Visual Studio Test Professional and Zeenyx AscentialTest are both robust testing tools in the software testing category. Zeenyx AscentialTest seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features.
Features: Visual Studio Test Professional integrates well with Microsoft products, offers automated testing capabilities, and has a straightforward interface. Zeenyx AscentialTest provides advanced scripting, ease of use, and a wide range of testing functionalities.
Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional could improve ease of use and debugging tools, and refine reporting capabilities. Zeenyx AscentialTest users desire better documentation, more training resources, and simplified user interface enhancements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional offers straightforward deployment and strong customer service. Zeenyx AscentialTest has more complex deployment but helpful customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional is more cost-effective and offers good value. Zeenyx AscentialTest is more expensive but delivers superior ROI with its richer features, justifying its higher cost.
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.
The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit.
The price is expensive.
It supports cross-platform functionality.
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
