Symantec Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Broadcom and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Broadcom is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.7, while WithSecure is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.0. Broadcom holds a 4.2% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.

Symantec Endpoint Security

Read 142 Symantec Endpoint Security reviews

12,805 Views
11,051 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Read 7 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

2,200 Views
1,648 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Endpoint Security

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Symantec Endpoint Security and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint security solutions market. User reviews suggest that WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a slight edge in overall satisfaction due to its advanced features, even though Symantec Endpoint Security is noted for its support and competitive pricing.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Security users value its threat intelligence, advanced malware protection, and support. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is praised for its comprehensive security suite, integration capabilities, and versatile features, providing better comprehensive security.

Room for Improvement: Symantec Endpoint Security reviewers often mention the need for better performance optimization, streamlined updates, and UI improvements. Users of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection suggest enhancements in reporting features, simpler configuration processes, and more detailed documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Users find Symantec Endpoint Security's deployment to be straightforward but occasionally time-consuming. Its customer service is generally well-regarded. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is noted for a quick and easy deployment process, but its customer service receives varied feedback.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Endpoint Security is appreciated for its value for money and suitable ROI. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has higher upfront costs but users feel it delivers a strong ROI through extensive security features.

To learn more, read our detailed Symantec Endpoint Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Symantec Endpoint Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

142

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

37th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security is 4.2%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.6%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

PedroSoares

Senior Security Information Analyst at Modal Bank

Helps us block ports, like TCP and UDP, and we don't need to use Active Directory GPOs to block anything

One suggestion I have for both regular and mobile would be to collect all the information about installed software, such as versions, and give that information to the manager to help with software management. That would be a huge advantage for everyone who administers these tools. For example, EDR gives me some applications with a version linked to a CVE or a MITRE attack. That's really interesting, But we don't know about other software that is installed and that means we need to install and use other software on the workstation to collect that information. If Symantec could do that, it would help managers improve their security, as they would know all the software installed on each device. Because Symantec is already installed on a workstation, it would not be difficult for the agent to collect information about the software installed. It wouldn't need to do anything other than collect and share the information. That would be a huge advantage for the administrator. The more information we have about a device, the more secure we can make it. For example, there are types of software that can open a port that an attacker can use. If we know that such software is installed, we could just act before something happens. If Symantec could collect that software information, it would be amazing.

Read full review

Muhammed Abdul Gafoor

Chief Information Officer at Future Generations Computers LLC

The product has excellent patch management features, but it does not provide technical support in the Middle East

The product does not have technical partners in the Middle East. It only has sales partners. I do not like the sales partners in UAE. They did not support me when I needed help with security. The vendor must provide a subscription-based model. Now, they have a prepaid model. Our clients and partners like subscriptions. Subscriptions let us use and then pay. Currently, we pay and then use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The administrator's console is very good and easy to manage with it. Deploying patches, definition updates and report is simple."

"The scheduled scans and the active protection were the most valuable because it allowed me to have the systems protected in real-time and also be able to schedule scans so that as new definitions would update, machines could be scanned to make sure that everything was in tip-top shape and there was nothing lurking in the background."

"The valuable features are device control, SONOR, and anti-virus."

"This solution has helped us because it is really useful for blocking all kinds of viruses."

"It is very easy to managing everything in relation to the implementation and processing. The initial setup is very easy."

"I think the key thing for me, is interoperability, in that you can deploy it to Windows, Mac, and Linux. That's been a really important feature in the last two years. Now there's one management console to cover all three OSs."

"It is a stable solution...It is a very scalable solution."

"Offers good antivirus and local firewall."

More Symantec Endpoint Security pros

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

Cons

"I would like to see improvements in the anti-virus and the device control features."

"Managements' number one item on the "Wish List" would have to do with the real-time scan of external media inserted into any client."

"The reporting function needs to be more user friendly in general."

"Nowadays, threats are changing, and they are moving more towards script control and zero-day attacks. So, we would like to have more control similar to an EDR solution. Symantec Endpoint Protection has certainly come a long way as a traditional antivirus, but because the threats are changing, we would like to have more EDR features so that we have a detailed view of the source from where the infection entered the environment and whether it has tried to connect any other endpoint. It should provide such a detailed view for investigation. It should protect against zero-day threats, etc. These are the key enhancements that can make it a complete solution for any enterprise. Currently, we have seen organizations going for two solutions: antivirus and EDR. With both these capabilities, it would be a complete package."

"It is only available to use on computers with higher-end specs."

"Using the management console is a bit complex. There are many features that we cannot use and we could use some help. We need some assistance to make them work better. They need to add features to make it simpler."

"I would like to be able to migrate to the cloud so that the end-users outside the company offices don't need a VPN to connect to the Symantec server to update the policies. They should be able to connect to the admin center directly through the internet to get updated policies. There is some integration issue with the other security appliances or tools. Other hardware, firewall, or Network Detection and Response (NDR) solution vendors are not willing to integrate with Symantec. They only mention products from other vendors such as CrowdStrike and Carbon Black. Symantec is not there. Symantec should work on integration with products from other security vendors."

"If a machine is infected by ransomware, it's hard to recover the data. We don't have any data on the client, so we're not overly concerned about that. Still, it would be nice to have this feature if there are any future problems."

More Symantec Endpoint Security cons

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am not sure of the initial cost, but the yearly renewals are quite affordable, which is a good thing. The price seems to have come down in recent years, and with the alternatives that are out there, such as Microsoft Defender, it needs to maintain that affordability to make it attractive."

"There is a yearly license."

"Licensing is based on a yearly subscription."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"We pay on a yearly basis..."

"The price of the product is competitive if compared to its competitors in the market."

"One great benefit is we do not need to activate a license for every endpoint. The price is fair."

"It is cheap. It is especially cheaper than Malwarebytes, which is three times higher than this. It is also cheaper than Cisco. Its price is almost similar to Bitdefender, Gravity, and CloudZone."

More Symantec Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

"The price is comparable."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"The product has average pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

19%

Government

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Cortex XDR or Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?

Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...

See all answers

Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?

We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?

Symantec have everything – documentation, videos, data sheets.

See all answers

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The price is comparable. We do not have a problem with the pricing. I rate the pricing a five or six out of ten. There are no additional costs associated with the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 20% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 18% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Security Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 39% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Security

November 2024

Download Symantec Endpoint Security product report

Buyer's Guide

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

November 2024

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Symantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Learn More

Broadcom

Video not available

WithSecure

Overview

Symantec Endpoint Security is a robust and reliable product that provides complete protection against viruses, malware, Trojans, and malicious files. It offers application and device control, ease of use in deploying and updating, a central control console, stability, scalability, auto-discovery capabilities, patch management, endpoint detection and response capabilities, intrusion detection module.

The Symantec Global Intelligence Network (GIN) provides threat intelligence and detection across endpoints, email, and web traffic. It has helped organizations reduce downtime, increase productivity, and improve security posture. Symantec Endpoint Security is easy to use, has a flexible administration, and offers more value than expected.

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

Sample Customers

Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

December 2024

Free Report: Symantec Endpoint Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec Endpoint Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Symantec Endpoint Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.