IceWarp vs Zimbra Collaboration comparison

"The product is used very extensively in my company since we have around 1,500 users using it. Also, there is no requirement for any administrators to manage the product by the people who own the solution."

"An effective, functional, very good tool for controlling resources."

"It's scalable and stable."

"The solution is easy to manage and includes features such as smart documents and the archiving of user data."

"The most valuable feature of IceWarp is the chat rooms and file-sharing, they are useful. It is convenient that everything is in one place. You can easily share and collaborate documents, making the program's unity a significant advantage."

"It has great communication capabilities for team chatting and web conferences."

"The solution's voice services work well for our company."

"Its price is the most valuable. It is definitely one of the lowest price solutions."

"A lot of other products like Microsoft Exchange offer email or collaboration features, but they are not as fast as Zimbra."

"The configuration is simple."

"The solution is easy to implement."

"One of the premium features was customized rooms tailored to the collaboration needs. Many of the clients customize features such as organization logos and scanners."

"The web interface is powerful and easy to use."

"Network NG Modules are valuable to us."

"Zimbra Collaboration has integrated a lot of their party tools and they have good documentation available."

"Good email solution and it's open-source."

"Although it is not a tool, video conferencing should be scalable and operate in a professional and efficient way."

"The solution has traditional SSL integration, SAML, and Federation Services. In its latest version, it added SAML integration. However, it needs to work on API integration, especially for dashboards or integration with SAP for log and data system management. It doesn't yet have the kind of API that Google and Microsoft provide for synchronizing users with Active Directory."

"The solution needs improvements in security, particularly regarding document management."

"It is difficult to disable user rights on the console so some users accidentally delete their documents or user details."

"The exchange compatibility mode is rather limited. Their technical support can also be better. They only provide online support, and there should be some option for escalating."

"The tool's configuration capabilities are not straightforward. Apart from that, if I want to archive emails into a vault so that they can be retrieved again later, the integration doesn't work, and IceWarp crashes."

"I would like to have a trial for mobile applications and more documentation similar to Google Drive with mobile applications."

"Although the documentation is extensive and in depth, you must familiarize yourself with it before taking full advantage of the product."

"We have had an issue with security."

"I can confidently say that Zimbra is good enough for 2,000 client users. But, at the same time, if my client needs more than that and we have two options—Zimbra or Microsoft—I'm going with Microsoft because many admins will speak to Microsoft's ability to handle that many."

"In the next release, Zimbra Collaboration should include a security feature to allow access for mobile device administrators."

"Some issues cause the solution not to function correctly or to cause downtime once a month."

"There are some security issues."

"The installation is not straightforward, it can take two days for the full implementation."

"It would be great if a group chat feature were created to allow for a team environment."

"Zimbra Collaboration does not have a solution roadmap as aggressive as the new collaboration mail solutions. Additionally, they can have a better interface and integration with single sign-on."

"There are various licensing plans available based on geographic zone."

"Costs far less than other solutions."

"The solution is inexpensive which is its main benefit."

"Price-wise, it's a cheaper solution, without a doubt. Price is the reason we are still using the tool."

"I don't see any challenges for the Indian market. For example, 1 GB is available for around 399 INR, and 2 GB for 499 INR. They offer a range of plans, from basic to professional and enterprise, with multiple features. IceWarp's aggressive pricing is competitive compared to other market solutions like Zoho and Microsoft. One significant advantage is that IceWarp does not impose user capping like Google and Microsoft, which allows for substantial cost savings and flexibility in user conversion."

"It is definitely one of the lowest price solutions."

"The solution is priced well."

"Pricing and licensing is very competitive and in some cases, cheap."

"I use Zimbra Collaboration's community version. We may move to the enterprise version since prices are affordable."

"Zimbra Collaboration offers a good price-to-feature ratio."

"Zimbra Collaboration is less expensive than Microsoft Exchange. Zimbra works for small companies because it is not expensive. Zimbra Collaboration has more security tools than Microsoft Exchange. If you are choosing between Zimbra Collaboration and Microsoft Exchange, you have to take into account the cost of security tools with Microsoft Exchange. When you purchase Microsoft Exchange, you will also have to purchase tools for security, which adds to the cost. The migration from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution is very simple and easy. Migration from Microsoft Exchange to another email solution is very difficult. Microsoft doesn't allow migration that easily. In fact, you have to pay for tools to do that. You have to buy some expensive tools to migrate."

"There is an annual standard licensing fee to use Zimbra Collaboration and there is no other cost."

"We pay yearly licenses for Zimbra Collaboration."

"We do not pay for licenses to use this solution."

"The solution is competitively priced."

"Zimbra Collaboration is expensive, and there is no perpetual license option."