Huawei Wireless Reviews

The solution offers very good value for money. The access points on offer are very comparable to what is on the market, and it comes in at a much cheaper price.

The speed of the solution is good.

The stability is great so far.

We've found the scalability to be quite good.

They should actually first test the equipment thoroughly and then launch it. Sometimes, things come out too soon, before they are ready. What happens is they launch too early, and then a problem is found and they have to fix it and the client gets very annoyed.

The initial setup is a bit complex.

The configuration is not that easy. Specifically, using the GUI interface is quite difficult to understand.

I've been working with the solution for about six months or so.

The stability of the solution is very good. It doesn't have bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's pretty reliable.

The solution can scale well. A company shouldn't have any issues with expanding the solution.

Typically, our clients are small and medium-sized organizations.

Technical support is quite good. I'd rate them at an eight out of ten. We're mostly satisfied with the level of support we receive.

While the response is great, occasionally, the competency isn't there.

We also use Cisco. We're partners with them as well.

We've used Aruba, however, I find the solution quite bad.

The initial setup is pretty complex. It's not exactly straightforward.

The configuration process is not so easy and the GUI is a bit difficult, which makes it a bit harder than it needs to be.

The solution is not expensive at all. It's very reasonable and very competitive.

We are Huawei and Cisco partners and we're an IT company.

I'd recommend the solution to others. I'd rate the product eight out of ten. If the setup was easier I'd likely rate it higher.

We use the solution for providing internet access to cell phones and other smart devices in our organization.

The solution offers us secure, stable, and high-speed connections.

The solution's most valuable feature is coverage.

They should include more security features in the solution.

We have been using the solution for three years.

I rate the solution's stability as a nine.

We have around 100 solution users in our organization. I rate its scalability as a nine.

The solution's initial setup was straightforward.

The solution's ROI is worth it.

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

The solution is excellent and generates a good return on investment. I rate it as a nine.

We primarily use it for private purposes. It provides us with WiFi for the network. 

The solution has a very long range. It's pretty powerful. I didn't need to use any mesh. 

It's stable. 

The setup is easy.

It can scale. 

The speed could be a bit better. It could offer better performance. 

I've used the solution for about two years. I haven't used it for too long. 

The solution is stable and reliable. It's fast. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

We have five or six people using the solution right now. We do not have plans to increase usage at this time. 

I've never had to contact support in the past. I haven't had any issues with it. 

I did use other solutions previously. It was a long time ago, and I can't remember which brands I used. 

The initial setup was straightforward. It didn't take too long to deploy. It only took one hour to get it up and running. I can't remember the exact process, as I did it a few years ago. 

I handled the initial setup myself, in-house. I didn't need outside assistance. 

You do not have to pay for a year subscription. It is a one-time fee. 

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

It's very fast and stable. I'd recommend the solution to others. 

We mostly use the on-premises version. I believe they don't have a private cloud offering yet on the controller. Either way, it's on-premises that we are using now.

That would be more of engineering at this point. I'm from more of the business side. It's pretty much doing the standard installations with portal integrations and integrations with the Mac.

Improving the visibility, control offered, and cloud management would all be very helpful. Also how you can monetize the information you get from Wi-Fi controllers should be improved.

It's pretty stable.

The scalability depends on which model you are using. It is pretty scalable for an enterprise. We haven't tried it on a cloud model, so I wouldn't know.

We don't have that many users internally. We're mostly using it for some fragments in the innovation center. We mainly use a different solution. We are using it in different fragments of the management department. We don't have a bulk of users there, but as an estimate, you could say 50 to 60 users.

The customer support is pretty good.

We have different vendors we work with. We work with Cisco and Aruba as well.

We do a standard installation unless there's a requirement from the customer to customize it. If there is customization, that can get as complex as it can be in an enterprise environment.

Deployment time varies. There's no standard. A very standard configuration is about a day or two, but that still depends.

We have all sizes of customers.

It's a pretty good solution. The design has to be right. If the design is done properly and the conditions are right, it's a stellar product.

It would probably be a seven or eight out of ten.

We are using the solution for mobile users, HR, and projects.

The solution has high performance and we are using Wi-Fi 6 that we have found to be the best coverage.

The security of the solution could be better in the future.

I have been using the solution for three years.

The solution is stable.

