The most valuable feature is that you do not require a spanning tree. With some of the other vendors, some of the other competitors, you require a spanning tree which cause a lot of looping issues in your data center or in your network. The other thing is, the HP 5400 switches comes with a lifetime warranty, so you don't have to invest anything onto a contract side, which is very good thing about it. The 5400 switches, you can use as a whole or access layer in your network and work out great.
Enterprise Network Architect at a individual & family service with 10,001+ employees
Video Review
It has met all of our needs but tech support could be better.
What is most valuable?
How has it helped my organization?
The benefits are it's been running robust, the hardware is running robust, no issues at all. It's lifetime warranty again. From the hardware standpoint, configure standpoint, it's all working fine.
What needs improvement?
I don't know about specifics, but so far all the switches that we deployed, it meets all of our needs. For what we require, it has all of features. It also varies on the switch by switch version, and it depends on what kind of switches you have. For me, right now it's meeting all my needs, so I don't have any complaints about it.
For how long have I used the solution?
We deployed HP for almost five years and it's been rock solid. All the switches, no single-out days with the switches. The switches hardware have a long life, and it has been working great for us.
Buyer's Guide
HPE Ethernet Switches
January 2025
Learn what your peers think about HPE Ethernet Switches. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability is pretty good, as I say that we deployed HP, it's been about four years and we haven't had a single out day in my data center. I can't ask anything more than that.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
All the hardware that we have, our portfolio at HP, it's pretty scalable to the latest and greatest technology. You can have a 40 GIG QSFP Uplink for the top of Rex switches, or even one for your core switches, that's over 40 GIG, 100 GIG Uplink. That is what everybody is going towards now, with all the data centers. It's up to the mark.
How are customer service and support?
To me, the technical support is not that good. Trust me, we don't use the technical support anymore from HP because we tried to use them and we didn't get much of a response from them. I know everybody's experience is different, but we try to do it by ourselves. We try to figure out by ourselves if any kind of software issue or any kind of hardware issue. The support, we didn't get much response from HP about the software support, configuration support, we just tried by ourselves, but hardware, it's pretty good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
With the old technology we were paying more money with the context. Obviously, we were having a lot of issues with the Data Center, where Data Center used to go down with the old legacy technology. We decided to move forward with RFP. We evaluated a few vendors in the market and after evaluation we decided to go with HP and it's been working out great for us.
How was the initial setup?
When we started deploying, it was H3C and they have a different division, Comware, and HP are 5400 Series, they have a different set up command lines. Now, they are making everything together on the Comware division. When we deployed, it depends on the switches. If you buy Comware switches, they have a different command set compared to HP or H3C switches. It was kind of hard for us to learn the command line initially, but now we are all comfortable with it and it's working fine. Since they are all HP now, all the switches, they only have a one command line in the Comware 7, if you have that, it's pretty easy to deploy initially.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We tried Cisco, we tried Dell. Again, it's more robust and the most important factor was a price. I just look at the technology and see if it meets your needs for your data center and not in HP, looks like they did, they did meet our needs, what we needed for our data center, for our campus, branch offices and it's been working out great.
What other advice do I have?
Hardware can last for a while. You have all of options to upgrade the switches, a lot of options to support the connectivities, like 1 GB, 10 GB, 40 GBs, different varieties of the switches. You can choose from.
I just want to say that best thing about HP is they don't have a technology called a Spanning Tree Protocol, which can cause a lot of issues on your network, and HP kind of get rid of that. When you do a HP IRF, you kind of don't need that Spanning Tree, which is the most important part about HP.
Other than that, again it's a hardware stability. Hardware stability, they have IRF for the switches to virtualize your switches. The easy set of command line, with the new Comware 7.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Specialist at DataBank
Has a simple and understandable user interface
Pros and Cons
- "I value that there is a clear place to find a MAC table with HPE Ethernet Switches."
- "The next release would benefit from adding a central management that could be deployable on premise and allow you to see the layout of topology."
What is our primary use case?
The use case of this solution depends on our client's environment. Some use HPE Ethernet Switches right out of the box, while some of them use models where the interface can only be opened by Internet Explorer.
The primary use cases would be office interconnection and industrial interconnection. The switches are best suited for our small or medium-sized clients.
What is most valuable?
For me, as an administrator, I value that there is a clear place to find a MAC table with HPE Ethernet Switches.
