Temenos Quantum vs Xamarin Platform comparison

Temenos and Microsoft are both solutions in the Mobile Development Platforms category. Temenos is ranked #9, while Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7. Temenos holds a 7.1% mindshare in MDP, compared to Microsoft’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Temenos users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Temenos Quantum

Read 15 Temenos Quantum reviews

1,568 Views
580 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Xamarin Platform

Read 40 Xamarin Platform reviews

995 Views
935 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Temenos Quantum

Xamarin Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Temenos Quantum and Xamarin Platform are competitive players in the mobile app development arena. Xamarin Platform is favored for its advanced features, making it a valuable choice for premium investments.

Features: Temenos Quantum offers robust backend integration, pre-built app templates, and strong reporting tools. Xamarin Platform excels in cross-platform compatibility, seamless Visual Studio integration, and superior code-sharing capabilities, which reduce development time by using C# across Android and iOS.

Room for Improvement: Temenos Quantum could enhance its maturity and reduce implementation complexities. Greater ease with complex tasks would improve its usability. On the other hand, Xamarin Platform could benefit from improved support for third-party libraries like Firebase, addressing module-specific functionality, and simplifying the complexity of advanced features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Xamarin Platform facilitates a streamlined deployment process, backed by extensive documentation and strong Microsoft tool integration. Temenos Quantum also provides effective deployment capabilities, with an emphasis on personalized support from a dedicated service team. Both platforms enable efficient application launches, though Xamarin’s integration with Microsoft tools provides a distinct advantage.

Pricing and ROI: Temenos Quantum appeals with competitive pricing and a favorable ROI, supported by cost-efficient tools and comprehensive support services. While Xamarin Platform incurs higher initial costs, its rapid development cycle and extensive code-sharing capabilities promise a substantial ROI, making it a viable long-term investment despite the initial premium.

To learn more, read our detailed Temenos Quantum vs. Xamarin Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Temenos Quantum vs. Xamarin Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Temenos Quantum

Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms

9th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Platforms (5th), Rapid Application Development Software (30th), Low-Code Development Platforms (23rd)

Xamarin Platform

Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Mobile Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 7.1%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Xamarin Platform is 6.3%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Xamarin Platform	6.3%
Temenos Quantum	7.1%
Other	86.6%

Mobile Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Zain Omer

Software Engineer (Kony-Temenos | Android) at Xpert Digital

Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability

There is a lot of room for improvement in Temenos Quantum. Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet. Improvements can be made to make Temenos Quantum stable. Improvements are needed in the solution, considering how my company needs to raise a lot of tickets with the technical support team of Temenos for some basic issues every time. There are some features in Temenos Quantum that I want to be stabilized by Temenos, just like in Android Studio and Xcode. Building an application using Temenos Quantum is not difficult, but my company needs to seek some support for the solution all the time.

Read full review

Prince Tiwari

Senior Software Engineer at AAPC

Facilitates UI development with XAML, enabling shared UI code across platforms and reducing platform-specific work

I like its simplicity. As someone who didn't start my career as a dedicated developer, I was used to building websites or Windows applications. Transitioning to mobile app development meant learning new languages like Swift or Java. With C# and Xamarin, though, I could leverage my existing skillset. Xamarin, and specifically Xamarin.Forms, let me write my code once and deploy it natively to both Android and iOS. Xamarin.Forms are very useful. Essentially, it's a framework that allows me to create the UI mostly in XAML. This XAML code is then translated into the native UI elements for each respective platform. The advantage is that roughly 90% of my UI code can be shared. This significantly reduces the amount of platform-specific UI work compared to having to write separate UIs for each platform. For the most part, Xamarin's integration with Visual Studio improved the workflow, whether I'm on Windows or Mac. Since I'm familiar with Visual Studio, it provides a comfortable development environment. Additionally, features like Hot Reload and the integration of tools like Copilot help streamline the development process. Overall, it offers a positive development experience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."

"The visualizer and API manager are super useful. It's easy to create applications for the agent. Automations and other complex tasks can be hard, but it's mostly straightforward. You can create forms and populate tables."

"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."

"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."

"I like the complete, professional social site."

"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."

"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms."

"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."

More Temenos Quantum pros

"The most valuable features of the Xamarin Platform are that it has cross-platform development, one code base serves a purpose on both, and the grid layout is a lifesaver."

"I like Renderers in Xamarin. They allow us to use native-platform controls easily."

"The cross platform ability is a great asset."

"Cross-platform development saves time and provides consistencies."

"This solution is a cross-form technology, meaning that we don't have to create separate code to deploy apps across different platforms."

"Xamarin Platform's best features are its single codebase, the support from Microsoft, and the free libraries."

"It allows us to reuse our knowledge of C# and .NET Framework."

"Because of the C# programming language, we can train our .NET developers to learn Xamarin and develop mobile apps easily."

More Xamarin Platform pros

Cons

"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."

"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."

"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."

"Some features are only enabled for paid users. It would be much better if they enabled those features without having to pay. I would also like to see them publish information about future technologies on the Home screen under a separate tab. That would be an improvement."

"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."

"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."

"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"

"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."

More Temenos Quantum cons

"There is limited support for UX widgets."

"The primary area for improvement is the support for third-party libraries, especially for major providers like Microsoft and Google."

"Xamarin Platform is missing the code renderer."

"Xamarin Platform's performance base could be improved."

