My primary use case for One Identity Safeguard is privileged password vaulting and real-time session monitoring, which has been a game changer for managing sensitive access. I mainly use it to securely store, manage, and rotate privileged credentials across multiple environments. In my day-to-day work, I frequently need to provide temporary, controlled access to different users, including third-party vendors. In a recent project, we granted time-bound access through the privileged password vault and monitored vendor activity using session recording rather than direct password exposure. Another major advantage is One Identity Safeguard’s ability to integrate with existing systems, particularly for centralized privileged password management.
Developer Intern at Stealth
Privileged access has been secured while real-time monitoring simplifies credential control
Pros and Cons
- "I give it an eight because of its robust security features, its splendid automated password management, and real-time activity monitoring that stood out to me."
- "One Identity Safeguard has made a noticeable positive impact on our organization by giving us much better control and visibility over privileged access."
- "It takes some time to understand the features of One Identity Safeguard, and it would be more useful if it was easier to set up."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
One Identity Safeguard has made a noticeable positive impact on our organization by giving us much better control and visibility over privileged access. We no longer have to worry about shared or unmanaged administrator passwords, as everything is securely stored and rotated automatically. Session recording has been especially helpful because we can see exactly what actions were performed, which has improved accountability and made audits much easier. It has also reduced manual effort for our IT and security teams, improved compliance, and lowered the overall risk of misuse or unauthorized access.
What is most valuable?
In my opinion, the strongest features of One Identity Safeguard are session monitoring, real-time session control, and the privileged password vault. The password vault has been a game changer because it provides a secure and controlled way to store, manage, and rotate sensitive credentials without exposing them to users. Session monitoring allows us to track and record privileged user activity in real time, which improves visibility and accountability. Overall, One Identity Safeguard has had a positive impact on our organization by strengthening security through centralized privileged access control and improving efficiency through automation. Real-time session monitoring has further enhanced oversight and reduced risk.
What needs improvement?
One Identity Safeguard does require some time to fully understand its features, and the initial setup could be simpler. There is a learning curve at the beginning, although it improves with regular use. If user access and control management were more intuitive, it would further enhance the overall experience. With these improvements, the platform would be even more user-friendly.
Buyer's Guide
One Identity Safeguard
June 2026
Learn what your peers think about One Identity Safeguard. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
900,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using One Identity Safeguard for around a month.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard has been stable for me so far.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In my experience, One Identity Safeguard is pretty scalable.
How are customer service and support?
I have not used One Identity Safeguard's customer support until now.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not previously use a different solution before One Identity Safeguard.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment of One Identity Safeguard solution has been ongoing and is still under development. We are still deploying new changes, and it takes around three to four weeks.
We are still configuring the training required to start using One Identity Safeguard. However, it took some time for our administrators, and we are still determining how much time the end users will take to use it.
The deployment of One Identity Safeguard affected our privileged users smoothly, and it was pretty smooth.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We are still evaluating other options before choosing One Identity Safeguard, but so far, we see that One Identity Safeguard is much better.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I have found One Identity Safeguard to be a very good solution. I would rate it an eight out of ten due to its strong security capabilities, excellent automated privileged password management, and effective real-time session monitoring. User feedback within our organization has been positive so far, and we are continuing to gather more input. My advice to others considering One Identity Safeguard is to evaluate it through a trial or demo, as pricing can be an important factor depending on organizational needs. Our company’s relationship with One Identity is strictly as a customer; we are not a partner or reseller.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Mar 2, 2026
Flag as inappropriateSeniour System Admin at Pantomath Group
Centralized logins have simplified unix access and improved security and compliance
Pros and Cons
- "I achieved a good ROI with One Identity Safeguard through approximately thirty to forty percent reduction in manual user management effort, fewer password and local account issues, faster access management, and improved audit and compliance efficiency, which saved administrative time and improved security operations."
- "One Identity Safeguard can be improved with a more modern and intuitive interface, better troubleshooting and diagnostic tools, enhanced real-time monitoring and reporting, and stronger integration with cloud and hybrid identity platforms to simplify administration and improve operational visibility."
What is our primary use case?
In day-to-day work, I use One Identity Safeguard to manage centralized login for Linux and UNIX servers, troubleshoot login access issues, enforce security policies, manage AD-based permissions, monitor authentication logs, and ensure secure and compliant access across the systems.
Additionally, I use One Identity Safeguard for operational tasks like on-boarding and off-boarding users, reducing dependency on local accounts, improving audit and visibility, and simplifying administration through centralized access control and policy management.
What is most valuable?
The best features of One Identity Safeguard are centralized authentication, seamless Active Directory integration, single sign-on on Linux and UNIX systems, role-based access control, policy enforcement, and auditing capability, which improve security and simplify administration and enhance compliance across the enterprise environment.
The most valuable feature is seamless integration with Active Directory, allowing Linux and UNIX systems to use centralized AD authentication, enabling single sign-on, centralized user management, consistent security policy, and easier access control without maintaining separate local accounts.
Additionally, the auditing, policy enforcement, and centralized access management features of One Identity Safeguard are very valuable as they improve security, visibility, simplify compliance management, and reduce administrative effort across Linux and UNIX environments.
One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted my organization by reducing manual user management efforts, improving security through centralized authentication, eliminating most local account-related issues, simplifying access management, and improving audit and compliance visibility across Linux and UNIX systems.
What needs improvement?
One Identity Safeguard can be improved with a more modern and intuitive interface, better troubleshooting and diagnostic tools, enhanced real-time monitoring and reporting, and stronger integration with cloud and hybrid identity platforms to simplify administration and improve operational visibility.