HPE Ethernet Switches are quite robust. I have not seen them damaged to the level that they are not operable anymore.
The solution has a simple and understandable user interface providing everything I need.
What needs improvement?
In the past, I have encountered configuration problems with the Spanning Tree Protocol. The switches were only handling a single loop. There were quite a few looped switches that could not handle the board blocking, creating the need to manually fight each loop. I have not had the same problems with the newer models of HPE Ethernet Switches.
HPE Ethernet Switches tend to hang from time to time, but all switches do that.
The next release would benefit from adding central management that could be deployable on-premise and allow you to see the layout of topology.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with HPE Ethernet Switches for about one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable. HFE does not fail any more or less often than other switches.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
HPE Ethernet Switches, especially the 1820s, are best suited to small or medium-sized organizations, however each case is model dependent. The switches we use, are used in large companies, but they are fractured into smaller layers of three subnets.
The solution is scalable, you can add a switch when you need to, and you can reconfigure it.
How are customer service and support?
I have not had the need to contact customer service and support. Any past issues, we were able to resolve by go through some of our forums.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Since our company provides services, we work with the switches that the clients have. Most of the switches we work with are HPE's, Cisco, and UniFi.
I found that when using Aruba or UniFi, you have to search for the MAC table from CLI. This is difficult because when someone calls using a MAC, I will not get the IP address and I need to guess where the user is.
UniFi requires less intervention in configuration, requiring some tune-up support. HPE needs to be configured manually.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of HPE Ethernet Switches is straightforward. The time it takes to deploy depends on the overall network configuration, including the number of LAN, number of up links and down links for that switch.
If you only need to connect the switch to the up link and give out for a test for the end devices, it would take a maximum of thirty minutes after installing the switch to its correct place.
In a case where there is a lot of VLAN with some trunking, deployment could take a couple of hours.
I would rate the initial setup of HPE Ethernet Switches a five out of five. They require little to no maintenance and are reliable enough.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
As a technician, I am not certain of pricing, but I believe HPE is less expensive than Aruba and UniFi and that is why certain clients have chosen them as their solution.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend to anyone looking into implementing HPE Ethernet Switches to go for it if the price makes sense for their organization.
Overall, I would rate HPE Ethernet Switches an eight out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
Buyer's Guide
HPE Ethernet Switches
January 2025
Learn what your peers think about HPE Ethernet Switches. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Easy to use, manage, and configure
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is very stable and easy to use."
- "I would like to see more updates for the solution."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for a small network and a small data center.
What is most valuable?
The solution is very stable and easy to use.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see more updates for the solution.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using HPE Ethernet Switches for a couple of years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the solution ten out of ten for stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
More than 250 users use HPE Ethernet Switches regularly in our organization.
I rate the solution’s scalability ten out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
The solution’s technical support was good.
How was the initial setup?
The solution’s initial setup is very easy.
What about the implementation team?
The solution can be implemented through an in-house team. The solution's deployment process is very easy and includes designing the network and configuring VLAN.
What other advice do I have?
The solution's security features are very good, and I rate them ten out of ten. Two people are needed for the solution's deployment and maintenance. I would recommend the solution to other users. I rate the solution ten out of ten for ease of management and configuration.
Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: May 10, 2024
Flag as inappropriateFounder & CEO / CIO at German Top Secure Data Processing GmbH
Offers good performance and easy to deploy
Pros and Cons
- "I would rate the stability a solid ten out of ten."
- "There is room for improvement in the update process, especially the web UI update process."
What is our primary use case?
We use them as a core connection throughout the entire company. Our entire company network is run by those switches. So, it's for internal Ethernet. We use it for almost everything.
What is most valuable?
They are running very robustly, so they handle the default tolerance.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement in the update process, especially the web UI update process, is very, very slow. That should be improved.
In future releases, I would like to see zero downtime updates. Currently, when I do updates on a certain website, I have to restart the entire device, which makes it hard to keep network connectivity going.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability a solid ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is definitely scalable. I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We actually looked into three companies, HPE, Dell, and Ubiquiti, during our initial setup. We made our decision for HPE because the price value was quite competitive. Even though at some point, they were more expensive than Dell's tools, they had some advantages in terms of stability and availability as well.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was actually straightforward. The onboarding was quite easy. You just have to learn some command line codes, which are very well documented. So with some experience, it was an easy task to do.
