, keyword-driven approach, and reusability of the scripts. The solution has introduced a new feature that helps us identify objects we cannot normally identify. It gives you a fair idea of objects, resolving the object recognition issue. The solution can be used to perform different tests on different machines.

Read full review

Ashu Singh

Senior quality analyst at Lalli

An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget

The solution's reporting system should be clearer and easier to understand for a layperson. I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it. For a layperson, the solution should be easy to use. Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product. The product's current price should be lowered to attract potential customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Test automation with TestComplete significantly (estimated 80%) reduced the regression timeline for a complex AUT with a large number of test cases."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"Object Browser is the most powerful feature."

"Price-wise, feature-wise, its ability to integrate with other products, and of course, scalability-wise, it's great."

"My advice to others is: If you're looking for speed, configuration consistency, and accuracy of tests with fantastic results, go get TestComplete."

"Object spy and object recognition are working very well, giving us a lot of possibilities."

"Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution."

"This is the best tool for GUI and Web Automation."

More SmartBear TestComplete pros

"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."

"The automation and AI are very good."

"The product has a very good record-and-play functionality."

"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"One of the valuable features the solution offers is the chance to be able to perform automatic tests by recording, and to create them without having coding knowledge."

"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."

"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."

Cons

"The way objects are added and used when utilizing descriptive programming could be improved. It is a little unwieldy, compared to UFT."

"Headless testing would be a big improvement."

"There often are issues with web test execution."

"There is no qualified support for different web UI frameworks and no V8 support as well."

"Memory consumption Speed of interaction with controls Sets of prepared libraries like asserts Templates of tests from scratch"

"If that engine could better identify more XPaths automatically and make the process more flexible, that would be better."

"Technical support can be improved by being more efficient in responding to questions."

"The initial deployment of TestComplete was difficult, but with the assistance of SmartBear technical support, I was able to get it up and running."

More SmartBear TestComplete cons

"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."

"Technical support is an area they need to work on, they are too slow to resolve issues."

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."

"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."

"A company would not be able to scale with just this solution."

"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."

"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."

More TestProject [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a TestComplete 12 license."

"It is approximately $6,000 a year."

"The solution's licensing cost has increased because it has moved to some new SLM-based licenses."

"Overall, for us, the cost of the TestComplete platform and the three extra modules is around $8,000."

"It costs a few hundred per year, but I am not sure. It is not at all expensive as compared to other tools."

"Buy modules on demand. If you have a four-person team and they will each automate tests only 25% of the time, it's better to buy a floating licence and share the tool during the work day."

"The pricing is pretty reasonable."

"Our ROI is about $10,000 a year."

More SmartBear TestComplete pricing and cost advice

"Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."

"The solution is free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	32

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartBear TestComplete?

I am not involved in pricing or licensing; our management team handles these aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete?

While using SmartBear TestComplete, we are fine with the current capabilities, however, it would be beneficial to improve some performance aspects, especially the image comparison feature. Occasion...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SmartBear TestComplete?

We are using SmartBear TestComplete ( /products/smartbear-testcomplete-reviews ) for automation over applications.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 8% of the time

Eggplant Test vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 6% of the time

Katalon Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 2% of the time

More SmartBear TestComplete Competitors

Testim vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Katalon Studio vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

BrowserStack vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

More TestProject [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete

September 2026

Download SmartBear TestComplete product report

Buyer's Guide

TestProject [EOL]

September 2026

Download TestProject [EOL] product report

Overview

SmartBear TestComplete offers automation testing across desktop, web, and mobile platforms with robust object identification and cross-browser compatibility. It features seamless integration with CI tools and supports diverse tech stacks, enhancing efficiency through modular testing and data-driven capabilities.

SmartBear TestComplete is known for its Object Browser and Object Spy, providing deep inspection and interaction within applications. It supports third-party tool integration, particularly CI platforms, enhancing testing consistency through name mapping and modular testing. Despite its high pricing and need for enhancement in COM and ActiveX support and mobile testing, it offers record-and-playback features, self-healing capabilities, and cross-browser compatibility, making it a choice for regression and automation. Users leverage it for testing in environments including Windows, with exploration into a Flutter-based mobile context. Improvements are desired in object mapping, headless testing, and programming language support, while challenges exist in UI usability and virtual machine licensing.

What are the key features of SmartBear TestComplete?

Object Browser and Object Spy: Provides deep inspection and interaction capabilities within applications.
Integration Support: Seamlessly works with third-party tools and CI platforms.
Record-and-Playback: Simplifies test creation and execution.
Data-Driven Testing: Enhances testing processes by using varied data inputs.
Self-Healing: Offers resilience in automated tests upon changes.
Cross-Browser Compatibility: Supports testing across different browsers effectively.

What benefits do users highlight in reviews?

Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes and reduces manual effort.
Consistency: Promotes uniform testing practices through modular approaches.
Diverse Tech Stack Support: Accommodates a wide range of programming languages.
CI/CD Pipeline Compatibility: Enhances integration and testing in CI/CD workflows.

SmartBear TestComplete is implemented in industries requiring comprehensive testing solutions, including those performing regression and functionality testing across platforms. Its integration and behavior automation support CI/CD pipelines, while desktop, web, and mobile applications are tested for UI automation and backend database functionality, showing its adaptability to industry-specific needs.

SmartBear

TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.

IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.