Datadog Reviews

We’re currently using logging, monitoring, metrics, APM, etc.  

We've started to use קSLOs. However, it takes a bit of time to work through those.

RUM (Real User Monitoring) has been very useful. I have used this in the past to debug problems in production, which has been great.

We also want to start using synthetics and tracing more. 

Our application currently runs in many different environments based on our customers' requirements. This allows us to see everything in one place and still filter by the environment as required, which is extremely useful. 

The solution has offered increased visibility via logging APM, metrics, RUM, etc. Going from almost nothing to something that didn’t take a lot of time to set up has been great since we have so little time to spare

As a startup, we have limited resources, and no one has enough time for anything. There are so many easy integrations and things configurable by YAML making everything easy to set up without needing a full-time employee. Just configuring monitoring solutions is very desirable. 

The APM is very useful for tracking down anything that’s gone wrong. I’ve been using it to make sure everything is working correctly after deployment, to make sure we don’t suffer performance degradation, and to track down anything that’s gone wrong in real-time  

The logs are great and necessary for any application. Before this, our solution would have been to SSH into a machine and tail log files. This is untenable for many reasons, and one of the first things I wanted to change.

The RUM is useful for seeing how real users interact with our website.

Sometimes it’s difficult to customize certain queries to find specific things, specifically with the logging solution. I’ve used other logging platforms in the past that have extensive and mature query languages, which might not be super friendly to start out with, yet they can be very powerful. I wish there was more of an emphasis on that instead of the UI-based tooling that Datadog provides. Even though it is powerful on its own, UI-based design lacks the elegance, efficiency, and complexity that something like that can provide. 

I've been using the solution for six months or so.

We did not previously use a different solution.

I don’t handle the licensing or pricing.

We did look into Splunk.

I like Datadog because it is so easy use, I can easily connect to public clouds, and I have a view of observability. In my opinion it's the best tool in the market.

I like the interface so much. The interface and the integrations make it so easy to connect to the cloud or to the on-premise environment. It has so many monitors for alerting. I like all the versions and especially the APM model, on which I did a lot more testing with my applications. I have made applications for testing the tool that is in the resource. The APM is the goal for me in the Datadog.

In terms of what could be improved, Datadog does not have the feature where you can monitor external websites or check the SSL secure for websites.

I have been using Datadog for the last 14 days.

In terms of stability, I don't have any problem with its stability or the website data. They have a solid infrastructure. I don't have any problems with that.

It was simple to configure and to set up this tool.

I have less experience with Zabbix than I have with Datadog, but I don't see Zabbix as a great tool for cloud specific monitoring because I cannot connect so easily to public clouds to gain all the information that I can in Datadog, which I can easily set up.

I have used Zabbix for 20 days for my personal tests and I really don't like it.

There is something that I liked with Zabbix, though. Zabbix is better for monitoring virtual machines. That's a feature that I liked. But everything else is awful. I can't have dashboards. I do not have integrations with some ITSM systems, like Jira or OTRS. It's awful because I need to have those integrations.

I would rate Zabbix a nine from one to ten for on premises environments. For cloud platforms, I rate this tool as a five, because of the complexity required to integrate it in other platforms.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Datadog a nine, just because of the missing feature of checking websites.

I implement this solution for clients.

I have found some of the most valuable features to be the way things all come together that gives us a point of view that is useful. The panel is very beautiful and customizable. The configuration file was really helpful, we were able to configure the solution in the way we needed. The portability of this solution is more flexible than other competitors, allowing us to change cloud services when we want. We are not locked into a particular one.

The solution is scalable.

We have used CloudWatch previously and this solution is better at meeting all our needs.

The installation is easy for me. However, if you are new to this solution it might not be so easy.

I am an implementor, I did the implantation of the solution.

I rate Datadog a nine out of ten.

• Monitoring
• Analytics
• Tracing
• APM

It's hosted. We don't have to do it, and they handle a large amount of data with backups and all of the other things that we no longer have to manage. 

There are things about it that we would like to be fixed, such as it is taking averages of average. This results in data that we don't expect, but overall we are happy with it.

It is incredibly stable.

We have had no issues with scalability.

We have needed technical support because we were dealing with averages of averages.

The integration and configuration are incredibly simple. The SaaS offering is remarkably easy to set up, especially if you're coming from a Graphite environment or anything that uses a StatsD. Datadog is a custom StatsD client, and it adds additional functionality, like tags, etc. However, out-of-the-box should work with native StatsD, so it is incredibly easy to drop in replace if you are using StatsD for metrics.

In terms of employee time: While the instructor costs were transferred to Datadog, it freed up our engineers to work on things which were of valuable to our business rather than maintaining a service that we don't make money on.

It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost.

We did look at several vendors. What it came down to is we did not want to manage the metric services ourselves anymore, and Datadog matched what it cost for us to host it ourselves.

Check out Datadog. It is awesome.

The ingestion points are unlimited and support customization. We haven't had anything yet that we haven't been able to integrate with it.

We have only used the SaaS offering, but not AWS nor on-premise.

Our company is transitioning to using the solution for monitoring and analytic services we provide to customers. Once fully rolled out, there will be 80-100 users companywide. 

The solution's SaaS model is easy to manage and works well in single- or multi-cloud environments. 

The Saas format can handle heterogeneous or multi-language applications much better than using a combination of tools. 

Graph filters for logs need to be set manually which works well for JSON but not for unstructured logs. 

Making structured logs for high-performance applications is over our heads so we had to dump some technical streams for our logs. 

I recently started using the solution. 

The solution is stable and passed an our internal assessment.

The solution is scalable. 

We received product support through the sales department and they were helpful. 

The solution is better than what we previously used. 

The initial setup is straightforward which is impressive.

I rate setup an eight out of ten. 

We implemented the solution in-house and are continuing to roll it out. 

Licensing is based on the retention period of logs and metrics. 

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

The solution is primarily used for better understanding the health of applications, modern environments, and many other solutions, which are the main focus of Datadog and many other monitoring tools.

With Datadog specifically, I can look at the health of the technology stack and services, and also integrate multiple metric sources, security, business data, and much more. This makes it a real software solution for centralizing data and unifying monitoring silos in one place. Datadog is like a hub - not just a monitoring software.

The solution primarily has helped the organization by helping us better understand the health of applications, modern environments, et cetera. 

We can see the health of the technology stack and services. We can also integrate multiple metric sources, security, business data, and much more. It centralizes data and unifies monitoring in one place. It's Helping reduce costs with other solutions, and also reduces costs with teams that might waste time with manual troubleshooting.

Understanding better the health of applications, modern environments, and many other solutions, is the main focus of Datadog and many other monitoring tools.

With Datadog I can look at the health of the technology stack and services. I can also integrate multiple metric sources, security, business data, and much more. It's great for centralizing data and unifying monitoring silos. 

Datadog is a hub, not just a monitoring software. The biggest value of Datadog is looking at the big picture, not only one part of it.

Datadog could have a better business analysis module. 

Other vendors have specific business collections and analyses. With Datadog, I don't see much of it. It's possible to do this with custom metrics, dashboards, etc. However, none of those are business-focused - and that is what is lacking in Datadog.

I've used the solution for two years. 

We use the SaaS version of the product.

Observability is a key use case, as is security.

With this product, we get more visibility into our K8s clusters and more intelligent alerting.

Datadog dashboards are pretty great.

We need more integration with security tools like Drata.

I've used the solution for three years.