ManageEngine OpManager vs ScienceLogic comparison

Read 44 ScienceLogic reviews

2,162 Views
1,602 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and ManageEngine OpManager are competitors in the network monitoring software market. ScienceLogic appears to have an advantage in enterprise-level environments due to its automation and integration capabilities, whereas ManageEngine OpManager is favored for cost-effectiveness and simplicity in monitoring.

Features: ScienceLogic stands out with customizable dashboards, rich integration options, and built-in automation for fault reduction and efficiency. It excels in supporting multi-tenant environments and comprehensive event management. ManageEngine OpManager offers robust network monitoring, clear alerts and notifications, and cost-efficient operations, making it ideal for straightforward monitoring needs.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic struggles with a complex interface, reporting limitations, and some technical support issues. Users suggest enhancements for reporting and easier configuration. ManageEngine OpManager could improve its storage monitoring, backup solutions, and dashboard flexibility. Its software performance is affected in larger infrastructures, indicating a need for optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports both cloud and on-premises deployments. It has a mixed reputation for technical support but receives praise for its technical vision and dedicated service. ManageEngine OpManager mainly operates on-premises and has varying feedback on deployment ease. While its service is generally positive, improvements in documentation and support are needed.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is pricier, targeting enterprises with flexible pricing models. Its ROI is linked to problem resolution and proactive monitoring, despite high initial costs. ManageEngine OpManager is competitively priced, offering an affordable option with tangible ROI through comprehensive monitoring without high additional costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine OpManager vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: January 2025).

ManageEngine OpManager vs. ScienceLogic

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (24th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (19th), AIOps (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.7%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

MUBDIUL ISLAM

Junior System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

NetFlow monitoring has improved operations but needs better configurations

For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface. When I add the interface, I am confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint. If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure. Another issue is with threshold values; sometimes, it shows kilobytes (kB) while our threshold is set to gigabytes. This can be confusing. Improving this aspect would be beneficial. In URL monitoring, there is room for enhancement.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager is the management of the virtual machine and the host machine."

"The solution offers very good integration capabilities."

"Defining thresholds and other alerting criteria is fairly simple and would not require a lot of training. This is very useful if you are managing a large environment."

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring alerts. The administrators are immediately notified and can do the required action immediately. This is the feature we value and use the most."

"The traffic monitoring and the traffic analysis are great."

"This is a good general monitoring system that has all the features we require and they constantly update with new capabilities."

"The features we found most valuable in ManageEngine OpManager are the probe server and reporting because they're pretty good features."

"Device backups are smooth and managed centrally, with a nice dashboard, so you can quickly see the status."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"A major benefit is eliminating visibility gaps, which motivates me to consolidate tools."

"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"I recommend ScienceLogic to other users."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"It is simple."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"WMI and SNMP integration with the domain controller should be seamless"

"We have been facing an issue since last year when a lot of our users started to work from home through their mobiles or computers. We are having trouble reaching these devices. We are now planning to publish our instance to the cloud so that we can reach these devices. Its performance should be improved in terms of the discovery of the devices. I would like to feel confident with the discovery that this solution does. For example, on my dashboard, I would like to be able to view a list of all devices seen on a specific server. At present, it is difficult to find such information. This would be an excellent feature to have."

"It is sometimes difficult to manage the user interface. It can get very complicated."

"The initial setup is a bit complicated. It needs a technician who is very aware of the flow and how to officially set up the flow chart, etc."

"The integration with various OEM products could be simplified."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface."

"The solution is a bit difficult to configure. There are quite a number of configurations and plugins that you must handle early in the process."

"We would like link monitoring included. At times we need to monitor those specific links closely."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"There are often bugs in new releases."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"It was challenging onboarding users."

"They need a little more self-service."

"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

"It is reasonably priced."

"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."

"The pricing is moderate."

"The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"The price for ManageEngine OpManager is average."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

54%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

The cost is medium. It could be cheaper.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Comparisons

Compared 26% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 16% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 11% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Network Operations Management vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 3% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 15% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 12% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

ManageEngine OpManager

February 2025

Download ScienceLogic product report

February 2025

Also Known As

OpManager

No data available

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell