IceWarp vs Zimbra Collaboration comparison

"The solution's voice services work well for our company."

"The groupware module is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature of IceWarp is the chat rooms and file-sharing, they are useful. It is convenient that everything is in one place. You can easily share and collaborate documents, making the program's unity a significant advantage."

"The product is used very extensively in my company since we have around 1,500 users using it. Also, there is no requirement for any administrators to manage the product by the people who own the solution."

"The TeamChat feature has been really good for our email management. It lets us collaborate, share files, and invite guests like Google Spaces or Microsoft Teams. I like the two-factor authentication for security. However, they need to improve their document collaboration tools, as their Word, Excel, and PowerPoint features are basic compared to Microsoft and Google."

"It has great communication capabilities for team chatting and web conferences."

"Its price is the most valuable. It is definitely one of the lowest price solutions."

"The solution has a very good log-in to the UI when compared to other solutions."

"The Zimbra Collaboration's most valuable feature is web access."

"The web interface is powerful and easy to use."

"Zimbra Collaboration is a good tool for video calls...Zimbra Collaboration's initial setup phase was easy."

"The most valuable feature of Zimbra Collaboration is the cost."

"It has all collaboration features, such as document sharing, video conferencing, chatting, task sharing, and calendar sharing."

"One of the premium features was customized rooms tailored to the collaboration needs. Many of the clients customize features such as organization logos and scanners."

"The backup and storage management features of Zimbra Collaboration are valuable."

"The solution is easy to implement."

"I would like to have a trial for mobile applications and more documentation similar to Google Drive with mobile applications."

"The solution has traditional SSL integration, SAML, and Federation Services. In its latest version, it added SAML integration. However, it needs to work on API integration, especially for dashboards or integration with SAP for log and data system management. It doesn't yet have the kind of API that Google and Microsoft provide for synchronizing users with Active Directory."

"The solution needs improvements in security, particularly regarding document management."

"Our customers sometimes have problems receiving mail."

"Although the documentation is extensive and in depth, you must familiarize yourself with it before taking full advantage of the product."

"The exchange compatibility mode is rather limited. Their technical support can also be better. They only provide online support, and there should be some option for escalating."

"With multiple databases for VOIP, chat and web IMAP, maintenance is cumbersome."

"Support should be improved. Most of the time, the queries are not resolved within the SLA."

"The support was lacking in my experience. However, recently the support I received was good. Perhaps they have improved."

"Zimbra Collaboration could improve the migration from a basic solution to a more containerized solution. For example, the installation should be able to extend to the containers and manage them with some solution, such as OpenShift or Kubernetes."

"The solution could improve by making it easier to use."

"It does have a few bugs."

"It is good and competent, but you have to pay for video and group chat features."

"We have had an issue with security."

"The antispam and antivirus features are hard to understand on mobile devices."

"The installation is not straightforward, it can take two days for the full implementation."

"Costs far less than other solutions."

"The solution is priced well."

"Price-wise, it's a cheaper solution, without a doubt. Price is the reason we are still using the tool."

"It is definitely one of the lowest price solutions."

"Our licensing is on a yearly basis. There were no additional costs."

"There are various licensing plans available based on geographic zone."

"The license is based on the number of users."

"The solution is inexpensive which is its main benefit."

"The solution is not expensive compared to other products."

"Zimbra Collaboration is less expensive than Microsoft Exchange. Zimbra works for small companies because it is not expensive. Zimbra Collaboration has more security tools than Microsoft Exchange. If you are choosing between Zimbra Collaboration and Microsoft Exchange, you have to take into account the cost of security tools with Microsoft Exchange. When you purchase Microsoft Exchange, you will also have to purchase tools for security, which adds to the cost. The migration from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution is very simple and easy. Migration from Microsoft Exchange to another email solution is very difficult. Microsoft doesn't allow migration that easily. In fact, you have to pay for tools to do that. You have to buy some expensive tools to migrate."

"The price of the solution is low."

"We do not pay for licenses to use this solution."

"It's very expensive. When we compare the cost with Google Workspace, it's so expensive."

"There is an annual standard licensing fee to use Zimbra Collaboration and there is no other cost."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the price a four"

"We are using perpetual licenses. We have deployed it in our local data center, and we buy perpetual licenses on a per-user basis."