"Xamarin's profiling tools are only available for the highest tier of MSDN subscription and compatibility with platform-native profiling tools is rather lacking. This causes friction when working on performance-related issues."

"It needs offline sync capabilities to store data on devices persistently."

"We have noticed that there have been stability-based performance issues with this product, which need to be improved."

"From time to time, it is a bit harder to code some specific scenarios compared to the native approach."

More Xamarin Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."

"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."

"The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it"

"It is expensive solution."

"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."

"My company provided all the licenses that we need to support our use of Xamarin Platform."

"There is no requirement for a license. It is available for free as an open-source product."

"Xamarin Platform is a free open-source solution."

"Xamarin Platform is open-source, so it is free to use."

"Xamarin is available under several licensing arrangements. Each developer needs one license at least. All features, especially the Profiler, unlock only with the highest tier."

"Xamarin is free, or comes with Visual Studio. Therefore, it is very profitable."

"There's no licensing cost for Xamarin."

"Xamarin Platform is open-source, but there are fees for deployment, the API Store and Play Store, and using third-party libraries."

More Xamarin Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

University

Educational Organization

18%

Marketing Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Xamarin Platform?

Xamarin.Forms are very useful. Essentially, it's a framework that allows me to create the UI mostly in XAML. This XAML code is then translated into the native UI elements for each respective platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Xamarin Platform?

Xamarin Platform is free, and we use an Azure subscription at a relatively low cost for our builds. It offers a good value for money, although it requires time to make it work effectively.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Xamarin Platform?

The primary area for improvement is the support for third-party libraries, especially for major providers like Microsoft and Google. The lack of robust documentation and support for third-party bin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Appzillon Digital Platform vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 31% of the time

Jitterbit Vinyl vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 6% of the time

OutSystems vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 6% of the time

Apple iOS SDK vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 5% of the time

Mendix vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 5% of the time

More Temenos Quantum Competitors

Mendix vs Xamarin Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Apple Xcode vs Xamarin Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Ionic vs Xamarin Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Verivo Pyxis Platform vs Xamarin Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Magic xpa Application Platform vs Xamarin Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More Xamarin Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Temenos Quantum

January 2026

Download Temenos Quantum product report

Buyer's Guide

Xamarin Platform

January 2026

Download Xamarin Platform product report

Also Known As

KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum

No data available

Overview

Temenos Quantum is a Multiexperience Development Platform (MXDP) that combines ease-of-use and speed of low-code productivity with deep enterprise capabilities for both consumer grade digital experiences across multiple touchpoints and robust backend services for identity, integration, orchestration, business process automation, and business rules management.

Temenos

Xamarin is an open-source platform for developing modern and performant applications for iOS, Android, and Windows using.NET. Xamarin is an abstraction layer that manages how shared code is communicated to the platform's underlying code. Xamarin is for developers with the two following goals:

Cross-platform sharing of code, tests, and business logic.
Writing cross-platform apps in C# with Visual Studio.

Xamarin allows developers to share an average of 90% of their program across platforms. This enables programmers to achieve native performance, look, and feel on each platform while writing all of their business logic in a single language (or reusing existing application code).

Xamarin applications can be created on a PC or a Mac and compiled into native application packages, such as an .apk file for Android or an .ipa file for iOS.

Xamarin Platform Features

Xamarin Platform has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Complete binding for the supporting SDKs: Xamarin includes bindings for almost all of the underlying platform SDKs in iOS and Android.
Java, C, Objective-C, C, C++ Interop: Xamarin gives you the ability to use a variety of third-party code by providing tools for directly invoking Objective-C, Java, C, and C++ libraries.
Modern language constructs: Xamarin applications are written in C#, a modern language with many capabilities that Objective-C and Java do not have, like lambdas, LINQ, parallel programming, generics, and more.
Strong base class library (BCL): Xamarin apps use the .NET BCL, a large collection of classes with streamlined features, like powerful XML, database, serialization, IO, string, and networking support, among others.

Xamarin Platform Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing the Xamarin Platform. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Native UIs and APIs: Xamarin delivers comprehensive access to each platform's native SDK and UI controls, projecting the entire native API of each device into C#. Therefore, the apps you develop are native instead of write-once/run-anywhere programs that look alien on every platform. Xamarin provides you access to all of the capabilities that distinguish each platform.

Share code between platforms: With Xamarin, you can share all code across platforms while providing a native user interface tailored to each individual device. With Xamarin, you can execute the same C# code on iOS, Android, and Windows Phone. With Xamarin, your software is compiled to a native binary rather than being interpreted, in contrast to other cross-platform frameworks. Even in the most demanding situations, native compilation provides users with excellent app performance. Xamarin provides responsive, multi-user input and feedback, fluid scrolling, sophisticated graphics and animations, complicated data visualization, and realistic high frame rates for games.

Code with C#: Write shorter, more concise, and more maintainable code by leveraging advanced language features, such as Language Integrated Query (LINQ), delegates, lambdas, events, garbage collection, and many other features. With Xamarin's fully extensible platform, you can include libraries written in C, Objective-C, C++, or Java. In C#, you have access to the entire native ecosystem of components and libraries.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank

Cinemark, MixRadio, Sqor Sports, Storyo, JetBlue, The World Bank, Cr_dito Agrcola, Applied Research Associates

Buyer's Guide

Temenos Quantum vs. Xamarin Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Temenos Quantum vs. Xamarin Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Temenos Quantum vs. Xamarin Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Temenos Quantum vs. Xamarin Platform report.

See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.