Additionally, One Identity Safeguard could improve policy synchronization speed, provide clearer error messages during authentication failures, simplify complex configurations, and enhance automation and self-service capabilities to reduce administrative overhead in large enterprise environments.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using One Identity Safeguard for the last two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard is generally stable and reliable in an enterprise environment with consistent authentication performance and minimal downtime when properly configured and maintained.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard scales well in enterprise environments, as it can efficiently handle a large number of Linux and UNIX systems and users through centralized authentication and policy management without significant performance impact.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support for One Identity has been generally good, with knowledgeable technical teams and effective guidance for most deployment and troubleshooting issues; although response times for complex cases can sometimes be slow.
Customer support for One Identity Safeguard is around a seven out of ten for strong technical expertise and helpful guidance, with some room for improvement in response and escalation times.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, I used local authentication and manual account management for Linux and UNIX systems, but I switched to One Identity Safeguard to achieve centralized authentication, better security, simplified administration, and improved compliance.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment of One Identity Safeguard took approximately two to four weeks, including planning, Active Directory integration testing, policy configuration, and phased rollout across Linux and UNIX systems.
What about the implementation team?
One Identity Safeguard required moderate training, especially for administrators managing Active Directory integration, authentication policies, and troubleshooting; typically, a few days of hands-on training and documentation review is enough for experienced system administrators to manage daily operations effectively.
What was our ROI?
I achieved a good ROI with One Identity Safeguard through approximately thirty to forty percent reduction in manual user management effort, fewer password and local account issues, faster access management, and improved audit and compliance efficiency, which saved administrative time and improved security operations.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Pricing and licensing for One Identity Safeguard are generally enterprise-based and depend on the number of users and systems; while setup costs are moderate due to deployment, integration, and training requirements, overall the solution provides good value through centralized authentication, improved security, and reduced administrative overhead.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated solutions including CyberArk Privilege Access Management, BeyondTrust Remote Access, and Microsoft Entra ID before selecting One Identity Safeguard due to strong Active Directory integration and simplified Linux and UNIX authentication management.
What other advice do I have?
The feedback for One Identity Safeguard has generally been positive, especially regarding simplified login, single sign-on experience, and reduced password-related issues; while administrators appreciate the centralized authentication and improved security, some users mentioned that troubleshooting and advanced configuration could be more user-friendly.
One Identity Safeguard is integrated with tools and platforms including DevOps environments, Linux, UNIX applications, SSH-based systems, and Active Directory services, helping provide centralized authentication, role-based access control, and security management across infrastructure.
The integration of One Identity Safeguard with Active Directory was moderately easy; the core AD integration is straightforward, but advanced configuration, policy mapping, and troubleshooting in a complex hybrid environment require careful planning and some expertise.
I recommend One Identity Safeguard for organizations seeking centralized authentication, strong Active Directory integration, improved security, and simplified Linux and UNIX access management in enterprise environments. I would rate this product an eight out of ten overall.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: May 22, 2026
Flag as inappropriateBuyer's Guide
One Identity Safeguard
June 2026
Learn what your peers think about One Identity Safeguard. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
900,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Business development executive at Digitaltrack solution Pvt Ltd
Centralized controls have improved privileged access security and audit visibility
Pros and Cons
- "One Identity Safeguard has had a very positive impact on our organization, especially in terms of security, efficiency, and visibility."
- "One key area is performance and resource usage, especially when advanced features like session recording or OCR are enabled."
What is our primary use case?
In our organization, the primary use of One Identity Safeguard is managing and securing privileged access, and we mainly use it to store and protect sensitive credentials like admin passwords, ensuring that they are not exposed or misused. It also helps in monitoring privileged sessions, allowing us to track and audit activities performed by administrators or high-level users. This adds a stronger layer of security and compliance, as all credential access is controlled, recorded, and reviewed when needed. Overall, it plays a key role in protecting sensitive systems and reducing the risk of insider or outsider threats.
A common example of how we use One Identity Safeguard to secure privileged access is when a system administrator needs access to a production server. Instead of sharing or knowing the actual admin password, they request access through One Identity Safeguard, which securely provides a temporary credential for a session without exposing the password. This system automatically records an entire session, including actions performed on the server. If anything unusual happens, such as an unauthorized change or risky commands, the session logs and recording can be viewed by a security team, ensuring that privileged access is tightly controlled, fully monitored, and auditable at all times.
One additional point about our main use case is that we use One Identity Safeguard not just for securing access but also for enforcing strict governance and accountability across teams. For example, we apply role-based access control and approval workflows, so any privileged access request must be approved before it is granted.
What is most valuable?
The best features of One Identity Safeguard mainly revolve around strong security, visibility, and control over privileged access. One of the most valuable features is its password management, where sensitive credentials are securely stored, automatically rotated, and accessed only through a controlled workflow, reducing the risk of misuse. Another standout feature is session monitoring and recording, which captures every action taken during privileged sessions.
The session monitoring and recording feature in One Identity Safeguard has been extremely valuable for our team, especially from a security and compliance perspective. We use it quite regularly whenever an administrator accesses critical systems. Every privileged session is recorded in detail, covering screen activity, commands executed, and user behavior, so we have a complete audit trail. This has helped us quickly investigate incidents, verify actions taken on sensitive systems, and ensure that all activities follow internal policies.
One Identity Safeguard has had a very positive impact on our organization, especially in terms of security, efficiency, and visibility. It has helped us centralize and control privileged access and provided a structured secure approach. As a result, we now have much better visibility into accessing credentialed systems and the actions performed, which has improved accountability and compliance.
One Identity Safeguard has significantly improved accountability and compliance by giving us complete visibility of all privileged activities. Every access requires approval, and a session is logged and recorded, which means we always have a great audit trail of who accessed what and when. This has made internal and external audits much smoother, as we can quickly provide evidence without manually tracking.
What needs improvement?
