Top 10 Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

6 reviews
83% willing to recommend

278 followers

Top Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, and Mendix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Power Apps

3.9 out of 5

Microsoft Power Apps

3.9 out of 5

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers robust tools for complex app development, appealing to users needing high customizability. In comparison, Microsoft Power Apps is favored for its seamless integration with Microsoft services and easy deployment, making it attractive for users seeking flexible, quick solutions.

Download Microsoft Power Apps vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Report

Pricing

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Power Apps, which offers a more affordable initial setup. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service includes advanced features, while Microsoft Power Apps focuses on ease of use and integration.

View comparison

Pricing

Appian

4.2 out of 5

Appian

4.2 out of 5

Appian is known for its comprehensive features and ease of use, making it ideal for straightforward projects. In comparison, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service excels in customization and integration with Oracle products, providing significant advantages in complex enterprise environments. Pricing for Appian is considered cost-effective, whereas Oracle offers substantial long-term benefits.

Download Appian vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Report

Pricing

Appian requires a significant initial investment for setup, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers a more cost-effective setup cost. Appian may provide better value for complex needs.

View comparison

Pricing

Appian requires a significant initial investment for setup, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers a more cost-effective setup cost. Appian may provide better value for complex needs.

Mendix

4.2 out of 5

Mendix

4.2 out of 5

Mendix appeals with its competitive pricing and responsive support, making it ideal for rapid development and budget-conscious teams. In comparison, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service attracts those needing robust features and comprehensive functionality, particularly benefiting users within the Oracle ecosystem.

Download Mendix vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Report

Pricing

Mendix has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, making it a more budget-friendly option. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service involves higher initial expenses, reflecting its comprehensive feature set and advanced capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

OutSystems

4.2 out of 5

OutSystems

4.2 out of 5

OutSystems excels in ease of deployment and customer service, offering comprehensive pre-built templates and an intuitive drag-and-drop interface. In comparison, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers advanced JavaScript support and seamless integration with Oracle products, justifying its higher cost for complex applications.

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. OutSystems Report

Pricing

OutSystems offers lower setup costs compared to Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. In contrast, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service has a higher setup cost but may cater to users with different budget allocations.

View comparison

Pricing

Salesforce Platform

4.1 out of 5

Salesforce Platform

4.1 out of 5

Salesforce Platform offers extensive app-building capabilities and a strong ecosystem. In comparison, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service provides advanced integration with Oracle Cloud and a simple drag-and-drop interface. Salesforce is easier to deploy with notable customer service, while Oracle offers a favorable price but a steeper learning curve.

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. Salesforce Platform Report

Pricing

Salesforce Platform has a higher setup cost, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers a more cost-effective option.

View comparison

Pricing

Salesforce Platform has a higher setup cost, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers a more cost-effective option.

Microsoft Azure App Service

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Azure App Service

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Azure App Service is an HTTP-based mobile application development platform and solution. It is designed to enable organizations to completely control their application development and hosting processes.

Download Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Report

Pricing

Azure doesn't cost as much as other services.

Less than USD $100 per month.

View comparison

Pricing

Azure doesn't cost as much as other services.

Less than USD $100 per month.

Studio Creatio

4.3 out of 5

Studio Creatio

4.3 out of 5

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers strong integration capabilities, while Studio Creatio excels in customizability and workflow automation. In comparison, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service's straightforward deployment is notable, and Studio Creatio's superior long-term ROI makes it an attractive choice for varied business needs.

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. Studio Creatio Report

Pricing

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service has a higher setup cost compared to Studio Creatio, making it a less budget-friendly option. Studio Creatio offers a more economical setup process, appealing to cost-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

Adobe ColdFusion

4.3 out of 5

Adobe ColdFusion

4.3 out of 5

Adobe ColdFusion is valued for its pricing and customer support advantages, making it attractive for those seeking cost-effective solutions with strong support. In comparison, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers a feature-rich environment at a higher price, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive integration and powerful development tools.

Download Adobe ColdFusion vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Report

Pricing

Adobe ColdFusion has a higher setup cost compared to Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. This makes Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service a better choice for cost-conscious organizations.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Rapid Application Development Software

Low-Code Development Platforms

Business Process Management (BPM)