We performed a comparison between ManageEngine OpManager and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities."
"It is easy to use and deploy."
"I liked Network Configuration Manager. They had some pretty decent features there, and they also had pretty good monitoring and alerts."
"I like being able to push configurations to multiple devices. If you have the same configurations for all the branches, it's easier to use ManageEngine OpManager and push configurations at once rather than individually pushing them to each device."
"Monitoring is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"We find the networking aspect of this solution to be the most valuable."
"We use the solution to monitor links. It also helps us to track servers and monitor logs."
"Device monitoring is a good tool of this solution."
"The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration."
"Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures."
"The solution is quite mature and very stable."
"The best thing about Zabbix is the integration and the APIs that are included are very fast"
"In terms of customization and integration, we have more flexibility. We can automate configurations, define deletion rules, and customize based on the needs. The client interface allows for further configuration, making it quite comprehensive."
"Zabbix is good for discovery."
"They've already added extra features, such as noise-canceling and facial recognition, which is great."
"The solution allows for good integration with other products."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"We have been facing an issue since last year when a lot of our users started to work from home through their mobiles or computers. We are having trouble reaching these devices. We are now planning to publish our instance to the cloud so that we can reach these devices. Its performance should be improved in terms of the discovery of the devices. I would like to feel confident with the discovery that this solution does. For example, on my dashboard, I would like to be able to view a list of all devices seen on a specific server. At present, it is difficult to find such information. This would be an excellent feature to have."
"You cannot resolve 100 percent of the issues yourself. You would need to reach out to the support. It needs to be cheaper."
"The licensing for this solution is not straightforward and should be improved."
"The main area for improvement for ManageEngine OpManager is its performance."
"I would like to see more enhancements made to the product."
"The initial setup is a bit complicated. It needs a technician who is very aware of the flow and how to officially set up the flow chart, etc."
"There should be an option to get mobile notifications or SMS mirror notifications for critical issues. That way, when we don't have access to email, we can still receive notifications via our phones."
"OpManager is slow but that just might be the server we have it on. I don't think that's the problem but I don't do the server. But it is slow. When you're interacting with it, it could be more nimble and could be faster."
"An area for improvement would be the ease of doing aggregation from the value or different devices."
"Sometimes, the documentation is a little bit written in Estonia – a country in Europe. The language barrier and translation to English can sometimes make it difficult to understand what they're trying to get at. It's just a language thing."
"I would like to remotely connect to the computer, and Zabbix doesn't have this capability."
"It could be more stable."
"My company wanted to do an exercise command to access IT from Cameroon. They wanted to access an FSS to a second host with second equipment that was on another coast but it is not possible on Zabbix to do it. They want to directly access from the front-end of Zabbix to access a prompt in Zabbix to an access terminal. In the front-end, there is no way to do that. That would be an important improvement."
"Improvement is needed as per customer requirements."
"I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes."
"There are not too much documentation or manuals. We found the tutorials very easy to understand but do not go deep enough in the use of Zabbix. We need more manuals, proper use, documentation, etc."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 13th in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.0, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "Helps us monitor all the infrastructure in our company but UI monitoring is not practical". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, PRTG Network Monitor, Nagios XI, SCOM and WhatsUp Gold, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, Nagios Core, Amazon CloudWatch and SolarWinds NPM. See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