One Identity Safeguard is a strong PAM solution, but there are definitely a few areas where it could be improved based on practical experience and known limitations. One key area is performance and resource usage, especially when advanced features like session recording or OCR are enabled. These features consume significant CPU and storage, and in some cases, may slow down connections or processing time if not optimized properly. Improving efficiency here would make the platform smoother and more scalable.
One additional improvement that would be helpful in One Identity Safeguard is better integration flexibility with modern cloud and DevOps tools. While it supports many systems, connecting with newer platforms for automation workflows in dynamic environments can sometimes require extra effort or customization.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using One Identity Safeguard for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard is highly scalable, and that is a core strength in enterprise environments. It is designed for scale through clustering and a distributed architecture, allowing multiple appliances to work together as a single system. For example, organizations can add multiple One Identity Safeguard appliances to handle an increasing number of users, privileged accounts, and session traffic without impacting performance.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support for One Identity Safeguard has been generally reliable based on our experience. On the positive side, the customer team is knowledgeable and technically strong, especially when dealing with configuration issues, session monitoring, or password-related queries. For standard or well-defined issues, responses are usually helpful and resolve problems efficiently.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We evaluated a few other privileged access management (PAM) solutions before implementing One Identity Safeguard, including CyberArk and other enterprise PAM tools in the same space.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment of One Identity Safeguard was relatively quick compared to many other IAM and PAM solutions because it is delivered as a pre-configured appliance, either physical or virtual. The initial setup can be done quite fast, which helps to reduce the time to value.
What about the implementation team?
The deployment of One Identity Safeguard was fairly smooth overall with minimal disruption for privileged users. During the initial rollout, there was a short adjustment period where users had to request access through the system instead of directly using credentials, which slightly changed their workflow. However, once they became familiar with the process, it actually improved their experience by simplifying access and removing the need to remember or manage sensitive passwords.
The training required for One Identity Safeguard was quite manageable and varied by role. For end-users and privileged users, training was minimal, and basic guidance was enough for them to understand how to request access and start sessions since the interface is fairly straightforward for daily use.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a clear return on investment with One Identity Safeguard, mainly driven by time savings, reduced manual effort, and fewer security-related incidents. One of the biggest measurable improvements has been in IT workload reduction. After implementing One Identity Safeguard, we saw a significant drop in manual tasks including password handling, privileged access approvals, and incident troubleshooting.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others looking into using One Identity Safeguard is that we have seen a clear return on investment, mainly derived from saved operational efficiency and reduced security overhead. A simple way to explain it is time saved, faster administration, fewer security incidents, and efficiency gained.
Overall, One Identity Safeguard stands out as a strong and well-built privileged access management solution, especially for organizations that want tighter control over admin activity without slowing down operations. I would rate this product a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
Last updated: Apr 20, 2026
Flag as inappropriateAssistant Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Privileged access has become more secure and password management saves significant time
Pros and Cons
- "One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted my organization by helping to increase security because of password vaulting."
- "One Identity Safeguard could be improved, and some user tools can be enhanced."
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is to manage and control privileged accounts and store passwords. For example, if an IT admin needs access to a server, I use One Identity Safeguard to manage and control privileged accounts. One Identity Safeguard helps companies avoid data breaches regarding my main use case, influencing other teams and types of users who interact with it.
What is most valuable?
One best feature One Identity Safeguard offers is multi-factor authentication, which adds extra security by requiring more than one verification step. When I mention requiring more than one verification step, I am referring to multi-factor authentication, and it helps to secure systems because it will protect the data. One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted my organization by helping to increase security because of password vaulting.
Password management has improved as it is easier now; for example, I experienced improved efficiency when my IT team needs to access a production server. I have noticed measurable outcomes regarding reduced time to access servers and fewer security incidents since using One Identity Safeguard because it helps me to secure my data and it is reliable.
What needs improvement?
One Identity Safeguard could be improved, and some user tools can be enhanced. I would add more about the needed improvements related to user tools or any other area. The improvement I suggest is to add AI and smart automation; One Identity Safeguard already uses analytics to detect risks, but there is room for enhancement. I believe One Identity Safeguard can be improved by enhancing the user experience.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for one and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard is stable, and this is actually expected by most organizations, commonly compared with CyberArk.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
For scalability, instead of one system handling everything, multiple systems are used.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support is good and meets my expectations. I would give a rating of 4.5; I think it is good for customer support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have previously used a different solution and it was a good experience.
How was the initial setup?
The training required to use the solution is straightforward and effective. It took about one to two weeks for deployment of the solution.
What about the implementation team?
I typically integrate One Identity Safeguard with several parts of the business to make access more seamless. The integration process was balanced because of moderate challenges but manageable overall.
What was our ROI?
For ROI, I have seen a return on investment based on time saved, which is nearly a 50 to 70% reduction.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
A strong and honest answer about pricing is that it shows both cost and value.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated other options before choosing One Identity Safeguard.
What other advice do I have?
The feedback regarding the solution's usability and functionality is positive; from my perspective, it is easy to use. I have additional thoughts about One Identity Safeguard. I find this interview very appreciating; it is very helpful, and overall it is a good experience.
I can provide a short poem: Locked doors, silent keys, access flows, watched and secure. This poem captures my sentiments regarding the solution. My overall review rating for One Identity Safeguard is 8.5.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Apr 30, 2026
Flag as inappropriateIT Manager at Flash.co
Secure credential management has reduced password theft and supports efficient remote work
Pros and Cons
- "The incidents of password theft have reduced by around forty percent, which has been a very good result from using One Identity Safeguard for our organization and is a great benefit for us."
- "One feature that I feel One Identity Safeguard lacks is a robust reporting interface, as the data we get from it is not very well displayed."
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is to store our IDs and passwords so that they can be used later for logging in. It also helps us when our employees are working from home by managing IDs, passwords, and other login credentials safely, without any worry of password theft or identity theft.
