BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

BlackBerry and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.4, while WithSecure is ranked #51 with an average rating of 7.0. BlackBerry holds a 1.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews

3,417 Views
2,603 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

1,798 Views
1,353 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection compete in the comprehensive endpoint security category. While BlackBerry Cylance has the upper hand for its AI-driven malware detection and low resource usage, WithSecure excels in vulnerability management and application monitoring.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance offers AI-driven malware detection, script blocking, and operates without constant updates, ensuring low resource usage. Its Persona feature provides behavior monitoring. WithSecure boasts vulnerability management, application monitoring, and DeepGuard for software behavior tracking. It also includes tamper protection and AMSI for enhanced script inspection.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance could reduce false positives and improve its user dashboard for better analytics. Users also seek improved feature complexity management, support, and pricing. WithSecure could enhance resource optimization and offer more integration options for large-scale deployment. Patch management and real-time responsiveness are additional areas needing enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance facilitates flexible deployment across various cloud environments like public, private, and hybrid settings. Customer service feedback is mixed, highlighting both quick responses and slow resolution times. WithSecure offers a straightforward deployment process but with fewer cloud options. It generally receives high praise for responsive technical support.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance's pricing is slightly higher but offers substantial protection, justifying its cost for significant threat mitigation. Pricing can be optimized through negotiations. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection provides competitive pricing, with favorable ROI, especially for bulk licensing. Security enhancements are noted as a key benefit.

To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

51st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry

Security Operations Manager at Philips

Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT

I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.

Read full review

Muhammed Abdul Gafoor

Chief Information Officer at Future Generations Computers LLC

Has an easy initial setup process, but there could be more integration options

The initial setup is easy. I rate the process a seven or eight out of ten. We have LPR procurement. The deployment involves installing the product and adding a license. It takes three to four days to complete and requires a team of less than ten people to execute the process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The CylancePROTECT agent is very low on CPU usage, so it has virtually no adverse impact on my servers, desktops, or workstations."

"The most functional item that we use is the process to turn off the false flags that it causes."

"The solution is easy to deploy."

"The solution is very quick at easily changing the levels of protection for each computer and the server."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT is the support."

"It secures different entry points into the network."

"Very easy to deploy. It can be done one by one or deployed by customizing an MSI file for GPO push."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

Cons

"The solution’s user interface could be improved."

"Having worked with SentinelOne, Cylance is good, however, it probably needs to add a feature similar to SentinelOne's rollback functionality. With this feature, if you get infected, with a click, you can go back to the pre-infection state. If Cylance could add this functionality to their offering as well, that would be ideal."

"It should provide more details about the events that they have detected."

"I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices."

"The product does not do a lot of reporting on what it is taking care of. Enhanced reporting would be a welcome improvement."

"I would like to see them fix the alerting system so that the endpoint reporting is a bit more streamlined."

"The stability could be improved."

"CylancePROTECT's dashboard could be more user-friendly."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license price for this solution could be better. It's on the expensive side."

"We pay our license on a yearly basis and have just renewed for two years."

"My company is on a yearly CylancePROTECT subscription. Price-wise, the solution is slightly expensive, so I'd rate it as eight out of ten."

"The solution provides me with competitive pricing."

"We would just add more if there are new users, but right now you just need one license for per user."

"The monthly fee is $55 USD per user."

"Do not get hung up on price. You pay for what you get and expensive will hurt one time, where cheap will hurt forever, especially if you fall victim to a ransom attack, etc."

"Review closely how many endpoints you actually need before buying into a pricing level. Deal and deal with the VAR of your choice."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

"The product has average pricing."

"The price is comparable."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Government

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?

It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?

The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?

See all answers

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The price is comparable. We do not have a problem with the pricing. I rate the pricing a five or six out of ten. There are no additional costs associated with the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The product does not have technical partners in the Middle East. It only has sales partners. I do not like the sales partners in UAE. They did not support me when I needed help with security. The v...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 21% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 5% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 5% of the time

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 37% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 16% of the time

Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

April 2025

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report

Buyer's Guide

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

March 2025

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance provides endpoint security, threat protection, and antivirus capabilities, using AI and machine learning for protection against malware and ransomware on desktops, servers, and virtual machines worldwide. Its AI-driven threat detection operates even with limited internet, facilitating effective threat management.

BlackBerry Cylance's centralized dashboard simplifies threat management and vulnerability protection for organizations globally. The platform combines AI and machine learning to deliver superior zero-day threat protection and minimize CPU usage, offering stable and accurate threat detection without frequent updates. It includes tools like CylanceOPTICS and CylancePERSONA for enhanced user behavior monitoring and adopts a proactive approach that effectively manages threats at various lifecycle stages. Renowned for stability and performance, it efficiently prevents unauthorized applications while maintaining system productivity.

What are the main features of BlackBerry Cylance?

Minimal CPU Usage: Efficiently operates without taxing computer resources.
AI and Machine Learning: Advanced technology for zero-day threat protection.
Lightweight Design: Functions without constant updates for simplified usage.
Centralized Management: Offers a user-friendly, intuitive dashboard.
CylanceOPTICS and PERSONA: Tools for in-depth user behavior analysis.

What are key benefits to look for in user reviews?

Effective Malware Detection: Recognized accuracy in identifying security threats.
Proactive Threat Mitigation: Actively detects and manages threats.
Stability and Performance: Consistent protection without hampering system performance.
Reduced Unauthorized Access: Limits unpermitted application activity.

In the professional sector, BlackBerry Cylance is leveraged to protect crucial infrastructure through a robust approach accommodating environments with limited connectivity. Its widespread deployment in industries, including healthcare and finance, is attributed to its ease of deployment and comprehensive protection capabilities. However, enhancements in reporting, pricing structures, and technical support are avenues for development, reflecting user feedback for improving detection rates and overall dashboard usability.

BlackBerry

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

April 2025

Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.