Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum and Microsoft Defender for Business compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. Kaspersky appears to have the upper hand with its advanced real-time threat response capabilities and cost-effectiveness, though Microsoft Defender excels in integration with its ecosystem.
Features: Kaspersky offers a user-friendly dashboard, real-time threat response, and advanced features like remote network isolation and device control. It supports daily scans and provides vulnerability management through a cloud console. Microsoft Defender integrates seamlessly with the Microsoft ecosystem, providing robust threat detection, predictive analysis, and is especially beneficial for Microsoft-centric environments.
Room for Improvement: Kaspersky users express a need for better update processes, improved internet protection integration, broader compatibility, and enhanced scalability. Concerns also include the need for a unified management console and faster scans. Microsoft Defender could improve fine-grained reporting, threat protection customization, integration ease, and quicker response times, particularly for email threats, with a less complex user interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaspersky supports flexible deployment options with on-premises and private cloud settings, offering responsive support despite minor delays at times. Microsoft Defender supports hybrid and public cloud setups, leveraging native ECOSYSTEM integration. However, customer service can be slow, and additional customization may be required.
Pricing and ROI: Kaspersky is economically priced with additional costs for modules, appealing to budget-conscious buyers seeking comprehensive threat intelligence, despite geopolitical concerns. Microsoft Defender, included with Office 365 subscriptions, offers a complete security approach but can be costly for startups. Both solutions provide significant ROI, but Kaspersky's affordability is highlighted.
```Using Microsoft Defender for Business results in cost reductions as it consolidates various features under one product, saving around 20% to 30% of the budget.
It is pretty good because it offers various features such as Exchange, OfficeSuite, OneDrive, and SharePoint.
The value I see in Microsoft Defender for Business is in its ability to track and respond to application usage and security threats through its CASB and automation features, which are cost-beneficial.
We usually solve issues ourselves due to our experience, as paid support is not used.
I rate the technical support between seven and eight out of ten for Kaspersky.
It is rated ten out of ten for its quality and assistance.
The onboarding support is exceptional, ensuring seamless integration and implementation.
Faster support is needed for endpoint security solutions.
It is very easy for me to scale.
Currently, I find it good and easily scalable.
The cloud-based nature of the solution ensures high scalability.
The scalability of Microsoft Defender for Business is rated as ten, indicating it is very scalable.
In terms of scalability, I find Microsoft Defender for Business to be good and reliable.
The solution is highly stable, scoring more than nine in terms of protection.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is stable.
No customer complaints about its functionality or reliability.
Although it generally works, there are occasional issues and errors that sometimes require a complete system format to rectify.
Threat detection capabilities could be improved.
To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included.
Occasionally, I encounter connection problems, and the signal is not very good.
We face challenges with the automated effective awareness platform program (ASAP), particularly with its implementation.
Microsoft should provide batch management solutions with the application, integrating pass management with roles.
Features related to Advanced Persistent Threat detection vectors and cyber kill chain integrations are not available out-of-the-box.
There can be improvements in the user interface to make it more intuitive.
Kaspersky is very cheap compared to solutions like CrowdStrike or other vendors.
The value from Kaspersky is very good, especially since we recently got a special deal.
Single-year pricing remains good.
The pricing is quite affordable at the enterprise level with no extra expenses noted.
The package with Business Premium is good for what you get for the price.
It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks.
It monitors vulnerabilities and takes action, such as blocking USB or devices from the network, to avoid vulnerabilities or ransomware.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is effective, especially in isolating computers from the network when needed.
The threat detection capabilities are robust, with a dedicated research team and a continuously updated threat feed.
Its vulnerability management is regarded as one of the best in the industry.
The most effective features of Microsoft Defender for Business include its threat detection and response capabilities in managing vulnerabilities and ransomware attacks.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.
Microsoft Defender for Business is a new endpoint security solution that was designed especially for the small and medium-sized business (up to 300 employees). With this endpoint security solution, your company's devices are better protected from ransomware, malware, phishing, and other threats.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.