What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?

Symantec Endpoint Security is an expensive solution.

The licensing is okay. Symantec has a very granular licensing model, so you only buy what you need. It's similar to other competitors. I don't see them as being higher or lower than others in terms of pricing.

Symantec Endpoint Security's pricing is okay. It is cheaper compared to other products.

Symantec Endpoint Security is a moderately priced solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten.

The price of the product is competitive if compared to its competitors in the market.

I rate the product's pricing a six out of ten.

It's pretty awesome price-wise. That's why we give it to most of our clients. It isn't very expensive. Compared to Cisco AMP, which is very expensive, its price is okay. It's also cheaper than Malwarebytes. The license that you purchase lasts a period of time. After that, you again need to purchase another license. Otherwise, you will not be able to get support from Symantec every time you have issues.

The price of Symantec is on the higher end. They face some competition from a company called Quick Heal, which is much cheaper than Endpoint Security. They offer three years of protection at just 900 rupees.

The solution could be cheaper.

The price of Symantec is reasonable compared to other solutions.

The pricing is pretty much at the market standard. I don't see any issues with it. It depends on case to case. Symantec is not that cheap and it's not that expensive compared to CrowdStrike. I would put them in the "middle block."

I thought the pricing was reasonable.

The pricing was one of the factors that led us to choose this product. That said, I was not the decision maker. I simply proposed it to our manager.

I was not involved in the negotiations, but I believe the price was within the range we expect for endpoint protection.

Pricing is handled by a separate team. Whenever a new client asks for a recommendation, we provide it, but they deal directly with Symantec or other vendors for the pricing.

The pricing is as per the environment. If all the features are there, there will be a cost for them. There were no additional costs for me. Support and other things were included in the pricing.

It's really hard to get the price since Symantec became Broadcom. 

But if you are a Broadcom direct customer, you will get a good price. Sometimes it is better than any other vendor. 

Otherwise, if you're not a direct customer, look for a big reseller or think about a change of your solution. 

Because we are still awaiting pricing, I am not sure what the difference is. I have only done the technical comparison; I haven't done the pricing comparison yet.

I am not sure of the initial cost, but the yearly renewals are quite affordable, which is a good thing. The price seems to have come down in recent years, and with the alternatives that are out there, such as Microsoft Defender, it needs to maintain that affordability to make it attractive.

This is not the cheapest product and I know others that are most cost-effective, although it is difficult to compare because it depends on the features.

Symantec End-User is not expensive.

We have some customers on a one-year license and others on a three-year license.

Its price is fair.

The price of Symantec End-User Endpoint Security is okay. When comparing the price of this solution is not expensive.

I don't have any insights into the pricing or licensing aspects of the product.

They have increased the products of these products recently without any notice. This hasn't gone over well with small clients.

One great benefit is we do not need to activate a license for every endpoint. The price is fair.

There is a yearly license.

I cannot speak to the exact licensing costs. We recommend the solution to our clients, however, they buy the license from the vendor directly.

When comparing this solution to others in the current market it is expensive.

They're on the reasonable side. They are at mid-level. They're not too expensive as compared to their competitors. They're also not too cheap. In terms of price structure, hopefully, they could do a subscription.

Its price is reasonable.

The license for this solution is purchased on an annual bases. The price could be cheaper but it's not too bad. We also pay for technical support which we get locally here in Serbia.

Symantec is expensive. When compared with Trend Micro and Sophos, it is expensive. Customers are required to purchase a license.

We had some issues with licensing registration on the company website. We pay on an annual basis and it's a fair price.

Symantec Endpoint Security does have some aggressive competitors and they're offering very competitive pricing. Maybe Symantec Endpoint Security could amend their pricing structure, but they always offer a good product.

We pay a yearly licensing fee. The fee was paid last year, however, I don't have access to the exact costs. It may have been renewed before I started working with the company.

Licensing is based on a yearly subscription.

We need licenses to use the product, however, the pricing is reasonable. It's not too expensive.

The EDR options are costlier than other products.

We usually go on a per-seat basis, and it's usually yearly. The prices fluctuate, but this year I think it was maybe around $12,000. If you're looking at the on-prem costs for the virtual server and the licensing for the server, that would be the only extra cost.

There are subscription costs, we typically purchase the annual subscription. There can be other expenses too, for example, we use CrowdStrike also as part of our policy.

Its price should be reasonable.

We pay on a yearly basis. However, I'm unsure of the exact amount.

My understanding is that the price is quite good and competitive. My advise is to invest the necessary time and effort to deploy it correctly and with minimal disruption. In the enterprise arena, if you don't have the in-house expertise in the more complex areas of the product do your organization a favor and get expert assistance.

The solution needs better licensing options.

We were using some traditional licensing. Our company is a nonprofit, so we have a different price pricing model.

We're a not-for-profit. We do get exceptionally good pricing, however, I cannot say exactly what the costs are for us on a monthly or yearly basis.

This product is more reasonably priced than some competing solutions.

Considering the features, the price of this solution is average. We pay our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and everything is included in that price. Whether it is via email or phone call, they do what needs to be done.

This solution is more costly than some competing solutions.

We receive a discounted price for this solution because we are a non-profit organization. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.