

Splunk Enterprise Security and Zabbix compete in security management and network monitoring. Splunk has an edge with advanced threat detection, while Zabbix is favored for cost efficiency and monitoring capabilities.
Features: Splunk excels with features like customizable dashboards, real-time analytics, and the Search Processing Language (SPL) for powerful data handling. It supports diverse data sources and compliance needs. Zabbix provides extensive monitoring through SNMP, JMX, and agentless setups. It includes automated discovery, customizable dashboards, and robust alerting systems, proving effective for various environments.
Room for Improvement: Splunk's complexity may require a steep learning curve, and extensive customization can be overwhelming for new users. It could benefit from more affordable pricing models. Zabbix might improve by enhancing its documentation for easier user adoption and developing more intuitive interfaces. Better integration with cloud-based services would also enhance its appeal.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk offers structured deployment processes and dedicated support, which is beneficial for large enterprises. Zabbix is user-friendly with straightforward setup processes and a strong support community, making self-help feasible. Its documentation aids in seamless integration with existing systems, catering to diverse user needs.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk involves higher initial costs but justifies them with advanced features that boost security ROI. Zabbix offers economical setup and operations, delivering excellent ROI for organizations prioritizing monitoring without high financial outlays. Splunk's value is seen in its data analytics and security insights, while Zabbix is best for those seeking robust monitoring at reduced costs.
The documentation for Splunk Enterprise Security is outstanding. It is well-organized and easy to access.
We couldn't calculate what would have been the cost if they had actually gotten compromised; however, they were in the process, so every investment was returned immediately.
On average, my SecOps team takes probably at least a quarter of the time, if not more, to remediate security incidents with Splunk Enterprise Security compared to our previous solution.
We have paid for Splunk support, and we’re not on the free tier hoping for assistance; we are a significant customer and invest a lot in this service.
I have had nothing but good experiences with Splunk support, receiving timely and helpful replies.
We've had great customer success managers who have helped us navigate scaling from 600 gigs to 30 terabytes.
It is so straightforward that I have never had to use the support.
We currently rely on disaster recovery and backup recovery, which takes time to recover, during which you're basically blind, so I'm pushing my leadership team to switch over to a clustering environment for constant availability.
It is one of the things that separates it from other tooling, and if not, it is the most scalable solution out there.
They struggle a bit with pure virtual environments, but in terms of how much they can handle, it is pretty good.
Zabbix is very scalable and lightweight.
Zabbix has high scalability.
I would rate its scalability ten out of ten.
They test it very thoroughly before release, and our customers have Splunk running for months without issues.
Splunk has been very reliable and very consistent.
We need more SMEs, and there is no mechanism to tell us about indexer or search head issues.
Zabbix is very scalable and lightweight.
Zabbix is quite stable, and we haven't had any problems with Zabbix itself.
I think the stability of Zabbix is around five to six on a scale of ten, where ten is the best and one is the worst.
Improving the infrastructure behind Splunk Enterprise Security is vital—enhanced cores, CPUs, and memory should be prioritized to support better processing power.
Splunk Enterprise Security is not something that automatically picks things; you have to set up use cases, update data models, and link the right use cases to the right data models for those detections to happen.
For any future enhancements or features, such as MLTK and SOAR platform integration, we need more visibility, training, and certification for the skilled professionals who are working.
The only issue I can note is that it's Linux-based, and Linux documentation is not the best.
The potential and customization is a little difficult because you have to learn scripts.
I saw clients spend two million dollars a year just feeding data into the Splunk solution.
The platform requires significant financial investment and resources, making it expensive despite its comprehensive features.
I find it to be affordable, which is why every industry uses it.
Zabbix is providing everything free of cost.
It is literally free.
This capability is useful for performance monitoring and issue identification.
I assess Splunk Enterprise Security's insider threat detection capabilities for helping to find unknown threats and anomalous user behavior as great.
Splunk Enterprise Security provides the foundation for unified threat detection, investigation, and response, enabling fast identification of critical issues.
If disk usage surpasses a threshold, say 70%, I receive alerts and can take proactive action.
Zabbix has a lot of features, including monitoring, status updates, and collecting information telemetry from storages and servers as well.
Zabbix is Linux-based open-source software, and the main use case is to reduce costs.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Splunk Enterprise Security | 7.1% |
| Wazuh | 6.4% |
| IBM Security QRadar | 5.4% |
| Other | 81.1% |
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Zabbix | 5.7% |
| SolarWinds NPM | 3.4% |
| PRTG Network Monitor | 3.3% |
| Other | 87.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 109 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 50 |
| Large Enterprise | 264 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 56 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
Splunk Enterprise Security delivers powerful log management, rapid searches, and intuitive dashboards, enhancing real-time analytics and security measures. Its advanced machine learning and wide system compatibility streamline threat detection and incident response across diverse IT environments.
Splunk Enterprise Security stands out in security operations with robust features like comprehensive threat intelligence and seamless data integration. Its real-time analytics and customizable queries enable proactive threat analysis and efficient incident response. Integration with multiple third-party feeds allows detailed threat correlation and streamlined data visualization. Users find the intuitive UI and broad compatibility support efficient threat detection while reducing false positives. Despite its strengths, areas such as visualization capabilities and integration processes with cloud environments need enhancement. Users face a high learning curve, and improvements in automation, AI, documentation, and training are desired to maximize its potential.
What Are the Key Features of Splunk Enterprise Security?In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Splunk Enterprise Security is instrumental for log aggregation, SIEM functionalities, and compliance monitoring. Companies leverage its capabilities for proactive threat analysis and response, ensuring comprehensive security monitoring and integration with various tools for heightened operational intelligence.
Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.
It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.
With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.