A specific example of how I use One Identity Safeguard with employees working from home is when they are using their personal Wi-Fi connection, where the chance of personal theft increases. One Identity Safeguard helps us manage the chances of theft, reducing the instances of password theft and identity theft, which has been very useful for us and has also reduced the cases we experience.
What is most valuable?
The best features are that the user interface is very good and the functionality is smooth, with a good user experience overall. Apart from this, the third-party integration that One Identity Safeguard provides is another major feature that I appreciate. It integrates well with other third-party websites and solutions, allowing the end user to log in or save their password on those websites using One Identity Safeguard.
A specific third-party integration that I found especially useful was when we integrated Salesforce Cloud, which was a smooth experience overall without any bottlenecks during the integration process, resulting in a good workflow.
One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted my organization by reducing the cases of password theft and increasing efficiency. Our employees no longer have to worry about password theft, allowing them to be more efficient in their work. It has helped us reduce the effort that our employees used to expend by entering passwords and user IDs manually before using One Identity Safeguard.
The incidents of password theft have reduced by around forty percent, which has been a very good result from using One Identity Safeguard for our organization and is a great benefit for us.
We have saved a lot of time because users no longer have to save passwords manually, as everything has been automated. This saving of time leads to increased overall efficiency of our organization.
What needs improvement?
One feature that I feel One Identity Safeguard lacks is a robust reporting interface, as the data we get from it is not very well displayed. A reporting dashboard is missing and needs to be incorporated in the coming updates. This is one of the essential features that is missing from the solution.
One Identity Safeguard needs improvement in customer support, and there are also glitches while logging in that end users face. These minor glitches cause problems for us, which need to be addressed.
In the case of the glitches, sometimes we have to try two or three times for one task. While these glitches are minor and happen occasionally, they need to be taken care of.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using One Identity Safeguard for the last one and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard is stable and quite performance-centric.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard's scalability is quite good.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support for One Identity Safeguard needs improvement. I would rate the customer support as a seven out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were not using any other solution prior to One Identity Safeguard. This is the first solution that we have purchased, as One Identity Safeguard was the market leader and that is why we selected it.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment of One Identity Safeguard took around four to five months.
The deployment affected my privileged users by being somewhat disruptive, as they had to make changes to their day-to-day workflow. Overall, it was a very good experience with support from the One Identity Safeguard team during the deployment stage.
There was no need for any training for either end-users or for the people who manage One Identity Safeguard.
What about the implementation team?
We have not integrated One Identity Safeguard with other parts of our business.
What was our ROI?
If you are looking to increase the organization's efficiency, One Identity Safeguard is the solution that needs to be purchased, as it is an overall cost-efficient solution for business needs.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I find that the pricing is very affordable and the setup cost is also very affordable, aligning with our budget. Licensing is per-user based.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
While selecting One Identity Safeguard, we evaluated other options, but they were not aligning with our business needs, so we chose One Identity Safeguard instead.
What other advice do I have?
After thoughtfully considering the pros and cons of One Identity Safeguard, I give this product a rating of nine because it is overall very good software. However, factoring in the subpar customer support and the technical glitches, I believe nine is a perfect rating.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Google
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: May 17, 2026
Flag as inappropriateHuman Toxicology Engineer at Arrow PC Network Pvt Ltd
Privileged access has become controlled and auditing provides clear visibility into admin activity
Pros and Cons
- "Once set up correctly, it provides strong security, better control over privileged access, and improves auditing and compliance significantly."
- "Overall, One Identity Safeguard works well, but it could be improved in terms of UI simplicity and ease of navigation, especially for new users."
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is managing and securing privileged access on a day-to-day basis. It is used for password vaulting, controlled admin access to servers, and monitoring privileged sessions to ensure security and compliance.
Recently, I used One Identity Safeguard to retrieve a privileged account password from the vault for server access during troubleshooting. The access was time-bound and automatically logged. I also checked session activity logs to verify the actions performed, ensuring everything was secure and compliant.
What is most valuable?
Some of the best features of One Identity Safeguard in my opinion are its password vaulting, session monitoring, and detailed auditing capabilities. It securely stores privileged credentials, provides real-time monitoring and recording of admin sessions, and maintains complete audit logs, which helps in improving security and meeting compliance requirements.
One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization by improving our overall security through controlled and monitored privileged access. We have reduced risk related to password misuse, and auditing has become much easier. It also helps in maintaining compliance and gives better visibility into admin activities across the environment.
What needs improvement?
Overall, One Identity Safeguard works well, but it could be improved in terms of UI simplicity and ease of navigation, especially for new users. Some configuration can feel complex, so better documentation or more intuitive workflows would help. Additionally, faster performance in session monitoring and reporting would enhance the overall experience.
A better integration with other security and monitoring tools would improve the overall experience. Also, more user-friendly reporting and a customizable dashboard would make it easier to track activities and generate insights quickly.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using One Identity Safeguard for six months to one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard is stable in our environment.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard is highly scalable in our environment. We are able to add more users, systems, and privileged accounts without impacting performance. As our infrastructure grows, the solution continues to handle the increased load smoothly, especially for password vaulting and session monitoring, without any major changes required.
How are customer service and support?
I would say the customer support for One Identity Safeguard has been generally responsive and helpful. Whenever we raise issues related to configuration or access, the support team assists with proper guidance.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we were using a more manual process for privileged access management, which involved shared credentials and less centralized control. We switched to One Identity Safeguard to improve security, implement proper access control, and gain better auditing and monitoring of privileged activities.
How was the initial setup?
Deployment of One Identity Safeguard in our organization took approximately a few days to a couple of weeks, including installation, configuration, and integration with Active Directory and internal systems as well. Most of the time was spent on testing and ensuring proper access policies were applied.
What about the implementation team?
