Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo

Top 10 Symantec Endpoint Security Alternatives

Vendor: Broadcom
3.8 out of 5
4,677 followers
Post review

Top Symantec Endpoint Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Symantec Endpoint Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Cisco Secure Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Broadcom Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Broadcom, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security attracts users with its extensive feature set and integration capabilities. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels with advanced threat intelligence and seamless cloud deployment. Symantec is ideal for wide-ranging functionality, while CrowdStrike Falcon appeals to those prioritizing real-time threat intelligence and proactive support.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security setup cost is noted to be low, while CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is relatively higher. Users mention that Symantec is easier to implement compared to Falcon.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security setup cost is noted to be low, while CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is relatively higher. Users mention that Symantec is easier to implement compared to Falcon.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.0 out of 5

Symantec Endpoint Security is preferred over Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for its advanced threat detection capabilities, comprehensive coverage, and frequent updates. Microsoft Defender offers seamless integration and efficient support, Symantec's robust protection and user-friendly interface make it the top choice.

Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security's setup cost is justified by its strong features. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers competitive pricing with a reasonable setup cost. Symantec's licensing is flexible, while Microsoft's process is user-friendly.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security's setup cost is justified by its strong features. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers competitive pricing with a reasonable setup cost. Symantec's licensing is flexible, while Microsoft's process is user-friendly.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers a comprehensive unified approach featuring threat intelligence and behavior analytics. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint excels with advanced malware protection, sandboxing, and retrospective security. Symantec Endpoint Security needs optimization; Cisco Secure Endpoint requires enhanced detection capabilities. Users find Symantec straightforward to deploy; Cisco has superior service. Symantec provides competitive pricing; Cisco offers better ROI.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security users report lower setup costs, while Cisco Secure Endpoint setup costs are higher, indicating a significant price difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security users report lower setup costs, while Cisco Secure Endpoint setup costs are higher, indicating a significant price difference.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers robust malware protection and extensive reporting features. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in real-time AI threat detection and automated response. Symantec requires resource optimization and simpler management, while SentinelOne needs better feature customization and detailed alert information.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security features a moderate setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a more straightforward setup process with lower initial expenses, making them distinct in terms of cost and implementation complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security features a moderate setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a more straightforward setup process with lower initial expenses, making them distinct in terms of cost and implementation complexity.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers robust support and affordability, making it ideal for users seeking comprehensive threat detection and customizable policies. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient is favored for its advanced features, seamless integration, and higher perceived value, appealing to those prioritizing integration capabilities.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has moderate setup costs, while Fortinet FortiClient is generally considered to be more affordable during initial implementation. Fortinet FortiClient's cost efficiency stands out in comparison to Symantec's more considerable investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has moderate setup costs, while Fortinet FortiClient is generally considered to be more affordable during initial implementation. Fortinet FortiClient's cost efficiency stands out in comparison to Symantec's more considerable investment.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security stands out for affordability and customer support, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. Cortex XDR provides sophisticated features, advanced threat intelligence, and integration capabilities. In comparison, Cortex XDR's high cost is justified by its superior functionalities and advanced analytics.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. Symantec focuses on enterprise-level investment, whereas Cortex XDR is more accessible for smaller budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. Symantec focuses on enterprise-level investment, whereas Cortex XDR is more accessible for smaller budgets.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security excels in cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment, making it appealing for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint offers advanced threat detection and robust ransomware defenses, attracting tech buyers prioritizing cutting-edge security features and a strong return on investment.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has higher setup costs compared to Intercept X Endpoint, making Intercept X Endpoint a more budget-friendly option for installation and initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has higher setup costs compared to Intercept X Endpoint, making Intercept X Endpoint a more budget-friendly option for installation and initial setup.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security provides comprehensive threat detection and strong system integration. In comparison, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security delivers advanced analytics and cloud-based threat intelligence. Symantec offers competitive pricing, while Trend Vision One's advanced features provide substantial value for a higher cost. Symantec excels in ease of deployment and customer service, whereas Trend Vision One requires better documentation and support.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security's setup cost is higher compared to Trend Vision One Endpoint Security's more affordable setup fee. Significant differences in pricing are evident.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security's setup cost is higher compared to Trend Vision One Endpoint Security's more affordable setup fee. Significant differences in pricing are evident.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security provides robust pricing and support, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security excels in advanced features, justifying its higher cost. Symantec is perfect for straightforward deployment, while Trellix offers superior integration and machine learning capabilities.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security setup cost is often described as moderate and straightforward, while Trellix Endpoint Security setup cost is seen as higher and more complex.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security setup cost is often described as moderate and straightforward, while Trellix Endpoint Security setup cost is seen as higher and more complex.