Superhuman vs Zimbra Collaboration comparison

"The best feature about Superhuman is the fact that you don't have to manually go through your emails. This solution segregates your email according to your preferences and how you want to categorize emails."

"It is fast, and it increases your productivity."

"Network NG Modules are valuable to us."

"Zimbra Collaboration's sharing features are most valuable."

"The most valuable feature is sending messages as well as text and documents. It's a big solution for us since internal communication is a must in our organization."

"The product is easy to set up."

"Zimbra Collaboration is light to manage. It works on the Linux operating system, which is far better to manage than Microsoft Windows. Microsoft Exchange works only on the Windows server. We prefer working on the Linux server for security reasons and ease of management. Zimbra Collaboration also has some integrated tools for security. It some modules to fight malware. These modules are not very powerful but are still doing a great job. Microsoft Exchange doesn't have a basic module. You have to purchase a security solution and add it to the solution. The cost of Zimbra Collaboration is one more reason for liking it. It is also very simple to migrate from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution."

"The solution is easy to implement."

"The backup and storage management features of Zimbra Collaboration are valuable."

"It has all collaboration features, such as document sharing, video conferencing, chatting, task sharing, and calendar sharing."

"Superhuman could be improved by being made available across a broader range of devices including Android and Windows PCs."

"It can have a few more integrations. As far as I know, it is being integrated with Salesforce."

"I can confidently say that Zimbra is good enough for 2,000 client users. But, at the same time, if my client needs more than that and we have two options—Zimbra or Microsoft—I'm going with Microsoft because many admins will speak to Microsoft's ability to handle that many."

"Zimbra Collaboration could improve the migration from a basic solution to a more containerized solution. For example, the installation should be able to extend to the containers and manage them with some solution, such as OpenShift or Kubernetes."

"The solution’s forums don't have much information or documentation on administration tasks."

"The support was lacking in my experience. However, recently the support I received was good. Perhaps they have improved."

"The product must be more customizable."

"The tool should improve its multi-cloud feature."

"They should enhance its online meeting features."

"There are some security issues."

"It is fairly expensive. They have monthly and yearly licensing options."

"Zimbra Collaboration is expensive, and there is no perpetual license option."

"We are using perpetual licenses. We have deployed it in our local data center, and we buy perpetual licenses on a per-user basis."

"Zimbra Collaboration offers a good price-to-feature ratio."

"If you choose the network edition, it is a little pricier. They have the open-source edition too which is only community supported."

"The solution is competitively priced."

"We do not pay for licenses to use this solution."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the price a four"

"The price of the solution is low."