Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaspersky Total Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security comparison

Kaspersky and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Kaspersky is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.2, while Broadcom is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7. Kaspersky holds a 0.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Kaspersky users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Kaspersky Total Security
Read 23 Kaspersky Total Security reviews
  • 1,016 Views
  • 884 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Symantec Endpoint Security
Read 144 Symantec Endpoint Security reviews
  • 10,450 Views
  • 8,921 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Symantec Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Total Security compete in the enterprise and personal security software category. Kaspersky Total Security seems to have the upper hand due to its more advanced features and comprehensive protection.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Security is known for its advanced threat protection capabilities, ease of integration with existing systems, and efficient resource handling. Kaspersky Total Security offers an extensive array of features such as secure payment options, password management, and privacy protection tools, making it more encompassing and user-friendly.

Room for Improvement: Symantec Endpoint Security could improve in reducing system impact during scans and providing more intuitive configuration options. Users also suggest better user interface and reporting features. Kaspersky Total Security could enhance the speed of customer service response, offer more flexible licensing options, and reduce the system resource usage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Endpoint Security users find the deployment process straightforward and value its reliable customer service, though the initial setup might be complex for some. Kaspersky Total Security is noted for its smooth deployment process and user-friendly installation, but there is a need for faster customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Endpoint Security is perceived as cost-effective, offering a good balance between expense and security capabilities, providing satisfactory ROI. Kaspersky Total Security is considered pricier; however, its wide range of features and thorough protection justify the higher cost for those seeking premium security, ultimately delivering solid ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,989 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Total Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
28th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Symantec Endpoint Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
12th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
144
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Total Security is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security is 4.0%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Ashford Asante - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool with an easy initial setup phase that can be centrally managed by users
What needs to be improved is what my company sends to Kaspersky's team when we are working with it, and then they work on it, which is why we always have updates to take care of the bugs and all those things. You can't have one thing in the solution that needs to be improved. The solution is affordable. For the solution itself, while you are working with it, you come across stuff, that Kaspersky's network helps you deal with since you can send your stuff to Kaspersky's team, and they have access to certain reports, and based on the reports and what what are we doing, the solution is always worked on, so that it can be made the best and efficient application. On a daily basis, the tool is being improved, and I am okay with it. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Select is automated. The cloud application for Kaspersky is automated. For the solution needed for individual systems, Kaspersky provides you with a platform that provides internet security. With Kaspersky, you have a platform that allows you to access www.kaspersky.com and see the systems that you have worked on in the past. If you need to do anything with your individual machines indirectly, you can manage it through a centralized system. The solution's automation capabilities is an area where certain improvements are required.
Read full review
Hakeem_Abdulkareem - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution has given us visibility into compliance within our whole system and helped us ensure everything is updated
Symantec's application security module needs some improvement. You need to create a lot of fingerprints for application security. For instance, let's say I have different brands of ATMs in my environment, like Wincor and NCR. I use GRG to deploy an application control to whitelist some applications. I have to get the exact image of the different models of ATMs. When I tested in the past, some machines would not connect to the server without that. Only the approved software on the ATM should run. Anything outside that should not even come up at all. We did this so that an outside person doesn't introduce malicious software to the ATM. That's the essence of locking down with application control. Using Symantec for application control has been hectic, so I use Carbon Black to do the lockdown. Checking that data security will work fine with Carbon Black. Carbon Black worked fine. Setting up approval in Carbon Black works differently than Symantec. In Symantec, we first need the fingerprints of the applications running underneath. Before setting up Carbon Black, you first install the agent, allowing it to learn the environment. It will analyze all the software's behavior and provide recommendations for what should be allowed. It's more straightforward, whereas configuring application control in Symantec is a bit cumbersome.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it can be centrally managed, allowing users to know what is happening and what can be expected in the systems."
"I installed Kaspersky for protection if there is a virus on my computer"
"Kaspersky Total Security has valuable reporting features regarding visibility for trusted sites and safe browsing."
"It has advanced features for detecting malware and ensuring customer safety."
"It automatically identifies potential threats in emails, websites, and documents, swiftly blocking or quarantining anything harmful to prevent any damage or infection to my system."
"It is a stable product."
"The most beneficial feature of Kaspersky Total Security for me is its all-in-one antivirus solution with continuous signature updates for effective malware detection and prevention."
"I am satisfied with the solution's security features because we have been using it for years."
More Kaspersky Total Security pros
"It seems to be user-friendly. Our users seem to like it for the most part."
"Symantec Endpoint Security is very stable, and I would rate it ten out of ten for stability."
"The best thing about Symantec is its ability to control our endpoints from a single point. You can manage the antivirus definitions, upgrades, remote scanning, etc., from one console."
"Some of the features that were important were a built-in firewall and device control."
"The firewall, malware, and anti-virus protection have earned its keep in times past by catching the unexpected."
"It's good at detecting signature-based stuff and stopping that."
"The scheduled scans and the active protection were the most valuable because it allowed me to have the systems protected in real-time and also be able to schedule scans so that as new definitions would update, machines could be scanned to make sure that everything was in tip-top shape and there was nothing lurking in the background."
"One of the most valuable features is its antivirus database, which is current and updated daily. Another valuable feature is its capacity to be managed by a single server. The solution is managed by a secure server, so all the endpoints are managed from a central point."
More Symantec Endpoint Security pros
 

