Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs OutSystems comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
User experiences with Oracle Visual Builder support vary, ranging from self-sufficiency and strong community support to dissatisfaction with official assistance.
Sentiment score
8.3
OutSystems' customer service is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, though some users note delays and technical support improvement needs.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.5
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service needs license improvements, simpler action chains, native mobile development, fewer bugs, and better on-prem integration.
Sentiment score
4.8
Users request better containerization, integration, language support, and improvements in performance, documentation, UI development, and automation features.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is stable, easy to learn, scalable, and essential for developers working on the presentation layer.
Sentiment score
6.5
OutSystems offers impressive scalability, seamlessly handling large back-ends across platforms, though better specifications than recommended may be required.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
<p>Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service provides flexible pricing, including subscriptions and pay-as-you-go, tailored to business needs and usage levels.</p>
No sentiment score available
OutSystems is costly and suited for large enterprises, with prices from $4,000 to €170,000 annually, including user licenses and infrastructure.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is stable, reliable, handles complex applications well, and maintains integrity with minimal disruptions.
No sentiment score available
OutSystems is praised for stability and performance, though some note issues under heavy loads or with high user volumes.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.8
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers drag-and-drop, low-code development, scalability, Oracle compatibility, and extensive support and resources for all users.
Sentiment score
8.0
OutSystems offers rapid development, integration, scalability, and a user-friendly interface, unifying front and backend services to boost productivity.
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
20th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
15th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OutSystems
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
2nd
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is 1.4%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OutSystems is 10.2%, up from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Sherif Bashar - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day
There are very minor things, like the feature called "action chains," that could use a bit of enhancement. But the team is perfect; they're working on it. An action chain is a sequence of actions triggered by a button or an event. It executes code in order, from top to bottom. For example, it could call a code, call a REST service, and then insert data into a database. It needs enhancement because it can be a bit complex for fresh grads or new developers to understand. It would be better if it was made more readable. That's the main point. But if you have experience, you'll understand it easily. One more thing I want to add about Visual Builder: up until two years ago, it supported native mobile development. That's not available anymore. They replaced native mobile development with progressive web apps, and most customers are complaining about that. We need native mobile development back – the ability to put apps on stores like Google Play or the App Store. That feature is not available right now, and they deprecated it starting in 2024. It's very important. Otherwise, clients go with Flutter or other mobile development tools. It would be good for Oracle to regain that capability. We need the native mobile development feature back.
Vadivelan Rajendiran - PeerSpot reviewer
The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend
The solution is ground up, it follows exactly what the developer does. The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided. Infusing AI that would automate the process would be game-changing. On a logical level, if data on a form is automated, it would be great if when required, the developer can then go and look for it.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
Educational Organization
32%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?
I actually don't have much experience with pricing, so I can't comment on it right now.
What is your primary use case for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?
There was a requirement to build a custom form to raise AI invoices, using Oracle Fusion. We created a form, and another use case was that users wanted to create and update customers.
Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...
What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?
I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applications that work in no time? And OutsyStems does exactly that. The low-code plat...
How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?
We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing how we like the platform, but so far, we have been satisfied with it and will li...
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products
Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. OutSystems and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.