The initial deployment took me about three months throughout the entire company. We're talking about thousands of switches.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We also have Ubiquiti. We use them in our branch offices as a connection throughout the office network because they are very easy to manage. It's one of the best UI experiences I've had in the past years.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend that you talk to the folks from HPE. They have real knowledge of what they are doing. They don't see you as a typical customer; they see you as a partner. So they went pretty far with engineering and ingenuity, which took me very, very far. They've made a difference for us to get this all up and running.
Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
Director of Information Technology at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees
Simple commands, good scalability, and easy to use and install
Pros and Cons
- "The simplicity of the commands is most valuable. The commands are the same for several devices."
- "They should have more control tools for controlling the bandwidth."
How has it helped my organization?
We use these switches to distribute our network and control the traffic.
What is most valuable?
The simplicity of the commands is most valuable. The commands are the same for several devices.
These switches are also easy to use.
What needs improvement?
They should have more control tools for controlling the bandwidth. They should also have more reporting and alerts for downtime.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It has good scalability. It can grow easily.
Currently, 250 people are using it in my organization. We don't have any plans to increase its usage.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have experience with a gold partner. They are not HPE, but we have a good experience with them.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have used Cisco switches.
How was the initial setup?
They're pretty easy to install. They don't require a lot of effort to install.
The installation duration depends on the configuration, but normally, it takes 30 minutes to one hour.
What about the implementation team?
Sometimes, I install it myself, and other times, I use a consultant and integrator.
For their deployment and maintenance, we have a technical team of two managers.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We need to pay when we buy the switch. We pay for a license to use the software, but it is not required.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to others who want to start using it. I would rate HPE Ethernet Switches a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Manager at Lancaster Kumasi City
Offers good performance, scalable, robust, and offer good speeds with standard configurations but expensive license
Pros and Cons
- "It is a stable product."
- "The pricing is expensive."
What is our primary use case?
It is a product that provides a reliable link to your network.
What is most valuable?
I use the HPE switches because of their toolkit. In terms of performance, the features are reliable, and the management and backup options are good.
The security features are good. Overall, it is scalable, robust, and offers good speeds with standard configurations.
What needs improvement?
The price could be cheaper. That might depend on the vendor you are buying from. So present something.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working on this solution for a very long time.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability depends heavily on how you manage them. For our current needs, we have no plans to scale up.
There are around 17 users using this in my organization.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment process depends on what you are doing and how many segments you are going to put on that switch.
If you are connecting, for example, four different applications with different connectivity requirements, the deployment time will be affected.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing is expensive. We pay yearly.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate the solution a six out of ten. It is very robust and reliable. It's easy to get them up and running.
If you have IT experience, they're simple to manage and deploy. If not, you might need some external help.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Director at JEDI SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
A scalable solution that is easy to use and has a very low failure rate
Pros and Cons
- "HPE Ethernet Switches are scalable, and their software is also quite sturdy."
- "The solution’s licensing could be improved."
What is most valuable?
HPE Ethernet Switches are scalable, and their software is also quite sturdy. The solution's security is up to the mark according to industry standards. HPE Ethernet Switches are very easy to use, and the MTBF or failure rate is very low.
What needs improvement?
The solution’s licensing could be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
In my current organization, I have provided HPE Ethernet Switches to one or two customers, but in my previous organization, we have provided HPE Ethernet Switches to more customers. They entered the Indian market in 2008 and have a very good reputation.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate HPE Ethernet Switches a nine out of ten for stability.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support team of HPE Ethernet Switches is very good.
How was the initial setup?
The setup of HPE Ethernet Switches depends on the SoW, and it's not complex at all. The solution's initial setup is quite straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
L2 switches are deployed in half an hour to one hour. But L3 switches get deployed in one, two, or three days depending on the SoW.
Depending on the quantity, one or two L2 or L3 people are more than sufficient for the solution's implementation. Two people are required to implement L3 switches, and depending on the SoW, the job can be finished in one or two days.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
HPE Ethernet Switches used to have a lifetime warranty for some of the products. We have to see only the security part when considering licenses because the licenses upgrade.
What other advice do I have?
Since the Indian market is very price-sensitive, HPE Ethernet Switches are preferred from a commercial point of view. Cisco switches are more stable from a technical and commercial point of view, but commercially, HP is the choice for any enterprise. Since HPE Ethernet Switches have an SMB presence, SMB customers will buy them.
