Datadog Reviews

We use Datadog for application monitoring, to help identify errors. It is also used to monitor application performance.

It helps organizations to understand User Experience with user behaviour pattern

Helped to reduce production issues in a defined timeframe

Helped to refine UX

Datadog has a very good visualization for my complete infrastructure and network traffic, which enabled me to create a capacity plan.

This product is great because it shows you the SQL and your application request in a single view.

The error traceability is an area that can be improved. This is something that helps us to pinpoint the area where a problem is occurring. It is a function stack, and it should be showing us how each function is defined.

We have been using Datadog for the past couple of Years.

I have not worked on it long enough to properly comment on stability, yet, because it has to be tested across my other platforms.

We have not done a full evaluation yet, but given that it is cloud-based, DataDog has to be scalable.

I have not needed to contact technical support.

Positive

We were using New Relic prior to implementing Datadog. In terms of application monitoring, Datadog is not up to the level that New Relic is. It is a better product but the price is too high, which is why we switched.

Yes. It is not complex. It allows you to get a certification of DataDog prior deployment of associates to administration and configuration

Inhouse. We got our Admin team certified.

Time to resolution production issue

The price is better than some competing products.

NewRelic

This is a good product and I can recommend it to others, although New Relic is still my first choice. Datadog is my second choice.

Overall, it is a good product and my main complaint is that it needs better error traceability.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I like Datadog because it is so easy use, I can easily connect to public clouds, and I have a view of observability. In my opinion it's the best tool in the market.

I like the interface so much. The interface and the integrations make it so easy to connect to the cloud or to the on-premise environment. It has so many monitors for alerting. I like all the versions and especially the APM model, on which I did a lot more testing with my applications. I have made applications for testing the tool that is in the resource. The APM is the goal for me in the Datadog.

In terms of what could be improved, Datadog does not have the feature where you can monitor external websites or check the SSL secure for websites.

I have been using Datadog for the last 14 days.

In terms of stability, I don't have any problem with its stability or the website data. They have a solid infrastructure. I don't have any problems with that.

It was simple to configure and to set up this tool.

I have less experience with Zabbix than I have with Datadog, but I don't see Zabbix as a great tool for cloud specific monitoring because I cannot connect so easily to public clouds to gain all the information that I can in Datadog, which I can easily set up.

I have used Zabbix for 20 days for my personal tests and I really don't like it.

There is something that I liked with Zabbix, though. Zabbix is better for monitoring virtual machines. That's a feature that I liked. But everything else is awful. I can't have dashboards. I do not have integrations with some ITSM systems, like Jira or OTRS. It's awful because I need to have those integrations.

I would rate Zabbix a nine from one to ten for on premises environments. For cloud platforms, I rate this tool as a five, because of the complexity required to integrate it in other platforms.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Datadog a nine, just because of the missing feature of checking websites.

I'm not sure which version we're using, although I believe it to be the latest. 

We essentially use the solution in advance of performance testing, performance monitoring, and troubleshooting.

The solution affords us many uses when it comes to troubleshooting and application. Should we encounter issues while troubleshooting under load, we can take advantage of Datadog usage metrics to see which method or area is having difficulty, in order that we may resolve the issue. 

The solution has valuable troubleshooting and instrumentation features. 

The setup was a bit complex. 

As Datadog is a bit on the expensive side, I would recommend it for simple, uncomplicated, solutions.

I have been using Datadog for nearly four or five years. 

The solution is sufficiently stable. 

As our company does not have many users who are making use of the solution at present, I have not encountered issues with its scalability. 

I do not have plans to increase the usage at the moment. 

I cannot comment on tech support, as I have not made use of them, although my team members have. It seems okay. 

We mainly work with Datadog, although with Dynatrace, as well. 

The initial setup was a bit complex. 

We hired a separate team to handle the implementation. 

At present, not much staff is needed for the deployment and maintenance. 

I am not in much of a position to address the question of return on investment, although I believe it is for the better that my organization employs the solution.

I do not have knowledge of the licensing costs. 

As Datadog is a bit on the expensive side, I would recommend it for simple, uncomplicated, solutions. 

We are just the users of the solution. There are not many of us in our company. 

The solution is good for complex integations which have lots of downstream and involve multiple combined systems. This is where it is useful. 

I rate Datadog as a nine out of ten. 

Sometimes it's more user friendly for development teams. There are some parts of Datadog that are more understandable for development teams. For example, the APM in Datadog works more manually and works like the tools in New Relic or Grafana or Elastic. It is easier to understand for software development teams. 

It could use some additional features when working with metrics like Grafana or like New Relic has. Datadog does not use library technologies like Dynatrace does. Datadog has machine learning too, but it does not have this option in all layers of monitoring like infrastructure service process in applications. 

I've used Datadog for about one month. 

Datadog is a great tool, but it does not cover 100% of all libraries and technologies, like Dynatrace does.

I give Datadog an eight out of ten. 

We have a web infrastructure that uses Amazon Web Services containers with everything included, and we use Datadog to monitor them all.

The most valuable feature of Datadog is its logs. We can use the logs to conduct analysis and root cause analysis.

They could look into improving the integration.

I'd like to see better pricing and more integration in the next release.

I have been working with Datadog for approximately one year.

Datadog is a stable solution.

The scalability is good.

Datadog is currently used by 15 people in our organization.

We intend to continue and expand our use of this solution.

We contacted technical support, and they were extremely helpful.

The installation is reasonably straightforward.

We are a small organization. We have one administrator who is responsible to maintain and keep this solution up to date.

Our licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis.

It's quite expensive. They could improve the price by making it affordable.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I would rate Datadog an eight out of ten.

I am using Datadog for error reporting.

I have found error reporting and log centralization the most valuable features. Overall, Datadog provides a full package solution.

I have been using this solution for approximately three years.

The solution is stable.

I used to process a million requests easily with Datadog, I never had any scalability issue.

I have not needed to contact support.

The initial setup is easy.

Datadog does not provide any free plans to use the solution. When I start with a proof of concept it would be sensible to have a free plan to test the tool and check whether it fits the requirements of the project. Before the production stage, it is always good to have a free plan with some limited features, number of requests, or logs.

I rate Datadog a nine out of ten.

We are currently testing it. If the testing goes well, we'll purchase the full version, and it will probably be our main monitoring tool. We plan to use it for monitoring our activities and the attacks on our systems or network.

It is a cloud monitoring tool. I believe it would make things easier for our clients in terms of monitoring.

Its integration is most valuable because you can integrate it with various service providers such as AWS, .Net, etc.

I'm still exploring the trial version, and it is fine. One thing that I haven't been able to figure out is how to retrieve a report. This is something that could be improved. I probably need to navigate to a place to access the reports. 

We started using its trial version just last week.

We have not yet interacted with their technical support.

Currently, we're on EventTracker. We are doing research to see if we could get a better monitoring solution. That's why we are trying out Datadog. If we like it, we will buy the full version. We would also recommend it to our other clients.

It is easy to install, and it doesn't have any cumbersome procedures. Its deployment took a couple of hours.

I did it by myself.

We evaluated solutions from SolarWinds and IBM.

I would recommend this solution. I am still trying it out, and I haven't encountered any challenges so far. I would rate Datadog a seven out of ten.

The application performance monitoring is pretty good. 

The Log Explorer could be better. I don't think it has log manipulation as Splunk does.

I've only been using Datadog for the past one or two months. 

Datadog is stable. 

The initial setup is pretty easy. It's a kind of agent-based application monitoring. It's similar to Splunk and Elastic Stack.

Although I don't have that much experience with it, overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give Datadog a rating of eight.