Tanium vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform comparison

Tanium and ThreatLocker are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Tanium is ranked #37 with an average rating of 7.1, while ThreatLocker is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.1. Tanium holds a 2.5% mindshare in EPP, compared to ThreatLocker’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Tanium users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of ThreatLocker users who would recommend it.

Tanium

Read 16 Tanium reviews

6,481 Views
4,517 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...

Read 39 ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform reviews

2,418 Views
1,622 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Tanium

ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 23, 2025

Tanium and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform are products in the endpoint protection category. While Tanium is appreciated for its pricing and customer support, ThreatLocker holds the upper hand due to superior features valued by users.

Features: Tanium provides extensive endpoint visibility and control, offers a scalable solution, and delivers rapid query capabilities. ThreatLocker focuses on application allowslisting, features ringfencing, and provides storage control, embodying a zero-trust security posture.

Room for Improvement: Tanium could enhance deployment simplicity, improve its learning curve, and boost immediate support availability. ThreatLocker could work on granularity for its options, increase integration capabilities, and further streamline its user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ThreatLocker ensures an intuitive deployment experience and offers strong technical support, making deployment straightforward. Tanium's deployment may involve a steeper learning curve and requires improved initial support.

Pricing and ROI: Tanium may involve significant initial costs with variable ROI, contingent on user engagement. ThreatLocker provides a consistent ROI due to its cost-effective pricing, making it appealing for budget-conscious buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed Tanium vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Tanium vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,466 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Tanium

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

37th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (9th), Vulnerability Management (26th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (27th)

ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

10th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Access Control (NAC) (5th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (7th), Application Control (3rd), ZTNA (6th), Ransomware Protection (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Tanium is 2.5%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Mo Vermeiren

Cybersecurity Business & Technology Consultant at Capgemini

Is able to make several campaigns work in parallel, but the user interface needs improvement

It's mainly used by the cybersecurity team for Windows patching and deployment of some software solutions I like the fact that you can create patching campaigns depending on the area of your network that you want to address first. I like the ability it has to make several campaigns that work in…

Read full review

Johnathan Bodily

Technical Engineer at Cloud 1 Solutions

Ensures ransomware protection and reduces phishing chaos

The application control has been great so far, and while I am still exploring the network access controls, I unfortunately don't have access to one module I would love to have due to licensing restrictions. It's easy to use in regard to reducing attack surfaces. For me, it's a piece of cake. We can have something approved within 30 seconds, thanks to the mobile app. We haven't eliminated security solutions. We just add to it, and ThreatLocker has been a great addition. We also have Kaseya and ThreatLocker as a supplement to that. It's useful. They have overlap, and we look at the overlap as a good thing. It's helped your organization save on operational costs or expenses by ensuring that many fewer hours are spent dealing with ransomware nonsense. I cannot count the amount of hours that I personally have not had to put in to recovering an environment from a ransomware event. The last big one took us about three weeks to completely recover from. Since we've grouped ThreatLocker in, the management of that whole setup has gone down to just daily help desk tasks and general server maintenance instead of having the whole system on fire. There are probably thousands of hours of saved time between our teams. It's been great so far. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications is great. It's my biggest protection, the blocked applications. In a lot of cases, you go to install something yourself that you need for management, and it comes in and says, nope. And then I have to log into the portal and approve it. I get our other guys saying, hey, why are you trying to approve something? Any of the tools that I'm using on a day-to-day basis that haven't been in the environment during the whole learning mode initially, I could go through and set extensions and all that. So, while it's a headache on that end, the amount of saved time I can't even count. It is a little frustrating on my end since I like to go as quickly as I possibly can, and it slows me down. However, that's a really good thing. Depending on the site, it can save a lot of time and cut down headaches. It's likely saved a week's worth of time. It's cut down the amount of sever help desk tickets. Those have become minimal.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When I push a quick update, it's done right away, and I can rescan immediately to confirm completion within minutes."

"The interrogation piece was the most valuable feature because it was very detailed."

"Tanium’s linear-chain architecture is valuable."

"I like the fact that you can create patching campaigns depending on the area of your network that you want to address first. I like the ability it has to make several campaigns that work in parallel."

"Tanium's most valuable feature is its instant discovery aspect."

"Threat hunting is a very good feature on Tanium. We have just started using it and have not used it extensively."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the consolidation of all historical data on device endpoints, security drivers, firmware, and Software version gaps."

"The product is granular and can build complex roles compared to other EDR vendors."

More Tanium pros

"Allowlisting, in general, is valuable because it allows us to have a lot more granular control over what is executed on a desktop. We are also able to ringfence known vectors of attack through Office applications, email, browsers, etc."

"Feature-wise, the learning mode and the fact that it's blocking everything are the most valuable. I don't see why more companies don't use the type of product."

"We are seeing a return on investment, especially with our managers and customers."

"What sets ThreatLocker apart from competitors offering similar solutions is ringfencing. The ringfencing controls, along with the application elevation features, keep it out of the user's line of sight while still protecting them."

"The biggest improvement has been knowing that something unauthorized isn't going to get installed on anyone’s machines."

"Every single feature has been invaluable."

"The control list is the best feature. For our company, it provides value to our customers since they can see we are improving our security."

"The application management on any workstation with the solution is valuable. I find it valuable that it indicates whether the software is part of our pre-approved list, adding a nice layer of protection. It works great because people cannot just install or download any app from the web."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform pros

Cons

"The solution lacks mobility."

"Tanium’s scalability could be improved."

"I would like to have more integrations and custom plugins to input. Integration is always a big deal in a lot of different environments."

"They could improve the UI."

