Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs OutSystems comparison

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Read 55 OutSystems reviews

8,450 Views
5,746 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

OutSystems and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service are leading low-code development platforms. OutSystems is favored for its ease of use and robust community support, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is praised for its integration capabilities and scalability, giving it an edge in complex enterprise environments.

Features: OutSystems users value the range of pre-built templates, drag-and-drop functionality, and rapid development acceleration. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is noted for its seamless integration with Oracle Cloud applications, robust back-end capabilities, and support for enterprise-level integrations.

Room for Improvement: OutSystems users often highlight the need for better performance optimization, more detailed documentation, and enhancements in scalability. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service users suggest improvements in onboarding experience, usability for new developers, and a more intuitive interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OutSystems gets high marks for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, while more complex to deploy, benefits from extensive Oracle support networks.

Pricing and ROI: OutSystems users find the setup costs to be relatively high but justified by the platform's capabilities and faster ROI. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers competitive pricing structures and strong ROI for large enterprises due to its integration efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. OutSystems Report (Updated: April 2026).

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. OutSystems

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

21st

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OutSystems

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

7th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Development Platforms (2nd), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OutSystems is 4.8%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OutSystems	4.8%
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service	1.7%
Other	93.5%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Sherif Bashar

Head of Digital Solutions at Wind Integrated Solutions

Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day

There are very minor things, like the feature called "action chains," that could use a bit of enhancement. But the team is perfect; they're working on it. An action chain is a sequence of actions triggered by a button or an event. It executes code in order, from top to bottom. For example, it could call a code, call a REST service, and then insert data into a database. It needs enhancement because it can be a bit complex for fresh grads or new developers to understand. It would be better if it was made more readable. That's the main point. But if you have experience, you'll understand it easily. One more thing I want to add about Visual Builder: up until two years ago, it supported native mobile development. That's not available anymore. They replaced native mobile development with progressive web apps, and most customers are complaining about that. We need native mobile development back – the ability to put apps on stores like Google Play or the App Store. That feature is not available right now, and they deprecated it starting in 2024. It's very important. Otherwise, clients go with Flutter or other mobile development tools. It would be good for Oracle to regain that capability. We need the native mobile development feature back.

Read full review

reviewer2787186

Senior Technical Lead at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Rapid delivery has transformed complex enterprise apps and supports faster cross-domain projects

Every platform or low-code platform tool is quite good in its own area, but there is always space to groom or enhance or improve. The same is with OutSystems as well. A couple of things from the integration point of view can be enhanced. If your application or the enterprise organization is tackling a huge data application where you have bulk amounts of data, it becomes a challenge for all the technologies and the same with OutSystems. You have to design your architecture in a very magnificent and decent way so that how you process your data so that load can be easily balanced. Data handling and huge data handling is a kind of challenge you may need to face. Then we have some vendor lock-in. If you are trying to migrate your application from OutSystems, then you probably get into this vendor lock-in system. Some organization may face challenges if some organization is on a small scale size. The small scale businesses may find OutSystems costly because of its high cost and pricing due to the licensing cost. Apart from that, OutSystems really plays well, and it needs a learning curve. If a traditional application or programming is there which your developers are skilled into and they are directly deployed into OutSystems, it may take some significant amount of time for them to get comfortable with OutSystems. There is a learning curve. OutSystems community is already in place, but it can more be enhanced regarding some aspects. They did organize lots of bootcamps and other user groups as well, but those can also be improved from the documentation point of view and having some integration guidebook as well. A couple of things which can be improved into OutSystems include the licensing cost, the vendor lock-in side, the learning curve, couple of integration aspects and customizations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is easy."

"The action chains are really helpful, and the trigger event, along with those action chains, has been very helpful."

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

"The tool is very easy to use."

"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."

"You can avoid costly React developers that are required for building advanced UI."

"OutSystems is a low-code solution. Most features are like drag-and-drop, so it's pretty easy to work. Thus it helps the organization by saving time for developers."

"The solution is all-encompassing and very easy to use with its drag-and-drop feature."

"The most valuable feature of OutSystems is the drag and drop and toolchains in the small AI developing environment. Additionally, the documentation is helpful."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it allows users to easily build applications."

"The scalability of OutSystems is very good, it scales automatically very useful for us."

"OutSystems has no issues so far, the drag and drop environment is quite dynamic, and we can create our own UI on top of it."

"The scratch coding is useful. The solution is easy to understand."

"OutSystems is a robust and rapid application development platform with a less steep learning curve."

More OutSystems pros

Cons

"My honest opinion is: do not use this solution — there are plenty of free options out there that will do the trick."

"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."

"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."

"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."

"There are some bugs in VBCS."

"The tool has minor bugs."

"If you're doing some, for example, extremely responsive applications for the web, it's not as good."