Cons

"Its interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"Enhancing the encryption code, particularly in relation to ransomware would be a great addition for future use."
"It would be beneficial if the resource usage could be reduced to lessen the burden on devices."
"Kaspersky Total Security's configuration part is complex."
"The stability could be improved."
"The solution’s email protection area should be improved."
"The solution's automation capabilities is an area where certain improvements are required."
"Kaspersky Total Security is an expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."
More Kaspersky Total Security cons
"The solution could be more secure and scalable."
"The one thing I don't like about Symantec Endpoint Security is the amount of resources it uses."
"More control features can be added, and its performance can also be better. Sometimes, the performance is not good when we access the cloud console. Moving to each tab is slow. The dashboard can be a little bit user-friendly. For some users, it is a bit difficult. If someone is a little bit familiar with it, then it is fine. Otherwise, it is hard to find policies in Symantec."
"I would like to see fileless attack protection."
"They lack the visibility you get in a heuristical, artificial, AI type of product, like a next-gen antivirus."
"The support can be wanting. Sometimes the time to resolution is longer than I would expect."
"Any external device which is inserted into a computer should be subject to an auto-scan policy, to automatically scan it before accepting the device... They need to make it more user-friendly, so that when anyone puts in a USB stick it will be scanned, popping up any problems before it is used."
"They provide the updates of the client, and those clients need a reboot after the upgrade, which is something we don't like. We don't like to reboot the server after the upgrade because we have live applications. If we do a reboot, it can impact the business as well."
More Symantec Endpoint Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Kaspersky Total Security is not an expensive solution."
"The product is not expensive."
"We purchase the product’s yearly license."
"I like this solution due to its cost-free nature"
"We pay around $30 to $35 for the solution yearly."
"Kaspersky Total Security is an expensive solution."
"The pricing of the solution is good."
"Users need to pay a licensing fee for the solution, which is neither cheap nor expensive."
More Kaspersky Total Security pricing and cost advice
"Symantec Endpoint Security is a moderately priced solution."
"The licensing is okay. Symantec has a very granular licensing model, so you only buy what you need."
"It provides a good solution at a good price."
"When comparing this solution to others in the current market it is expensive."
"There are subscription costs, we typically purchase the annual subscription. There can be other expenses too, for example, we use CrowdStrike also as part of our policy."
"The pricing is a little bit more expensive than other competitors, if you compare it to Kaspersky, for example, or McAfee."
"The pricing is pretty much at the market standard... Symantec is not that cheap and it's not that expensive compared to CrowdStrike. I would put them in the 'middle block.'"
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
More Symantec Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
25%
Comms Service Provider
9%
University
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kaspersky Total Security?
I am satisfied with the solution's security features because we have been using it for years.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Total Security?
The pricing for Kaspersky Total Security is quite affordable, rated at eight out of ten, and all necessary licensing fees are included.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Total Security?
The system can be demanding on resources, making devices busy when running the client application. It would be beneficial if the resource usage could be reduced to lessen the burden on devices.
See all answers
Which is better - Cortex XDR or Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...
See all answers
Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?
We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...
See all answers
What do you like most about Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Symantec have everything – documentation, videos, data sheets.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Total Security Logo
HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Total Security
Compared 37% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Total Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Total Security
Compared 8% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs Kaspersky Total Security Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs Kaspersky Total Security
Compared 8% of the time
Malwarebytes vs Kaspersky Total Security Logo
Malwarebytes vs Kaspersky Total Security
Compared 7% of the time
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Kaspersky Total Security Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Kaspersky Total Security
Compared 3% of the time
More Kaspersky Total Security Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 18% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 18% of the time
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 8% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 7% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 4% of the time
More Symantec Endpoint Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
April 2025
Kaspersky Total Security reportDownload Kaspersky Total Security product report
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Security
March 2025
Symantec Endpoint Security reportDownload Symantec Endpoint Security product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Symantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)
 