Only basic training was required to start using One Identity Safeguard. For administrators, a bit more training was needed to understand configuration, policies, and session management. For end users, minimal training was required since they mainly use it for requesting and accessing privileged credentials.
What was our ROI?
We have seen ROI mainly in terms of time saving and improved efficiency with One Identity Safeguard. Administrators spend less time managing privileged access and handling password requests because most processes are now automated. It has also reduced security risks by minimizing password sharing and manual access handling, which indirectly saves costs by preventing incidents and reducing audit effort. My advice would be to plan the deployment properly and ensure clear access policies are defined before implementation. It is important to invest time in understanding the configuration and integration with Active Directory. Once set up correctly, it provides strong security, better control over privileged access, and improves auditing and compliance significantly.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I was not directly involved in the pricing, setup cost, or licensing decisions for One Identity Safeguard. However, from an operational perspective, the solution is considered a premium enterprise tool, and the licensing is managed centrally by our IT security team based on organization requirements.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before selecting One Identity Safeguard, we evaluated a few other privileged access management solutions, including CyberArk and BeyondTrust. We chose One Identity Safeguard based on its features, integration capabilities, and ease of deployment within our existing infrastructure.
What other advice do I have?
Overall feedback from users regarding One Identity Safeguard's usability and functionality has been positive. However, some users feel the interface is slightly complex initially and requires some learning. Once familiar, they find it reliable for accessing privileged accounts and monitoring sessions effectively.
Since implementing One Identity Safeguard, we have seen better control over privileged access and reduced manual password handling. It has saved time during troubleshooting by providing quick, secure access, and auditing has improved, making it easier to track activities and support compliance requirements.
The integration with Active Directory was moderately easy. The initial setup required proper configuration of trust and mapping of users' roles, which took some time. However, once configured correctly, it works smoothly and provides centralized authentication and better control over privileged access.
I would rate this review an overall score of eight.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Apr 30, 2026
Flag as inappropriateHead of External Relations at Lilo.org
Strong data protection has improved compliance and centralized monitoring for sensitive access
Pros and Cons
- "One Identity Safeguard is powerful because it provides beneficial features that support clean integration with different tools, significantly improving security and automation processes."
- "I find it challenging mostly when managing complex work, especially when trying to implement it on a larger scale; sometimes it becomes slow, and the automation process also slows down."
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is for strong security, and it also helps me to store my information, to protect my data, and focus on data protection compliance.
One specific example of how I use it for security is to protect my data from external access. Regarding security compliance, I am able to set the metrics and also set the guidelines and the regulations about how my software should be stored and kept.
What is most valuable?
One Identity Safeguard provides multiple features, including data protection services. These tools are able to assess the security demands and compliance requirements. After assessing, I am able to know how data can be saved, and when data is properly saved, everything becomes easier because my data is stored securely and no one can access it.
One of the reasons why I need this is because it has the ability to centralize security monitoring across the entire data infrastructure, and it helps to automate and connect devices in a single platform whereby I can safeguard my data through multiple authentications.
Among the features, there is the AI assistant which helps to verify the quality of data and also verifies the security setups. I appreciate that this tool eliminates the manual process and time-consuming tasks for gathering evidence for compliance by auditing automatically, and it also pulls information from all integrated tools. This helps to ensure that the security of the integrated ecosystem is functioning and protected.
One Identity Safeguard works with One Login, and when they work together, they provide the best outcome which increases the security factors. Cloud integration is another valuable feature that enhances the overall security capabilities.
What needs improvement?
I find it challenging mostly when managing complex work, especially when trying to implement it on a larger scale; sometimes it becomes slow, and the automation process also slows down. I believe it should be improved upon when implementing it on an enterprise scale or with complexity; it should be faster than it currently is.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using One Identity Safeguard for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is good; it runs without issues.
How are customer service and support?
The excellent customer support provided during the integration made sure it did not disrupt my users, thanks to the support from both customer service and technicians from the vendor.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used a solution called Microsoft Entra ID; it was expensive and not easy to operate, which is why I decided to switch.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment of the solution took around one to two weeks.
After using One Identity Safeguard, I can say it operates effectively with One Login; when these two tools work together, I find that as a user, I save a lot of funds because they provide extremely high privacy. In this way, they ensure security is maintained, saving time and the costs of employing more workers to oversee increased compliance regulations over personal information. The system is reliable and performs effectively, reducing the need for extensive monitoring and therefore costs.
The integration with the cloud targets was somewhat complex initially, but it became easier after understanding the entire process of integration. After acquiring an integration specialist, everything became very easy and user-friendly.
The initial deployment was somewhat disruptive, but the excellent customer support provided during the integration made sure it did not disrupt my users, thanks to the support from both customer service and technicians from the vendor.
What about the implementation team?
Since we were using One Login along with One Identity Safeguard, it took us around one week for full training and a few days for practice implementing what we were trained on. Overall, it took around two weeks to fully understand how the tool operates.
We use virtual appliances because they are easier to operate and use compared to physical appliances. Additionally, for those of us who are located remotely, purchasing this tool is easier with the virtual appliance compared to physical appliances.
What was our ROI?
After deploying this tool, it saves time; under policy governance, policy monitoring, and more integrations and configurations, it requires very few users to run and operate, which ultimately saves costs as well.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing and setup cost were negotiable depending on requirements and usage, which made it relatively friendly and accommodating compared to other tools.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated Microsoft Entra ID as well as the CyberArk tool before choosing One Identity Safeguard.
What other advice do I have?
One Identity Safeguard is powerful because it provides beneficial features that support clean integration with different tools, significantly improving security and automation processes. The navigation process is easy, and the platform has been extremely valuable for managing customer relationships as well as tracking and providing a centralized system for managing privacy and protecting accounts, as well as safeguarding data.