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security excels in pricing and customer support, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In contrast, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business attracts those seeking comprehensive features, including encryption and mobile security, even at a higher cost. Symantec's smooth deployment contrasts with Kaspersky's mixed feedback on customer service.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a relatively low setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business tends to have higher initial expenses. Symantec's affordability in installation contrasts with Kaspersky's more substantial upfront financial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a relatively low setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business tends to have higher initial expenses. Symantec's affordability in installation contrasts with Kaspersky's more substantial upfront financial investment.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers robust threat detection and policy management, ideal for users seeking comprehensive protection. In comparison, Tanium excels in asset management and real-time data. Symantec is easier to deploy, while Tanium provides long-term value despite higher costs.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Tanium Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost, whereas Tanium tends to be more expensive upfront. The difference in setup costs highlights Symantec's affordability compared to Tanium.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost, whereas Tanium tends to be more expensive upfront. The difference in setup costs highlights Symantec's affordability compared to Tanium.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is praised for affordability, simple management, and minimal system impact. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security stands out for advanced threat protection and detailed reporting, justifying its higher cost for those requiring comprehensive features and proactive security measures. ESET's smooth deployment contrasts Symantec's complex configuration yet strong support.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a low setup cost and straightforward installation, while Symantec Endpoint Security has higher initial expenses and a more complex setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a low setup cost and straightforward installation, while Symantec Endpoint Security has higher initial expenses and a more complex setup process.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers advanced threat protection and comprehensive device management, making it attractive for budget-conscious users due to its competitive pricing and ROI. In comparison, BigFix stands out with robust automation capabilities and real-time visibility, delivering significant long-term value despite a complex setup process.
Download BigFix vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to BigFix, which requires a higher initial investment. BigFix, however, comes with more comprehensive features that may justify its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to BigFix, which requires a higher initial investment. BigFix, however, comes with more comprehensive features that may justify its higher setup cost.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers ease of deployment and competitive pricing appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's advanced threat detection and real-time response justify its higher price. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides robust customer support to assist users with complex deployments.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Symantec Endpoint Security setup cost is reported as high, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a relatively lower setup cost by comparison.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security setup cost is reported as high, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a relatively lower setup cost by comparison.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security stands out for its competitive pricing and robust threat protection, making it a cost-effective choice. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint delivers advanced features such as anti-phishing and sandboxing techniques, justifying its higher cost with superior security functionalities and better overall protection.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has higher setup costs, whereas Check Point Harmony Endpoint is more cost-effective. Symantec's extensive features come at a premium, unlike Check Point's affordable pricing with essential functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has higher setup costs, whereas Check Point Harmony Endpoint is more cost-effective. Symantec's extensive features come at a premium, unlike Check Point's affordable pricing with essential functionalities.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security is praised for strong support and reasonable pricing, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Trellix ENS is recognized for superior features and performance, suggesting it may justify higher costs for those seeking advanced capabilities. Symantec offers straightforward deployment, while Trellix ENS provides robust ongoing support.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report
Symantec Endpoint Security is noted for its higher setup cost, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is recognized for a more affordable setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security is noted for its higher setup cost, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is recognized for a more affordable setup cost.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Comparing Symantec Endpoint Security and HP Wolf Security reveals significant differences. Symantec Endpoint Security offers advanced threat detection and multi-layered protection. In comparison, HP Wolf Security provides lightweight performance with micro-virtualization technology. Symantec's comprehensive features justify its higher cost, while HP's efficiency delivers better ROI.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to HP Wolf Security, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to HP Wolf Security, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat protection and detailed reporting at a cost-effective price. In comparison, Cynet’s advanced features like integrated EDR, NGAV, and deception technologies provide enhanced versatility and operational efficiency, making it a worthwhile investment despite its higher cost.
Download Cynet vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Cynet offers a more affordable setup cost. Symantec Endpoint Security is ideal for businesses willing to invest more upfront, whereas Cynet is suitable for budget-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Cynet offers a more affordable setup cost. Symantec Endpoint Security is ideal for businesses willing to invest more upfront, whereas Cynet is suitable for budget-conscious businesses.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers comprehensive protection and customizable settings, though it is complex and impacts system performance. In comparison, Malwarebytes is user-friendly with quick scanning but lacks enterprise-level features and reporting tools. Symantec is feature-rich but costly, while Malwarebytes balances affordability and effectiveness.
Download Malwarebytes vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has higher setup costs compared to Malwarebytes, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has higher setup costs compared to Malwarebytes, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
4.0 out of 5

Symantec Endpoint Security offers robust threat detection and real-time response. In comparison, Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response excels with advanced analytics and automated threat hunting. Symantec's pricing and support are appreciated, while Cybereason's features and ROI make it appealing for tech buyers seeking superior value.