Overall, I rate HPE Ethernet Switches an eight or nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
Network engineer / owner at a photography company with 11-50 employees
Perform quite well and last for a long time
What is our primary use case?
I have been working with HP ProCurve Switches for about 20 years. I used to be an employee at a company that was a reseller for HP and obtained some networking certifications, such as Master HPE.
For the last ten years, I have been working as an engineer with customers, setting up networks and devices with HP or Aruba solutions.
How has it helped my organization?
HPE Ethernet switches support some parts of our network infrastructure well, but other parts not so well.
What is most valuable?
HPE Ethernet switches perform quite well and last for a long time. They are robust and have a low frequency of breaking down or failing.
What needs improvement?
The initial support from HPE was not good. Also, the Aruba and HPE Comware operating systems are incompatible in many ways.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have experience with HPE Ethernet Switches for about ten years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of HPE Ethernet switches a nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability of HPE Ethernet switches as fair - not bad, not very good, but somewhere in between.
Manageability could be improved. The clients using this solution are mainly small businesses.
How are customer service and support?
The accessibility of support could be improved.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have a long experience with HPE solutions, including ProCurve Switches, Aruba, and the legacy iLO portal or web solution.
How was the initial setup?
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate my experience with the initial setup a six.
The solution is deployed on-premises, and the deployment usually takes a few days.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend HPE Ethernet switches. Overall, I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: MSP
Last updated: Jun 30, 2024
Flag as inappropriateBuyer's Guide
Download our free HPE Ethernet Switches Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2025
Product Categories
Ethernet SwitchesPopular Comparisons
Cisco Ethernet Switches
Aruba Switches
NETGEAR Switches
MikroTik Routers and Switches
Ubiquiti UniFi Switches
Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches
Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access
Arista Networks Platform
D-Link Ethernet Switches
Meraki MS Switches
Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches
Huawei Ethernet Switches
NVIDIA Mellanox
H3C Ethernet Switches
Brocade Ethernet Switches
Buyer's Guide
Download our free HPE Ethernet Switches Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Why does Cisco dominate the ethernet switching market?
- User question: which of the following is the best Ethernet Switch?
- Juniper vs Cisco ethernet switches: Which one is better?
- When evaluating Ethernet Switches, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Which Ethernet switch do you use? Why?
- What are your recommended Layer 2 and Layer 3 network switches if the main consideration is performance?
- Does anyone have statistics on how often a fire occurs in a computer room?
- Why does Cisco dominate the ethernet switching market?
- Juniper EX4600 vs. Cisco 3850
- What's your number one piece of advice for someone looking to purchase an Ethernet switch?
Sounds about right. HP seems to have found a good developer for their switches in the 3Com division H3C Technologies Co., Ltd. Based in HangZhou, China. Haven't heard of any huge issues with their switches but as has long been the case, HP seems to fall down flat on their face when it comes to support. From single user PCs , printers, switches or anything else it seems the premier issue is always SUPPORT. One might think they would learn but in more than 20 years I've not heard much different and have my own stories about their support or lack thereof.
Really good technicians and network professionals often do their own support and usually prefer to but when running any network, as is often the case these days, companies are depending on fewer and fewer network/computer technicians to keep their systems up and running. A small staff or single person sometimes needs a hand and that's what, in my opinion, HP cannot be relied on for. Kudos to those who have figured out how to use the less expensive switches while understanding the tradeoff is that you are often on your own supportwise.
To me that's the real tradeoff when it comes to determining a purchase in today's market. It's not hard to find quality equipment but the real price has to be figured and that can't be done if we leave out the need for what we used to call "good service". If that service is poor or unavailable when it comes to support, the lower cost of some equipment may not be as attractive as the initial price tag may indicate. The need for support needs to be factored in as a real cost when considering network and computer equipment purchases.
Don't forget a most important factor when it comes to this kind of support, do not underestimate your value as an employee and your own worth if you are capable of troubleshooting on your own. Don't be shy about pointing out how you save the company $$ and how much more it would cost them to pay for equipment that comes with better support. Companies that can rely on an employee who has had no outages for 4 years and running can point to that factor and know it's not just because of equipment. The people behind that equipment count even more. New equipment can always be purchased but a really good network professional is worth their weight in gold, so to speak. Don't be afraid to let your employers know that at review time, in a modest way, of course!