IceWarp vs Zimbra Collaboration comparison

IceWarp and Zimbra are both solutions in the Email Applications category. IceWarp is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Zimbra is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. IceWarp holds a 5.1% mindshare in EA, compared to Zimbra’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of IceWarp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Zimbra users who would recommend it.

IceWarp

Read 17 IceWarp reviews

2,617 Views
2,094 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Zimbra Collaboration

Read 29 Zimbra Collaboration reviews

2,651 Views
2,518 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IceWarp

Zimbra Collaboration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Zimbra Collaboration and IceWarp compete in the collaborative software market. IceWarp appeals with its extensive feature set, while Zimbra attracts those looking for competitive pricing and support.

Features: Zimbra Collaboration is known for its comprehensive email and calendaring features with effective platform integration. The system is designed with real-time control through its management console, offering premium features like mobile management and seamless synchronization. It's valued for its open-source nature and customizable options, facilitating robust collaboration features. IceWarp provides strong email capabilities and an all-encompassing suite boasting instant messaging and video conferencing, alongside tools for smart document management and team chat features that enable file sharing and real-time collaboration.

Room for Improvement: Zimbra could enhance ease of use for non-technical users, improve its two-factor authentication system, and offer better document collaboration tools compared to cloud giants like Microsoft and Google. IceWarp faces challenges with the advancement of its document management tools, needs more comprehensive smart document archiving features, and could benefit from providing more extensive customization options beyond current implementations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zimbra stands out with its open-source platform that supports scalability and benefits from a community-driven support mechanism. Its deployment is straightforward with comprehensive documentation. IceWarp offers a flexible deployment process with typically faster setup periods, complemented by professional customer service that assists with configuration and troubleshooting needs.

Pricing and ROI: Zimbra offers lower initial setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious buyers seeking quick ROI while maintaining high functionality standards. It provides an affordable alternative for organizations mindful of software expenses. IceWarp may involve higher initial investments, yet its extensive feature set is designed to provide substantial long-term ROI for businesses that value integrated communication solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed IceWarp vs. Zimbra Collaboration Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IceWarp vs. Zimbra Collaboration

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IceWarp

Ranking in Email Applications

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zimbra Collaboration

Ranking in Email Applications

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Email Applications category, the mindshare of IceWarp is 5.1%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zimbra Collaboration is 8.6%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Applications

Featured Reviews

AvinashLotke

Delivery Head at Team Computers

Useful for collaboration and storage but improvement is needed in API integration

The solution has traditional SSL integration, SAML, and Federation Services. In its latest version, it added SAML integration. However, it needs to work on API integration, especially for dashboards or integration with SAP for log and data system management. It doesn't yet have the kind of API that Google and Microsoft provide for synchronizing users with Active Directory. I think IceWarp needs to improve in a few areas. They have two types of admin consoles - a web-based one and a remote one. I'd like to see these combined into a single web-based admin console. The log reading and information system also needs improvement. The current way of showing incoming and outgoing logs isn't very clear. For new users, it's hard to understand these logs, especially compared to Office 365 and other systems with easier-to-read logs. They should also add an export option to get all logs with a single click whenever we need them.

Read full review

Vidya Shree

CTO at Molecular Connections Private Limited

Deploys quickly and has a good web interface

Zimbra Collaboration has a good web interface When it comes to administration tasks like configuring specific filters or group signatures, I have to dig into the configuration since there's nothing in the graphical or web interface. The solution’s forums don't have much information or…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IceWarp has multiple applications that are easy to use for many people."

"The most valuable feature of IceWarp is the chat rooms and file-sharing, they are useful. It is convenient that everything is in one place. You can easily share and collaborate documents, making the program's unity a significant advantage."

"It's scalable and stable."

"The solution has a very good log-in to the UI when compared to other solutions."

"The solution is easy to manage and includes features such as smart documents and the archiving of user data."

"The product is used very extensively in my company since we have around 1,500 users using it. Also, there is no requirement for any administrators to manage the product by the people who own the solution."

"The solution's voice services work well for our company."

"It has great communication capabilities for team chatting and web conferences."

More IceWarp pros

"The stability is good and keeps getting better with each new update."

"It has all collaboration features, such as document sharing, video conferencing, chatting, task sharing, and calendar sharing."

"The product is easy to set up."

"The backup and storage management features of Zimbra Collaboration are valuable."

"Zimbra Collaboration is light to manage. It works on the Linux operating system, which is far better to manage than Microsoft Windows. Microsoft Exchange works only on the Windows server. We prefer working on the Linux server for security reasons and ease of management. Zimbra Collaboration also has some integrated tools for security. It some modules to fight malware. These modules are not very powerful but are still doing a great job. Microsoft Exchange doesn't have a basic module. You have to purchase a security solution and add it to the solution. The cost of Zimbra Collaboration is one more reason for liking it. It is also very simple to migrate from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution."

"Zimbra Collaboration is a good tool for video calls...Zimbra Collaboration's initial setup phase was easy."

"One of the most valuable features involves the solution's automatic backup, which I find to be pretty simple and straightforward, and obviates the need for additional software."

"The Zimbra Collaboration's most valuable feature is web access."

More Zimbra Collaboration pros

Cons

"With multiple databases for VOIP, chat and web IMAP, maintenance is cumbersome."

"Our customers sometimes have problems receiving mail."

"I would like to have a trial for mobile applications and more documentation similar to Google Drive with mobile applications."

