Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Symantec Endpoint Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
12th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
142
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Endpoint Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
98
Ranking in other categories
Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security is 4.1%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security is 3.3%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Q&A Highlights

it_user570909 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 27, 2017
 

Featured Reviews

Hakeem_Abdulkareem - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution has given us visibility into compliance within our whole system and helped us ensure everything is updated
Symantec's application security module needs some improvement. You need to create a lot of fingerprints for application security. For instance, let's say I have different brands of ATMs in my environment, like Wincor and NCR. I use GRG to deploy an application control to whitelist some applications. I have to get the exact image of the different models of ATMs. When I tested in the past, some machines would not connect to the server without that. Only the approved software on the ATM should run. Anything outside that should not even come up at all. We did this so that an outside person doesn't introduce malicious software to the ATM. That's the essence of locking down with application control. Using Symantec for application control has been hectic, so I use Carbon Black to do the lockdown. Checking that data security will work fine with Carbon Black. Carbon Black worked fine. Setting up approval in Carbon Black works differently than Symantec. In Symantec, we first need the fingerprints of the applications running underneath. Before setting up Carbon Black, you first install the agent, allowing it to learn the environment. It will analyze all the software's behavior and provide recommendations for what should be allowed. It's more straightforward, whereas configuring application control in Symantec is a bit cumbersome.
AhmedEl-Tayeb - PeerSpot reviewer
Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services
Some of our products have a first and second line owned by us. We are giving support services to the customers instead of the vendor. Some other products are supported directly by the technology vendor, however. Technical support from the vendor is very bad. Usually, when the customer submits a ticket, they put a severity level on the case. Whenever the case is very important, and there is a real malfunction in the product on the customer side, and there is something down that needs someone to have a look immediately, it takes more time than it should to even engage with the customer. When someone has to contact the customer and have a remote session within the customer environment, they sometimes lack in terms of communication with the customer. The support centers are located in the East and not all have an acceptable level of English in order to communicate directly with the customer.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution detects malware very well."
"It seems to be user-friendly. Our users seem to like it for the most part."
"The solution can be scaled to handle different threats."
"It is very easy to managing everything in relation to the implementation and processing. The initial setup is very easy."
"The solutions' main features are patch management and security."
"Some of the most valuable features were antivirus, malware, and spyware. They were really good."
"It's good at detecting signature-based stuff and stopping that."
"The best thing about Symantec is its ability to control our endpoints from a single point. You can manage the antivirus definitions, upgrades, remote scanning, etc., from one console."
"The solution includes a good combination of features for both signature and signature-less."
"The solution provides dashboard control, so we can centrally monitor the entire status of our organization."
"The solution provides a data view of the Alpha systems with Trellix installs and makes small changes to the central management console. Nothing on the endpoints themselves works, but it focuses more on the management side."
"We can manage everything from the central console and it is very easy."
"The detection is great and the solution is constantly improving."
"I have found the most valuable features to be the ability to manage the solution from anywhere and having an overview of the companies security."
"The solution offers very good endpoint security."
"Their malware detection rate is excellent for all type of devices and the anti-theft products are good and easy to use."
 

