BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

BlackBerry and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while WithSecure is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.0. BlackBerry holds a 1.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews

4,155 Views
3,119 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Read 7 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

2,112 Views
1,586 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection compete in the comprehensive endpoint security category. While BlackBerry Cylance has the upper hand for its AI-driven malware detection and low resource usage, WithSecure excels in vulnerability management and application monitoring.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance offers AI-driven malware detection, script blocking, and operates without constant updates, ensuring low resource usage. Its Persona feature provides behavior monitoring. WithSecure boasts vulnerability management, application monitoring, and DeepGuard for software behavior tracking. It also includes tamper protection and AMSI for enhanced script inspection.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance could reduce false positives and improve its user dashboard for better analytics. Users also seek improved feature complexity management, support, and pricing. WithSecure could enhance resource optimization and offer more integration options for large-scale deployment. Patch management and real-time responsiveness are additional areas needing enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance facilitates flexible deployment across various cloud environments like public, private, and hybrid settings. Customer service feedback is mixed, highlighting both quick responses and slow resolution times. WithSecure offers a straightforward deployment process but with fewer cloud options. It generally receives high praise for responsive technical support.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance's pricing is slightly higher but offers substantial protection, justifying its cost for significant threat mitigation. Pricing can be optimized through negotiations. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection provides competitive pricing, with favorable ROI, especially for bulk licensing. Security enhancements are noted as a key benefit.

To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

38th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Hadar Eshel

Co-Founder and CEO at Cloudway

Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance

We integrate it into our comprehensive cybersecurity strategy, specifically for antivirus and antiviral purposes. CylancePROTECT provides comprehensive endpoint security, including EDR capabilities. Additionally, BlackBerry now offers XDR, similar to other companies like CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. The AI-driven threat detection of CylancePROTECT has significantly enhanced our organization's security posture. This company has pioneered an AI-based engine that doesn't rely on signatures, thus offering protection for every computer, server, and endpoint without requiring specific signatures for malware or other attacks. Cylance stands out for pioneering the delivery of a complete AI-driven antivirus engine that relies primarily, if not solely, on AI and machine learning for threat identification. Remarkably, it identifies over 99.7% of global threats.

Read full review

Eeva Niemi

office manager at MaxBuild Oy

Useful portal, secure, but compatibility issues could improve

The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve. If we try and implement third-party vendors with the solution we can experience issues, such as Microsoft Office 365. It will limit certain emails from being received or sent. There can be compatibility issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution runs in the background, and I do not need to care about it."

"I rate the tool a ten out of ten when it comes to the ease of use or management part."

"The most valuable features of CylancePROTECT are its powerful machine-learning capabilities and predictive intelligence."

"Centralized dashboard online which can be used for managing a huge product."

"The platform's most valuable features are the malware detection capabilities."

"The solution is easy to deploy."

"I've found the AI engine in CylancePROTECT to be particularly effective for technology and in preventing unknown threats."

"What's most valuable in CylancePROTECT is the optics feature. I also like its easy-to-use and user-friendly dashboard and monitoring system."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

Cons

"They could improve on the false positives, reporting and whitelisting features."

"An area for improvement in CylancePROTECT is its pricing, as it's a bit costly."

"Having worked with SentinelOne, Cylance is good, however, it probably needs to add a feature similar to SentinelOne's rollback functionality. With this feature, if you get infected, with a click, you can go back to the pre-infection state. If Cylance could add this functionality to their offering as well, that would be ideal."

"Reporting is an area with shortcomings in CylancePROTECT that needs to be improved."

"I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices."

"I would like to see them fix the alerting system so that the endpoint reporting is a bit more streamlined."

"The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward."

"Work on the math model. We are catching a lot of false positives, which gets to be a pain at the start of a deployment."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing cost for the solution is around $4,000 for six months. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Currently, we have competitive pricing for Cylance, which is affordable enough to consider."

"CylancePROTECT is worth the money, but I'm not sure of its exact price. I can't remember off the top of my head."

"We pay our license on a yearly basis and have just renewed for two years."

"It is expensive, but not unreasonable."

"My company is on a yearly CylancePROTECT subscription. Price-wise, the solution is slightly expensive, so I'd rate it as eight out of ten."

"The solution provides me with competitive pricing."

"Do not get hung up on price. You pay for what you get and expensive will hurt one time, where cheap will hurt forever, especially if you fall victim to a ransom attack, etc."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice

"The price is comparable."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"The product has average pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

19%

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?

It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?

The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?

I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immedi...

See all answers

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The price is comparable. We do not have a problem with the pricing. I rate the pricing a five or six out of ten. There are no additional costs associated with the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The product does not have technical partners in the Middle East. It only has sales partners. I do not like the sales partners in UAE. They did not support me when I needed help with security. The v...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 23% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 17% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 5% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 5% of the time

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 36% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 14% of the time

Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

January 2025

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report

Buyer's Guide

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

December 2024

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Learn More

BlackBerry

Video not available

WithSecure

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance provides endpoint security, threat protection, and antivirus capabilities, using AI and machine learning for protection against malware and ransomware on desktops, servers, and virtual machines worldwide. Its AI-driven threat detection operates even with limited internet, facilitating effective threat management.

BlackBerry Cylance's centralized dashboard simplifies threat management and vulnerability protection for organizations globally. The platform combines AI and machine learning to deliver superior zero-day threat protection and minimize CPU usage, offering stable and accurate threat detection without frequent updates. It includes tools like CylanceOPTICS and CylancePERSONA for enhanced user behavior monitoring and adopts a proactive approach that effectively manages threats at various lifecycle stages. Renowned for stability and performance, it efficiently prevents unauthorized applications while maintaining system productivity.

What are the main features of BlackBerry Cylance?

Minimal CPU Usage: Efficiently operates without taxing computer resources.
AI and Machine Learning: Advanced technology for zero-day threat protection.
Lightweight Design: Functions without constant updates for simplified usage.
Centralized Management: Offers a user-friendly, intuitive dashboard.
CylanceOPTICS and PERSONA: Tools for in-depth user behavior analysis.

What are key benefits to look for in user reviews?

Effective Malware Detection: Recognized accuracy in identifying security threats.
Proactive Threat Mitigation: Actively detects and manages threats.
Stability and Performance: Consistent protection without hampering system performance.
Reduced Unauthorized Access: Limits unpermitted application activity.

In the professional sector, BlackBerry Cylance is leveraged to protect crucial infrastructure through a robust approach accommodating environments with limited connectivity. Its widespread deployment in industries, including healthcare and finance, is attributed to its ease of deployment and comprehensive protection capabilities. However, enhancements in reporting, pricing structures, and technical support are avenues for development, reflecting user feedback for improving detection rates and overall dashboard usability.

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

January 2025

Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.