"The solution has traditional SSL integration, SAML, and Federation Services. In its latest version, it added SAML integration. However, it needs to work on API integration, especially for dashboards or integration with SAP for log and data system management. It doesn't yet have the kind of API that Google and Microsoft provide for synchronizing users with Active Directory."

"The solution needs improvements in security, particularly regarding document management."

"Although it is not a tool, video conferencing should be scalable and operate in a professional and efficient way."

"Although the documentation is extensive and in depth, you must familiarize yourself with it before taking full advantage of the product."

"The solution should improve the mailing list feature. Google has a similar feature where you can automate sending files to different people in a sequence, but that feature is no longer available in the current version of IceWarp. Other features may also have been removed in the current version."

More IceWarp cons

"We have had an issue with security."

"The antispam and antivirus features are hard to understand on mobile devices."

"It would be great if a group chat feature were created to allow for a team environment."

"The solution could improve by making it easier to use."

"There are some security issues."

"I can confidently say that Zimbra is good enough for 2,000 client users. But, at the same time, if my client needs more than that and we have two options—Zimbra or Microsoft—I'm going with Microsoft because many admins will speak to Microsoft's ability to handle that many."

"They should enhance its online meeting features."

"I would like to see a Microsoft schedule function added."

More Zimbra Collaboration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing and eight out of ten."

"The solution is inexpensive which is its main benefit."

"Price-wise, it's a cheaper solution, without a doubt. Price is the reason we are still using the tool."

"Our licensing is on a yearly basis. There were no additional costs."

"It is definitely one of the lowest price solutions."

"I don't see any challenges for the Indian market. For example, 1 GB is available for around 399 INR, and 2 GB for 499 INR. They offer a range of plans, from basic to professional and enterprise, with multiple features. IceWarp's aggressive pricing is competitive compared to other market solutions like Zoho and Microsoft. One significant advantage is that IceWarp does not impose user capping like Google and Microsoft, which allows for substantial cost savings and flexibility in user conversion."

"The solution is priced well."

"Pricing and licensing is very competitive and in some cases, cheap."

More IceWarp pricing and cost advice

"We pay yearly licenses for Zimbra Collaboration."

"The solution is competitively priced."

"I use Zimbra Collaboration's community version. We may move to the enterprise version since prices are affordable."

"The price of the solution is low."

"The solution is not expensive compared to other products."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the price a four"

"Zimbra Collaboration offers a good price-to-feature ratio."

"Zimbra Collaboration is less expensive than Microsoft Exchange. Zimbra works for small companies because it is not expensive. Zimbra Collaboration has more security tools than Microsoft Exchange. If you are choosing between Zimbra Collaboration and Microsoft Exchange, you have to take into account the cost of security tools with Microsoft Exchange. When you purchase Microsoft Exchange, you will also have to purchase tools for security, which adds to the cost. The migration from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution is very simple and easy. Migration from Microsoft Exchange to another email solution is very difficult. Microsoft doesn't allow migration that easily. In fact, you have to pay for tools to do that. You have to buy some expensive tools to migrate."

More Zimbra Collaboration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Applications solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IceWarp?

It's scalable and stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IceWarp?

IceWarp was very cost-effective, offering services at a significantly lower cost than Google, which was appealing for our organization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IceWarp?

The solution needs improvements in security, particularly regarding document management. Users currently have the rights to delete smart documents, which poses a challenge for administrators. A mor...

See all answers

How does Zimbra Collaboration compare with Microsoft Exchange?

Zimbra is a free, open source collaborative software suite. The features I like best are the ease of integration and the email, calendar, and collaboration server with web interface. In addition, I...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zimbra Collaboration?

The most valuable feature of Zimbra for our team's productivity is its efficiency in handling email communication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zimbra Collaboration?

The solution is competitively priced.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zoho Mail vs IceWarp

Compared 32% of the time

Google Workspace vs IceWarp

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Exchange vs IceWarp

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Exchange Online vs IceWarp

Compared 9% of the time

KerioConnect vs IceWarp

Compared 6% of the time

More IceWarp Competitors

Microsoft Exchange vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 27% of the time

Open-Xchange vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 22% of the time

KerioConnect vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Exchange Online vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 7% of the time

Google Workspace vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 7% of the time

More Zimbra Collaboration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IceWarp

July 2025

Download IceWarp product report

Buyer's Guide

Zimbra Collaboration

June 2025

Download Zimbra Collaboration product report

Overview

IceWarp helps thousands of organizations streamline all areas of business communication and become more profitable by providing Mail Server complete with GroupWare, Calendaring and Document Management, accessible through an intuitive WebClient, simple to setup in WebAdmin. Customize with add-ons: spam and virus protection, Instant Messaging with video calls, mobile sync and more.

IceWarp

Zimbra Collaboration provides administrators and their end users innovative features that solve the challenges faced by organizations using today's legacy communications infrastructure.

Zimbra

Sample Customers

Marriott, Toyota, Sony, Wendy's, Canon

NEC Biglobe, City of Ventura, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Hola Publishing, BIG, Sleepwell, LaFayette College, Xmission, DNA, Ring Line, Future Group, TIGC

Buyer's Guide

IceWarp vs. Zimbra Collaboration

July 2025

Free Report: IceWarp vs. Zimbra Collaboration

Find out what your peers are saying about IceWarp vs. Zimbra Collaboration and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IceWarp vs. Zimbra Collaboration report.

See our list of best Email Applications vendors.

We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.