Flowmon vs ManageEngine OpManager comparison

Progress Software and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Progress Software is ranked #44 with an average rating of 9.0, while ManageEngine is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1. Progress Software holds a 0.8% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Flowmon

Read 4 Flowmon reviews

974 Views
789 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 50 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

3,724 Views
2,185 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Flowmon

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and Flowmon compete in the network monitoring and analysis domain. ManageEngine OpManager seems to have the upper hand due to its competitive pricing and strong customer support, although Flowmon's robust feature set makes it preferable for detailed network insights.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager includes comprehensive network monitoring, server management, and real-time alerts. Flowmon provides advanced analytics, anomaly detection, and efficient incident response capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager could enhance its advanced analytics, incident response features, and anomaly detection capabilities. Flowmon may improve in simplifying its interface, expanding integration options, and reducing complexity in certain functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager offers straightforward deployment with excellent multi-channel customer support. Flowmon provides seamless deployment, with a support structure that is praised for being responsive and effective, especially for resolving technical challenges swiftly.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is recognized for competitive pricing, making it attractive for cost-conscious buyers. Flowmon, while having higher initial setup costs, offers significant value through advanced features, providing strong ROI for enterprises needing in-depth network performance analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Flowmon vs. ManageEngine OpManager Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Flowmon vs. ManageEngine OpManager

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Flowmon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

44th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (15th)

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Flowmon is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.9%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Pifu Lin

Senior System Engineer at DYNASAFE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.

Quick identification of network issues enhances performance monitoring

We will try to Proof of Concept (POC) to a client in Taiwan. We just use the features for the Network Performance Monitor (NPM) Flowmon is more easy to understand and helps find network issues more quickly. We need this solution to monitor the network performance. We started using it three…

Read full review

Tanveer Khalid

Technical Consultant at Kidan

Offers automation capabilities, ability to manage the entire network, and provides real-time monitoring of network utilization

For network performance, there are so many tools in OpManager for your network. You can manage your servers and processes as well. Processes are the Windows services running in the background. They are what you see in the task manager when you check how many are being run by Windows or the machine. OpManager can manage these processes. If one isn't running, you can reboot or start it or write a script for the situation. For example, if there's a server issue at night, a rule will automatically run in the background and reboot the services. OpManager will do all of that, and the services will come back online. It can resolve those types of issues on its own. And it's automated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is an open platform, so in terms of integration, we are quite happy. We can integrate it with other SNMP solutions. We can also integrate it with security solutions, such as a SIEM solution."

"The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce."

"The solution is stable."

"Flowmon is more easy to understand and helps find network issues more quickly."

"We find the networking aspect of this solution to be the most valuable."

"The features we found most valuable in ManageEngine OpManager are the probe server and reporting because they're pretty good features."

"Defining thresholds and other alerting criteria is fairly simple and would not require a lot of training. This is very useful if you are managing a large environment."

"The dashboard, versatility and larger horizon are valuable."

"The ease of use and comprehensive integration are the most valuable features"

"Some of the useful features are NetFlow and analytics."

"The product provides intensive reports."

"We don't have to keep an eye on it; it has a good automation option, which keeps us informed. It gives very less false positives. Overall, a really great product."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

Cons

"It would be helpful to have more details about the monitoring of the infrastructure. It should have support for SNMP. This is something that is currently not there in the product."

"I do not know the detailed pricing."

"If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good."

"The licensing price could be better."

"The pricing could be cheaper. The initial integration does cost a bit."

"ManageEngine OpManager can improve by having better updates for critical issues."

"Some of our customers have been asking that OpManager have a feature to monitor the operating system, however, I tell them that Endpoint Central is doing that. You can buy endpoints and then OpManager, and they integrate between them, and everything is okay."

"The licensing model is confusing."

"What I'd like ManageEngine OpManager to improve on is artificial intelligence. In particular, the machine learning feature should be integrated with the sensor flow. Doing this will give leverage, especially when you look at other products such as the Cisco DNA Center. When a switch goes down, I should be able to build on the correlation of other physical devices it's connected to so that I can integrate that with my CA CMDB. The ManageEngine OpManager team needs to draw a long-term roadmap where that feature becomes an integral part of the solution because right now, machine learning in ManageEngine OpManager is a long process. The solution doesn't have MLS search and I want to see ML being developed and applied for CA CMDB to greatly reduce the burden of tying everything. For example, if I have a data center switch that goes down now, I should know what server it's connected to, and when that switch goes down at twenty-four ports, I would get twenty-four alerts for different devices plugged in. I should be able to make a correlation that the major problem lies in the switch and not with the twenty-four elements connected to that switch. That is where machine learning should come into play and the ManageEngine OpManager AI should indicate "This is where the root of your problem is." It could be difficult, but this is a feature that should be improved or added to the solution."

"Needs an OVA, or more support for virtual deployments. Building a virtual instance of OpManager and OpManager Probe was a bit difficult because there was no OVA available."

"OpManager is slow but that just might be the server we have it on. I don't think that's the problem but I don't do the server. But it is slow. When you're interacting with it, it could be more nimble and could be faster."

"The solution's reports need to include the number of applications consumed."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It works with a permanent license, and then you can pay for the support. For the gold support, you need to pay yearly."

"The licensing fee accrues only once, but that of support is annual."

"The price of the solution could be better."

"Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager depends on the number of nodes you onboard and whatever pricing is reflected on the ManageEngine portal which offers discounts from ten percent to fifteen percent. It purely depends on the sales volume and the negotiation. In my organization, there are about one thousand two hundred nodes which cost around $29,000 per year. There's no additional support fee or maintenance fee from ManageEngine OpManager. Pricing for the solution is highly competitive and I would rate it five out of five. ManageEngine OpManager is one of the most competitive options out there."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"The solution is highly affordable"

"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."

"ManageEngine OpManager has a three-tier licensing model."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is on the cheaper side."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"ManageEngine OpManager is cheaper than SolarWinds."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

55%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

I don't understand the price. I am in deployment, so I do not know the detailed pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good.

See all answers

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

The product has only basic functionalities. It is not like SolarWinds. The data provided by the tool is not accurate. SolarWinds is more accurate.

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Flowmon

Compared 22% of the time

Vectra AI vs Flowmon

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Flowmon

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Flowmon

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Flowmon

Compared 3% of the time

More Flowmon Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 27% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 16% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 11% of the time

SCOM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 8% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2025

Download Flowmon product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

January 2025

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Also Known As

Flowmon Anomaly Detection System

OpManager

Learn More

Progress Software

ManageEngine

Overview

Flowmon is a professional tool for effective network troubleshooting, performance monitoring, capacity planning, encrypted traffic analysis and cloud monitoring. Instead of just the red/green infrastructure status, it helps NetOps teams to understand user experience while keeping the amount of data noise and analytical work to a minimum. Flowmon is a part of the Kemp product portfolio.

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

Sample Customers

SEGA

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Buyer's Guide

Flowmon vs. ManageEngine OpManager

January 2025

Free Report: Flowmon vs. ManageEngine OpManager

Find out what your peers are saying about Flowmon vs. ManageEngine OpManager and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Flowmon vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.