The reporting capacity is beneficial because it allows me to deal with customer reports about security purposes and understand what is occurring. Users say it is faster; for example, I can input the name of the information or the device I want to control, and this allows me to access it and do what is needed. The platform is intuitive, operates as demonstrated, and easily integrates with the existing platform.
Regarding integration, I primarily integrate One Identity Safeguard with cloud targets. I give One Identity Safeguard a rating of ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Google
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: May 13, 2026
Flag as inappropriateTester at PantomathGroup
Centralized controls have secured privileged accounts and simplify monitoring and auditing
Pros and Cons
- "One of the biggest positive impacts of One Identity Safeguard on my organization is the improved control over privileged access; before implementing it, managing administrative credentials and tracking privileged activity required more manual effort, and after implementation, access became more structured and we had better visibility into who was accessing critical systems and when, which helped strengthen our security posture and made audit-related activities easier to manage."
- "One area for improvement in One Identity Safeguard would be reporting and dashboard customization; while the platform provides useful information, having more flexible and easier-to-customize reports would help with administration and gaining insights more quickly."
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is managing and securing privileged access accounts, and I mainly use it for password vaulting, controlling access to administrative accounts, and monitoring privileged sessions on a day-to-day basis. It helps ensure that sensitive credentials are protected, that privileged activities are properly controlled and audited.
A common example of how I use it in my daily work is when an administrator needs access to a critical server; instead of sharing credentials directly, they request access through One Identity Safeguard, which provides controlled access and records sessions for auditing purposes. This approach helps improve security while maintaining accountability.
What is most valuable?
The best features One Identity Safeguard offers, which stand out for me, include password vaulting, session monitoring, and privileged access control, which collectively help us secure sensitive accounts, control access to critical systems, and maintain an audit trail of privileged activities. Together, they provide a good balance between security and operational efficiency.
Session monitoring has been very useful for my team from both a security and audit perspective, giving us visibility into privileged activity and ensuring that administrative access is being used appropriately. For example, during troubleshooting or system maintenance, we can review the session record if there are questions about changes made on a server, which has helped improve accountability and made the review much easier.
Another feature I appreciate is the approval-based access workflow, as it gives us more control over privileged access requests without slowing down operations too much. What stands out to me is how the platform combines security, auditing, and access management in one place, making it easier to manage privileged accounts across different systems.
One of the biggest positive impacts of One Identity Safeguard on my organization is the improved control over privileged access; before implementing it, managing administrative credentials and tracking privileged activity required more manual effort. After implementation, access became more structured, and we had better visibility into who was accessing critical systems and when, which helped strengthen our security posture and made audit-related activities easier to manage.
One measurable improvement I observed was the reduction in time spent managing privileged credentials and access requests, as tasks that previously involved manual coordination became more streamlined through the platform. We also improved audit readiness because privileged sessions and access activities were centrally tracked, which reduced the effort required during compliance reviews and investigations.
What needs improvement?
One area for improvement in One Identity Safeguard would be reporting and dashboard customization; while the platform provides useful information, having more flexible and easier-to-customize reports would help with administration and gaining insights more quickly. I would also appreciate a more streamlined user interface for managing access requests and reviewing privileged sessions, especially in larger environments with many users and systems.
Another area I would mention for improvement is integration capability; while the platform integrates with common enterprise systems, expanding out-of-the-box integration options would make deployment faster and reduce customization efforts. I would also appreciate more detailed analytics around privileged access trends and user activity, which could help security teams identify risks and make better access management decisions.
From a governance and security perspective, One Identity Safeguard is very strong; it helps enforce privileged access control, secure credential management, session monitoring, and detailed auditing, which are all important for reducing security risks. Regarding AI capability, I see the platform's strength more in policy-based security and access governance than in advanced AI features. However, adding more intelligent risk analytics, anomaly detection, and access recommendations could further enhance its value for security teams. Overall, the governance and security are among the strongest aspects of the product.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using One Identity Safeguard for the last four years, which gives me a very good experience with it as I work with privileged access management, password vaulting, session monitoring, and secure administrative access to critical systems.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard has been a stable and reliable platform in my experience, performing consistently without significant downtime. I use privileged access management regularly, and most of the issues we encountered were related to configuration or integration changes rather than the product's stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
From my experience, One Identity Safeguard scales effectively as an organization grows; as we added more systems, privileged accounts, and users, the platform continued to perform reliably. Features such as centralized credential management and policy-based access control have helped us expand without significant increases in administrative overhead, making it well-suited for our organization's evolving privileged access management requirements.
How are customer service and support?
My experience with customer support has been positive overall, as the support team was responsive and knowledgeable whenever we needed assistance with configuration, integration, or troubleshooting issues. For more complex cases, the resolution time sometimes required additional investigation, but the support engineers were helpful and provided clear guidance throughout the process.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before implementing One Identity Safeguard, we relied on manual privileged account management and native administration tools, and we switched because we needed stronger control over privileged credentials, better auditing, and a more centralized approach to managing administrative access across the environment.
How was the initial setup?
We evaluated a few other privileged access management solutions, including CyberArk and BeyondTrust, but we chose One Identity Safeguard because it offered the right balance of privileged access control and password management features.
What about the implementation team?
Overall, the integration with those systems was fairly straightforward since we already had established identity and infrastructure systems in place; connecting One Identity Safeguard to those environments was not particularly difficult. The main challenge was planning access policies and ensuring the correct privileged accounts and systems were onboarded, but once that was completed, the integration worked smoothly and provided a more centralized approach to privileged access management.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a positive return on investment mainly through improved operational efficiency and reduced administrative effort in managing privileged credentials, access approvals, and audit activities, which became more streamlined. This change saved time for both security and infrastructure teams; while we did not reduce headcount, the team was able to spend less time on manual access management and more time on higher-priority security tasks.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing and licensing for One Identity Safeguard has been generally positive; for an enterprise security solution, the cost is justified by the value provided in privileged access management, credential security, and audit capabilities. The setup perspective is straightforward, with most of the effort going into onboarding systems, defining access policies, and configuring governance requirements rather than the installation itself.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not purchase One Identity Safeguard through the Azure Marketplace; the product was acquired through our organization's standard procurement process and integrated with our existing infrastructure and cloud base. Azure is part of our environment, but it was not the purchasing channel for the solution.
