Darktrace Reviews

I work for a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide the solution for our clients to improve their security posture in both IT and OT. The deployments are typically hybrid. 

The solution is outstanding from a monitoring perspective. 

All of the features are valuable and provide excellent capability in the field.

Darktrace is a closed technology, meaning we know very little about how it works, including the architecture, which is significant. As a result, when we implement the system and find we're getting many false positives, we have minimal insight into why it's happening and what we can do to fix it. We don't know how the solution is configured, the criteria for threats to be determined, or the product's inner workings. We understand that they have to ensure privacy and their copyright, but we want to see some documentation or public research into the security Darktrace provides.

A relatively new module called Darktrace PREVENT provides digital protection to the company from the internet. However, the protection doesn't extend to the dark web, which limits its depth. PREVENT also offers phishing awareness training in the form of dummy attacks and some penetration testing, but it is very limited from my point of view.

The AI and Darktrace breach model must be enhanced to minimize false positives, as they can give our customers a negative impression of the solution. Some of them come to us and say they aren't getting what they expect from it, especially after a significant investment.

I initially used the product in 2016, then returned to it in 2022 and have been using it for about a year. Over the years, the extension to the Darktrace portfolio has been tremendous, and they have made improvements in many areas, including reporting and autonomous response.

The stability is very good; I rate the solution eight out of ten here. 

The solution is scalable; I rate it eight out of ten for scalability.

Darktrace tech support is helpful, but there is room for improvement, especially around assistance for complex deployments. I rate them seven out of ten. 

Neutral

The deployment is straightforward. However, a complex network, such as one in the cloud and a DOCSIS ecosystem, can become extremely difficult. Generally, though, the deployment is straightforward, and in our case, we completed the whole setup in three to four hours.

Specifically, large, complex MPLS networks are exceedingly tricky when deploying Darktrace. We may need more experience or training, but it would be good to see some improvements here.

Our InfoSec team uses the solution, consisting of two to three staff members. Regarding endpoints protected by the product, there were around 400 in my old position and 2000 in my current organization.

I'm unfamiliar with the exact cost, but we have a yearly license and had to pay for Darktrace's services before the deployment. The product is very expensive, so some organizations can't afford to pay the total amount directly, meaning they often seek a partner or pay in installments, which increases the price more.

Darktrace requires direct billing to London, which isn't possible for organizations in Qatar, so they have to go through processes that increase the price even further. If they had an office in Dubai or Qatar, that could solve this payment issue.

I rate the solution eight out of ten and highly recommend it.

From a technological perspective, Darktrace is an excellent company, and the rate at which they improved and continue to improve their product is impressive.

All the data is on the appliance on the customers' premises, and we have to open back doors to the analysts in London to access the devices, who have complete visibility into what's happening on the customer side. This is a significant negative point for Darktrace. They also have complete visibility into our email, which is a privacy concern for us. 

We use Darktrace for threat monitoring in the finance industry.

Darktrace's most valuable features are its dashboards and its ability to summarize huge amounts of information about threats and suspicious traffic. The solution summarizes suspicious traffic in all our networks, allowing us to focus our efforts on the most vulnerable points in our network.

The solution's user interface and stability could be improved.

I have been using Darktrace for one year.

I rate the solution’s stability a six out of ten.

I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.

The solution's technical support team was very proficient and useful.

Positive

We previously used Cisco's EDR and traffic monitor.

The solution's initial setup is very complex. It's not easy to set up Darktrace. The solution was deployed in three months by a team consisting of ten networking engineers.

The solution improved our visibility. Earlier, we couldn't visualize some threats on the internal network level. With Darktrace, we were able to spot some deficiencies and certain vulnerabilities.

Before choosing Darktrace, we evaluated Palo Alto and Cisco. Palo Alto needed some integration with other Palo Alto and Cisco products. It was mostly focused on network traffic anomalies rather than cybersecurity threats.

Darktrace is a very complex product. It's not like a commodity because we're not talking about licenses but mostly about traffic, which is a complex matter. Darktrace's AI technology could be improved because it requires a huge amount of manual work to work properly.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Darktrace is an appliance that has been installed in our network, and it is connected to the database SaaS applications and they're collecting the data from there.

We are using Darktrace for tracking our network and if any suspicious activity happens, we will be notified or we can check it on our tenant.

The most valuable features of Darktrace are its full capabilities. You have visibility of everything.

Darktrace could improve by being more user-friendly.

I have been using Darktrace for approximately six months.

Darktrace is stable.