"When working with Tanium, there are some older devices that haven't been patched for a long time, and certain patches are not included in Tanium."

"Any movement into a SaaS solution has challenges since the processes and data flows are not well defined. Hence, you need to build it at the same time."

"Most of the time, agent-relative issues have to be more equipped with self-healing features. At times, the agent is there, but for some reason, it doesn't report a status. It gives certain problems that are obviously agent-based."

"Tanium's limitations should be improved because although it is a great tool, it is limited to only a few classes during a session."

More Tanium cons

"It would be beneficial if it became more recognized in the EU to gain respect."

"From a reporting perspective, enhancing the ability to customize reports would be beneficial."

"ThreatLocker could offer more flexible training, like online or offline classes after hours. The fact that they even provide weekly training makes it seem silly to suggest, but some people can't do it during the day, so they want to train after work. They could also start a podcast about issues they see frequently and what requires attention. A podcast would be helpful to keep us all apprised about what's going on and/or offline training for those people who can't train during the week."

"Better visualizations of what exactly is happening in our logs would be helpful. There can be more visuals on what has been elevated. Presenting this in a more refined manner would be beneficial."

"To become the best solution, some sort of integration or remote management, like remotely connecting, could be beneficial."

"The reporting could be improved."

"Some reporting areas need improvement. We need to generate more reports."

"I'm not sure if I'm using it wrong; however, I find that I have to babysit it too much."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution offers value for money."

"It's an expensive solution. It would be nice if the cost were lower."

"The product's pricing differs from region to region depending on negotiations and the number of endpoints."

"Tanium is a more expensive solution in Latin America than some of the competitors, such as BigFix."

"The solution is expensive but it's a good investment."

"There is an annual license required to use this solution."

"It is higher than some competitors in the market."

"ThreatLocker's pricing seems justifiable."

"Others say ThreatLocker is too expensive, and I tell them they're dreaming. It's well-priced for what it does."

"The price is very reasonable, and we have been able to integrate ThreatLocker with all of our clients."

"I do not know about the licensing and price as it comes bundled from our MSP. However, it seems fairly reasonable for us, which is why we chose it."

"We have not had any real issues with the pricing. As they have added more features, due to the way our contracts are structured with our customers, we have had to hold off on adopting the new features because they do add costs."

"The pricing is reasonable and normal. I do not have any problems with the cost."

"So far, it has been great. I have no complaints. Of course, everybody wishes it was cheaper."

"I believe ThreatLocker's pricing model is fair and flexible, allowing account managers to offer customized deals based on our specific needs."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

38%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Tanium?

Tanium’s linear-chain architecture is valuable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tanium?

When working with Tanium, there are some older devices that haven't been patched for a long time, and certain patches are not included in Tanium. I have to search outside to download patches, creat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tanium?

We primarily use Tanium for patching, focusing on vulnerabilities. Our major goal with Tanium is to patch based on vulnerabilities detected by our other vulnerability tools.

See all answers

What do you like most about ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

We have encountered a few challenges regarding pricing, contract renewals, and additions. As we explored adding features like Cyber Hero, it proved to be an increased expense for our clients. This ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

I find that the learning mode is too accessible. Technicians sometimes default to it instead of manually building policy controls. I would prefer the learning mode to be harder to access, ideally h...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tanium

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Tanium

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Tanium

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs Tanium

Compared 6% of the time

BigFix vs Tanium

Compared 6% of the time

More Tanium Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 20% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 5% of the time

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Tanium

March 2025

Download Tanium product report

Buyer's Guide

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

March 2025

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform report

Download ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Protect, Allowlisting, Network Control, Ringfencing

Overview

Tanium Endpoint Platform reduces security risk, improves agility & increases efficiency, a fundamentally new approach to endpoint security's threat detection, indicent response, vulnerability assessment and configuration compliance & with management's software distribution, asset utilization, asset inventory and patch management.

Tanium

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust endpoint security through application control and allowlisting, safeguarding servers and workstations from unauthorized software execution.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides extensive application control with features like ring-fencing and selective elevation, ensuring meticulous execution management. Offering learning mode and extensive support, it integrates threat detection and activity monitoring to enhance compliance, reduce costs, and bolster cybersecurity through alerts and approvals. Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement in training flexibility, policy updates, and interface enhancements, along with challenges in handling non-digitally signed software. Deployed across environments, it works well with existing cybersecurity instruments for real-time threat prevention.

What are the top features of ThreatLocker?

Intuitive Interface: User-friendly design simplifies endpoint protection management.
Application Blocking: Prevents unauthorized applications from running.
Selective Elevation: Grants control over application permissions.
Ring-Fencing: Isolates applications to limit interactions.
Allowlisting: Ensures only trusted software can execute.
Learning Mode: Facilitates configuration by observing user behavior.
Real-Time Support: Access to assistance and training resources.

What benefits should reviewers seek?

Compliance: Meets regulatory standards.
Operational Cost Reduction: Consolidated alerts and approvals.
Enhanced Cybersecurity: Prevention of unauthorized applications.
Regulatory Alignment: Helps ensure adherence to legal requirements.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is widely implemented to safeguard IT infrastructures against unauthorized access and application use. In sectors where data security is paramount, this platform enables users to prevent unauthorized software installations and control device applications, ensuring real-time threat prevention and compliance with industry regulations.

ThreatLocker

Sample Customers

JPMorgan Chase, eBay, Amazon, US Bank, MetLife, pwc, Cerner, Delphi, MGM Grand, New York Life

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Tanium vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

March 2025

Free Report: Tanium vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Tanium vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Tanium vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.