ManageEngine OpManager vs ScienceLogic comparison

Read 44 ScienceLogic reviews

2,123 Views
1,573 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and ManageEngine OpManager are competitors in the network monitoring software market. ScienceLogic appears to have an advantage in enterprise-level environments due to its automation and integration capabilities, whereas ManageEngine OpManager is favored for cost-effectiveness and simplicity in monitoring.

Features: ScienceLogic stands out with customizable dashboards, rich integration options, and built-in automation for fault reduction and efficiency. It excels in supporting multi-tenant environments and comprehensive event management. ManageEngine OpManager offers robust network monitoring, clear alerts and notifications, and cost-efficient operations, making it ideal for straightforward monitoring needs.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic struggles with a complex interface, reporting limitations, and some technical support issues. Users suggest enhancements for reporting and easier configuration. ManageEngine OpManager could improve its storage monitoring, backup solutions, and dashboard flexibility. Its software performance is affected in larger infrastructures, indicating a need for optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports both cloud and on-premises deployments. It has a mixed reputation for technical support but receives praise for its technical vision and dedicated service. ManageEngine OpManager mainly operates on-premises and has varying feedback on deployment ease. While its service is generally positive, improvements in documentation and support are needed.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is pricier, targeting enterprises with flexible pricing models. Its ROI is linked to problem resolution and proactive monitoring, despite high initial costs. ManageEngine OpManager is competitively priced, offering an affordable option with tangible ROI through comprehensive monitoring without high additional costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine OpManager vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: March 2025).

ManageEngine OpManager vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 842,651 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (23rd), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (19th), AIOps (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.7%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

MUBDIUL ISLAM

Junior System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

NetFlow monitoring has improved operations but needs better configurations

For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface. When I add the interface, I am confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint. If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure. Another issue is with threshold values; sometimes, it shows kilobytes (kB) while our threshold is set to gigabytes. This can be confusing. Improving this aspect would be beneficial. In URL monitoring, there is room for enhancement.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The application monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager makes it easy to monitor all the network alerts on the application."

"The integration with the firewall monitoring, the security monitoring, is great."

"You can put all of your work on there, they'll send you an email or send you a text. That functionality as a network engineer is the one I like the most. I do like the fact that we can schedule reports. That works too because that's a lot fewer spreadsheets that I have to create."

"The detections are fine when they work."

"I am satisfied with ManageEngine OpManager's monitoring features."

"The setup was easy."

"The traffic monitoring and the traffic analysis are great."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

"The power flow is great."

"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"It would be great if there were some sort of artificial intelligence feature which would help us make improvements in the network once we find an issue, and do it automatically."

"The solution's reports need to include the number of applications consumed."

"If you have a ton of devices, it might slow down a bit."

"WMI and SNMP integration with the domain controller should be seamless"

"Real user and UI monitoring are not practical."

"Needs an OVA, or more support for virtual deployments. Building a virtual instance of OpManager and OpManager Probe was a bit difficult because there was no OVA available."

"I would like to see more enhancements made to the product."

"We get a lot of false alerts."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is very low compared to other products."

"ManageEngine OpManager has a three-tier licensing model."

"In terms of pricing, I would rate it a two out of five. It was expensive."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"The product is not worth the money."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is on the cheaper side."

"It is reasonably priced."

"The solution is highly affordable"

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

49%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

The cost is medium. It could be cheaper.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 16% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 12% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

Flowmon vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 2% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

ManageEngine OpManager

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Also Known As

OpManager

No data available

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

ManageEngine OpManager vs. ScienceLogic