The scalability of Darktrace is good.

We have approximately 350 users using the solution in my company. Everyone is using it.

The support from Darktrace is responsive and speedy.

I rate the support of Darktrace a nine out of ten.

Darktrace is simple to install and the full process took approximately three weeks.

The deployment of Darktrace was done by the vendor.

The price of Darktrace is high and could be reduced. We pay approximately $30,000 to $54,000 annually.

The cost of the solution is high making it an issue for smaller companies. We are a small organization and it is difficult to afford. We are not a large organization. For this reason, the solution's price must be reduced. Having 350 users is not a large organization. It's a small organization and paying approximately $30,000 to $54,000 annually, is a lot. However, sometimes we had too many services to have more visibility and be secure, this is the idea why we went with Darktrace without negotiating the prices.

I recommend Darktrace to others, it is a helpful service you will have full visibility of what's happening on your network, emails, and SaaS applications.

I rate Darktrace an eight out of ten.

We use the product to collect and monitor my environment. It models my traffic and sends me reports. Additionally, I have the response module in place to handle critical breaches by quarantining devices. I utilize it for generating reports and analyzing data to leverage threat intelligence.

The product's most valuable features are the response module and email protection.

Darktrace is quite expensive, which can be a significant factor for organizations with budget constraints. The pricing needs improvement. 

I have been working with Darktrace for around four to five years now.

It is a stable solution. I rate the stability an eight. 

I rate the platform scalability a ten. It supports a wide range of devices and is highly scalable.

The technical support services are reliable.

Positive

With the support from Darktrace and its partners, the setup process was user-friendly and easy.

The deployment took less than a week, although the learning phase for the environment can take some additional time.

Darktrace generates an ROI by effectively mitigating threats and avoiding costs related to downtime and other issues.

The product is expensive.

Darktrace provides real-time alarms for any anomalies in my network, which I utilize for incident response. It has significantly improved our reporting capabilities and response times once we set the parameters for identifying critical threats.

The response capability is beneficial because it autonomously responds to identified threats without manual intervention, ensuring that alerts are addressed 24/7. This includes quarantining devices as needed, which adds resilience to our security operations.

There have been improvements in incident response times. Before using the response functionality, we experienced a breach last year. Now, reports highlight and address incidents more effectively, reducing response times.

Its AI technology supports cybersecurity by learning my environment and accurately responding to threats. It reduces false positives and provides accurate threat detection by understanding the behavior of my network.

It is a tool worth trying, but the pricing aspect should be considered. I rate an eight out of ten.

Darktrace is used for network security.

The solution can be deployed in the cloud and on-premise.

The most valuable feature of Darktrace is the AI that detects abnormal network activity.

Although we haven't detected any network threats since implementing Darktrace, we are unsure of its efficacy. It would be beneficial if the solution could offer additional details to the user regarding any potential or prevented threats. Additionally, there could be better search tools and integration.

I have been using Darktrace for approximately three years.

The stability has been good in my usage.

I rate the stability of Darktrace an eight out of ten.

We have serval engineers that use Darktrace.

I rate the scalability of Darktrace an eight out of ten.

The support has been good. When we contacted them we received a helpful response.

I rate the support of Darktrace an eight out of ten.

We have used many similar solutions before Darktrace. We choose Darktrace because of the AI. We can develop many use cases with the solution.

The initial setup of Darktrace is straightforward. We are using Slunk and the implementation is simple.

We used a third party for parts of the implementation of Darktrace.

There is an annual license to use Darktrace.

One person can handle the maintenance of Darktrace.

I recommend the solution to others.

I rate Darktrace an eight out of ten.

We were trying to justify Darktrace, and I was starting to do an analysis of the different solutions. We did a POC and haven't made a decision as to if we will use it or not.

We were just trying to validate their claims of AI-driven preventive network issues. They showed us a number of things, and we were able to show or verify that, yes, the things that they pointed out we were glad they caught. Nothing turned out to be a true intrusion, however, the stuff that they showed us were things that we were happy to see on our network. They discovered traffic on our network that was anomalous. We were just looking to see if they could point us to anomalous traffic, and they did.

We liked their approach to identifying intrusions or network anomalies using AI.

We liked their interface and the graphics that they deployed to present the information. It was really good, and we were happy with the overall quality of the product, which was very, very robust.

The implementation was easy.

We didn't really notice any downsides to the product. We were very impressed with it. It was a matter of timing and cost. Upper management wasn't sold on the value proposition.

We had demoed Darktrace for a few months.

