Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Symantec Endpoint Security comparison

Kaspersky and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Kaspersky is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.7, while Broadcom is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7. Kaspersky holds a 0.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Kaspersky users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...
Read 19 Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum reviews
  • 1,798 Views
  • 1,243 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
Symantec Endpoint Security
Read 142 Symantec Endpoint Security reviews
  • 12,215 Views
  • 10,516 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Symantec Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum are two leading endpoint security solutions. While Kaspersky offers comprehensive features, Symantec outperforms in support, deployment ease, and pricing.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Security offers strong threat detection and response capabilities, seamless integration, and solid data protection. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum includes advanced malware detection, automated investigation tools, and comprehensive threat hunting tools.

Room for Improvement: Symantec Endpoint Security needs better integration with other security tools, optimized performance, and enhanced reporting features. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum requires improved reporting capabilities, faster support response times, and a more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Endpoint Security is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Kaspersky receives mixed reviews for deployment but earns high praise for its detailed implementation guidance and support materials.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Endpoint Security is cost-effective with good ROI. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum has higher upfront costs but delivers strong ROI over time due to its advanced features and comprehensive capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
19th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Symantec Endpoint Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
12th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
142
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security is 4.1%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

SharjeelFarooque - PeerSpot reviewer
Great threat response, provides for proactivity, and has automated threat identification
In terms of the Pakistani market and talking from a salesperson's perspective, I'd suggest that Kaspersky introduce a bundle of Kaspersky EDR-Optimum or Kaspersky EDR-Expert along with its Business Select/Advance suite. When I say this, I understand the Pakistani market and how slow and less eager organizations are to invest in IT and internet security. Most of them don't invest until or unless they face any attack or network failure. However, in addition to the product, Kaspersky should give EDR-Optimum on the cloud for less than 300 users as well, in case any customer has its whole network on the cloud. That way they can easily use it.
Read full review
Hakeem_Abdulkareem - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution has given us visibility into compliance within our whole system and helped us ensure everything is updated
Symantec's application security module needs some improvement. You need to create a lot of fingerprints for application security. For instance, let's say I have different brands of ATMs in my environment, like Wincor and NCR. I use GRG to deploy an application control to whitelist some applications. I have to get the exact image of the different models of ATMs. When I tested in the past, some machines would not connect to the server without that. Only the approved software on the ATM should run. Anything outside that should not even come up at all. We did this so that an outside person doesn't introduce malicious software to the ATM. That's the essence of locking down with application control. Using Symantec for application control has been hectic, so I use Carbon Black to do the lockdown. Checking that data security will work fine with Carbon Black. Carbon Black worked fine. Setting up approval in Carbon Black works differently than Symantec. In Symantec, we first need the fingerprints of the applications running underneath. Before setting up Carbon Black, you first install the agent, allowing it to learn the environment. It will analyze all the software's behavior and provide recommendations for what should be allowed. It's more straightforward, whereas configuring application control in Symantec is a bit cumbersome.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Instead of having to wait for alerts, the IT security team can actively hunt for threats by proactively scanning endpoints to spot anomalies and security breaches."
"The solution is very user friendly, which we appreciate."
"One of the most valuable features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is its cloud console allows users to remotely isolate a single computer from a network in the event of an attack, enabling them to perform root cause analysis without disrupting the entire network. This is particularly useful for organizations that may not have expert resources for endpoint detection and response."
"The most advantageous aspect is tracking and taking action automatically."
"The encryption feature that allows you complete control of your device is what I found most valuable in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum."
"EDR Optimum's best features are its dashboard, control of external media, and user-friendliness."
"It offers features like system hardening, vulnerability management, patch management, and device control, which are not present in other solutions."
"Kaspersky EDR is constantly updated and can respond to any threat nearly in real-time. They work hard to produce all the updates on time."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum pros
"The most valuable feature is the virus and malware detection capability."
"We use the solution for our endpoint security."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it is really easy to use, and it is secure."
"This solution has helped us because it is really useful for blocking all kinds of viruses."
"It is a scalable product and is average stability-wise."
"It is easy to use. Its interface is user-friendly. So, anybody can use it very well, which is a good thing."
"The centralized console is great for us. It gives us one centralized console to manage all of the endpoints."
"The tool has predefined rules, like which actions to block or allow. This makes it easy because I don't have to figure out what policies to deploy."
More Symantec Endpoint Security pros
 

