Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs OutSystems comparison

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Read 56 OutSystems reviews

12,773 Views
8,430 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OutSystems and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service are both low-code development platforms competing in the app development space. OutSystems generally leads in deployment flexibility and extensive third-party integration capabilities, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service holds an advantage due to its seamless integration with Oracle's ecosystem, providing robust services to Oracle-centric enterprises.

Features: OutSystems stands out with drag-and-drop editing, real-time performance monitoring, and rapid app development, offering a comprehensive set of third-party integrations. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service shines with its integration capabilities within the Oracle ecosystem, rapid deployment options, and ease of use for Oracle customers.

Room for Improvement: OutSystems could enhance its initial setup process and improve its pricing flexibility for smaller enterprises. It may also benefit from better out-of-the-box solutions for non-Oracle environments. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service could improve its third-party integration capabilities, offer more advanced customization options, and enhance non-Oracle product support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OutSystems is known for its user-friendly deployment and extensive support resources, making it easy to get started. Oracle Visual Builder simplifies integration with Oracle's ecosystem through streamlined cloud deployment, offering reliable support directly from Oracle. Though both platforms provide robust customer service, Oracle's alignment with Oracle environments is particularly attractive to existing Oracle customers.

Pricing and ROI: OutSystems has a higher initial setup cost but can lead to better ROI through its wide-ranging services and integrations. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers a more cost-effective setup for Oracle users, providing a consistent return by leveraging Oracle investments. Both platforms exhibit potential ROI, with OutSystems offering value through broad capabilities and Oracle focusing on optimizing Oracle ecosystem integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. OutSystems Report (Updated: October 2026).

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. OutSystems

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

28th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OutSystems

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

5th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Development Platforms (2nd), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OutSystems is 4.8%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OutSystems	4.8%
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service	1.5%
Other	93.7%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Sherif Bashar

Head Of Digital Solutions at Aptec Ingrammicro

Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day

There are very minor things, like the feature called "action chains," that could use a bit of enhancement. But the team is perfect; they're working on it. An action chain is a sequence of actions triggered by a button or an event. It executes code in order, from top to bottom. For example, it could call a code, call a REST service, and then insert data into a database. It needs enhancement because it can be a bit complex for fresh grads or new developers to understand. It would be better if it was made more readable. That's the main point. But if you have experience, you'll understand it easily. One more thing I want to add about Visual Builder: up until two years ago, it supported native mobile development. That's not available anymore. They replaced native mobile development with progressive web apps, and most customers are complaining about that. We need native mobile development back – the ability to put apps on stores like Google Play or the App Store. That feature is not available right now, and they deprecated it starting in 2024. It's very important. Otherwise, clients go with Flutter or other mobile development tools. It would be good for Oracle to regain that capability. We need the native mobile development feature back.

Read full review

Aditya Bhatt

Sr. Project Delivery Lead | Sr. Technical Lead at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Rapid delivery has transformed complex enterprise apps and supports faster cross-domain projects

Every platform or low-code platform tool is quite good in its own area, but there is always space to groom or enhance or improve. The same is with OutSystems as well. A couple of things from the integration point of view can be enhanced. If your application or the enterprise organization is tackling a huge data application where you have bulk amounts of data, it becomes a challenge for all the technologies and the same with OutSystems. You have to design your architecture in a very magnificent and decent way so that how you process your data so that load can be easily balanced. Data handling and huge data handling is a kind of challenge you may need to face. Then we have some vendor lock-in. If you are trying to migrate your application from OutSystems, then you probably get into this vendor lock-in system. Some organization may face challenges if some organization is on a small scale size. The small scale businesses may find OutSystems costly because of its high cost and pricing due to the licensing cost. Apart from that, OutSystems really plays well, and it needs a learning curve. If a traditional application or programming is there which your developers are skilled into and they are directly deployed into OutSystems, it may take some significant amount of time for them to get comfortable with OutSystems. There is a learning curve. OutSystems community is already in place, but it can more be enhanced regarding some aspects. They did organize lots of bootcamps and other user groups as well, but those can also be improved from the documentation point of view and having some integration guidebook as well. A couple of things which can be improved into OutSystems include the licensing cost, the vendor lock-in side, the learning curve, couple of integration aspects and customizations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."

"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The tool is very easy to use."

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

"You can avoid costly React developers that are required for building advanced UI."

"The action chains are really helpful, and the trigger event, along with those action chains, has been very helpful."

"The product is mostly stable."

"Before OutSystems we used to take six to seven months to build applications, now, using OutSystems, it just takes two to three months, max, and the best part is that one or two developers can create a full application."

"The most valuable feature of OutSystems with discipline and the development processes. Instead of each developer doing tasks on their own with their own approach, et cetera, the solution would help bring some organization to the development process."

"The integration capabilities have benefited my customers by providing many connectors out of the box, allowing for the integration of external applications or business applications."

"Scalability proved to be an exceptionally beneficial feature."

"Once built, web/mobile components can be reused in all new developments. In addition, the OutSystems Forge is very useful. We can exchange components and even already-built applications, reducing costs to build specific solutions."

"OutSystems is a hybrid framework and supports my mobile and web application development needs. This means I don't have to write separate code for mobile applications. It adapts the UI and functionality, whether I'm developing for web or mobile interfaces. All I need to do is provide the layout during development."

"In terms of user support and community engagement, I rate the tool a ten out of ten."

More OutSystems pros

Cons

"My honest opinion is: do not use this solution — there are plenty of free options out there that will do the trick."

"If you're doing some, for example, extremely responsive applications for the web, it's not as good."

"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."

"There are some bugs in VBCS."

"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."

"The tool has minor bugs."

"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."

"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

"The biggest challenge for us is the licensing model and the cost of OutSystems."

"I think OutSystems needs to improve in many areas. First, sometimes Service Studio becomes really slow and even hangs for long periods. Also, if I have not published my module in some time, and some kind of Service Studio exception occurs, I lose my work."

"The technical features are good, but the actual commercialization is out of reach."

"The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided."

"Its ability to create and run automated tasks could be better."

"One of the biggest areas for improvement is that every time an existing data element is modified, it creates a new data element. It doesn't really modify that particular data element. So, a user has to follow an extra step of removing the existing data element and bringing in the new and modified data element that is being added, which sort of goes into negative productivity."

"The solution's testing framework needs to be improved, and the workflow should be slightly more mature."

"The largest obstacle currently associated with OutSystems is its high cost and limited availability of skilled personnel. Despite being a rapid application development platform, having a highly skilled individual familiar with the platform can be much more beneficial than an inexperienced individual. Because there is a shortage of people with the necessary OutSystems skills, utilizing the platform can become expensive. This makes little sense, considering that a rapid application development platform should be accessible to the average person. However, having a highly skilled individual can greatly increase productivity, making the cost worthwhile."

More OutSystems cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."

"It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."

"There are no additional costs with the standard license."

"For a single application, it's too expensive."

"OutSystems is a very expensive solution, and it has to be cheaper."

"As for licensing costs, I'm not directly involved in that aspect."

"It is not an expensive product, especially if you have access to more features and deal with more projects."

"There is a free trial to use this solution and other options available, such as enterprise. There are different subscription plans."

"It is too expensive for small companies."

"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to OutSystems. It is an expensive product."

More OutSystems pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	33

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?

The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...

See all answers

What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?

I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applications that work in no time? And OutsyStems does exactly that. The low-code plat...

See all answers

How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?

We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing how we like the platform, but so far, we have been satisfied with it and will li...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 9% of the time

Creatio Studio vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

MATS vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 7% of the time

Comidor vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Competitors

Mendix vs OutSystems

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs OutSystems

Compared 5% of the time

Appian vs OutSystems

Compared 4% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs OutSystems

Compared 4% of the time

ServiceNow vs OutSystems

Compared 4% of the time

More OutSystems Competitors

Product Reports

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service product report

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report

Download OutSystems product report

Overview

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service delivers a low-code environment featuring drag-and-drop capabilities for seamless development without vendor locks, ensuring scalability and versatility.

Offering drag-and-drop functionality and a low-code environment, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service supports both beginners and experienced developers by integrating JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, enhanced with Oracle JET packages. This service facilitates browser-based development and easy integration with existing systems. However, improvement is needed in its licensing structure, functionality for less experienced developers, and native mobile development support. Performance can be affected by minor bugs, especially with complex tasks.

What are the key features?

Drag-and-Drop Builder: Simplifies UI/UX development with intuitive design tools.
Low-Code Environment: Accelerates application development with minimal coding.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS for complex scenarios.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs with robust architecture.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed resources for assistance and learning.
Action Chains & Trigger Events: Enhances application interactivity and functionality.

What should users consider for ROI?

Development Speed: Reduces time to market with efficient design tools.
Cost Effectiveness: Offers long-term savings compared to custom coding solutions.
Flexibility: Supports diverse business applications from case management to AI invoices.
System Integration: Works seamlessly with Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP.

Businesses leverage Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service in industries like legal, healthcare, and enterprise resource planning. It aids in developing software for case management, creating worklists for medical companies, and extending Oracle SaaS applications. Companies also benefit from its capability to build custom forms and streamline business processes.

Oracle

OutSystems is a low-code platform designed for accelerated application development, offering customizable UI with drag-and-drop features and integration options for efficient workflow management.

OutSystems supports rapid project delivery through visual modeling and reusable components, facilitating Agile development across platforms. It integrates seamlessly with databases and external services, offering native mobile capabilities and enterprise scalability. While known for handling complex demands with ease, users suggest enhancements in AI integration, support services, pricing, and documentation. Automation, version control, and learning resources are other areas highlighted for potential improvement. OutSystems is widely used for streamlining processes in banking, healthcare, and insurance industries, with integrations into SAP and ServiceNow, leveraging cloud capabilities on AWS and Azure.

What are the key features of OutSystems?

Drag-and-Drop Development: Simplifies application building with an intuitive UI.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with databases and external systems.
Forge: Provides a repository of reusable components for efficiency.
Enterprise Scalability: Supports large-scale application deployment with ease.
Cross-Platform Deployment: Enables deployment across web and mobile platforms effortlessly.

What benefits should users look for in OutSystems?

Rapid Project Delivery: Speeds up development timelines significantly.
Flexible Integration: Offers extensive system and database connectivity.
Quick Learning Curve: Provides ease of use for developers of varying experience levels.
Reduced Maintenance: Lowers ongoing effort and resources required for upkeep.

In industries such as banking, healthcare, and insurance, OutSystems is employed to develop both web and mobile applications for streamlined processes and task automation. Companies use this platform for rapid application development, integrating with systems like SAP and ServiceNow, and employing cloud services from AWS and Azure for optimized deployment.

Sample Customers

Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products

Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. OutSystems