GitHub Reviews

We use GitHub to share the source code and can give users different permissions to use different parts of the project. Whenever a developer changes a source code, it can push it easily, and others can see the change and who made it.

It is a very good solution. GitHub allows the backup of our source code. So we are sure that if all the computers in our company crash and the hardware fails, we can access our code on GitHub. Also, in the past, every repository we built was publicly available to anyone, and others could see our source code, but now we can make a private repository and share it with our team. This feature is very valuable and good for us.

It is very tricky to work with GitHub. For example, it is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version. It would be great if they provided a tool that merges the code better and more intelligently.

We have been using this solution for ten years.

It is very stable. Whenever it is connected, it always works, and we love it.

It is scalable. We can easily extend to team members, with a team of about six or seven people in a GitHub repository. Most users are developers, but we can also provide viewing access to others. We don't have any distinct plans to increase our usage of GitHub.

We have not used technical support because GitHub has a large community of users, so if there is an issue, we can find the solution on Google.

We did not use any other solutions before GitHub.

The initial setup was very easy.

It is a free solution. 

I rate this solution a ten out of ten. I recommend GitHub to others to back up their source code or share it among different people on the same project. GitHub is integrated very well with Microsoft Visual Studio and .NET. For example, if we make a project inbox for Visual Studio, we can push the code to GitHub by adding our account to Visual Studio.

We used it mainly for version control and when we wanted to test an application at the initial stage or launch the mock-up version.

When it comes to version control, GitHub is fulfilling all that requirements. GitHub is the best tool for source repositories.

You can create public and private repositories.

GitHub could expand the limits of the free version. People are waiting for CNS. 

I have been working with Github for the past eight years.

I consider it stable as of now.

It is also scalable with respect to the branches.

We have not had to use technical support. The documentation that was provided for troubleshooting worked effectively.

The setup was very straightforward and easy for me.

We did not compare GitHub with other options.

I would rate GitHub a nine out of ten.

It's a code repository, so it is used for checking it, code, and version control.

This solution is deployed on the cloud. 

There are 10-15 people using this solution in my organization.

The most important feature of GitHub is the maintainability of the versions of the code. It allows multiple people to work on the same use case, so anyone can check in and check out, and that history is available.

We are not able to access GitHub from our VPN. Whereas on the customer side, we are able to access the open source data. If the data was more accessible in my company as well, I think it would be useful to have the ability to work with VPN.

I would also like to see deeper integration with Microsoft products.

It's a stable solution.

It's scalable.

It's a simple process.

I think Microsoft SVN is also a good solution compared to GitHub. Our organization is tied up with Azure, and many of the Microsoft tools like Office or 365 are provided. It's easy to have Microsoft for the code repository as well rather than getting GitHub.

Using the microsoft.net framework is easier than using UiPath on .NET.

I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.

I use GitHub for work and personal projects.

With pull requests into the project, all the different repositories are there, and we make the changes there.

GitHub has everything. All the integrations with different applications are really good. GitHub's transparency is also valuable; when something happens, you have a status online.

The solution is really good. I cannot think of improvement needs. 

I have been using GitHub for four or five years.

I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute. However, GitHub keeps us informed with their status updates, so you know it's not you but GitHub, ensuring transparency.

The support team is good. They provide an online status when something happens. It is reassuring to know that it's not your problem but GitHub's, which shows transparency.

Positive

It's really easy to set up. The initial setup and the deployment are also easy to manage.

I do not know about the pricing because I do not pay anything. It's free for me.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

We used the product for CI/CD.

I like the CI/CD features. The tool was easy for me to use because I had used it for a long time. GitHub is a leader in the domain. Others copy GitHub.

The stability can be improved.

I have used the solution for 15 years.

I rate the tool’s stability a ten out of ten. The vendor modifies many things and provides new releases regularly.

The tool is very scalable and reliable. There is no loss in quality.

It is easy to set up the account and give permissions to others.

The product can be deployed in-house.

The product is reasonably priced.

I have also used GitLab. There is not much difference between GitLab and GitHub.

I used GitHub in my previous organization. In my current organization, we mostly use Azure. GitHub is easy to use and easy to manage. It's good for integration and for multi-worker projects. It is robust. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I use the solution as a repository to store the source codes that I create with small tools. I also use it to share codes with customers when it is impossible to directly upload them from my computer to the customer’s environment due to some network restrictions. However, it is possible to download from GitHub in such environments. So, I transfer my source codes through GitHub so that they can download and implement them.

GitHub is a simple repository of source codes. The ease of use is valuable. It supports collaboration within the team very well.

We face issues with synchronization while working with teams. It is difficult to synchronize the source code between team members.

I have been using the solution for more than five years.

The tool is very stable. I do not face any unavailability.

I use the solution for my personal use cases.

The setup is very easy. It is very easy to create a new repository for a new project. It is easy to create teams.

The tool is of great value. It provides space for source codes for future use. If I migrate from one computer to another, I can still use the same Git without any complications.

We must pay the licensing fee if we want to use the tool commercially.

I do not use any pipelines or other tools. I do not use the tool frequently. I mostly develop things on my computer and hand them over to the customers. People must start using the product. It is easy for users who have experience with other Git tools like GitLab or GitBucket. We just have to create a project and clone it. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

We are using GitHub for the development environment. After we develop some applications, we are pushing actually on both settings. 

I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security.

I have been using GitHub for the past seven years.

We are finding GitHub is very stable. Because it is the one that we are actually using on the cloud, it is easy for actual resources.

We currently did not choose the option with the subscription, but the free version actually provided by GitHub and GitLab is acceptable for us. Maybe the institution wants to increase the number of developers to twenty from what we currently have three, then definitely we will increase and prefer to have additional services from GitHub as well as GitLab.

Technical support is excellent on a scale of one to ten I give technical support a ten.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward and easy. For someone who has actually good experience in software development, including using a repository solution, I think it is easy. Beginners need to refer to the manual and see some online tutorials to receive assistance so that it is easier for them to setup.

You can do the deployment in-house without a problem.

We are currently paying nothing for GitHub.

I think I remember Tortu was the name of the product. There is a Q Balance in our repository providers. I think that one is Microsoft. I do not know exactly, but we are not using it. We tried it but we returned to GitHub.

If you are working in development I would recommend using GitHub. I would rate GitHub a ten out of ten.

We use GitHub for source control.

GitHub is convenient and easy to use.

GitHub should provide more integration in their next release, including integrating with Jenkins, CI/CD and Jira.

We have been using GitHub for two years.

GitHub is a stable solution.

The solution is scalable. We have approximately 200 users.

Prior to using GitHub, we used Subversion, or SVN and CVS. We switched to GitHub because of the cloud enablement as well as the ease of use.

I would recommend GitHub to anyone considering implementing the solution into their organization. 

Overall, I would rate GitHub a nine out of 10.