Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Flowmon Logo

Top 10 Flowmon Alternatives

Vendor: Progress Software
4.3 out of 5
Post review

Top Flowmon Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Flowmon based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, SolarWinds NPM, and PRTG Network Monitor. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Flowmon surpasses its competitors by offering advanced network intelligence and security capabilities, providing real-time visibility, comprehensive threat detection, and seamless integration with existing IT environments for enhanced operational efficiency.

Progress Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Progress Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Flowmon Logo
Zabbix
4.1 out of 5
Flowmon Logo
Zabbix
4.1 out of 5
Zabbix is valued for its cost-effectiveness and customizable monitoring, ideal for businesses needing specific solutions. In comparison, Flowmon emphasizes robust network traffic analysis and security, attracting enterprises seeking in-depth insights with a streamlined deployment process and dedicated support, justifying its higher initial investment.
Download Flowmon vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix offers lower setup costs, while Flowmon may require a higher initial investment due to its advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix offers lower setup costs, while Flowmon may require a higher initial investment due to its advanced capabilities.
Flowmon Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
Flowmon Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM excels with comprehensive performance monitoring and real-time alerts. In comparison, Flowmon provides advanced traffic analysis and security features. SolarWinds attracts cost-conscious buyers with strong support, while Flowmon appeals to those needing detailed traffic insights and robust security.
Download Flowmon vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM has a higher setup cost compared to Flowmon, making it a more significant initial investment. Flowmon offers a more affordable entry point, appealing to those with limited budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM has a higher setup cost compared to Flowmon, making it a more significant initial investment. Flowmon offers a more affordable entry point, appealing to those with limited budgets.
Flowmon Logo
Flowmon Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers affordable pricing with easy deployment and strong customer support. In comparison, Flowmon provides robust features and advanced analytics for complex environments. While cost-effective solutions may favor PRTG, Flowmon justifies its higher cost with comprehensive network security and analysis.
Download Flowmon vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, while Flowmon typically requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, while Flowmon typically requires a higher initial investment.
Flowmon Logo
Flowmon Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers advanced threat detection and extensive network visibility, making it ideal for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, Flowmon excels in performance monitoring and customization, appealing to buyers seeking cost-effective solutions with adaptable deployment and specific application monitoring.
Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Flowmon Report
Cisco Secure Network Analytics setup involves higher initial costs, while Flowmon offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Network Analytics setup involves higher initial costs, while Flowmon offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Flowmon Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
Flowmon Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
ThousandEyes excels in network visibility and cloud integration, ideal for enterprises prioritizing global reach. In comparison, Flowmon stands out with advanced security analytics, serving security-focused environments effectively. Each solution presents distinct features catering to specific organizational needs in network monitoring.
Download Flowmon vs. ThousandEyes Report
ThousandEyes offers a competitive setup cost with efficient deployment, while Flowmon presents a higher initial investment accompanied by premium features.
View comparison
Pricing
ThousandEyes offers a competitive setup cost with efficient deployment, while Flowmon presents a higher initial investment accompanied by premium features.
Flowmon Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
Flowmon Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
Centreon appeals to cost-conscious users with ease of deployment and budget-friendly pricing. In comparison, Flowmon offers advanced security analytics and real-time traffic visibility, suitable for those prioritizing comprehensive features and security over a more straightforward setup and lower costs.
Download Centreon vs. Flowmon Report
Centreon's setup cost is reported as moderate, offering a balanced investment for comprehensive features; Flowmon, however, is noted for a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its advanced capabilities in network monitoring.
View comparison
Pricing
Centreon's setup cost is reported as moderate, offering a balanced investment for comprehensive features; Flowmon, however, is noted for a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its advanced capabilities in network monitoring.
Flowmon Logo
Flowmon Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
4.1 out of 5
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE excels in comprehensive network monitoring, ideal for large environments needing detailed insights. In comparison, Flowmon appeals to organizations seeking a balance of security analytics and cost efficiency. NETSCOUT suits complex setups, while Flowmon is favored for quick, affordable deployment.
Download Flowmon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Report
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE has a higher setup cost compared to Flowmon, making Flowmon a more budget-friendly option. nGeniusONE's higher investment might suggest added value for certain enterprise needs.
View comparison
Pricing
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE has a higher setup cost compared to Flowmon, making Flowmon a more budget-friendly option. nGeniusONE's higher investment might suggest added value for certain enterprise needs.
Flowmon Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
Flowmon Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
Meraki Dashboard simplifies network management with its cloud-based interface and competitive pricing. In comparison, Flowmon provides advanced analytics and extensive support with a higher upfront cost, appealing to buyers needing in-depth network insights and customizable on-premise solutions.
Download Flowmon vs. Meraki Dashboard Report
Meraki Dashboard has a straightforward setup cost, while Flowmon offers a more complex pricing structure that may involve higher initial expenses. Each solution's setup cost reflects its feature set and deployment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Meraki Dashboard has a straightforward setup cost, while Flowmon offers a more complex pricing structure that may involve higher initial expenses. Each solution's setup cost reflects its feature set and deployment requirements.
Flowmon Logo
Flowmon Logo
ManageEngine OpManager
4.0 out of 5
ManageEngine OpManager is optimal for budget-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and efficient customer service. In comparison, Flowmon offers advanced threat detection and network traffic analysis, appealing to those prioritizing security, despite its higher cost and more complex deployment.
Download Flowmon vs. ManageEngine OpManager Report
ManageEngine OpManager offers competitive setup costs, while Flowmon is known for its straightforward setup process, ideal for businesses seeking simplicity.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine OpManager offers competitive setup costs, while Flowmon is known for its straightforward setup process, ideal for businesses seeking simplicity.
Flowmon Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
Flowmon Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
LiveAction LiveNX stands out with advanced visualization and intuitive troubleshooting. In comparison, Flowmon emphasizes robust security analytics. LiveNX's straightforward deployment and competitive pricing appeal to those seeking rapid implementation. Flowmon attracts businesses prioritizing comprehensive analytics and security, offering significant long-term returns.
Download Flowmon vs. LiveAction LiveNX Report
LiveAction LiveNX presents a higher setup cost compared to Flowmon, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment. Flowmon offers a cost-effective alternative with less initial financial commitment, showcasing a clear discrepancy in price strategy.
View comparison
Pricing
LiveAction LiveNX presents a higher setup cost compared to Flowmon, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment. Flowmon offers a cost-effective alternative with less initial financial commitment, showcasing a clear discrepancy in price strategy.
Flowmon Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
Flowmon Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
Kentik offers real-time data processing and network visibility, appealing to those seeking cost-effective, efficient management. In comparison, Flowmon excels with deep packet inspection and anomaly detection, suitable for companies needing advanced analytics and infrastructure insights despite higher initial costs.
Download Flowmon vs. Kentik Report
Kentik shows a straightforward setup cost, while Flowmon presents a more flexible pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Kentik shows a straightforward setup cost, while Flowmon presents a more flexible pricing structure.
Flowmon Logo
Flowmon Logo
Azure Network Watcher
4.0 out of 5
Flowmon excels in pricing and responsive support, ideal for organizations seeking rapid implementation and in-depth security analytics. In comparison, Azure Network Watcher stands out with its feature set and cloud integration, appealing to enterprises heavily invested in Azure for long-term efficiency gains.
Download Azure Network Watcher vs. Flowmon Report
Flowmon entails an initial setup cost often highlighted as a hurdle, while Azure Network Watcher is praised for its manageable setup expenses, highlighting significant differences in initial cost ease between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Flowmon entails an initial setup cost often highlighted as a hurdle, while Azure Network Watcher is praised for its manageable setup expenses, highlighting significant differences in initial cost ease between the two solutions.
Flowmon Logo
Flowmon Logo
Arista Data ANalyZer
1 out of 5
Arista Data ANalyZer (DANZ) is an integrated feature set in Arista's Extensible Operating System and is currently available on Arista Networks 7150-series, 7280SE-series, 7500E-series, 7280R-series and 7500R-series switches. DANZ provides a solution to monitoring and visibility challenges at 10 to 100Gbps and higher with unmatched scale, price performance and bandwidth. DANZ can be further enhanced by leveraging Arista CloudVision for automation, provisioning and monitoring of the visibility infrastructure, whether implemented in-band in the production network or out-of-band for a separate visibility network.
View comparison
Flowmon Logo
Plixer Scrutinizer
4.3 out of 5
Flowmon Logo
Plixer Scrutinizer
4.3 out of 5
Plixer Scrutinizer offers comprehensive analytics and efficient reporting tools ideal for budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Flowmon's advanced security features and integration options make it appealing for those prioritizing threat detection.
Download Flowmon vs. Plixer Scrutinizer Report
Plixer Scrutinizer's setup cost is affordable, whereas Flowmon presents a higher initial expense, highlighting the pricing disparity.
View comparison
Pricing
Plixer Scrutinizer's setup cost is affordable, whereas Flowmon presents a higher initial expense, highlighting the pricing disparity.
Flowmon Logo
Flowmon Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE
4.3 out of 5
Flowmon stands out for its cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, appealing to enterprises seeking quick insights and simplicity. In comparison, NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE attracts buyers needing advanced features and detailed analytics, justifying its higher price with extensive capabilities.
Download Flowmon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE Report
Flowmon offers a simpler setup with lower initial costs, while NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE involves higher expenses upfront due to its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Flowmon offers a simpler setup with lower initial costs, while NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE involves higher expenses upfront due to its comprehensive feature set.
Flowmon Logo
Flowmon Logo
Precisely Network Management
1 out of 5

Syncsort Zen is a comprehensive set of network-management tools for z/OS platforms. Its various components provide superior monitoring, alerting, tracing, reporting, and security, creating an efficient and manageable product that can seamlessly replace legacy network-management tool sets at a fraction of the legacy cost.

View comparison

Related categories

Network Monitoring Software
Network Detection and Response (NDR)
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability