Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Active Directory Logo

Top 10 Microsoft Active Directory Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.3 out of 5
137 followers
Post review

Top Microsoft Active Directory Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Active Directory based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Auth0, and Ping Identity Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Microsoft Active Directory Logo
Microsoft Active Directory Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator appeals for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly deployment, while Microsoft Active Directory offers extensive features and robust integration. In comparison, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator's multifactor authentication shines, but Microsoft Active Directory's comprehensive directory services make it a powerful, albeit complex, tool.
Download Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Microsoft Active Directory Report
The setup cost for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is generally considered higher compared to the more budget-friendly setup of Microsoft Active Directory.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is generally considered higher compared to the more budget-friendly setup of Microsoft Active Directory.
Microsoft Active Directory Logo
Auth0
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Active Directory Logo
Auth0
4.2 out of 5
Auth0 offers extensive customization and third-party integrations, while Microsoft Active Directory features deep integration with other Microsoft services and robust security. In comparison, Auth0 has a more straightforward deployment and scalable pricing, whereas Microsoft Active Directory provides comprehensive enterprise-level features and long-term value.
Download Auth0 vs. Microsoft Active Directory Report
Auth0 has a lower setup cost, while Microsoft Active Directory's setup cost is higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Auth0 has a lower setup cost, while Microsoft Active Directory's setup cost is higher.
Microsoft Active Directory Logo
Microsoft Active Directory Logo
Ping Identity Platform
4.1 out of 5
Ping Identity Platform offers adaptive authentication and API security, making it ideal for flexible security needs. In comparison, Microsoft Active Directory excels in integration and directory services, appealing to those needing comprehensive feature sets despite higher costs. Ping's flexible pricing contrasts with Active Directory’s higher upfront investment.
Download Microsoft Active Directory vs. Ping Identity Platform Report
Ping Identity Platform has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Active Directory's more affordable setup, making Ping Identity more suited for larger enterprises spending on comprehensive identity management solutions. Microsoft Active Directory is budget-friendly, ideal for smaller...
View comparison
Pricing
Ping Identity Platform has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Active Directory's more affordable setup, making Ping Identity more suited for larger enterprises spending on comprehensive identity management solutions. Microsoft Active Directory is budget-friendly, ideal for smaller...
Microsoft Active Directory Logo
JumpCloud
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Active Directory Logo
JumpCloud
4.3 out of 5
JumpCloud is appreciated for its cloud-based management and multi-platform compatibility, making it attractive for modern setups. In comparison, Microsoft Active Directory, with its rich features and robust security, is worth considering for environments benefiting from extensive Microsoft integration despite possibly higher initial costs.
Download JumpCloud vs. Microsoft Active Directory Report
JumpCloud's setup cost is lower compared to the higher setup cost of Microsoft Active Directory, making JumpCloud more cost-effective for initial deployment. Microsoft Active Directory requires a higher investment upfront for implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
JumpCloud's setup cost is lower compared to the higher setup cost of Microsoft Active Directory, making JumpCloud more cost-effective for initial deployment. Microsoft Active Directory requires a higher investment upfront for implementation.
Microsoft Active Directory Logo
Microsoft Active Directory Logo
IBM Security Verify Access
3.9 out of 5
IBM Security Verify Access offers flexibility and comprehensive security policies with favorable pricing and support. In comparison, Microsoft Active Directory provides seamless integration with Microsoft products and robust directory services, making it beneficial for users needing extensive features, though it has a more complex configuration process.
Download IBM Security Verify Access vs. Microsoft Active Directory Report
IBM Security Verify Access offers a straightforward setup with reasonable initial costs, while Microsoft Active Directory entails higher setup expenses due to extensive configuration and customization needs.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security Verify Access offers a straightforward setup with reasonable initial costs, while Microsoft Active Directory entails higher setup expenses due to extensive configuration and customization needs.
Microsoft Active Directory Logo
Microsoft Active Directory Logo
Evidian Enterprise SSO
1 out of 5

Evidian Enterprise SSO replaces user passwords with a single authentication such as a password, biometrics, a smartcard or a radio badge. Access is immediate, whether the applications are internal or external to the company. The result for users is simplified access to their applications – they automatically comply with the security policy. And by removing tiresome administration tasks, Evidian Enterprise SSO simplifies information system management.

View comparison

Related categories

Single Sign-On (SSO)
Active Directory Management
Authentication Systems