Microsoft Purview Data Governance Reviews

I use the solution as a data catalog, to scan databases and report data insights. 

I use the tool in projects as a medium to provide information as reports to the stakeholders. 

I am impressed with the product's search and data catalog features. 

The product needs improvement to edit the number of assets. It needs to be more inuitive as well. 

I have been using the product for one and a half years. 

I haven't encountered any serious stability issues. 

The product is scalable. 

We split the data into dedicated customer-specific internal tools. My company made the business decision of choosing the solution which helped to manage data catalog, reports and connect databases in one place. 

The product's deployment was complex because it involved the connecting of different elements within the framework. I have been partly involved in the tool's deployment. I worked with the business requirements and user acceptance testing phase. I worked as a business analyst. There were the engineering team, DevOps team, and data engineers working on the project. We have a team who maintains the consistency of the data logs and data scans. 

I would rate the product a seven out of ten. 

I am a Windows user and connect the tool to the Azure platform to work on it. I have never used it on iOS and Android. I am sure that the multi-platform ability is a good feature of the product. I also find it important for the tool to be connected to data protection platforms. I think that it's a benefit to have the tool get data information from other cloud providers and platforms. It is also important that the solution was built taking into account critical regulations from all around the world. 

In my opinion, the tool has reduced the number of tools that I need to interact with. There was a project requirement from a customer where we were supposed to use a complete platform with the Azure framework. The solution has the potential to be used as a governance tool which helps to know where the data is placed, how it flows through the system, etc. I may use the AI and automation in Purview sometime later. 

I believe that the product speeds up compliance and Microsoft has documentation that can help with the same. The solution has helped me save time. For the tool's reporting part, we didn't need to rely on other tools and sort through manual files storing the information. 

We are using Microsoft Purview Information Protection. We want to do loss protection for our unstructured documents.

The integration ecosystem with Microsoft Purview is the most valuable aspect.

There is definitely room for improvement as this product is quite new. In terms of the competence of the tools with the Microsoft ecosystem, the product can do better.

We have been using the solution for almost a year.

The solution is not that stable all the time. Sometimes the issues are with the WiFi services, and it’s not on all the time. It needs more time to start up the services.

We do not really need scalability right now, so it still manages.

There is room for improvement in customer service. 

Neutral

The initial setup is quite easy.

It is cheap or free since we have an EFI license. It is free for the EFI user.

Be mindful of non-Microsoft ecosystem documents. While it is perfect for Microsoft documents, there is still room to improve for non-Microsoft documents.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

Our client was looking to do data governance and we decided to implement Microsoft Purview for them. The client did not have very specific requirements, because they had no idea what to do with data governance and they wanted someone who could kick-start things. We implemented the basic functionalities for them.

Our client was impressed because they now understand how much sensitive data they hold. They now know they have to assign someone who can work as a data steward, someone who will manage and protect the sensitive data to make sure that no one else can access it.

It has also helped our client save time when compared with doing data governance manually. It could be up to 80 percent faster because, if we had to do it manually, it would take a lot of time to create a script to scan all of the data in the data repository. With Purview, we can configure the connectors and just hit the button and it will do the rest.

Overall, Purview is quite good for helping you stay on top of compliance.

One of the best features is the classification rules, especially the scan rule sets. They are really useful, especially when we need to understand the current data the company has to ensure that all the problematic data can be put under someone's responsibility.

Also, although it is not automatic, managing the business glossary terms is valuable. If we have to work with other people who are also data governors, it's important to understand how the current data catalog is going to work with the business. We can do it manually to flag the business terms that we would like to handle.

It is also important that Purview delivers data protection across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments. Microsoft has built-in tools that can scan risky data that could be sensitive. It also provides connectors to other data platforms or clouds. These abilities are important for anyone who wants to see whether their organization has sensitive data, and how much.

In my understanding, because most of the connectors only scan databases or data lakes on multiple clouds, it is certainly not going to provide direct protection on other platforms, like iOS or macOS.

Also, Purview has no data ingestion capability. Of course, it can scan, but it won't import any data into Purview, just metadata. That is still important but it doesn't do data ingestion.

Another area for improvement is in managing the business glossary terms. If they could provide the same type of method that we use to configure the scan rule sets, that would be helpful. Currently, there is no option like this, so we have to do it manually. Automatic detection would be great.

I would also like to see third-party plug-ins. For example, there are several data quality or data management options on the market. Because Purview is not a 100 percent data governance solution, it would help if we could pick some of the good capabilities of other products. If we could plug Purview into the AI option from Ataccama, it would be enhanced immeasurably.

We implemented Microsoft Purview for a customer's company about two or three months ago.

It's stable. There were no weird glitches.

I think it's scalable, although Microsoft hasn't mentioned this explicitly. But it's a serverless solution, so it would scale. It just depends on how much data we need to scan.

We haven't had a chance to talk with Microsoft support because we haven't encountered any problematic situations.

Our client did not have a previous solution. They had no idea which one to go with. They just wished to have data governance and that's why we came up with Purview for them.

The initial deployment might seem complicated at first, but Microsoft has a guide with basic documentation on how to start and it's quite clear. Newcomers would need to understand the documentation first before they could implement this.

For example, for the resources in Azure, it might require the subscription owner to turn on some features. And in terms of the connectors, they would require an additional resource to store the data connection credentials called Key Vault. We had to implement all the resources to work along with Microsoft Purview.

It took about a week to get things up and running, but that was for the pilot solution. We did not have any very complex data to scan. We had to gather the information from the client about how much of the data they wished to scan, and when we got all the information, we started with the resources. 

We had three people involved in deploying it. One was responsible for most of the Azure connections and permissions. Another was the data governance operator who decided what to scan. The third was a data curator who made sure that all data was in the correct classifications.

It took about two weeks, after we implemented Purview, to realize the benefits of the most important features. The way that we implemented it, it was natively Microsoft-based, so there were not many other solutions to consolidate.

Compliance is not shown in real time because it might take some time to scan, but it depends on the amount of data involved. It's going to take some time to compile everything and show compliance.

Purview itself is on the cloud, but there is an on-premises database server that we need to connect with. Currently, there is no maintenance involved. It is done automatically.

The pricing is moderate. It's not too expensive, but it's not the most competitive.

In terms of additional costs, there is an option for advanced data lineage for lineage visibility with Power BI, but because our client did not have Power BI we didn't use this.

Although I haven't had a chance to work with Dynamics 365, I can see that Purview could be connected to that too, and I think it is important. And as far as I know, the classification rules built-in by Microsoft only apply to EU GDPR, as well as American and Canadian sensitive data protection. For all other regions, there are no options just yet.

If an organization wishes to do data governance that is not too advanced or sophisticated, Microsoft Purview could be the perfect fit for them, but they should, of course, do a PoC first.

We're building a new system from scratch for our clients and wanted to include the data governance. Their solution is hosted in Azure and it seemed logical to go with something that fits with that. I'm a solution specialist and we are partners with Microsoft. 

Purview has a pretty good interface and I'm satisfied with what the solution does and the price it's being sold at. It integrates well with Azure technologies. 

There are some limitations to the solution with regard to the lineage of data from different systems. I can see that everything works well, but if we start bringing in data from other systems not hosted in Azure the solution won't know whether it fits in the lineage space. Unfortunately, the solution only integrates with Microsoft Azure technologies so there is potentially some improvement that could be made in that area. In this case, we're lucky that the client has everything in Azure. 

I've only been using this solution for a couple of months. 

We currently have four Purview users. 

The initial setup was very easy, that's part of the appeal. 

Purview is reasonably priced and considerably less than most of its competitors.

I'm aware that the solution has some limitations, but that doesn't affect us in this case. If we do eventually need some features that are lacking, then we can look at other alternatives.

I rate the solution nine out of 10.