Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Service Manager [EOL] Logo

OpenText Service Manager [EOL] pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText
3.6 out of 5
2,923 followers
Post review
 

OpenText Service Manager [EOL] Pros review quotes

PJ
Feb 9, 2022
The solution will streamline productivity and also improve automation. That would bring efficiency as well the ability to handle a big number of enterprise-wide service needs. Productivity and collaborative capabilities are some of the key benefits.
it_user671370 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2017
Technical support is pretty good.
FB
Jan 19, 2020
The design has been revamped in terms of GUI. The current interface is quite easy to read.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Service Manager [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Islam Bayraktar - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 3, 2020
It can adapt to any process in the organization.
DB
Oct 11, 2020
Incident management is the most valuable because we're using it to manage tickets for an accounting system. With the reports that are available, it allows us to track and identify trends at the type and item level. It also helps us in managing the workload better than what we had in Remedy, which is what we were using before 2013.
it_user671316 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2017
We can have all our requests and incidents registered in one system.
it_user671310 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2017
The workflow engine that standardizes and globalizes the process steps. It drives people through the process by standardization and automation.
TK
Aug 1, 2022
It's easy to scale.
MEKKAB Raouf - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 6, 2022
The solution is simple to set up.
it_user671352 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2017
It helps to register things, to see the changing parts, and to correlate incidents.
 

OpenText Service Manager [EOL] Cons review quotes

PJ
Feb 9, 2022
I think the best recommendation to Micro Focus would be to increase awareness and the marketing for this product.
it_user671370 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2017
I think one area which is the most painful from my point of view is if you need to integrate a lot of the tools, and being able to make that a lot more seamless.
FB
Jan 19, 2020
The solution does not interface well with other products and is difficult to implement.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Service Manager [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Islam Bayraktar - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 3, 2020
With the new version moving toward the codeless configuration is good, but it's losing flexibility.
DB
Oct 11, 2020
We aren't able to take emails that come in and turn them into tickets, especially when it comes to attachments. When an email has an attachment, like a screenshot, it is a very cumbersome process, and it does not work very well. I shouldn't have been paying technicians to cut and paste attachments from an email into the ticketing system. It should do that automatically. Other solutions are able to do that. This is something that needs to be improved. Test manager and knowledge management areas are probably amongst the worst parts of this solution. We try to use this solution for knowledge management, but it is not user-friendly. Therefore, it has limited ROI as you need to spend time to try and fully capitalize on the knowledge management system.
it_user671316 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2017
The greatest issue for us is to understand the roadmap. We want to know whether we should upgrade now or should we wait three months.
it_user671310 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2017
There's a lot of manual work, which is error prone and time consuming, in how the code gets transported from one system to the other.
TK
Aug 1, 2022
The interface could be better.
MEKKAB Raouf - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 6, 2022
I don't see anything lacking.
it_user671352 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2017
There should be some front desk provided or some options to let our users serve themselves, because we have about 5000 servers and 400 applications.