Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Reviews

It's a spam filter and an antivirus solution. It protects our clients from spammers.

It has a really nice web-based administration console. Thanks to this, our clients are not tied to a particular server or workstation. They can just hit a URL anywhere in the enterprise and view the console.

The included patch management system is really good. It keeps itself up to date which is critical when you're dealing with anti-virus and spam filtering. Overall, I think it's really a great product.

It kind of has a heavy footprint — in terms of an implementation footprint. I think the implementation could be more streamlined. The implementation could be more flexible in terms of allowing users to pick and choose where they want to deploy.

Personally, I like to be able to pick and choose what I'm implementing and where I am implementing it in the environment instead of having to install the whole stack.

In the next release, I would like to see them add some features beyond just spam and anti-virus. Maybe some bulk email tools — in terms of being able to send them from within the environment. Send group emails, send information to the administration team; I'd like to see them add some MailChimp kind of functionality or mailing lists. 

Instead of just providing spam and anti-virus filtering, I'd like to see them add more feature functionality. The one thing that I don't like is that it's very much a point product. It just does what it does, very specialized. I think this industry as a whole is going away from point products and heading towards suites — integrated suites that do a number of different things. I think that they would be wise to fold this into a broader overall suite of products.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for roughly 15-16 years. 

This solution is exceptionally stable. It scales excellently for what it's used for.

The technical support is outstanding.

The initial setup is straightforward. 

ROI-wise, this solution has been great.

If you're interested in using this solution, make sure you understand the technical requirements and deploy it somewhere where it will have access both inside and outside that it needs. Inside, it needs to see the mail stores, and outside it needs to be able to download the packages that it needs to provide the spam and anti-virus filtering with protection.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of ten. 

I'm using Microsoft Exchange Online Protection to reduce cost because I won't need another solution to check the edge malware and spam.

The most valuable feature is the ease of administration. Other solutions require complex administration, but Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is easier.

The security compliance features need to be improved. Sometimes, a client's mailbox becomes full because of retained information and not because of mail.

I would like to see improvement in block rules as well.

I've been using this solution for nine years.

It is a stable solution, and I would give stability a ten out of ten.

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection's scalability is good, and I rate it at ten out of ten.

I would rate Microsoft's technical support at ten out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection was easy.

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is a good solution at an affordable price. It is a good investment.

I would recommend Microsoft Exchange Online Protection and rate it at ten out of ten.

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection's use case can be email collaboration, data protection from various threats such as phishing or malware, and deploying anti-spam policies and anti-malware policies to ensure user safety. Additionally, the attack simulation and training features within the solution can be used to train end users across different campaigns happening over the internet. Other features like saved attachments, saved documents, and disabling options in Microsoft Exchange Online Protection can also be utilized.

The pre-set policies and configuration analyzer are the most valuable features in my opinion. The configuration analyzer is a great function to bring about strong external protection, and one can either turn on the pre-set policies or take help from the configuration analyzer to get recommendations for better protection.

One area that could be improved is handling gray emails, which are emails with attachments or newsletters that are not necessarily malicious, but are coming from different providers and are being received by various customers. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection may not be fully capable of stopping these emails until submitted for investigation over a specific period of time by Microsoft experts. This process needs improvement.

I have been working with the product for approximately six years.

The stability of this solution is quite good. It's been working well for a long time. Microsoft is constantly updating it and adding more features. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

I would rate its scalability a seven out of ten. There are certain restrictions. When you're using a Microsoft product solution, you can scale it, but if you're not, there are limitations.

If a company is doing business transactions, sending and collaborating, or choosing teams, I suggest they use Exchange Online Protection. But it may not be enough for any organization that is doing its best, as many threats are happening through different communication channels. I suggest using Office 365 as well, which comes with more advanced functionalities.

The experience with customer service from Microsoft varies. For example, if you open a ticket and get good engineers or support representatives, the experience is obviously good. It really depends on the quality of the support you receive. Overall, my experience has been average. Sometimes I get very bad responses from engineers or developers who don't understand the service or may not be properly trained on it. It can be hard for someone like me to explain everything so that they can understand the problem, and they may need to consult their team or do some research before providing a solution. These things take time. But if you get a good representative who is knowledgeable, then the experience is very smooth.

The initial setup is very simple. There are certain policies within the environment that will do the job automatically if you don't do anything. Moreover, every organization has default policies that are automatically applied if you don't do anything, but Microsoft provides documentation if you want to customize the policies. It is easy to work around the default policies if you need to make changes.

EOP is mainly deployed for the public cloud and there is no on-premises version available. However, if an organization has an on-premises email solution, they can choose to connect it to EOP to protect their emails with external protection. Organizations can reroute their emails through EOP so that all inbound and outbound emails go through the EOP solution and get filtered accordingly.