It ran pretty fast. Its interface was quick, and it did not impact our network traffic. It didn't slow down anything on our network. It was stable. 

We had a sense that it was going to handle our network without many problems. We have a few hundred endpoints of all types, and there was no problem. We had three users on the solution. 

Since we weren't really entirely familiar with the product we were, I'd say we were probably using 10% to 20% of its capabilities.

When we originally initially configured and set it up, we used some support, and we were happy with them. We thought they were very confident and good.

We haven't demoed anything else before or since. 

The initial setup was actually pretty easy, as I recall. The hardest thing was finding space on our rack. That said, once we had that up and running, it was pretty straightforward.

We needed one or two people to deploy the solution. Two and a half people were on the deployment full-time. 

We did the deployment on our own, with Dartrace assisting us remotely. 

We only demoed the solution for a few months and therefore did not witness an ROI. 

The cost was reasonable. They were pitching us a five-year contract at a fairly reduced rate annually. The product cost was on the lower side. I'd rate it a two or three out of five in terms of the expense involved. There were no hidden or extra fees involved. 

We started looking at some other things yet didn't really dig very deep. When we were initially looking at Darktrace, they were the only game in town for us. They seemed to be unique after the fact.

We were end-users. 

I'd rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The solution is a security cover for our on-premises solution to improve our security rating. Also, we want to protect our emails.

It has helped the organization to detect any malware affecting the machines. For example, if any phishing email creates a factory view bug or some of the workstations have some weird activities, or if someone downloaded malware from the internet, then Darktrace sends us a warning notification to look into the details so that our machine does not get involved with the malware. This function has helped our organization.

The network monitoring and the email monitoring features are very valuable for us.

The main portal needs improvement as it is difficult to use. But it's straightforward to follow compared to other VPN portals, for example, Azure. You don't have to bug the customer support team quite often.

They can add the EDR and follow-up options in the next release. For instance, if something happens, we get a notification. If a follow-up option is available, we can create a case and then understand how to record the evidence.

I have been using Darktrace for one year.

It is a stable solution. I rate it nine out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. I rate it a nine out of ten. Presently, 150 users are using the solution, and we wish to increase the number of users in the future.

The technical support team is slow, but not that bad. I rate it eight out of ten.

Positive

I do not know much about it, as an engineer from Darktrace did the setup for us.

The engineer from Darktrace set it up about two years ago.

There has been a return on investment using the product.

We pay 8,000 a year. The pricing is reasonable.

If any company has enough budget to put another layer between the internet and the on-prem device, they should consider Darktrace.

I rate the product a nine and a half out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for network detection and response.

Antigena is the most valuable due to the reduction in terms of the mean time to respond.

The solution can scale.

It's reliable and stable. 

Technical support is great.

The pricing is good. 

The initial setup is a bit complex. 

It's quite a good product. However, I'd love them to see maybe covering the cloud a bit more. We'd like a cloud version. For example, FortiGate firewalls now have virtual firewalls that you can just install, as well as the cloud. They can drive it with Microsoft, and Microsoft can maybe provide technology that would allow Darktrace to work seamlessly in the cloud. 

I've used the solution for almost two and a half years. 

The solution is stable. It's reliable. 

The solution is very scalable. You can also install it in a Citrix environment very easily.

The whole security team has access to it. That said, I have the most hands on in terms of the product. Five or six people use the solution.

Technical support is great. They come from the UK and they came out to Africa to meet us personally. The engineers are always available. Their resellers are supportive. Even to this day we still run through weekly meetings.

We consume quite a lot of products from Darktrace, so we have a few. We got that Darktrace Network, Antigena, Cloud Sales, and AIS integrations, et cetera.

This is my first time working with an NDR that has AI and machine learning.

From a networking perspective, it is a bit complex since we sort of have to keep an end tab on the network for network log ingestion, flow ingestion, and all of that.

The implementation took about two months or so.

We did the implementation with the help of a technician from Darktrace and a reseller. I'd rate their assistance a ten out of ten. They were great.

The pricing is reasonable. I'm not sure of the exact costs. However, they are not that expensive. We pay annually.

I did not compare the solution to other options, although I did look into Cisco Secure Network Analytics.

I'm an end-user.

It's quite a good tool. They've worked hard to be the top security control in terms of AI and machine learning, and their product works well. Cisco would not match up. Maybe Palo Alto Cortex could do what they do. Cisco is not a security house, even though they have the networking knowledge and all of that. Most of their products are only now catching up to cybersecurity.

I'd rate Darktrace ten out of ten.