Mule ESB Reviews

I use Mule ESB to exchange data between four or five systems at one time. We exchange government organizations' data.

Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution.

There are some features on the commercial version of the solution that would be great if they were on the community version. Additionally, if they added more authorization features it would be helpful.

I have been using Mule ESB for approximately two years.

The stability of Mule ESB is very good.

Mule ESB is a highly scalable solution.

I am the only one using Mule ESB in my organization and I use it daily.

The community version of Mule ESB does not have support. I  find information online if I need it.

I was previously using Talend ESB but it's more complex than Mule ESB to use. The commercial versions have more features than Talend ESB.

Mule ESB was very easy to set up. I did three months of testing Mule ESB before I went into production.

I did the implementation of Mule ESB myself. There is no maintenance required for Mule ESB.

The price of the Mule ESB commercial version is expensive. However, they have a free community version.

I recommend this solution to others. If you have any data exchanges with other systems, Mule ESB is very useful and easy to use, even if it's the commercial version.

I rate Mule ESB a nine out of ten.

I use ESB to do integrations for a company called Pelindo. Pelindo is a company that's a terminal operator. They are involved in logistics, have many partners, and require transaction detection and a payment gateway.

I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support.

Mule ESB could be more user-friendly. I think users must learn about the architecture before they start coding. The price could be better. In the next release, I would like to see an EDIFACT integration.

I have been using Mule ESB since 2013, so nine years. 

Mule ESB is stable, but sometimes the traffic is unstable because the transaction rate increases and the server is obsolete.

Technical support is fast and good.

Positive

I think the initial setup was straightforward.

I have experience installing this solution for my company. I can also maintain  Mule ESB by myself.

I think the price is very high. If you use TIBCO BW, the license is for the CPU usage, then the IPS, and support. I also think the license for the product is a one-time expense. 

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Mule ESB an eight.

I used the free trial account to test the product, it allows 10 days free trial.  

I'm a software engineer and a user of Mule ESB. 

The best feature for me was the easy connectivity and easy integration. In comparison, if you go through code license for APN, it will require more configuration or more code but if you're going to Anypoint Studio and using Mule ESB, you just drag and drop the connectors, configure the credentials and complete your process as per your requirements. The product helps me a lot to integrate quickly. 

I think there are some connectors that are not available that should be included. Supports like Salesforce Connector that are available in APN could be included. It's possible that this requires more configuration in our system. I've also found that running Mule Anypoint Studio ESB can slow things down. 

They have good documentation but it's better to have a video explanation for some of the demos, something basic that runs for 10 minutes or so. If you have that and combine it with the documentation, it would simplify the learning process. 

I have used the solution for one year. Really helpful tool for integration with multiple system.

This is a stable solution.

The solution is scalable.

I haven't used technical support, I tend to check the documentation when there are problems. It's actually quite good. There is a video which explains integration in only three minutes, and that helped me understand the documents.

I used some of the notes and YouTube tutorials that explain the setup. They've simplified the process with the latest version which is a good thing. 

My primary uses are asset maintenance and data management.

The most valuable feature is that it's programmer-friendly, so it's very easy to develop APIs.

In order to meet the new trend of active metadata management, we need intelligent APIs that can retrieve new data designs and trigger actions over new findings without human intervention.

I've been using this solution for almost three years.

It's very stable and reliable.

This solution is scalable.

The technical support is reliable and quick to resolve any block we have.

The initial setup is straightforward and only takes a day, but it looks at many data sources, so you have to be specific about what you need. 

This product is expensive, but it does offer value for money.

I would give this product a rating of ten out of ten.

We use this solution for payment integration. We are customers of Mule ESC and I'm a co-founder and the data engineer head.

The solution has helped us to develop more quickly and improve our time to market. 

I like the graphical interface and the number of connectors. The solution is easy to maintain. 

I'd like to see more attention given to the community editions.  

I've been using this solution for 10 years. 

The solution is scalable and stable. 

The initial setup wasn't that complex, we did it ourselves.

We're using the open-source version. 

I rate the solution nine out of 10. 

We normally use the API-led connectivity approach. We get the architecture and follow the basic rules and principles that Mule has.

We have had our research analysis team do six months of work looking into if this solution was going to benefit our organization and they determined it fit perfectly into our business. 

The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave. Additionally, the exception handling is good. We have experienced zero downtime since moving to this solution.

In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application.

I have been using the solution for the past five years.

The solution is very stable we have not had any issues

The scalability is good. We have a banking application running worldwide through the solution which attracts many users.

The installation is straightforward.

I rate Mule ESB a nine out of ten.

We implemented the Mule solution for our orchestration. We use it to follow up with the customer so the online order gets orchestrated to the target automated system.

The features that I have found most valuable are that the product is updated regularly and Mule's framework. Overall the performance is good.

For our current solution, I think what Mule provides out-of-box is a sufficient product.

As for what can be improved, in my experience the SMPT connectors need some improvement. 

It definitely takes some amount of integration knowledge but it is still pretty easy to learn. But I would request that the documentation be more informative. That would help the development community to understand the solution better, to deal with whatever challenges they face and ensure they'll be able to solve them on their own. 

The integrations are complicated so maybe that aspect of the solution should also be made simpler to use so that it wouldn't require such experienced resources to build a more complex integration.

Additionally, there are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product. If you subscribe to the platinum subscription, you get more benefits. Now there are limitations in keeping the logs and the ability to handle the max of 30 days. They could improve that.

Lastly, they could provide us a bit more coding features.

I have been using Mule ESB for past one and a half years.

In terms of stability, we did found some bugs which we reported to Mule support, but overall I would say it's good.

Mule ESB's scalability is pretty good. It performs well.

In terms of numbers of people using the solution, actually Mule ESB plays an integrated role, so none of the users directly use it. But otherwise if you ask the production team and the development team, I would say close to 20 members are using this platform.

We definitely plan on increasing usage for Mule ESB because our customer is starting to do more AP's on the platform.

I think customer support is good. The support team responds to us, but due to some challenges in the product core, we are still waiting for them to respond to some issues.

The initial setup was straightforward.

I know that the setup is straightforward, but I did not do it myself. One person from our team did it. Everything is straightforward and pretty easy, including the deployment and the promotion from one level to another level.

I would definitely recommend Mule ESB for others to evaluate when they are choosing a product.

On a scale of one to ten, I would definitely rate Mule ESB an eight.

For it to be a higher rating they would need to improve the recording logs and encoding feature.

Mule ESB acts as an intermediary that assists with integration between multiple layers.

Mule ESB is quite lightweight.

Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature.

There are some issues with both stability and scalability.

I have experienced some issues with clustering.

We have been using Mule ESB for probably three years.

The stability of this product can be improved.

I have had a couple of issues with scalability. Our use case has traffic that depends a lot on the SDK, so there are a lot of users.

The LAN team has been in contact with technical support.

Prior to Mule ESB, we were using an IBM solution that was pretty good. Mule ESB is cheaper but I would choose the IBM product instead.

The installation and setup had been completed before I joined the company.

This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters.

I would rate this solution a six out of ten.