Cons

"Occasionally, I encounter connection problems, and the signal is not very good."
"I want Kaspersky to extend its products to internet protection. For example, I would like them to develop a firewall integrated with EDR."
"For improvement, they should make the scanning process faster. The scanning and updating take more time."
"They should provide more notifications for incidents and more clarification or information about malicious activity."
"An area for improvement in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum would be to provide the cloud console platform to all users, regardless of the number of licenses a company has purchased. For example, a company with 50 employees should have access to the cloud console platform even if they have only purchased a certain number of licenses for the solution."
"The application should be made a bit lighter so that it does not slow down the PC."
"The solution can improve the uninstallation process. The removal of the agent can be difficult. The purpose is for security, but it requires a lot of time and sometimes a special tool."
"Support is an area for improvement. It should have faster response times."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum cons
"It's not cheap."
"Is not a full anti-ransomware solution."
"The monitoring capabilities could be further developed."
"This solution is resource-heavy."
"Managements' number one item on the "Wish List" would have to do with the real-time scan of external media inserted into any client."
"Reporting in this solution needs improvement."
"After selling this product, what we have observed is that the system gets slower, which is a major issue."
"They provide the updates of the client, and those clients need a reboot after the upgrade, which is something we don't like. We don't like to reboot the server after the upgrade because we have live applications. If we do a reboot, it can impact the business as well."
More Symantec Endpoint Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool’s pricing is yearly. The solution’s pricing is expensive."
"The price of the solution is reasonable. It cost approximately €10,000 annually."
"The solution could be made a bit cheaper."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is more affordable than the endpoint security product of Fortinet. Whether it's worth the money depends on your security strategy."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is affordability, even for companies with limited budgets, such as those in the Pakistani market. It is a subscription-based license."
"The pricing is totally reasonable."
"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. You need to pay about 80,000 rupees yearly for the tool. There are no additional costs associated with the product."
"The price is good, not too high."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum pricing and cost advice
"They're on the reasonable side. They are at mid-level. They're not too expensive as compared to their competitors. They're also not too cheap. In terms of price structure, hopefully, they could do a subscription."
"Each annual client license is around 1200 or 1600 INR."
"I rate the product's pricing a six out of ten."
"Its price is fair."
"The licensing costs are huge compared to what is normally included in the licensing with other products such as the Microsoft products that we're using. We're paying between $300 and $400 per seat."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"What we have paid for this product is good value for the work and the services that they are providing to us."
"I thought the pricing was reasonable."
More Symantec Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
6%
Educational Organization
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?
The product's most valuable feature is the flexibility of installation with the console and a simple administration strategy.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?
Kaspersky is very cheap compared to solutions like CrowdStrike or other vendors. While each solution has strengths and weaknesses, Kaspersky offers better financial aspects.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?
Occasionally, I encounter connection problems, and the signal is not very good.
See all answers
Which is better - Cortex XDR or Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...
See all answers
Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?
We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...
See all answers
What do you like most about Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Symantec have everything – documentation, videos, data sheets.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
Compared 20% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
Compared 15% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
Compared 11% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
Compared 9% of the time
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
Compared 4% of the time
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 20% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 18% of the time
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 8% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 6% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 5% of the time
More Symantec Endpoint Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
January 2025
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum reportDownload Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum product report
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Security
December 2024
Symantec Endpoint Security reportDownload Symantec Endpoint Security product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Symantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)
 

Learn More

Kaspersky
Broadcom
 

Overview

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.

Symantec Endpoint Security is a robust and reliable product that provides complete protection against viruses, malware, Trojans, and malicious files. It offers application and device control, ease of use in deploying and updating, a central control console, stability, scalability, auto-discovery capabilities, patch management, endpoint detection and response capabilities, intrusion detection module. 

The Symantec Global Intelligence Network (GIN) provides threat intelligence and detection across endpoints, email, and web traffic. It has helped organizations reduce downtime, increase productivity, and improve security posture. Symantec Endpoint Security is easy to use, has a flexible administration, and offers more value than expected.

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
January 2025
Free Report: Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Symantec Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Symantec Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.