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response offers a more budget-friendly setup. Symantec delivers extensive features, whereas Cybereason balances affordability with essential security functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response offers a more budget-friendly setup. Symantec delivers extensive features, whereas Cybereason balances affordability with essential security functionalities.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
Tech buyers favor Symantec Endpoint Security for its robust threat protection and competitive pricing. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity attracts those prioritizing advanced AI-driven threat detection, despite higher costs, by delivering substantial ROI through its proactive, predictive capabilities.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security is praised for its straightforward setup with low initial costs, while BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers a more complex installation process, resulting in higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security is praised for its straightforward setup with low initial costs, while BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers a more complex installation process, resulting in higher setup expenses.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
4.1 out of 5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 excels in automated threat detection and real-time monitoring. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security provides multi-layered security and extensive threat intelligence. Panda features straightforward deployment, while Symantec offers stronger support. Panda's cost-effectiveness contrasts with Symantec's comprehensive but pricier coverage.
Download Panda Adaptive Defense 360 vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 setup costs are low and straightforward, while Symantec Endpoint Security's setup costs are higher and more complex.
View comparison
Pricing
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 setup costs are low and straightforward, while Symantec Endpoint Security's setup costs are higher and more complex.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security excels in comprehensive threat detection and customer support, suitable for those needing advanced capabilities. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security offers competitive pricing and easier deployment, appealing to buyers prioritizing budget and implementation simplicity.
Download Seqrite Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has higher setup costs compared to Seqrite Endpoint Security. Seqrite offers more affordable initial setup, making it a budget-friendly choice.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has higher setup costs compared to Seqrite Endpoint Security. Seqrite offers more affordable initial setup, making it a budget-friendly choice.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat detection and management capabilities at a competitive price. In comparison, Deep Instinct Prevention Platform uses advanced deep learning algorithms for more effective threat prediction and prevention. While Symantec provides easier deployment, Deep Instinct delivers better performance and higher long-term ROI.
Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security setup cost is lower while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform setup cost is higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security setup cost is lower while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform setup cost is higher.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security excels in advanced threat protection and detailed reporting. In comparison, Webroot Business Endpoint Protection offers fast scans and minimal system impact. Symantec can be resource-intensive, while Webroot ensures quick deployment and ease of management, with Symantec having higher setup costs but Webroot lower maintenance requirements.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection offers a lower setup cost. The notable difference in setup expenses may significantly impact budgeting decisions.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection offers a lower setup cost. The notable difference in setup expenses may significantly impact budgeting decisions.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Norton Small Business
4.4 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security, with robust features and strong support, suits larger enterprises needing advanced threat protection and comprehensive management tools. In comparison, Norton Small Business offers essential security at a lower cost, ideal for smaller businesses seeking simplicity and effectiveness in deployment.
Download Norton Small Business vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Norton Small Business, making Symantec more suitable for organizations with larger budgets. The discrepancy in initial investment reflects the distinct target markets they cater to.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Norton Small Business, making Symantec more suitable for organizations with larger budgets. The discrepancy in initial investment reflects the distinct target markets they cater to.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers advanced threat detection and a comprehensive security suite. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client excels in real-time malware protection and easy integration. Symantec's customer support is highly regarded, whereas SonicWall provides competitive pricing and fast ROI with efficient malware prevention.
Download SonicWall Capture Client vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more affordable initial setup.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security excels in robust data protection and threat detection, making it suitable for those prioritizing comprehensive coverage and data loss prevention. In comparison, Trend Micro Smart Protection offers advanced machine learning and cloud security, appealing to tech buyers seeking proactive threat prevention and cost-effective solutions.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Symantec Endpoint Security's setup cost is higher, whereas Trend Micro Smart Protection offers a more budget-friendly option. Trend Micro's setup process is often described as straightforward, while Symantec is noted for its comprehensive installation steps.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security's setup cost is higher, whereas Trend Micro Smart Protection offers a more budget-friendly option. Trend Micro's setup process is often described as straightforward, while Symantec is noted for its comprehensive installation steps.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security is favored for its competitive pricing, comprehensive threat protection, and easy integration with existing infrastructure. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection stands out for its superior advanced threat detection capabilities, streamlined management, and higher long-term value despite higher initial costs.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report
