Tenable Security Center vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform comparison

Tenable and Zscaler are both solutions in the Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) category. Tenable is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.4, while Zscaler is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.4. Additionally, 95% of Tenable users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

Tenable Security Center

Read 50 Tenable Security Center reviews

1,339 Views
992 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Read 62 Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform reviews

1,370 Views
1,039 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Tenable Security Center

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 7, 2024

Tenable Security Center and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform are two leading security solutions in the cybersecurity space. Zscaler appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and alignment with modern enterprise needs, making it worth the additional cost for many users.

Features: Tenable Security Center is recognized for comprehensive vulnerability management, seamless integration capabilities, and competitive pricing. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is valued for its cloud-native architecture, robust security policy enforcement, and alignment with zero trust methodologies.

Room for Improvement: Tenable Security Center could improve its update process, enhance reporting capabilities, and address scalability issues. Zscaler users desire more granular visibility, improvements in application performance, and enhanced scalability solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable Security Center gains feedback for its flexible deployment but requires significant resources. Customer service is noted for its responsiveness. Zscaler enjoys quick cloud-based deployment but faces some challenges during the initial setup. Customer service is praised though there are opportunities to improve complex troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable Security Center is known for favorable setup costs with mixed ROI impressions. Zscaler, despite higher initial costs, is perceived as delivering significant ROI due to efficient scalability and policy enforcement.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Report (Updated: September 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

September 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 812,651 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Tenable Security Center

Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (1st)

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (4th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (4th), Application Control (3rd), ZTNA as a Service (1st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (2nd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (8th), Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) (1st)

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain

Cyber Security Chartered Engineer at Banglalink

Feb 23, 2024

A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans

Additional costs are associated with using the solution, as additional scanners are required for different endpoints connected to the Tenable Security Center. If Tenable Security Center could extract information from these scanners automatically rather than manually, it would enhance user-friendliness for customers. For example, suppose I manually conducted CIS hardening or compliance scoring in a separate data centre. These scores should also be reflected in the Tenable Security Center dashboard. Since the scanner is connected to the Tenable Security Center, the dashboard should display the direct scan results from the general security centre and the connected scanners. There could be unusual activities or attacks with the rising AI-related issues or threats that the Tenable Security Center could track in the future.

Read full review

Vikram Srirama.

Deputy General Manager at Sagility

Oct 4, 2023

A VPN alternative that delivers a zero trust model

The primary use cases for the Zscaler include secure channel access for applications, private file service access, and remote connectivity to the active directory. These are the top three essential functionalities provided by Zscaler Previously, we utilized HubSpot, which required connecting to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find Tenable SC to be a very scalable product."

"Very customizable with a lot of templates."

"I like Tenable.sc's analytics and reporting. You can also configure your on-prem network monitors to talk to your Tenable.sc control panel."

"Tenable is the leading product for vulnerability scanning."

"One of the most valuable features is their distributed scan model for allotting engines to work together as a pool and handle multiple scans at once, across multiple environments. Automatic scanning distribution is a distinguishing feature of their toolset."

"Initial setup was pretty straightforward."

"Tenable.sc's best features are the availability model, accident management, and scoring."

"The solution is very intuitive and the dashboards are simple to use."

More Tenable Security Center pros

"The user interface of Zscaler Private Access is excellent. With proper knowledge and expertise, one can efficiently handle intricate enterprise environments without feeling overwhelmed. This leads to exceptional productivity for managed service providers. The user experience is remarkably streamlined, enabling the management of even the most complex enterprise setups without any excessive complications."

"The most valuable features of Zscaler SASE include web filtering, application control, and the private access configuration."

"The product provides a seamless user experience."

"The customer service and support are very good."

"Yes, it is very stable. I have never seen it go down, not once."

"Its impressive scalability allows the combination of multiple dictionaries and using them as one engine, resulting in narrower data loss gaps."

"SASE's most valuable features are proxy and content filtering."

"The policies are very easy to implement."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pros

Cons

"Additional costs are associated with using the solution, as additional scanners are required for different endpoints connected to the Tenable Security Center. If Tenable Security Center could extract information from these scanners automatically rather than manually, it would enhance user-friendliness for customers."

"The solution should provide better web application features and support."

"There is not much room for improvement. However, there should be a guide that describes the step-by-step procedures for doing tasks. Otherwise, training is required from a senior guy to a junior guy."

"For downloading reports, we have to go to the scan and then we have to go to the reports and download the Excel or CSV or PDF. I think these menus and clicks can be minimized."

"The solution needs to improve its support. I would like to see a bird's eye view of my network architecture. I would also like to see the continuous view feature in the tool."

"There's a lot of information being streamed out of the reports. What would be nice, and maybe we just haven't found it, would be more of an executive-type view. We still expect it to collect all this information, but we would like a feature that would allow us to show it to an executive or a director or someone like that and give them some type of high-level overview but not get into the nitty-gritty."

"The vulnerability scan does not work correctly until the access privileges are set by the system administrator."

"I will say it's a lot slower compared to an MS scan. It takes so much longer, so the performance could definitely be worked on."

