Top 10 Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Alternatives

4.2 out of 5

7 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Palo Alto Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Palo Alto Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks' robust data protection, advanced analytics, and easy deployment appeal to organizations focused on security. In comparison, Zscaler's zero-trust platform, offering end-to-end encryption and cost-effective cloud security, attracts those prioritizing secure access and seamless connectivity with competitive pricing.

Download Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention involves higher initial setup costs, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform offers a more economical setup, highlighting the stark contrasts in their initial financial investments.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

3.9 out of 5

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

3.9 out of 5

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention excels in integration with Microsoft 365, appealing to users within that ecosystem. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks offers a comprehensive security approach ideal for large enterprises needing flexible deployment and robust threat detection.

Download Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Report

Pricing

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention typically incurs lower setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, highlighting a significant difference for budget considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention attracts tech buyers with its cost-effective solutions and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention appeals through advanced machine learning capabilities and cloud integration, offering long-term value despite a higher initial investment.

Download Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Report

Pricing

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention involves a higher setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention offers more affordable initial pricing, emphasizing distinct budget considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Symantec Data Loss Prevention offers cost-effective data identification and monitoring. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention enhances protection with contextual awareness and integrated threat intelligence, justifying its higher initial investment. Symantec is favored for simple deployment, while Palo Alto offers rapid integration.

Download Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention Report

Pricing

Symantec Data Loss Prevention has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, highlighting Symantec's affordability aspect. Meanwhile, Palo Alto Networks offers richer integration features that justify its higher initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Digital Guardian

3.7 out of 5

Digital Guardian

3.7 out of 5

Digital Guardian excels with endpoint protection and cost-effective deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention offers advanced threat prevention and integration, attracting those prioritizing comprehensive security solutions despite a complex setup and higher initial investment.

Download Digital Guardian vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Report

Pricing

Digital Guardian offers cost-effective setup, while Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention incurs higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Digital Guardian offers cost-effective setup, while Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention incurs higher initial expenses.

Amazon Macie

3.3 out of 5

Amazon Macie

3.3 out of 5

Amazon Macie offers AWS-focused automated data discovery and protection, making it ideal for AWS users. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks DLP provides extensive, platform-wide protection, appealing to organizations seeking comprehensive coverage across multiple environments. Macie's usage-based pricing contrasts with Palo Alto's upfront investment in robust security.

Download Amazon Macie vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Report

Pricing

Amazon Macie typically offers a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, highlighting key cost differences. Palo Alto Networks requires a more substantial initial investment, emphasizing its robust feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

Cyberhaven

1 out of 5

Cyberhaven

1 out of 5

Cyberhaven offers robust data protection and threat detection capabilities. It stands out at mapping sensitive data flows while providing insightful threat alerts. It could benefit from enhanced integration options and faster data processing to further streamline its efficacy and address more complex security challenges.

View comparison

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

4.2 out of 5

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

4.2 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks excels in robust data loss prevention and seamless integration, appealing to organizations prioritizing comprehensive data security. In comparison, Check Point shines in cloud-native protection and flexible deployment, ideal for tech buyers focused on securing CI/CD pipelines and software development lifecycles.

Download Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Report

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention features a straightforward setup cost, while Check Point CloudGuard Code Security offers a flexible installation fee structure.

View comparison

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention features a straightforward setup cost, while Check Point CloudGuard Code Security offers a flexible installation fee structure.

Related categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

Application Control