Cons

"The solution could improve by having a better graphical interface."
"The malware and ransomware protections could be improved, which was ultimately the reason why I stopped using the solution."
"About four years back, Symantec's signature was very heavy and their signature patch was around 200MB or 300MB files."
"In a few cases, when we enable the IPS/IDS feature, there are performance-related issues on the end devices. If we run quite a few features of Symantec, especially the IPS/IDF, it consumes a lot of processing and memory capacity."
"The stability was not the best. There were times when antivirus updates broke it. It wasn't necessarily self-updating - at least, not in terms of the virus signatures. It updated in terms of the executable files. Therefore, when Windows updates would come out, they often couldn't be installed, or the computer would hang due to the fact that the updates weren't compatible with the antivirus."
"The areas that need improvement include scanning issues, application control issues, and the detection of malicious files."
"I would like to be able to migrate to the cloud so that the end-users outside the company offices don't need a VPN to connect to the Symantec server to update the policies. They should be able to connect to the admin center directly through the internet to get updated policies. There is some integration issue with the other security appliances or tools. Other hardware, firewall, or Network Detection and Response (NDR) solution vendors are not willing to integrate with Symantec. They only mention products from other vendors such as CrowdStrike and Carbon Black. Symantec is not there. Symantec should work on integration with products from other security vendors."
"Future releases should ideally be cheaper."
"The initial setup is complex. It is a very complex product. You must have experience with it."
"McAfee Endpoint Protection could improve the word control feature."
"They can improve its resource consumption, such as memory, and maybe provide better or smaller updates. It always takes a lot of resources, but it has been getting better. I have been using McAfee products for the last 20 years or so, and I know it is getting better."
"The local technical support could be better."
"With McAfee, if there is a zero-day vulnerability, you have to download the patch for it from the McAfee website, then apply it to your endpoint."
"The product could do more to keep administration alerted to detected threats on endpoints."
"There is room to improve with scalability."
"Its pricing needs to be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Symantec End-User Endpoint Security is okay. When comparing the price of this solution is not expensive."
"I rate the product's pricing a six out of ten."
"It's pretty awesome price-wise. That's why we give it to most of our clients. It isn't very expensive. Compared to Cisco AMP, which is very expensive, its price is okay. It's also cheaper than Malwarebytes."
"Its price is reasonable."
"The price of the solution could be less expensive."
"Symantec Endpoint Security is an expensive solution."
"I thought the pricing was reasonable."
"Symantec Endpoint Security's pricing is okay. It is cheaper compared to other products."
"Its price is very high. It is higher than its competitors, and it should be less."
"It's fairly priced compared to other products on the market."
"No comment."
"For each computer that is connected to the server McAfee charges us for each computer based on our license agreement."
"When comparing the solution to others it is a bit expensive. We are on a monthly license."
"There are some extra expenses for using the product, in addition to licensing related to the maintenance of the product."
"There is a one-year and a three-year license available for this solution, we are currently on a three-year license."
"The pricing is great and licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

it_user570909 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 27, 2017
Apr 27, 2017
Hello Santosh, our CEB (Complete Endpoint Protection - Business) Suite has encryption and 2 next gen features (Real Protect and Dynamic Application Containment, DAC for short). Here is more info to reference: https://www.mcafee.com/us/products/endpoint-protection/index.aspx I hope this helps.
2 out of 13 answers
it_user477966 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 15, 2016
Hi, I never use that software. Saludos. Byron Oña Asistente de Sistemas - Departamento ITT [cid:image001.jpg@01CCCAB8.D3EAB7B0]ADC&HAS Management Ecuador S.A. Telef: (593 2) 3954-300 Ext. 2758 Email: byron.ona@adc-has.com [cid:image002.jpg@01CCCAB8.D3EAB7B0] De: Ariel Lindenfeld from IT Central Station [mailto:site-admin@itcentralstation.com] Enviado el: jueves, 15 de diciembre de 2016 12:19 Para: Byron Oña Asunto: Seeking expertise in Data Loss Protection Hi, Can you help out a colleague with the following question about Data Loss Protection: ----- Symantec Endpoint vs. McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection: Technical Comparison Between Data Loss Protection Solutions I'm looking for a technical comparison between these products. I would like it to include information about features, limitations, system requirements and costs? ----- Please reply to this email with your response or post your answer here. User's background: User at a tech services company with 1000+ employees You've been a member of IT Central Station since July 2016. In a market full of vendor hype, we provide free connections between real users of Data Loss Protection to share advice and make better buying decisions. Thanks for being part of the community, Ariel Lindenfeld Community Director, IT Central Station IT Central Station 244 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10001 (646) 328-1944 um-nqn 159322 To change notifications, please visit your subscription page or unsubscribe completely from similar emails. gitbdelN1k0T0xsT25wWWF2SjhRK1BNYnZLcnU2WUZnNVBKU2VNYitxTDVDWnNVK3lTQnRVL2hURlBmMlFWYXM3Slp3Ky0tN3gzWkNtSm5ENVpKNDU0WVF3UUJVQT09--338af0f0b06b28f107b0a5109b050c4aa0d06b8dgitbdel Powered by Trend Micro ISMVA Email Scanner ADC-HAS & Quiport
it_user474720 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 15, 2016
Unfortunately no I can’t for these particular products.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
42%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Cortex XDR or Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...
Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?
We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...
What do you like most about Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Symantec have everything – documentation, videos, data sheets.
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?
The license costs are very reasonable, around 1,000 to 1,200 rupees per year.
 

Also Known As

Symantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Total Protection for Endpoint, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, MCAFEE Complete Endpoint Protection
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.