"One of the things that they could do a little better is the performance speed of the UI refresh; it sometimes seems a little choppy, and I would have to reload the same page a couple of times to get the reflection of the right information."

"In the future with OutSystems, improvements could be made on the costing side rather than the feature side."

"The resource availability needs to be increased."

"The PDD framework can't be used for the behavioral-driven development way of working."

"It needs improvement in the AI capability."

"Its ability to create and run automated tasks could be better."

"Writing custom code still needs to be done via Integration Studio. This might have been added to the IDE."

"I'd like to see AI features integrated into the solution."

More OutSystems cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."

"It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."

"As for licensing costs, I'm not directly involved in that aspect."

"There are no additional costs with the standard license."

"It is still very expensive, so small companies can’t generally afford it... Still, the time saving on development and delivery is worth the value."

"Pricing could be a concern. You have to pay yearly, even after you have completed your development."

"For one developer to use, the cost is around $5,000."

"OutSystems is a very expensive solution, and it has to be cheaper."

"OutSystems was open to a deal that worked for both sides."

"It's not cheap. It's pretty expensive."

More OutSystems pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Healthcare Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	31

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

The tool is very easy to use.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

I actually don't have much experience with pricing, so I can't comment on it right now.

What is your primary use case for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

There was a requirement to build a custom form to raise AI invoices, using Oracle Fusion. We created a form, and another use case was that users wanted to create and update customers.

Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?

The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...

What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?

I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applications that work in no time? And OutsyStems does exactly that. The low-code plat...

How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?

We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing how we like the platform, but so far, we have been satisfied with it and will li...

MATS vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Comparisons

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

Studio Creatio vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 7% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Competitors

Mendix vs OutSystems

Compared 6% of the time

Appian vs OutSystems

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs OutSystems

Compared 5% of the time

ServiceNow vs OutSystems

Compared 5% of the time

Betty Blocks vs OutSystems

Compared 4% of the time

More OutSystems Competitors

Product Reports

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service product report

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report

Download OutSystems product report

Overview

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service delivers a low-code environment featuring drag-and-drop capabilities for seamless development without vendor locks, ensuring scalability and versatility.

Offering drag-and-drop functionality and a low-code environment, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service supports both beginners and experienced developers by integrating JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, enhanced with Oracle JET packages. This service facilitates browser-based development and easy integration with existing systems. However, improvement is needed in its licensing structure, functionality for less experienced developers, and native mobile development support. Performance can be affected by minor bugs, especially with complex tasks.

What are the key features?

Drag-and-Drop Builder: Simplifies UI/UX development with intuitive design tools.
Low-Code Environment: Accelerates application development with minimal coding.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS for complex scenarios.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs with robust architecture.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed resources for assistance and learning.
Action Chains & Trigger Events: Enhances application interactivity and functionality.

What should users consider for ROI?

Development Speed: Reduces time to market with efficient design tools.
Cost Effectiveness: Offers long-term savings compared to custom coding solutions.
Flexibility: Supports diverse business applications from case management to AI invoices.
System Integration: Works seamlessly with Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP.

Businesses leverage Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service in industries like legal, healthcare, and enterprise resource planning. It aids in developing software for case management, creating worklists for medical companies, and extending Oracle SaaS applications. Companies also benefit from its capability to build custom forms and streamline business processes.

Oracle

OutSystems is a low-code platform designed for accelerated application development, offering customizable UI with drag-and-drop features and integration options for efficient workflow management.

OutSystems supports rapid project delivery through visual modeling and reusable components, facilitating Agile development across platforms. It integrates seamlessly with databases and external services, offering native mobile capabilities and enterprise scalability. While known for handling complex demands with ease, users suggest enhancements in AI integration, support services, pricing, and documentation. Automation, version control, and learning resources are other areas highlighted for potential improvement. OutSystems is widely used for streamlining processes in banking, healthcare, and insurance industries, with integrations into SAP and ServiceNow, leveraging cloud capabilities on AWS and Azure.

What are the key features of OutSystems?

Drag-and-Drop Development: Simplifies application building with an intuitive UI.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with databases and external systems.
Forge: Provides a repository of reusable components for efficiency.
Enterprise Scalability: Supports large-scale application deployment with ease.
Cross-Platform Deployment: Enables deployment across web and mobile platforms effortlessly.

What benefits should users look for in OutSystems?

Rapid Project Delivery: Speeds up development timelines significantly.
Flexible Integration: Offers extensive system and database connectivity.
Quick Learning Curve: Provides ease of use for developers of varying experience levels.
Reduced Maintenance: Lowers ongoing effort and resources required for upkeep.

In industries such as banking, healthcare, and insurance, OutSystems is employed to develop both web and mobile applications for streamlined processes and task automation. Companies use this platform for rapid application development, integrating with systems like SAP and ServiceNow, and employing cloud services from AWS and Azure for optimized deployment.

Sample Customers

Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products

Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. OutSystems