What other advice do I have?
One of the biggest positive impacts of One Identity Safeguard on my organization is the improved control over privileged access; before implementing it, managing administrative credentials and tracking privileged activity required more manual effort. After implementation, access became more structured, and we had better visibility into who was accessing critical systems and when, which helped strengthen our security posture and made audit-related activities easier to manage.
We have integrated One Identity Safeguard with our Active Directory environment and various server platforms to manage privileged access centrally. We also use it alongside cloud resources and security tools to help control administrative access and maintain consistent governance across different systems, which streamlines access management and improves visibility into privileged activities.
The integration has positively impacted our operations by centralizing privileged access management and reducing manual processes; one noticeable improvement is that administrators can request and access privileged accounts through a controlled workflow instead of relying on manual credential sharing. This change improved efficiency, strengthened security, and provided better visibility into privileged activities across the environment.
My advice for others looking into using One Identity Safeguard is to clearly define your privileged access policies and governance requirements before implementing the product, as you will get the most value when the access workflow, approval processes, and account ownership are well understood. I recommend starting with the most critical systems and privileged accounts first and then expanding gradually, as this approach helps teams become familiar with the platform while demonstrating value early in the deployment. I would rate this product a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Jun 12, 2026
Flag as inappropriateTechnical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
Privileged access has become fully audited and password management now saves significant time
Pros and Cons
- "We have saved approximately thirty to forty percent of our time, and our team is spending more time on critical issues rather than managing passwords."
- "They should provide a faster user interface, as we have noticed that the user interface acts slow when there are a large number of accounts or concurrent sessions going on."
What is our primary use case?
One Identity Safeguard is used to secure privileged access management, credential vaulting, and session monitoring because we are an IT-based company that handles the IT infrastructure of our clients, making it very important to keep everything secure.
One Identity Safeguard vaults privileged service accounts and provides time-bound access, ensuring that all administrative actions are tracked, reviewed, and easily monitored. We also use One Identity Safeguard to securely check admin credentials for customer servers. All access is automatically recorded and monitored through session auditing, which helps us comply with our customers' requirements.
We centrally manage privileged credentials, enforce secure access workflows, and record privileged sessions to maintain compliance and strengthen the IT security we deliver to our customers.
What is most valuable?
The best feature for us is the secure password vaulting, session recording, and automated approval workflows, because this gives us strong control over privileged access and helps us stay compliant both within our organization and with respect to customer compliance. The second feature that stands out is the real-time session monitoring and automatic credential rotation.
Automatic credential rotation helps our team by removing the need for manual changes to privileged passwords, reducing the risk of stale or shared credentials and ensuring that every access is controlled and compliant. It saves time and reduces risk since passwords are rotated after every use, so no one keeps passwords for long-term access. This prevents misuse and limits the impact of credential leaks.
We have found that we are able to comply with all security standards through the password rotation, which has helped us improve our security posture by centrally managing all privileged action accounts and enforcing strict access control to these accounts. Since the session monitoring feature and audit trail are available, we can see what changes were made by the user, who used this, how many times, and what was done in this session. We have also seen a reduction in IT operations because of password credential rotation and password management, which has reduced our manual work and increased our efficiency and security.
Our manual intervention has decreased because of the time we were taking for password management, and we have increased security with roughly a twenty to thirty percent decrease in IT calls, allowing the IT team to do other jobs because the load of password management has decreased. We have increased accountability since every privileged action is now traceable, which significantly strengthens our internal security control, and we have been able to get the compliance checks done much faster.
We have saved time since we do not have to manually manage passwords because One Identity Safeguard has automated that process. We have saved approximately thirty to forty percent of our time, and our team is spending more time on critical issues rather than managing passwords. This has reduced repetitive IT tasks and allowed our team to focus on more significant projects, and it has also reduced the risk of breaches and costly security penalties.
We have always received positive feedback from our team. The password rotation feature of this product is appreciated by all users, and they like this because they have saved time using this product, since they were previously wasting time on password management and manual interventions.
What needs improvement?
One Identity Safeguard should provide more documentation and training to the team. They can also provide better integration flexibility with more built-in connectors, and easy API workflows would help integrate more with our custom tools. They should provide a faster user interface, as we have noticed that the user interface acts slow when there are a large number of accounts or concurrent sessions going on.
Not every product can be perfect. For example, some parts of the user interface can feel a bit slow when there is a large number of concurrent sessions going on, and the integration with certain third-party tools requires more extensive implementation and configuration. These reasons made me give it an eight instead of a ten, but these are not major issues and just keep it from being completely flawless.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using One Identity Safeguard for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard is currently stable, and we have not found any issues. Since its implementation, we have not faced any major issues, and there has been no downtime.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard is scalable. We are implementing it globally, starting from one line of business, and now we are expanding, so it is scalable without any issues.
How are customer service and support?
I cannot speak much about the pricing because I am from the technical team and pricing is looked at by the sales team in our organization. However, I can speak about the support, which is very good with faster response times, and the team helps us every time with minimal downtime if we face any issues.
We are satisfied with customer support. The support team is technically very strong and responsive.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were using CyberArk, but we switched to One Identity Safeguard because it was costly. Everything was good with CyberArk, but we needed to scale, and the licensing costs were high.
How was the initial setup?