In my experience, scalability has been good in this solution. We have approximately 50 users using this solution in my organization.

The technical support is very good if we have any problem they resolve it quickly.

We previously used HP solutions in the past.

The initial installation is not difficult. We had to configure the controller making the whole installation time approximately six hours.

We used a technical team of three engineers to do the implementation of the solution.

The price is good for the solution and there is a license required.

We plan to continue using the solution in the future, we have upcoming projects. 

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Huawei Wireless a nine out of ten.

We are a service provider and Huawei wireless is one of the solutions that we implement for our clients.

This solution is very simple and the interface is user-friendly.

The coverage is good.

This solution has issues with bugs and instability.

In the future, I would like to see network access control features.

We have been working with Huawei for two or three years.

This is not a very stable product.

We haven't had any problems with scalability. One of our clients has approximately 100 users.

I also have a little bit of experience with Cisco and Aruba Wireless products. I find that the Aruba administration interface is more difficult to use than the other two. Huawei is cheaper than both Cisco and Aruba.

We have run into bugs while deploying this product.

One or two administrators are required for maintenance.

Huawei comes at a cheaper price than competitors like Cisco and Aruba.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for hot-spotting. It's very useful for home internet, for example. 

The solution is extremely affordable. the pricing is excellent.

The solution is very user-friendly and easy to use.

The solution has proven to be stable. The performance is very good.

It's a good, simple unit. It's not overly complex and confusing. 

The installation process is very easy. The deployment is very fast.

It's easy to configure everything.

The scalability could be better.

While the pricing is good, it still might not be acceptable to some people on the market. If they could lower it further, it would be ideal.

I've been using the solution for a few months at this point. It's been a while.

The solution is quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. it's reliable in terms of performance. 

Scaling is possible, or, at least, that's my understanding. If a user needs to expand it, they should be able to do so. However, it may be a bit limited.

I'm not sure how many users are currently on the solution.

We do plan to continue to use the solution, at least, until we get fiber.

I've never spoken with technical support. Due to the fact that I haven't had any direct interactions with them in the past, I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are. 

I haven't used any other wireless products in the past.

The installation process is not difficult or complex. It's simple and quite straightforward. 

The deployment process is quick and easy. You can deploy and configure it in about 30 minutes or so. It doesn't take very long.

The pricing on the solution is very reasonable. It's a less costly option.

There are no licensing costs for the solution.

We should be using the latest version of the solution. I'm not sure what the version number is at this time.

I'd recommend the solution to other users and organizations as it is a very simple, easy-to-use product.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

Overall, we've been quite pleased with the solution and its capabilities as well as its pricing.

We use the solution at home. We primarily use the solution for internet use.

The product is easy to use. 

The signal is very stable and it offers very good performance. For network devices it is great.

The most important aspect of the solution is that it is cheap. It beats solutions at a higher cost.

We've found the solution to be quite stable.

The scalability is okay.

The speed of the product is pretty good.

I've found that the configuration is quite simple to handle.

Technical support has always been quite helpful.

The initial setup is very easy and the deployment is very fast.

The scalability could be a bit better.

I've been using the solution for about five years or so at this point. It's been a while.

The stability is very good. The features support Wi-Fi 6 and it is using very stable technology.

The scalability is okay. If a company needs to expand, it can do so with relative ease. It shouldn't give you any trouble. However, they could always make it a bit better and even more scalable.

I simply use it at home for personal usage. I don't have a need to scale it out too much.

The solution is a local brand and we have local support, It's quite good. I find support to be better than Cisco, to be honest. I'm quite satisfied with the level of service they provide to us.

I also have experience with Cisco.

Both are good brands and good network device providers. Huawei may be the one to choose based on the requirements and based on the bandwidth. Different providers have different costs and a few different features. However, both brands are okay and are good.

The initial setup was not complex. It was pretty straightforward. It's very easy. A company shouldn't have any issue with the process.

The deployment took less than half an hour.

I handled the implementation myself. I did not need a consultant or integrator.

The pricing of the solution is excellent. It's much cheaper than the competition. The pricing is a great selling point.

I don't pay for licensing. I just pay for the device.

We are just a customer and an end-user. 

We are using the latest version of the solution.

I'd recommend the solution to other users and organizations.

I'd rate the product at an eight out of ten. We're mostly quite happy with the product, especially the excellent pricing.