Oracle Database as a Service Reviews

Debugging this solution is challenging. 

I have been using this solution for twenty years. 

I would rate this solution an eight or nine for stability. 

This solution does not offer the best scalability. I would rate it an eight out of ten.

The customer service for this solution is very good. I would rate them a nine out of ten. 

Positive

I would rate the initial setup a seven out of ten. Deployment took two years. 

This is an expensive solution. 

I use this solution because it is a powerful database and is faster than others. It has so many features. When I compare it with other database, I prefer the Oracle Database.

I would rate this solution an eight of ten. 

We are using Oracle Database as a Service only development environments and QA or UAT environments. We do not have it in production.

The most valuable feature of Oracle Database as a Service is its use as a provisioning database.

I have had a hard time finding some documentation. There should provide easier accessible documentation for Oracle Database as a Service.

I have been using Oracle Database as a Service for approximately three years.

Oracle Database as a Service is stable.

I have found Oracle Database as a Service to be scalable. It can scale easily.

We have approximately 30 people using this solution.

I have never used the support.

The initial setup of Oracle Database as a Service is easy. There were only a few things that needed to be set up.

The price of Oracle Database as a Service could be better.

My advice to others is that they need to know how to administer the solution.

I rate Oracle Database as a Service a nine out of ten.

Oracle Database as a Service for a web application used by our developer team.

The most valuable Oracle Database as a Service is security.

The initial setup could improve.

I have been using Oracle Database as a Service for approximately one year.

I rate the stability of Oracle Database as a Service a ten out of ten.

I rate the scalability of Oracle Database as a Service a six out of ten.

The initial setup of Oracle Database as a Service is complex.

We have received a return on investment.

The price of Oracle Database as a Service is reasonable.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Oracle Database as a Service a ten out of ten.

We use Oracle Database as a Service primarily to load data and for reporting purposes.

This solution is deployed both on-premises and on the cloud.

The analytics features are the most valuable.

The performance needs improvement.

I've been using it for more than four years.

It is a stable solution, and I'd rate the stability at nine out of ten.

I would rate the solution's scalability at six out of ten.

I'd rate Oracle Database as a Service's technical support at eight on a scale from one to ten.

Positive

The initial setup is not too difficult, and on a scale from one to ten with one being the most difficult and ten being the easiest, I'd rate it at eight.

The initial deployment can be done in an hour.

The cost for Oracle Database as a Service is higher than that for other similar solutions.

I would recommend Oracle Database as a Service to those who are considering it and rate it at seven on a scale from one to ten.

We are using Oracle Database as a Service when we need to extract information for a web service. Additionally, I use the solution for filtering and triggering information.

Oracle Database as a Service has been helpful because I can use it on my laptop when I need to write to the databases.

The most valuable feature of Oracle Database as a Service is the stopwatch.

Oracle Database as a Service could improve by having ETL for larger data.

I have been using Oracle Database as a Service for approximately three years.

I rate Oracle Database as a Service an eight out of ten.

I have mostly used Oracle Database as a Service in the banks I have worked with.

I like the solution's performance and ease of development.

Nowadays, scaling is very easy with AWS, Postgres, or MySQL solutions. Also, AWS takes care of a few things. However, we need to do everything manually in Oracle. It would be better if we could have a little bit of automation or a chance for autoscaling with Oracle Database as a Service.

I have been working with Oracle Database as a Service for almost 15 to 20 years.

Oracle Database as a Service is a very stable solution.

In my previous organizations, we had thousands of developers for Oracle Database as a Service.

The solution's technical support is good.

Positive

Other than Oracle Database as a Service, I have worked with Microsoft and SAP. Oracle Database as a Service is better than other solutions because it is easy to work with, and we can use many tools to work with it.

I would definitely recommend Oracle Database as a Service to users looking for performance or ease of tool handling and database handling.

Overall, I rate Oracle Database as a Service a nine out of ten.

Our clients have a variety of use cases for this solution. It can be used at gas stations and supermarkets. 

Clients come to us with huge on-prem databases. Because of the size of the databases, it can be difficult to grow to cloud. Thanks to Oracle Database as a Service, we can help these clients migrate quickly. 

Oracle solutions give our clients visibility.

No company is perfect, but Oracle does need to improve their support. They need to really focus on the customer experience, et cetera. 

I would also like to see them improve the Oracle Database Interface for distributor businesses.

I have a year of experience with Oracle Database as a Service. 

My impression of the stability of this solution is also very high.

My impression of the scalability of Oracle Database as a Service is very high.

I think that Oracle's technical support could improve. When they understand what the problem is, they are fast and solve it quickly, but it is difficult to get to that point with them. Sometimes communication is strained by the fact that we're always talking to different tech support specialists. Maybe the solution would be a sort of segmentation of their tech support team by departments. They do have some good people, but it takes some time to find them because you have to go through their call center. 

The initial setup is complex. This is not a really easy solution. It is very large, so it's hard to install, but it's not impossible.

For our clients, Microsoft is an alternative. Microsoft is cheaper, faster and has better support than Oracle.

We use this solution for multiple databases.

I have written Oracle scripts for operational databases and uploading databases.

Our environment includes a Red Hat server with two storage devices for high availability. 

I have been able to assist people with technical support remotely.

This solution is very stable, easy to use, and scales quickly. When we want more information on something that we are using, it is easy to find related topics on the internet.

We use the automated system for creating tables.

The security system is very good.

When we troubleshoot, there are many tools that we need to use. One example is having to look at the system logs. The troubleshooting process should be improved so that we can resolve errors faster. 

Oracle demands a lot of memory and you need to have a strong machine.

In the next release, I would like to see a framework for memory management.

Oracle databases are stable. It is a very dependable application.

Oracle has many strong features and tools. There are many options and possibilities.

Technical support for this solution is good.

I have used MySQL and Microsoft SQL Server, and there is no comparison to Oracle. 

I simply followed the instructions on the Oracle website.

The deployment took several months because we have a complex architecture with six thousand servers.

I don't use the management features because I don't work with the GUI. I prefer to use the command line.

Oracle is a very good solution that I would recommend. It is strong software with good support and documentation available.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.