CrossBrowserTesting Reviews

Use of CBT to test the UI in different mobile devices since the experience is different with a real device vs. resizing window browser. Also, it's very useful to test the UI in Internet Explorer.

It helps to speed up the process to test the product in different devices and browsers, making it easy to troubleshoot some issues.

I am frequently using live testing to verify the UI in different devices and IE browser. Also, I've started using a screenshot, but it is not very useful for me, since the page does not load properly without loading another CSS file.

• The speed to connect to mobile devices needs improvement, and sometimes the connection fails. 
• Possibility to use web inspector in all devices (it is not available for OS devices). 
• Also, easy access to run local files. I need to run a CSS file before loading the website, and sometimes, it does not work.
  

I had used BrowserStack; we switched to CBT because it is easy to have parallel users.

We are using this feature to run our application in all the updated browsers popularly used.       

It has increased the speed of our regression testing.                                      

• Cross browser testing
• Live test
• Video recording of the script running in a cloud server.

There should be more detailed training on CrossBrowserTesting.                                

We develop web and mobile applications and need to test our applications across different browsers and different devices across all operating systems.

Due to serious testing needs across platforms and devices; we found CrossBrowserTesting a useful tool as it has the capability for functional testing, UI testing, automated testing just on few clicks.

We have saved the cost to buy in house devices.

Real device sessions instead of simulators

Screenshot test across the web and mobile devices at once which returns images

Shareable reports

Selection of the required device, Platform, and browsers.

Automated testing could be improved.

Test management feature where tests could be scripted.

Data-driven testing could be added.

Very few issues

Excellent Product

We used Telerik Test studio for CrossBrowserTesting but found CrossBrowserTesting miles better instead.

It has already paid cost back

Buying a license is cheaper than procurement of in house devices and there is no maintenance cost either.

Yes, we compared with Test Studio

Agile Support

Test script feature

Graphical Test Reports

Dashboard Widgets