Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo

Top 10 Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Alternatives

Vendor: Kaspersky
4.1 out of 5
Post review

Top Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum surpasses its competitors by delivering advanced threat detection capabilities, seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, and an intuitive interface that simplifies management, empowering businesses to effectively safeguard their digital assets.

Kaspersky Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Kaspersky, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in threat intelligence and system performance, ideal for complex environments with detailed threat analysis. In comparison, Kaspersky EDR Optimum offers user-friendly real-time protection, appealing to budget-conscious buyers needing comprehensive device management and efficient monitoring.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which offers a more budget-friendly option. Despite the price difference, both solutions are well-regarded for their effective endpoint security features.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which offers a more budget-friendly option. Despite the price difference, both solutions are well-regarded for their effective endpoint security features.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in support and ease of use with automated threat detection and intuitive threat hunting. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers advanced investigation features and strong incident response tools, making it a powerful alternative for comprehensive endpoint detection.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has higher initial setup costs compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum. Kaspersky's setup is simpler and less expensive, making it more accessible for smaller businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has higher initial setup costs compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum. Kaspersky's setup is simpler and less expensive, making it more accessible for smaller businesses.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XDR offers comprehensive threat detection and integrates well with Palo Alto networks. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides efficient threat hunting and incident investigation. Cortex XDR is seen as easier to deploy and offers better support, while Kaspersky's pricing is more cost-effective.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a high setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a more affordable setup. Kaspersky is more cost-effective, but Cortex XDR involves initial high expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a high setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a more affordable setup. Kaspersky is more cost-effective, but Cortex XDR involves initial high expenses.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security excels in cost-effectiveness and customer support. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers advanced threat management and superior incident response tools. A tech buyer might choose Symantec for budget-friendly security or Kaspersky for cutting-edge threat protection.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers comprehensive support, making it a reliable choice. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum's advanced features and streamlined deployment make it a favored option. Trellix excels in continuous monitoring, while Kaspersky's automated responses provide sophisticated protection.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security setup cost is competitive and straightforward, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a higher initial setup cost reflecting its advanced feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security setup cost is competitive and straightforward, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a higher initial setup cost reflecting its advanced feature set.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust malware protection and is cost-effective with straightforward deployment. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides advanced threat detection and detailed analytics. ESET meets budget-friendly needs, while Kaspersky caters to complex security requirements.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which typically involves a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which typically involves a higher initial investment.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.8 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum excels in real-time threat response with user-friendly features and cost-effective pricing. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business benefits from seamless integration within Microsoft's ecosystem and offers a cost-effective solution through its inclusion in Office 365 subscriptions.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Microsoft Defender for Business Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum presents a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers a competitive installation price difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum presents a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers a competitive installation price difference.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Bitdefender Total Security
4.4 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities. In comparison, Bitdefender Total Security provides extensive features, including privacy tools and device optimization. Users favor Kaspersky for its straightforward deployment and supportive customer service, while Bitdefender's robust feature set justifies its higher cost.
Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum has a straightforward setup process with affordable initial costs, while Bitdefender Total Security offers slightly higher setup costs but includes more comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum has a straightforward setup process with affordable initial costs, while Bitdefender Total Security offers slightly higher setup costs but includes more comprehensive features.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform excels in advanced threat prevention and AI-driven analysis. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides holistic threat detection and response features. Deep Instinct is praised for innovative prevention, while Kaspersky is commended for comprehensive capabilities and efficient performance.
Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform has a low setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum demands moderate initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform has a low setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum demands moderate initial investment.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Trend Micro ServerProtect
3.9 out of 5
Trend Micro ServerProtect offers effective malware detection and efficient system performance. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides comprehensive threat detection and advanced reporting tools. Trend Micro ServerProtect is known for straightforward deployment, whereas Kaspersky's customer service and ROI are perceived as higher.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report
Trend Micro ServerProtect has a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum has a slightly lower setup cost. Kaspersky's lower initial expenses make it more budget-friendly compared to Trend Micro's offering.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro ServerProtect has a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum has a slightly lower setup cost. Kaspersky's lower initial expenses make it more budget-friendly compared to Trend Micro's offering.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
4.1 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers robust malware detection and ease of management, making it cost-effective with excellent customer support. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum excels in threat intelligence and advanced detection techniques, justifying a higher price with extensive capabilities.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum. Kaspersky is praised for its lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum. Kaspersky is praised for its lower initial expenses.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
GravityZone Business Security
4.2 out of 5
GravityZone Business Security offers lower pricing and centralized management. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides automated response capabilities and detailed incident reporting. GravityZone focuses on easy deployment, while Kaspersky emphasizes advanced threat detection for combating complex security threats.
Download GravityZone Business Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report
GravityZone Business Security has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which makes it a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
GravityZone Business Security has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which makes it a more budget-friendly option.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites
4.1 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers strong malware detection and a simpler deployment process. In comparison, Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites stands out with a comprehensive feature set and extensive customer service. Kaspersky is cost-effective, while Trend Micro's features justify its higher price.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation. Trend Micro, however, offers a higher setup cost that may imply a stronger feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation. Trend Micro, however, offers a higher setup cost that may imply a stronger feature set.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Identity Management (IM)