Microsoft Active Directory Reviews

We use Microsoft Active Directory to manage users, computers, servers, and group policies.

It is easy to use and configure. It is easy to understand all the components as well.

The product's premium support services are expensive. It could be better. 

We have been using Microsoft Active Directory since 2008.

We didn’t encounter stability-related issues with architecture.

It is a scalable product. We have 20 administrators to manage multiple sites and 3000 users for Microsoft Active Directory.

We used Microsoft premium support earlier. It was expensive, and we had to pay extra for a complex issue. Now, we take help from local support partners with access to different areas.

We receive help from Microsoft partners for installation.

Microsoft Active Directory is the product that is most used around the world. So we follow that. We are a joint venture between national companies and international companies. They already use Microsoft; thus, we opted for the product.

I recommend Microsoft Active Directory to others and rate it an eight out of ten.

We use Active Directory for domain and infrastructure management. 

One advantage of Active Directory is that you can sync it with Microsoft Office 365, so you can manage on-premise and cloud operations, which can have different requirements. The flexibility of a hybrid management solution is valuable. 

Active Directory's user experience is a little dated. Group policy management should be more customizable.  

I have used Active Directory for a year and a half.

I rate Active Directory nine out of 10 for stability. 

I rate Active Directory eight out of 10 for scalability.

I primarily go to the Microsoft knowledge base for support. It's fairly comprehensive. 

Positive

I rate Active Directory seven out of 10 for affordability. 

I rate Microsoft Active Directory nine out of 10. 

We usually provide the solution to clients. The customers typically use the solution for security and to deploy and manage their policies on Windows.

Centrally manage clients using active directory and provide integrated authentication for on-premises applications and SaaS applications such as O365.

The group policy is very useful. 

It is quite stable.

Technical support is helpful. 

There are no reporting features. Reporting needs to be added to Active Directory.

The installation can be a bit complex. You need to be knowledgeable. 

I've used the solution for over 20 years. I've used the solution for a very long time. 

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. I'd rate stability eight out of ten. 

This solution is not highly scalable. I'd rate the solution's scalability six out of ten.

Many of our clients are enterprises. 

The solution is somewhat straightforward to set up. It is not overly complex. An engineer would find the process very simple. 

I'd rate the ease of setup six out of ten. 

There are a few different options that you need to choose from when you do the installation. Therefore, an engineer should have some prior knowledge about the options.

We have about ten people handling the Active Directory design and installation process. They are system engineers. 

We have five members that can handle maintenance tasks, and they are systems engineers as well. 

We are able to implement the solution for clients. 

The pricing is moderate. I'd rate the affordability five out of ten. We have a perpetual license for the product.

We are Microsoft gold partners.

We are using the latest version of the solution. 

I'd advise others to be careful when they deploy group policies to end users. 

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. 

The solution is used for the 3A’s that is Authentication, authorization, and accounting.

I think the main reason we are using Active Directory for SSO Office for single time and for intake integrity capability to other services.

The scalability of the solution needs improvement.

I have been using the solution for ten years.

It is a stable solution.

The scalability of the solution can be improved. I rate the scalability a seven out of ten.

The technical support team is very good. I rate them a nine out of ten.

The initial setup is easy. The deployment of the solution takes approximately three hours and two people are required for the deployment. I can rate the initial setup a nine out of ten.

The pricing is not very expensive. I rate the pricing a five out of ten.

I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

This solution helps big companies that have lots of employees.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Active Directory is the group policies.

Microsoft Active Directory could improve by having better integration with other solutions.

I have been using Microsoft Active Directory for approximately 10 years.

The stability of Microsoft Active Directory could improve.

Microsoft Active Directory is scalable. However, in 2008 there were some problems encountered, such as crashes, load balancing, and coverage for the main Active Directory.

I have used this solution with approximately 1,000 users.

I have used the support from Microsoft Active Directory but they take a long time to respond. I have found all the information I needed online.

I rate the support from Microsoft Active Directory a two out of five.

Neutral

The initial setup of the solution was complex.

We used a third party for the implementation of the solution.

The version of Microsoft Active Directory I was using was expensive because it was used for large companies.

The amount of people required for the maintenance of the solution depends on the size of the company. If there is a large company, one administrator and two assistant administrators should be sufficient.

I would not recommend this solution. Microsoft Azure has the same features in the cloud and I would like to learn about it more and others should too.

I rate Microsoft Active Directory a six out of ten.

We use Azure Active Directory Identity Protection for conditional access features.

It is an all-in-one solution for cybersecurity and is available at a very low price.

There could be enough material to learn about the product.

We have been using Azure Active Directory Identity Protection for five years. At present, we use the latest version.

It is a stable product.

The product is suitable for small and medium businesses.

The product’s initial setup process is easy. It takes two to three hours to complete and requires two people to execute the deployment.

I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten.

I recommend Azure Active Directory Identity Protection to others and rate it an eight out of ten.

I am using Active Directory at home to learn the features. It's a solution for managing users and groups. 

I can use Active Directory to block a user's internet access and monitor how an employee is using the internet. 

It could be more stable. 

Setting up Active Directory isn't hard if you follow all the tutorials. I was able to set it up using some YouTube tutorials and Microsoft documentation. 

I pay a monthly license. 

I rate Microsoft Active Directory a seven out of ten.

The solution enables people to log on to computers and applications. I'm a domain architect. 

The most valuable feature is the ability for a single sign-on for applications.

We've found Active Directory difficult to restore. I'd also like to see more structure in the cloud version.

We've been using this solution for 15 years. 

The solution is stable.

Active Directory is scalable, we have around 7,000 users.

We've escalated to technical support many times. They provide good service.

Positive

The initial setup is very straightforward but Active Directory is hard to restore. Deployment is just a matter of downloading from Microsoft. There's no maintenance required. 

It requires a license but the product is bundled in with other functions, so it doesn't have a separate cost. There's a fixed price per user for the suite. 

I think structure and internal guidelines are extremely important and almost never there from the beginning. 

I rate this product nine out of 10.