We have deployed One Identity Safeguard in a phased manner. We deployed it for one line of business first, then for the second line, and we are planning to deploy it for other lines of business as well. The deployment for one line of business took approximately one month.
The privileged users adapted easily, and the deployment was done without disturbing our existing environment and setup, so there was no disruption, and the work went smoothly alongside the deployment.
What about the implementation team?
We did not face any significant challenges because the vendor team helped us with the integration, so the ease of integration was quite simple. We only had basic use cases like creating tickets for access requests, which are relatively straightforward, and there were not many complex integrations done. It was easy to integrate and the vendor team helped us with a step-by-step checklist for the integration with our existing SIEM and ITSM tools.
What was our ROI?
The pricing, costing, and licensing type is quite low compared to other products, so One Identity Safeguard is cheaper than other products, and the functions it has are worth the cost.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I was not part of the evaluation team, but the evaluation team must have evaluated other products. One example of an option that I personally evaluated was BeyondTrust Privileged Access Management.
What other advice do I have?
One thing other organizations should know about One Identity Safeguard is that it integrates well with the existing identity system, which is a very great point for other organizations to know before purchasing it because it makes it easier to deploy in their environment without changing the current workflow or existing network.
One Identity Safeguard provides heterogeneous integration with our existing products or legacy products, and the API integration is very helpful because it allows us to automate the onboarding of privileged accounts and integrate it with our existing ITSM tools, which is a really good thing about this product.
I would advise others looking into using One Identity Safeguard to choose this product because it is cheaper but provides great outcomes, and the security features are robust. I have given this product an overall rating of nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Dec 15, 2025
Flag as inappropriateSenior Cyber Security Analyst at DigitalTrack Solutions Pvt Ltd
Centralized privileged access has improved security, compliance, and session oversight
Pros and Cons
- "One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization in many ways by providing privileged access security and improving compliance."
- "I think the initial setup of One Identity Safeguard could be more simplified, and the dashboard customization could also be improved."
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is as our centralized privileged access management, which is the PAM system, to safely store administrative passwords and also restrict temporary access and record high-risk sessions.
Whenever our third-party vendor or any internal team engineer needs temporary administrative access to fix any kind of database or One Identity Safeguard issues, a timed credential that automatically expires is issued. The entire troubleshooting session is recorded for security.
What is most valuable?
The best features One Identity Safeguard offers include secure credential vaulting, live session recording and playback, and just-in-time access workflows that prevent engineers from having permanent admin rights.
I find myself relying most on the live session recording feature. Being able to look up a specific command used during an administrative session and jump directly to that video timestamp makes finding security or operational mistakes very quickly, which is valuable for us.
One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization in many ways by providing privileged access security and improving compliance. The overall access management, the better visibility we are getting into user accounts, and the better compliance controls are helping us in many ways.
What needs improvement?
I think the initial setup of One Identity Safeguard could be more simplified, and the dashboard customization could also be improved. Apart from this, the feature sets and the efficiency of the solution are very outstanding.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using One Identity Safeguard for more than three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Safeguard is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of One Identity Safeguard is excellent.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support is very helpful in nature, and they provide good support to us in troubleshooting complex issues.
I rate the customer support nine out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have not switched from a different solution; we have been using One Identity Safeguard since the start.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment of One Identity Safeguard took three to seven weeks.
What about the implementation team?
The deployment of the solution did not affect my privileged users disruptively. It was straightforward because we have not faced any kind of challenge, and it had minimal impact. We just required a brief adjustment period for our team, but overall it was not disruptive. The biggest breakthrough was that it saved our time, and the deployment was very smooth, with the vendor team helping us significantly.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a great return on investment with One Identity Safeguard due to its automation and AI capabilities.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
For the end-user training, we provided just a few hours of training, and they started using the solution without needing much training. For the solution management, we provided three to four weeks of training properly so they could manage it easily. Now we are able to handle it smoothly.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have not evaluated other options before choosing One Identity Safeguard.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise anyone looking for or considering One Identity Safeguard to carefully map out your asset hierarchy and account discovery rule before doing the main rollout. Spend time grouping your servers and target databases logically on paper first, and after that, you can go for the deployment.
We have integrated One Identity Safeguard directly into our DevOps. Thanks to its API-first design, we hook it up into tools such as HashiCorp Vault, allowing our automated build system to securely pull hardcoded secrets and API keys dynamically during deployment.
The integration with our DevOps tools was very smooth and easy.
The feedback I have had from users regarding the solution's usability and functionality has been very positive.
I would rate this review nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
Last updated: Jun 5, 2026
Flag as inappropriateBuyer's Guide
Download our free One Identity Safeguard Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2026
Product Categories
Privileged Access Management (PAM) User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM)Popular Comparisons
IBM Security QRadar
Okta Platform
Idira Privileged Access Manager
Varonis Platform
Rapid7 InsightIDR
Saviynt Identity Cloud
Idira Identity
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
Delinea Secret Server
Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager
One Identity Active Roles
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Axiad Conductor
Buyer's Guide
Download our free One Identity Safeguard Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which PAM tool do you prefer: CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Safeguard, Delinea Secret Server, or BeyondTrust Privileged Remote A
- Why should one choose One Identity Safeguard and One Identity Active Roles for the banking and insurance industry?
- What is One Identity Safeguard's lower-level architecture scheme?
- When evaluating Privileged Identity Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- How was the 2020 Twitter Hack carried out? Could it have been prevented?
- Which is the best Privileged Account Management solution?
- What are the top 5 PAM solutions that can be implemented which cover both hybrid and cloud?
- What are the top 5 PAM solutions?
- Which PAM tool do you prefer: CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Safeguard, Delinea Secret Server, or BeyondTrust Privileged Remote A
- How will AI and ML help or work with PIM/PAM?





















