Huawei Wireless Reviews

We use it for a campus network. We have something like 4G or 5G at the backend, and we have deployed a setpoint at the frontend to provide the services. It is an enterprise-level deployment. We are using its latest version.

It is based on 802.11ax, which is a new technology. There are several valuable things, such as its speed and mobility. There are options for self-organizing networking so that it can perform operations and maintain itself. Its three interfaces are very good and user friendly.

As such, there are no problems. It has been good. There were some issues with the network design, but that is not specifically related to the product. We had to make some improvements in the network design. The product as such is fine, and there are no big issues.

We are using the latest version having most of the features available in the industry, so the specs are very high. If something new comes up new in the industry, it needs to be incorporated into the product.

I have been using this solution for about five to six years.

It is stable. There are some issues, but they are more related to design and installation.

It is scalable. You can scale up. Depending on the requirement, you can add extra nodes.

We deployed it for another organization as a system integrator. They have at least 100 people within the campus network. There are also visitors.

It depends on what kind of agreement we have with them. In some agreements, we can only contact them in case there is something wrong with the product and we need replacement, which is fine because we have the backups. So, we can easily manage that.

The initial setup was easy. We used user-oriented manuals and guidelines for design and installation, so it was fine. 

We spent a lot of time on the design. Therefore, at the time of installation, it didn't take much time. For installation, we were sure what we wanted to do, so it went okay. It was not like plug and play, but overall, it was good.

It is not monthly. It is a kind of perpetual licensing. We pay once depending on the kind of services we need to deliver. There are no licensing fees.

I would recommend this solution, but it depends on the kind of use case we are going into. The main advice is to use the latest technology.

I would rate Huawei Wireless a nine out of ten.

I am using Huawei Wireless for WiFi access in my home.

The most valuable feature of the solution is its simplicity.

The solution could be easier to use.

I have been using Huawei Wireless for years.

Using the support was a good experience.

I tried other solutions but they were not very stable.

The setup of the solution was simple. It took approximately one hour. The setup can be done by one person.

My ISP come to my house and installed the solution.

Huawei Wireless was a good investment.

I pay monthly for the solution.

It's a strong product, which is the reason that we are using it.

It has all of the features that we need.

The manageability could be improved.

I have been using Huawei Wireless for three years.

It is very cost-effective.

I would rate Huawei Wireless a seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution as a wireless LAN.

The solution's roaming feature is very nice. When you move to another place it automatically changes the access point. It's one of the most valuable features.

The technical support needs to be improved. They also need to produce some more technical guides.

The solution is stable. Once you set up, you don't need to touch it again.

If you have an access controller, the solution is scalable. Our clients are typically medium-sized enterprises. We have about 200 users.

Technical support is not ideal. They sometimes cannot connect to the wireless access point or their connection drops.

The initial setup is simple. It usually takes one day to deploy the solution. You only need one person to maintain it once it is set up.

In terms of advice I'd give to others considering implementing the solution is that it's easy to use if they use an access controller.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I'd rate it higher but they don't offer a good technical guide which means you ultimately need to search and try out solutions for yourself.