Top 10 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

8 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat intelligence, AI-driven malware detection, and real-time response capabilities, ensuring comprehensive security with unmatched efficiency for all endpoints across diverse environments.

WithSecure Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with WithSecure, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat detection and remote connectivity for deep analysis, while WithSecure Elements focuses on tamper and vulnerability protection. In comparison, CrowdStrike's flexibility includes various cloud options, whereas WithSecure is known for cost-effectiveness and robust on-premises support.

Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is typically higher compared to WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two options.

View comparison

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is typically higher compared to WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two options.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, making it cost-effective and easier to deploy within Windows environments. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection excels with granular security controls and specialized tools, ideal for protecting complex and critical environments.

Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report

Pricing

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint requires a lower initial setup cost compared to WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, which involves a more substantial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint requires a lower initial setup cost compared to WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, which involves a more substantial investment.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers automated threat detection and response, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection provides multi-layered protection and easy management. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Complete is noted for quicker response times, whereas WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection excels in integration capabilities. SentinelOne offers competitive pricing, while WithSecure Elements justifies a higher cost with comprehensive features.

Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers competitive setup costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection provides a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting significant differences in initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are high-end cybersecurity solutions with different strengths. Users favor Cortex XDR for its comprehensive features and robust customer service. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection outshines in overall functionalities, making it a preferred choice despite its premium pricing.

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a high setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers a lower initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a high setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers a lower initial expense.

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient provides comprehensive features, including VPN services and automated threat response. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection excels in performance efficiency and ease of deployment. Fortinet’s integration capabilities stand out, while WithSecure offers simplified management and strong cloud protection.

Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiClient setup costs are low and straightforward, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a higher setup cost but offers extensive support. FortiClient is budget-friendly, contrasting with WithSecure's comprehensive setup assistance.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Secure Endpoint

4.3 out of 5

Cisco Secure Endpoint

4.3 out of 5

Cisco Secure Endpoint excels in comprehensive threat detection and prevention, with smooth deployment and solid customer support. In comparison, WithSecure Elements offers quicker adaptability to new threats, strong post-deployment assistance, and long-term cost-effectiveness, despite its higher initial costs.

Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report

Pricing

Cisco Secure Endpoint has moderate setup costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers a more cost-effective setup option. Cisco's higher initial investment reflects its comprehensive feature set, contrasting with WithSecure's affordability and streamlined implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Endpoint Security

3.8 out of 5

Symantec Endpoint Security

3.8 out of 5

Symantec Endpoint Security is favored for its competitive pricing, comprehensive threat protection, and easy integration with existing infrastructure. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection stands out for its superior advanced threat detection capabilities, streamlined management, and higher long-term value despite higher initial costs.

Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report

Pricing

Symantec Endpoint Security involves a significant setup cost, whereas WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection features a more moderate initial investment. Symantec is typically viewed as a higher-priced option compared to the more cost-effective WithSecure solution.

View comparison

Pricing

HP Wolf Security

3.9 out of 5

HP Wolf Security

3.9 out of 5

HP Wolf Security offers robust protection mechanisms valued for advanced threat protection and isolation capabilities. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection provides a comprehensive feature set with extensive threat detection and response features, delivering better ROI despite higher costs, making it a preferred option for extensive security needs.

Download HP Wolf Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report

Pricing

HP Wolf Security has a low initial setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection presents a slightly higher setup cost but offers more advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

HP Wolf Security has a low initial setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection presents a slightly higher setup cost but offers more advanced features.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

4.1 out of 5

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

4.1 out of 5

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is favored for its support and pricing. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection stands out for its advanced features and value. Trend Vision One offers excellent detection and reporting. WithSecure Elements excels in threat intelligence and management tools.

Download Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report

Pricing

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower initial setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a higher setup cost but offers a more comprehensive feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower initial setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a higher setup cost but offers a more comprehensive feature set.

Trellix Endpoint Security

4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security

4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security offers advanced threat detection and automated remediation. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection excels with superior malware detection and cloud-based management. Trellix receives praise for competitive pricing, while WithSecure enjoys preference for its innovative features and faster deployment.

Download Trellix Endpoint Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection involves a more complex setup and higher initial expenditures.

View comparison

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection involves a more complex setup and higher initial expenditures.

Show 14 more products

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Identity Management (IM)