I would rate it a seven out of ten. It is a low-price solution.

Overall, I would rate Microsoft Exchange Online Protection a six out of ten. It is a good product. However, it may not meet all the requirements of today's business world. But if you combine it with different solutions in production, then it becomes a lot more effective.

I work in a financial institution and we use Microsoft Exchange Online Protection to protect our CEO's emails and all users' emails from phishing and other threats.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is the accidental release of information protection capabilities. Additionally, the solution is easy to use.

The price of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection could be reduced to make it more competitive.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for approximately one year.

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is stable.

We have had some issues and the support we received was good and quick.

I have used other solutions, such as Carbon Black and Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector. I found that Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is a much better solution because the search time is quicker and there are more alert results.

The configuration of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is easier than other solutions.

We did the deployment of the solution in-house.

The solution is priced high and could be less expensive compared to other solutions.

There is no maintenance needed for this solution, but we have analyzed the results from the findings from the alerts.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Microsoft Exchange Online Protection a ten out of ten.

We use the product to provide full email security protection policies.

We like the holding facility that is available for potentially suspicious URLs.  This allows a real-time review to be performed before the email reaches a user's inbox.

We would like the solution to have more in-built intelligence in the way that it reviews potential security risks, rather than our team constantly having to update the policies.

We have been using this solution for around 15 years.

We have found the stability of this solution to be good.

We have found the solution to be easily scalable when new users need to be added; this is a multi-tenant product.

We have found the support to be good.  However, the default first line of issue resolution for this product is the online community and FAQ pages.

The initial setup was very straightforward due to the solution being completely cloud-based.

Licenses for this solution are available as packages of different tiers. The package will differ depending on the features that an organization wants, but all packages come with some default features included.

We would advise organizations who wish to build customized policies that this will increase the implementation time for this solution.

We would also advise organizations to carry out extensive testing before implementing this solution; this will ensure that it is set up exactly the way that they need it to be.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We use the solution to receive emails. We do not use the calendar function as our clients are slow adaptors to the latest features.

When the product is being updated, it changes some of the setups. The support team is also not good.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange Online Protection since 2019.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution. I've recommended the solution for small, medium, and large enterprises. 

The initial setup is straightforward. But if you do not know what you are doing then it can be troublesome. There are a lot of terms that they use for their online product. But we need to familiarize ourselves with the old jargon. 

The customers try to deploy it on their own and when they fail they involve us. The deployment takes a day because you still have to document everything you did. You still have to show the local admin what to do, and how to manage it. I can do the deployment myself, but I do it together with the local guys so that we can all be on the same load.

The pricing of the solution is reasonable. We are usually local, and most of our clients are in the development phase. So they're taking the governmental discount. We do not pay for extra support.

I advise people to use it. I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

We are using Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for the migration of users from on-premise to the cloud.

The most valuable features of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection are the EOP, ATP, safe links, fishing, and antispam.

Not all settings can be configured automatically and most still require manual configuration. However, there is an automation tool available that can be used to input all the configurations either as a script or a tool it would be helpful.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for approximately three years.

The stability of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is good. We have not had many issues.

I rate the stability of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection a nine out of ten.

I have used Mimecast. I do not have a lot of experience in Mimecast. 

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection can handle a more broad range of areas than Mimecast.

The initial setup of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection and streamlining is complex. When we use a feature and we try to streamline them based on its outcomes can be difficult, such as false positives.

We often use third-party tools for the deployment. We try and use Microsoft native tools, such as Office Configuration Analyzer.

I help my customers implement the solution and it typically takes one week with two consultants.

The price of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is reasonable.

If you're looking for recommendations, I suggest selecting the standard or strict settings provided by Microsoft for configuring Microsoft Exchange Online Protection. You can start with the standard settings and gradually increase the blocking and other settings such as spam confidence level based on your experience over time. It's important to keep in mind that further tuning may be required based on false positives and other factors, which will require manual adjustments based on experience. This configuration process is not a one-time setup and will evolve based on your customer experience.

I rate Microsoft Exchange Online Protection a nine out of ten.

I primarily use Online Protection for technical support.

Online Protection has allowed our customers to keep their data on our site using the DLP the solution offers.

Online Protection's most valuable feature is its admin interface.

Online Protection has an issue in that it doesn't provide an option to stop impersonation. 

I've been using Online Protection for about a year.

I would rate Online Protection's stability seven out of ten.

I would rate Online Protection's scalability ten out of ten.

The initial setup was straightforward.

Online Protection is fairly expensive.

I would give Online Protection a rating of seven out of ten.