ManageEngine OpManager vs ScienceLogic comparison

Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews

2,050 Views
1,504 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and ManageEngine OpManager are competitors in the network monitoring software market. ScienceLogic appears to have an advantage in enterprise-level environments due to its automation and integration capabilities, whereas ManageEngine OpManager is favored for cost-effectiveness and simplicity in monitoring.

Features: ScienceLogic stands out with customizable dashboards, rich integration options, and built-in automation for fault reduction and efficiency. It excels in supporting multi-tenant environments and comprehensive event management. ManageEngine OpManager offers robust network monitoring, clear alerts and notifications, and cost-efficient operations, making it ideal for straightforward monitoring needs.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic struggles with a complex interface, reporting limitations, and some technical support issues. Users suggest enhancements for reporting and easier configuration. ManageEngine OpManager could improve its storage monitoring, backup solutions, and dashboard flexibility. Its software performance is affected in larger infrastructures, indicating a need for optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports both cloud and on-premises deployments. It has a mixed reputation for technical support but receives praise for its technical vision and dedicated service. ManageEngine OpManager mainly operates on-premises and has varying feedback on deployment ease. While its service is generally positive, improvements in documentation and support are needed.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is pricier, targeting enterprises with flexible pricing models. Its ROI is linked to problem resolution and proactive monitoring, despite high initial costs. ManageEngine OpManager is competitively priced, offering an affordable option with tangible ROI through comprehensive monitoring without high additional costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine OpManager vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: April 2025).

ManageEngine OpManager vs. ScienceLogic

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (24th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (19th), AIOps (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.7%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

MUBDIUL ISLAM

Junior System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

NetFlow monitoring has improved operations but needs better configurations

For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface. When I add the interface, I am confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint. If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure. Another issue is with threshold values; sometimes, it shows kilobytes (kB) while our threshold is set to gigabytes. This can be confusing. Improving this aspect would be beneficial. In URL monitoring, there is room for enhancement.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Some of the most valuable features are the accessibility of the solution and the fact that it is simpler than other products. For example, discovering devices in the network is very simple, making it user-friendly."

"The solution's most valuable features are reporting, event notifications, and alert management."

"The uptime and monitoring are valuable to us because we need to monitor the uptime of our services, the memory, and the CPUs."

"The solution offers very good integration capabilities."

"The application monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."

"The solution is easy to deploy. It's also easy to manage and monitor the environment. Instead of being reactive, it's proactive."

"The traffic monitoring and the traffic analysis are great."

"The features we found most valuable in ManageEngine OpManager are the probe server and reporting because they're pretty good features."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"Power packs."

"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"A major benefit is eliminating visibility gaps, which motivates me to consolidate tools."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"This product is little bit slow sometimes. It may be that we need to change the configuration to improve performance."

"The solution is a bit difficult to configure. There are quite a number of configurations and plugins that you must handle early in the process."

"The dashboard could include more features."

"We would like link monitoring included. At times we need to monitor those specific links closely."

"The pricing could be cheaper. The initial integration does cost a bit."

"The pricing of the solution is high. They should work to adjust the pricing model to see if they can help reduce costs."

"There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop."

"They should add more features to URL monitoring."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."

"ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services."

"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."

"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ManageEngine OpManager is cheaper than SolarWinds."

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly and based on the number of applications."

"The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager depends on the number of nodes you onboard and whatever pricing is reflected on the ManageEngine portal which offers discounts from ten percent to fifteen percent. It purely depends on the sales volume and the negotiation. In my organization, there are about one thousand two hundred nodes which cost around $29,000 per year. There's no additional support fee or maintenance fee from ManageEngine OpManager. Pricing for the solution is highly competitive and I would rate it five out of five. ManageEngine OpManager is one of the most competitive options out there."

"The pricing is moderate."

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

37%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services. If the knowledge for implementation could be spread...

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Comparisons

Compared 25% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 16% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 13% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 2% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

ManageEngine OpManager

March 2025

Download ScienceLogic product report

March 2025

Also Known As

OpManager

No data available

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell