No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IceWarp vs Microsoft Exchange comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IceWarp
Ranking in Email Applications
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Exchange
Ranking in Email Applications
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
95
Ranking in other categories
Wireless Email (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Email Applications category, the mindshare of IceWarp is 4.7%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Exchange is 6.9%, down from 11.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Email Applications Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Exchange6.9%
IceWarp4.7%
Other88.4%
Email Applications
 

Featured Reviews

AvinashLotke - PeerSpot reviewer
Delivery Head at Team Computers
Useful for collaboration and storage but improvement is needed in API integration
The solution has traditional SSL integration, SAML, and Federation Services. In its latest version, it added SAML integration. However, it needs to work on API integration, especially for dashboards or integration with SAP for log and data system management. It doesn't yet have the kind of API that Google and Microsoft provide for synchronizing users with Active Directory. I think IceWarp needs to improve in a few areas. They have two types of admin consoles - a web-based one and a remote one. I'd like to see these combined into a single web-based admin console. The log reading and information system also needs improvement. The current way of showing incoming and outgoing logs isn't very clear. For new users, it's hard to understand these logs, especially compared to Office 365 and other systems with easier-to-read logs. They should also add an export option to get all logs with a single click whenever we need them.
AS
Bookkeeper at FCA - Victoria Point
Reliable email service has supported consistent communication and improved user training
I do use Cisco Secure Email, Grafis, and Proofpoint Email Protection when needed, but we were using Proofpoint before, and we are no longer using it. I am currently using Microsoft Exchange as our email solution. We are a client of Microsoft; there is no partnership between my company and Microsoft. My experience with Microsoft Exchange is as good as the generic email. I do not use Microsoft Exchange to synchronize emails across devices, and it is not part of my workflow. The protocols I mostly use with Microsoft Exchange for integration are SMTP. I do not use the shared calendars feature in Microsoft Exchange. Data loss prevention is something we are not really using or utilizing at the moment. My overall review rating for Microsoft Exchange is 8.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is inexpensive which is its main benefit."
"If you have a small to medium business and you require a professional collaboration server that focuses on the main services of emails and calendar scheduling, I recommend IceWarp."
"The solution is easy to manage and includes features such as smart documents and the archiving of user data."
"It's scalable and stable."
"IceWarp offers very extended cross-platform communication solutions."
"The most valuable feature of IceWarp is the chat rooms and file-sharing, they are useful. It is convenient that everything is in one place. You can easily share and collaborate documents, making the program's unity a significant advantage."
"It has great communication capabilities for team chatting and web conferences."
"As the license of our company is very affordable per year and per user, and considering the almost-zero administration needs, I would say that the cost is returned in the first three months, compared to other solutions."
"Exchange is a very good Microsoft product, and it's very stable."
"Microsoft Exchange is highly stable for the end-user systems. When we move to Office 365, it will be even more stable even. There's less administration required and it's very robust. We are really quite happy in using that."
"This is a good product but our version is reaching end-of-life."
"Technical support is good."
"Customers can benefit from this new pricing model because it's expensive, and now with the subscription, they can budget for this."
"Overall, I am satisfied with the product."
"Microsoft Exchange is a user-friendly and easy-to-deploy solution, which is beneficial for handling emails even without professional support."
"Internal communication stability within Exchange is ensured by the stability of the internal network which is guaranteed by default."
 

Cons

"The Exchange compatibility mode is rather limited."
"Support is not good and it is challenging to receive a timely response."
"Support should be improved. Most of the time, the queries are not resolved within the SLA."
"I would like to have a trial for mobile applications and more documentation similar to Google Drive with mobile applications."
"Although the documentation is extensive and in depth, you must familiarize yourself with it before taking full advantage of the product."
"The database query for creating new database and querying about activities are too simplistic."
"There are some feature improvements possible the way we use it as a hosting provider, but for most we currently have workarounds."
"Although it is not a tool, video conferencing should be scalable and operate in a professional and efficient way."
"Its search functionality can be better. It is currently not really easy."
"The cost could be cheaper."
"From a security point of view, Microsoft should enhance the new features. Technical support could also be better."
"The default storage capacity is too small."
"One thing for improvement would be to have an offline version of Exchange available for use if our connection goes down."
"The only thing that could be improved is the pricing."
"Microsoft Exchange could improve by being more secure. We are always looking to have more security."
"There is a lot of spam email that comes in, so they should add functionality to help fix this problem."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing and eight out of ten."
"The solution is inexpensive which is its main benefit."
"The license is based on the number of users."
"Costs far less than other solutions."
"The solution is priced well."
"I don't see any challenges for the Indian market. For example, 1 GB is available for around 399 INR, and 2 GB for 499 INR. They offer a range of plans, from basic to professional and enterprise, with multiple features. IceWarp's aggressive pricing is competitive compared to other market solutions like Zoho and Microsoft. One significant advantage is that IceWarp does not impose user capping like Google and Microsoft, which allows for substantial cost savings and flexibility in user conversion."
"Price-wise, it's a cheaper solution, without a doubt. Price is the reason we are still using the tool."
"Our licensing is on a yearly basis. There were no additional costs."
"I rate Microsoft Exchange's pricing a six out of ten."
"The solution is expensive to maintain because it requires frequent updates and ongoing server maintenance."
"We can get Exchange in the cloud along with the Microsoft 365 license."
"I don't have enough information about the licensing costs of Microsoft Exchange, but I do know that you need two types of licenses to run it. You need the product key and the client access key to activate Microsoft Exchange. This means that apart from the standard Microsoft Exchange licensing fees, you have to pay additional costs."
"It's working very well. There is no problem, but the price is not the best."
"Compared to the other options in the market, the licensing costs attached to Microsoft Exchange seem reasonable."
"They are flexible when it comes to pricing, unlike most of the other vendors I have dealt with."
"We pay for the license annually."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Applications solutions are best for your needs.
921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business43
Midsize Enterprise28
Large Enterprise35
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Zimbra Collaboration compare with Microsoft Exchange?
Zimbra is a free, open source collaborative software suite. The features I like best are the ease of integration and the email, calendar, and collaboration server with web interface. In addition, I...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Exchange?
I am aware of pricing aspects, and I would say it is affordable for what it is.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Exchange?
I see some drawbacks and areas for improvement; the quarantining is not fantastic. I think the quarantining is not fantastic because it lets a lot of spam through, and when it is notified of spam, ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Exchange, MS Exchange
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Marriott, Toyota, Sony, Wendy's, Canon
Paderborn-Lippstadt Airport, Scitec Nutrition, British Airways, InnoGames, Osteology Foundation, Franz Haniel & Cie. GmbH, NTC Contracting
Find out what your peers are saying about IceWarp vs. Microsoft Exchange and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.