Overview

Kaspersky Total Security provides robust antivirus and malware protection, comprehensive security for banking systems, infrastructure, endpoints, and personal devices including antivirus, firewall, and VPN services.

Kaspersky Total Security is a multi-faceted solution featuring antivirus, firewall, VPN services, and protection for personal devices, company laptops, and critical data. It is utilized for patching, managing vulnerabilities, and safeguarding against threats from USB drives and harmful websites. With features like anti-spam for Microsoft Exchange Server and secure web browser modes for online banking, Kaspersky offers comprehensive protection for personal and business use. Additionally, its combination of machine learning, AI, and reliable intrusion prevention makes it a preferred choice for many users.

What are the most important features of Kaspersky Total Security?
  • Antivirus: Provides efficient virus protection and real-time threat detection.
  • Firewall: Ensures safer internet browsing and blocks unauthorized access.
  • VPN Services: Secures online activities and protects privacy.
  • Machine Learning and AI: Enhances automatic threat identification and management.
  • Vulnerability Management: Offers timely vulnerability fixes and patching.
  • Anti-Spam: Filters unwanted emails, especially for Microsoft Exchange Server.
  • Fast Scanning: Performs quick and thorough scans for threats.
  • User-Friendliness: Easy to install and simple to manage.
What are the benefits or ROI users should look for in reviews when evaluating Kaspersky Total Security?
  • Cost-Free Accessibility: Provides significant value without additional cost.
  • Reliability: Ensures continual protection against threats.
  • Central Management: Facilitates easy monitoring and control.
  • Safe Browsing: Enhances visibility and safety during online activities.
  • Lightweight Performance: Does not heavily impact system performance.

Kaspersky Total Security is implemented across diverse industries to fortify banking systems, infrastructure, and endpoints. It protects personal devices, company laptops, and sensitive data, ensuring a safe digital environment for users. Industries rely on its anti-spam features for secure communication and its secure browser modes for safe online banking. Kaspersky's superior intrusion prevention and automated threat recognition powered by AI and machine learning enhance industry-specific cybersecurity measures.

Kaspersky

Symantec Endpoint Security is a robust and reliable product that provides complete protection against viruses, malware, Trojans, and malicious files. It offers application and device control, ease of use in deploying and updating, a central control console, stability, scalability, auto-discovery capabilities, patch management, endpoint detection and response capabilities, intrusion detection module. 

The Symantec Global Intelligence Network (GIN) provides threat intelligence and detection across endpoints, email, and web traffic. It has helped organizations reduce downtime, increase productivity, and improve security posture. Symantec Endpoint Security is easy to use, has a flexible administration, and offers more value than expected.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
April 2025
Free Report: Kaspersky Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Kaspersky Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.