Symantec Endpoint Security involves a significant setup cost, whereas WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection features a more moderate initial investment. Symantec is typically viewed as a higher-priced option compared to the more cost-effective WithSecure solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security involves a significant setup cost, whereas WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection features a more moderate initial investment. Symantec is typically viewed as a higher-priced option compared to the more cost-effective WithSecure solution.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti offers competitive pricing and superior customer support, making it ideal for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Symantec's advanced features and robust threat detection appeal to those needing comprehensive security. Ivanti's user-friendly management contrasts with Symantec's complex but powerful deployment. Ivanti is budget-friendly, while Symantec delivers extensive protection.
Download Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a moderate setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a moderate setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Security requires a higher initial investment.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
GravityZone Business Security
4.2 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat detection and mitigation with minimal impact on system performance. In comparison, GravityZone Business Security leverages advanced machine learning and integrated features for superior protection. Symantec's ease of deployment is notable, whereas GravityZone excels in intuitive setup and sophisticated features.
Download GravityZone Business Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while GravityZone Business Security offers a more budget-friendly option. Symantec provides extensive features, whereas GravityZone balances affordability and essential security functions.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while GravityZone Business Security offers a more budget-friendly option. Symantec provides extensive features, whereas GravityZone balances affordability and essential security functions.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security excels in seamless support and easy implementation. In comparison, NetWitness NDR stands out for advanced threat detection features. A tech buyer might choose Symantec for simple deployment, while NetWitness offers superior threat identification tools and strong ROI despite higher costs.
Download NetWitness NDR vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has lower setup costs, providing a more affordable initial investment, while NetWitness NDR, though more expensive to set up, offers a comprehensive threat detection solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has lower setup costs, providing a more affordable initial investment, while NetWitness NDR, though more expensive to set up, offers a comprehensive threat detection solution.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Sophos EPP Suite
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Sophos EPP Suite
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security is known for comprehensive coverage and advanced threat protection. In comparison, Sophos EPP Suite is praised for ease of use and innovative features. Symantec offers deeper threat visibility, whereas Sophos stands out with intuitive management and synchronized security options.
Download Sophos EPP Suite vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to Sophos EPP Suite.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to Sophos EPP Suite.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security excels in cost-effectiveness and customer support. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers advanced threat management and superior incident response tools. A tech buyer might choose Symantec for budget-friendly security or Kaspersky for cutting-edge threat protection.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security is praised for comprehensive threat detection and multi-layered defense while offering competitive pricing and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Morphisec impresses with its prevention-first approach and lightweight architecture, delivering superior ROI and minimal system impact despite higher cost.
Download Morphisec vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Morphisec, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Morphisec, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security excels in malware protection and ease of deployment, making it a robust choice for comprehensive security features. In comparison, Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers advanced threat prevention and cost-effectiveness, attracting users focused on sophisticated endpoint management and cost-efficient solutions.
Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection, which offers a more affordable setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection, which offers a more affordable setup option.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat detection and remediation, making it ideal for robust protection. In comparison, Avast Business Hub excels in ease of use and device management. Symantec emphasizes security prowess, while Avast appeals to those prioritizing usability and cost-effectiveness.
Download Avast Business Hub vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Avast Business Hub, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Avast Business Hub, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Stormshield Endpoint Security
4.0 out of 5
Stormshield Endpoint Security offers robust protection and user-friendly management, beneficial for its pricing and ease of deployment. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security delivers advanced threat detection and extensive integration, making it worth its initial cost and offering substantial ROI due to broader security measures and adaptability.
Download Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Stormshield Endpoint Security has lower initial setup costs compared to Symantec Endpoint Security, where the implementation expenses are higher. Symantec, however, offers more comprehensive setup support included in the price.
View comparison
Pricing
Stormshield Endpoint Security has lower initial setup costs compared to Symantec Endpoint Security, where the implementation expenses are higher. Symantec, however, offers more comprehensive setup support included in the price.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Nyotron PARANOID
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Nyotron PARANOID
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security excels with comprehensive threat detection and seamless integration. In comparison, Nyotron PARANOID offers unique prevention against unknown threats. Symantec’s straightforward deployment and strong customer service contrast with Nyotron’s intuitive setup and innovative yet resource-intensive security features.
Download Nyotron PARANOID vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost whereas Nyotron PARANOID is known for having a higher initial setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost whereas Nyotron PARANOID is known for having a higher initial setup expense.
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Carbonite Endpoint
1 out of 5

Carbonite Endpoint protection safeguards the data that resides on your organization’s computers, laptops, tablets and smartphones. Using file-level backup with patented global deduplication, Carbonite gives you the tools to manage bandwidth and accelerate data recovery speeds on distributed networks.

View comparison

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Identity Management (IM)
Threat Intelligence Platforms