Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Dell PowerMax NVMe Logo

Dell PowerMax NVMe pros and cons

4.4 out of 5
414 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Dell PowerMax NVMe provides enhanced reliability, ensuring seamless operations with superior performance and near-zero downtime.
Key features such as deduplication, compression, and replication lead to significant cost savings and efficient data management.
The migration process from older VMAX arrays to Dell PowerMax NVMe is streamlined and user-friendly, facilitating easy adoption.
Dell PowerMax NVMe reduces physical footprint significantly, which contributes to lower power and HVAC costs in data centers.
Administrators find Dell PowerMax NVMe to be user-friendly and efficient, simplifying storage management and reducing management overhead.

CONS

Deduplication and compression rates could be improved, with expectations of achieving higher ratios like 3:1 or better.
The complex initial setup presents challenges, even for experienced personnel, requiring a streamline in installation processes.
NVMe needs to support end-to-end operation and feature NVMe over Fabrics, enhancing direct communication capabilities.
There is a need for better technical support and SLA compliance, as current response times are longer than expected.
Pricing is high compared to other options, and there is a need for customization in pricing structures to match enterprise needs.
 

Dell PowerMax NVMe Pros review quotes

PC
May 24, 2021
There is no management overhead involved in optimizing performance. It does it so well on its own. We don't have to manage much at all. It really is like a set it and forget it solution. My storage engineers love the system. It is a lot less work than our previous systems, which weren't bad by any means. There is not nearly as much management as before. So, we are saving dozens of hours per month for our storage team, and that is a real cost in our business.
OO
Nov 3, 2021
We find the service level option to provision storage very valuable. The ability to define different service levels for storage groups helps us in prioritizing our workload at the infrastructure level.
CM
Apr 27, 2021
The performance is very good. Our predominant workloads are all less than 5 milliseconds and it's most common to have a sub-1-millisecond response time for our applications. In terms of efficiency, we've turned on compression and we're able to get as high as two-to-one compression on our workloads, on average.
Learn what your peers think about Dell PowerMax NVMe. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Abdul-Salam - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 11, 2022
The compression and deduplication are always on. We get more than 4:1 capacity savings using them. The efficiency benefits from compression and deduplication are through a specialized hardware module within the storage itself, and that means there is no overhead to the compression and dedupe.
VV
Dec 8, 2021
They're basically tanks. You could take a baseball bat to the thing, and it's still going to keep running and doing what it's supposed to do. We've had a couple of part failures, and you can pretty much replace any part on that thing at any time during the day in the middle of production without worrying about anything happening.
it_user1256415 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 15, 2021
The SRDF site-to-site replication for the volumes is the most important feature for us. That enables us to do site recovery and replication for our VMware infrastructure.
FA
May 4, 2021
The solution's snapshot capabilities and replication are very good features. Snapshots are allowing us to quickly build analytical models directly from production data. This gives us amazing insights into market trends and allows us to build more effective trading algorithms. Replication offers us unparalleled levels of resilience.
StorageEb283 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 8, 2019
The compression and deduplication are the most valuable features because of the cost savings.
JD
Nov 21, 2022
PowerMax NVMe has made it a lot easier to understand how much we are able to provision. It has made it a lot faster to provision new things. 90% of my time for provisioning has been reduced. Also, it has made it very easy to understand and see everything behind it versus the older heritage, where Dell EMC was very convoluted and hard to get working. Things that used to take an hour, probably now take five to 10 minutes.
PC
May 8, 2019
My storage engineers are very happy with PowerMax. They are very pleased with the performance, decreased latency, and dependability. From the team, the RESTful API makes management so much easier for them versus the command line interface.
 

Dell PowerMax NVMe Cons review quotes

PC
May 24, 2021
Support of the product can be slow and an administrative challenge: planning, scheduling, and overseeing data center access for a Dell EMC rep. One improvement could be to enable a self-maintenance option. The requirements that we go through to get Dell EMC onsite to replace failed drives, power supplies, and other small redundant parts can be unnecessarily complex. If simplified, they could send us the parts, then we could replace them much faster, more easily, and truly within the SLA parameters.
OO
Nov 3, 2021
They can make the GUI better, especially for the ones that come out of the box. We did encounter a bit of difficulty in setting up the storage. We had to deploy Solutions Enabler on a Linux machine to be able to fully interact with the storage. They need to upgrade the web interface for the management of the storage that comes out of the box. The management interface for NFS is also a bit old and not very intuitive.
Abdul-Salam - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 11, 2022
Although they call it unified storage where you have SAN and NAS, with a NAS implementation on top of a SAN, the NAS implementation is a little complicated and clumsy. As SAN, as block storage, it is very powerful... If they could provide a very good NAS implementation, it would be better, so that customers don't have to look for other simple solutions for NAS.
Learn what your peers think about Dell PowerMax NVMe. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.
VV
Dec 8, 2021
I think management is where PowerMax is weakest. We're still managing it like we managed EMC arrays in the early 2000s. There's a slicker, fancier GUI that does more things, but at the end of the day, you still have to dig into the command line and issue a lot of the same commands that we still were using almost 20 years ago.
it_user1256415 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 15, 2021
There is also room for improvement in the PowerMax architecture and hardware itself. They should design the PowerMax on the basis of PCIe 4.0. I would like to see the possibility of an NVMe drive that operates on PCIe 4.0 and not PCIe 3.0.
FA
May 4, 2021
It's a relatively new product, but for the next release I would like to see higher bandwidth on the front-end adapters. This would allow even greater scalability for critical workloads and consolidation for non-critical workloads. The hosts may not require that level of I/O performance today. However, it allows us to scale physical non-cloud environments without large investment.
StorageEb283 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 8, 2019
Since the merging of EMC and Dell into Dell Technologies, there has been a hurdle that they've had to overcome, and they're not over it yet. It takes two to three times longer for things to get fixed than it did when they were separate companies. That is something that has to be fixed.
JD
Nov 21, 2022
Firmware updates are a bit painful because you have to involve their support, as opposed to having the ability to do it yourself.
PC
May 8, 2019
I would like them to continue improving the management tools and continue moving towards a RESTful API versus CLI.
SP
Oct 25, 2021
We brought up this question to the implementation engineer. We were comparing use cases where a customer is using RecoverPoint, then goes to PowerMax. In our previous setup with XtremIO, we were using RecpverPoint and keeping snapshots for 30 days, every few seconds. With PowerMax, I requested this for every 15 minutes, keeping it for a week. The engineer's answer was, "There will be too many snapshots. It might slow down the system." This is specifically for the use cases where there is RecoverPoint. While PowerMax works with RecoverPoint, and you can use it, there should be some way where you can have even more snapshots and not to worry about performance and system cache.