GitHub Reviews

We are customers of GitHub.

GitHub provides the SFH key to protect our passwords and our connection, it's a helpful product. It secures our repositories so any attempt to access from outside the company is blocked. We also have control of our product versions in GitHub, which is very useful. I like the fact that you can use it on any device.

The only problem we have is that our firewall was blocking cloning and downloading with SSH.

I've been using this solution for three years.

GitHub is stable. In the three years that I've been working with it, we've had very few problems.

Stability is good, we have around 200 users.

I never use the technical support of GitHub. I believe it's user-friendly but I've never needed to access it.

This is a free solution so there are no licensing costs.

I rate this solution 10 out of 10.

We use GitHub for AI features.

GitHub is a cost-effective solution. The solution provides good customization and support.

I have been using GitHub for a couple of years.

We haven’t faced any stability issues with GitHub.

The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.

GitHub is a cost-effective solution.

GitHub's branch protection feature is effective in our workflow management. I work with the cloud version of GitHub. The documentation is enough to resolve issues with the solution. People working with Microsoft tech can use GitHub. Microsoft is investing heavily in this tool. Using GitHub depends on users' use cases and their technologies.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

GitHub is mainly used for code control. We have three environments, and we keep their codes as per those environments. As and when required, we clear pull requests as well. The main purpose of GitHub is to keep our code available.

GitHub is simple to use and has great performance. Even if I'm not in the office, I can access and work on my code from anywhere with my account credentials. GitHub has an interactive user interface.

The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated.

I have been using GitHub for five and a half years.

Around 200 users are using GitHub in our organization.

The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.

If I go as per the process we follow, it will take hardly half an hour for me to deploy the solution.

You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version. It gives you all the possible features it has.

GitHub is deployed on the cloud in our organization. Users who have to manage their code can create a GitHub account and start using it.

Overall, I rate GitHub ten out of ten.

We use this product to host the code base for different development teams within our organization and for versioning the codes and integrating with CI/CD tooling. We have a partnership with GitHub and I'm a product manager. 

Using GitHub has been beneficial for us because it was an easy process for users and it has improved efficiency. In contrast to Bitbucket or Azure Repos, moving things over to GitHub was simple.

We like the simplicity of GitHub and that it is free of complications, as opposed to other tools on the market. Its ability to be integrated with third-party softwares such as Azure Pipelines or Jenkins, is great.

The solution lacks sufficient support in terms of professional services that could be provided proactively to customers. The product documentation could be improved. What currently exists on the GitHub website is not complete and not sufficient to help end users with customizations or integrations, tools for code quality, or app security. In the next release, I would love to see something around security as well as some code analysis and open-source vulnerability detection features. It would be helpful if there was a better DevOps offering from GitHub. GitHub Actions is still maturing.

I've been using this solution for two years. 

The solution is stable. 

GitHub is scalable, we have around 120 users. They are mainly software developers and engineering managers. We have three people, DevOps engineers and support engineers, working with GitHub and we're likely to expand usage. 

Our technical support experience has been quite good in terms of response and expertise.

Positive

We previously used Bitbucket and Azure Repos. We switched to GitHub because of its ease of implementation and ease of onboarding new users, as well as its integration with third-party tooling.

The initial setup was straightforward. We are in a regulated industry with a large volume of organizations, and there are additional processes that need to be taken care of. Taking all that into account, the deployment took about 10 days. Implementation of GitHub alone just takes a few hours. We worked with a third-party vendor. 

The product certainly saves us a lot of time and that equals money. We save time in terms of how the code base can be managed and versioned. We have better control over the release of the product, and we have reduced the time that takes. We're getting a good ROI. 

I recommend this solution even though it does not provide the complete suite. There are DevOps services coming in from Microsoft, for example, and you need to go to GitHub Actions separately. Source code management is better on GitHub and I would rate that higher.

Overall, I rate this solution seven out of 10. 

We use this solution to exchange files and manage version control.

GitHub have a built-in software application development environment and this has been most useful. 

The storage for this solution could be improved. 

I have been using this solution for two years. 

This is a stable solution. 

This solution is potentially scalable. 

The technical support for this solution is good. 

Positive

The installation for this solution is very easy. 

I would recommend this solution to others. I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

We use GitHub instead of our regular shared drive. It offers instant access to shared folders as well as good security.

The GitHub repository needs an upgraded user interface and overall UI improvements. In Automation Anywhere, we have one repository where you can download or upload information. They have two interfaces in a single view that has verification. It would be good if Github offered the same. 

I have been using this solution for five years. 

This solution is somewhat stable, but requires additional supporting products.

This is a scalable solution. We have more than 2,000 users.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. 

We use it to collaborate on projects, and store projects as well. 

This solution is just easy to use.

Github needs more storage.

I have been using this solution for about five years.

It is stable.

It is scalable for what we need.

There were other solutions that we used previously.

We are just on the entry tier; it is a free tier for education.

I would rate Github an eight out of ten.

We are using GitHub for all of our repositories. We can store the code, collaborate with different developers, build, and create a pipeline.

GitHub storage is one of the main requirements and it could improve.

I have been using GitHub for approximately four years.

I have found GitHub stable.

GitHub is scalable.

Every developer in the R&D department is using GitHub in my company. There are approximately 2,300 people in the R&D department.

I have not contacted technical support to need to contact support.

We used different solutions prior to GitHub, such as Perforce and Rational.

The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable.

I would recommend the solution to others. It is very good.

I rate GitHub a nine out of ten.