More Tenable Security Center cons

"You won't find anything that can help you with the configuration part and other areas related to the product if you search for proper or exact details of Zscaler Cloud DLP online in very easy language."

"The pre-defined dictionaries could be improved."

"Price-wise, it is a costly product and it should be reduced."

"There is some issue while accessing the portal. It takes too long."

"An area for improvement would be the ease of configuration."

"Zscaler Private Access could improve by improving external access. If external parties want to access locally to my company's services, we need to onboard them into our domain, otherwise, it doesn't work. Additionally, if their company also has Zscaler Private Access, then it doesn't work. They need to log in with our domain ID, not their company ID."

"Having a Zscaler-specific device could streamline this process and provide a more consistent user experience across diverse branches."

"We'd like to have two-factor authentication that is quite simple."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a bit expensive. Everything is included in the license."

"I rate the solution's price as seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The tool is quite expensive."

"We pay around 60,000 on a yearly basis."

"We're happy with the licensing cost and find it affordable."

"I use a local license to perform penetration testing and I'm pretty happy with everything when it comes to pricing and licensing."

"Though reasonable, the main competitor of Tenable SC, Rapid7, offers a more aggressive and better priced product."

"The price can start at €10,000 ($13,000 USD) for between 500 and 1,000 assets, and the price can climb into the millions as more assets are added."

"The price of Tenable SC is expensive, we pay approximately €70,000 for the license annually. We have to pay for each IP test. The cost of other solutions is far less, such as Nessus Professional, which is €3,000 annually."

More Tenable Security Center pricing and cost advice

"The product is a bit expensive."

"In terms of market positioning, I would describe Zscaler Private Access as offering optimal pricing. Based on our experience, Cato Networks tends to be slightly more expensive."

"There is definitely an ROI."

"Zscaler Cloud DLP is moderately priced. We pay around 2 million rupees per year."

"Pricing for Zscaler Private Access is moderate. It's acceptable, though I can't give you the exact price currently. It's not too expensive, and on a scale of one to five, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"It's expensive currently. But when purchasing for a large number of users, there's room to negotiate. It's really up to the procurement team."

"Zscaler CASB is an expensive solution."

"The licensing model for Zscaler Cloud DLP allows you to only buy what you need. You don't need to buy it as a whole, so it's good."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

812,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Tenable SC?

The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable SC?

For enterprise customers, it's acceptable. However, for smaller enterprises or businesses, the budget may be too restrictive to consider such extensive solutions. When proposing to small-scale indu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable SC?

They are not currently handling call flows properly. Some call flows are being deleted from the registry but still show as active. Support is also lacking in onboarding properly in this area. This ...

See all answers

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a cloud-deliver...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zscaler SASE?

The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zscaler SASE?

Zscaler SASE is quite expensive compared to other solutions. The price is not fixed and it does not include all of the features, so my advice for organizations would be to evaluate their specific n...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 28% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 13% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 11% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 10% of the time

Horizon3.ai vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

More Tenable Security Center Competitors

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Axis Security vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Wiz vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center

September 2024

Download Tenable Security Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

September 2024

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report

Download Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform product report

Also Known As

Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter

Zscaler SASE, Zscaler DLP, Zscaler CASB, Zscaler CSPM, Zscaler Browser Isolation, Zscaler Posture Control

Learn More

Tenable

Zscaler

Overview

Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform acts as a VPN alternative for secure remote access, cloud protection, and zero-trust strategies. It enables secure data transmission, supports remote work, and enhances compliance through a cloud-based architecture, offering improved performance and simplified management.

Designed for organizations seeking secure application access and robust data protection, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform delivers a comprehensive solution through seamless VPN connectivity, data loss prevention, and SSL inspection. Its cloud integration ensures scalability and reliability, while its interface provides intuitive management. Companies benefit from automatic secure access, minimizing constant authentication needs, and safeguarding sensitive data. The platform allows easy deployment and integration with diverse identity providers, granting granular control for access and application segmentation. Despite powerful capabilities, enhancements are needed in speed, bandwidth, and legacy support, with users noting interface and configuration challenges.

What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform?

Seamless VPN Connectivity: Provides automatic secure access without repetitive authentication.
Strong Security Measures: Offers DLP and SSL inspection for data protection.
Cloud Integration: Ensures scalability and performance optimization.
Granular Access Control: Manages access with application-specific segmentation.

What benefits should companies look for in reviews when evaluating this platform?

Performance: Enhanced connectivity and reduced latency.
Data Protection: Comprehensive DLP and encryption capabilities.
Scalability: Efficient handling of growing organizational demands.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup and integration with IDPs.

In specific industries, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange has been implemented to enhance security protocols in fields like finance and healthcare. By prioritizing data protection and compliance, it assists companies in safely managing sensitive information and meeting regulatory requirements. Organizations leverage its features to ensure secure operations across remote and cloud environments, adapting to industry-specific needs with customizable access and security controls.

Sample Customers

IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific

Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

September 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM). Updated: September 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

812,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.